|
|
06-01-2016, 12:57 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 379
Likes: 1,280
Liked 931 Times in 196 Posts
|
|
The little known .22spl cartridge
...the .22 special:
A few years ago I took advantage of the opportunity to purchase a few hundred rounds of a recent reproduction of a very old .22 caliber cartridge that I had never previously heard of, and is now almost obsolete. This round is called the .22 SPECIAL. The formal name for this round is the Winchester Rim Fire {WRF}. Remington also made it.
Today, this cartridge is not very well known. Back around 1890-1905 a few firearms manufacturers produced handguns and rifles for this round, {Colt, Winchester, and Stevens, etc.}, Winchester and Remington produced the cartridge. It was, at that time, the answer to the need for a harder hitting small-bore projectile that was not available from the well known .22 Long Rifle cartridge. After about five decades, this round lost its appeal when today's more powerful and better known .22 Magnum Rim Fire {MRF} was introduced in 1959. The old WRF can be fired in a newer MRF gun, but not other way around.
If you have one of these old firearms whose unaltered chamber is designed to fire the old .22 Special {WRF}, you can still fire the other available present-day cartridges {short, long, and long rifle}, but if you do fire these other three rounds in that old firearm, the majority of the cases will split, just the same as if you fired them in a modern chamber designed to fire the MRF. Accuracy may slightly suffer, but this creates no danger to neither the person firing nor to the firearm, provided the firearm is in good condition.
Other obsolete .22 rounds also existed in those early days, such as the {not very popular} .22 xtra-long-rifle, but these cartridges didn't survive the change-over from black powder to smokeless powder which occurred in the mid 1880's.
Just thought I'd pass this on to you for your information and enjoyment. {My pictures are also included}.
-Don
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
06-01-2016, 01:25 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Peoples Republic of Calif
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 1,235
Liked 6,037 Times in 2,150 Posts
|
|
Thanks. I gotta admit it is a new one on me.
|
06-01-2016, 03:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,160
Likes: 3,620
Liked 5,205 Times in 2,173 Posts
|
|
My favorite squirrel load for taking the bushytails out of the tall trees in the river bottomlands of KY: .22WRF from an old J.C. Higgins (Marlin) .22 magnum rifle. Shoots flat and knocks them out dead from 100 ft nut trees.
The .22 WRF chamber (same as .22 mag diameter) is larger than the .22 RF chamber, and the old manuals said NOT to fire .22 RF in a .22 WRF chamber, although everybody seems to try it at least once.... The undersized .22 RF is too inaccurate for squirrels anyway in a .22 WRF.
__________________
Science plus Art
Last edited by OKFC05; 06-01-2016 at 03:11 PM.
|
06-01-2016, 03:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,111
Likes: 1,691
Liked 16,314 Times in 4,238 Posts
|
|
I remember the ".22 Special" (WRF). Mostly in Winchester Pump Action Rifles.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-01-2016, 03:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 834
Likes: 1,638
Liked 1,067 Times in 327 Posts
|
|
The Remington version was the .22 Remington Special, the Winchester version was the .22 Winchester Rimfire. Remington rifles were marked for the Special, as far as I know, all others were marked .22 WRF. The two were interchangeable, but the Remington had a round nose, and the WRF had a flat point. In addition to the increased power of the two cartridges, the were inside lubricated, whereas the .22 LR years ago had an outside, soft lubricant that was not only messy, it picked up grit and pocket lint.
|
06-01-2016, 03:54 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Bluegrass state
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 1,046
Liked 1,922 Times in 607 Posts
|
|
Don,
Thanks for your info on the WRF, as yours is the most info that I have ever had the pleasure of reading. I have been petting firearms for over 60 years and never read as much about this cartridge as I have today.
terry
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
06-01-2016, 04:11 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Roanoke, Virginia
Posts: 978
Likes: 128
Liked 1,331 Times in 540 Posts
|
|
The Winchester 22 WRF was designed for their model 1903 semi-auto rifle. They did not want the shooter to be able to use the then common black powder 22 ammo that would quickly gum up the action. Remington did the same thing for their rifles but the two rounds are not interchangeable. Both became obsolete when smokeless powder 22's became common.
|
06-01-2016, 05:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,720
Likes: 1,602
Liked 6,317 Times in 2,296 Posts
|
|
I'm familiar with the .22WRF, they used to pop up fairly often a few decades ago.
I'm going to go on record as saying you should only fire ammunition that the gun is designed for. If the cases are splitting this is not safe. Or at the very least it's not a good idea.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-01-2016, 05:14 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,607
Likes: 240
Liked 29,113 Times in 14,076 Posts
|
|
As noted, the Remington version of the same WRF cartridge was called the ".22 Remington Special," not the .22 Special. It was popular among butchers of the day as the .22 WRF/Rem Special was a more effective livestock killer than the .22 LR.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-01-2016, 05:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,880
Likes: 3,791
Liked 11,733 Times in 3,661 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bastogne71
The Winchester 22 WRF was designed for their model 1903 semi-auto rifle. They did not want the shooter to be able to use the then common black powder 22 ammo that would quickly gum up the action. Remington did the same thing for their rifles but the two rounds are not interchangeable. Both became obsolete when smokeless powder 22's became common.
|
This is incorrect.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
06-01-2016, 06:06 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 2,905
Liked 5,333 Times in 1,869 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColbyBruce
This is incorrect.
|
You are right. The Winchester Model 1903 rifle was designed to fire the 22 Winchester Automatic cartridge and this cartridge was never chambered for any other firearm. When Winchester upgraded this rifle they converted the chambering over to the much more conventional 22LR.
Additionally Remington had a similar round to the Winchester Auto and the two are NOT interchangeable.
A run of 22 Winchester Automatic cartridges was made several years ago but I haven't seen any around for quite some time.
Jim
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
06-01-2016, 06:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,880
Likes: 3,791
Liked 11,733 Times in 3,661 Posts
|
|
I buy .22 WRF when I find it cheap enough, and shoot it in my S&W 650. Two years ago I found a couple of boxes for $5.00 each.
I gave a box of these to a neighbor's kids about a year ago. The kid's grandpa had passed and their grandmother gave them a Remington 12 and a High Standard Sentinel MK something revolver. 5:00 p.m. on a Sunday is no time to go shopping for hard to find ammo in north GA.
Last edited by ColbyBruce; 06-01-2016 at 07:02 PM.
|
06-01-2016, 07:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 4,550
Liked 5,572 Times in 1,319 Posts
|
|
The old 22 WRF is actually fairly easy to locate. Each year some ammo manufacturers make up a limited run. Since nobody knows what they are I get to buy all I want. Why would I want them??? With 22 magnum ammo so hard to find the past 3 years, this is what I shoot in my 22 magnum guns. An added plus (to me) is that they are much milder turning the 22 mag into a regular 22. This creates a situation where I can quietly shoot my magnums in the back yard without bothering anybody.
__________________
Dr. B
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-01-2016, 08:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Near Roanoke VA
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 1,025
Liked 2,681 Times in 960 Posts
|
|
So, does the WRF have any "bullet jump" when used in the Magnum chamber?
(the WRF looks shorter than the Mag)
IIRC, bullet jump can adversely effect accuracy??
Hmmmmmm,,,,,,
|
06-01-2016, 10:46 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Inman, SC USA
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 95
Liked 649 Times in 372 Posts
|
|
Lot of bad information in this thread! The .22 WRF, the 22 Automatic and the .22 Remington special are not the same cartridge, and are not interchangeable. The .22 WRF was designed to get more power out of .22 rifles with black powder than could be had with .22 LR black powder rounds. It was chambered in the Winchester 1885 single shot, 1890 pump and probably others, as well as some Colt DA revolvers. The two automatic rounds were designed for use in automatic rifles only as a replacement for the BP loaded .22 LR rounds that gummed up the actions with BP residue. I believe that they were originally loaded with semi-smokeless powder, and later with smokeless, and were no more powerful than .22 LR. The High Velocity .22 LR made all of them obsolete.
__________________
Tom
1560
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-01-2016, 11:28 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 915
Likes: 2,850
Liked 1,455 Times in 401 Posts
|
|
Way back in my college days I had a Colt Scout with both a .22RF and .22MRF cylinders. I shot a lot of .22WRF through it as it was cheaper than the .22 Mag loads. Brings back some good memories.
__________________
Keep Shootin' and check 6
|
06-01-2016, 11:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 538
Likes: 91
Liked 1,525 Times in 368 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetMK
So, does the WRF have any "bullet jump" when used in the Magnum chamber?
(the WRF looks shorter than the Mag)
IIRC, bullet jump can adversely effect accuracy??
Hmmmmmm,,,,,,
|
Depends on how you define "accuracy."
Bullet jump can adversely affect the accuracy of a benchrest or other rifle capable of one-hole accuracy.....but likely won't be quite as important in a rimfire rifle. Take a look at any 22LR revolver and you'll see that bullet jump of 1/2" or so is the norm.
__________________
Carry.."hope" isn't a strategy
|
06-01-2016, 11:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,607
Likes: 240
Liked 29,113 Times in 14,076 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skeetr57
Lot of bad information in this thread! The .22 WRF, the 22 Automatic and the .22 Remington special are not the same cartridge, and are not interchangeable.
|
Noit quite. The .22 WRF and the .22 Remington Special are the same and interchangeable. The only difference is the bullet shape. I once had a Winchester 1890 pump rifle (very often found chambered in .22 WRF, as it was fairly popular), and I also had for a short time a Colt Police Positive in .22 WRF/Rem Special. I never shot either much as the ammunition was somewhat more expensive than the .22 Shorts I used almost exclusively at that time. Here is a website regarding the .22 WRF/Rem Special: .22 WRF (.22 Rem. Special)
|
06-02-2016, 12:00 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Monroe cnty. Ohio
Posts: 6,947
Likes: 4,426
Liked 10,065 Times in 3,688 Posts
|
|
I have had several 22WRF rifles. I got a bunch of ammo from
a old hardware back in 60s. I shot a lot of it in a Savage 24
22 mg/ 20g. I had a 4x scope on it and it was a deadly squirrel
load. Ammo was Rem in nickel cases. Still have a few boxes left.
I know a guy that had a nice Colt d/a in 22WRF, he had it reamed
to 22 mag. With very little shooting with the mags. resulted in
cracked cylinder.
|
06-02-2016, 12:18 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 5,060
Likes: 739
Liked 3,275 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
A hunting and shooting buddy ended up with a Winchester rifle for the .22 WRF but had no ammo. This was about 1970. When Winchester made their first modern run of it in the late 1970's (I think), I saw it in a shooting magazine and told him. He ran out and bought 1,000 rounds of it.
I was over at his house last summer and we were looking at his guns. I asked him about his ammo when he got the old Winchester out of his gun cabinet and asked him it he still had any ammo for it. He laughed and showed me his stash. He said he shot about 100 rounds when he first got it, the rifle shot really poorly, and there is has sat.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-02-2016, 12:29 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Rome, GA
Posts: 555
Likes: 13
Liked 459 Times in 196 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DocB
The old 22 WRF is actually fairly easy to locate. Each year some ammo manufacturers make up a limited run. Since nobody knows what they are I get to buy all I want. Why would I want them??? With 22 magnum ammo so hard to find the past 3 years, this is what I shoot in my 22 magnum guns. An added plus (to me) is that they are much milder turning the 22 mag into a regular 22. This creates a situation where I can quietly shoot my magnums in the back yard without bothering anybody.
|
I think I read somewhere that you shouldn't use WRF ammo in WMR guns unless, it's a revolver. Apparently, it doesn't have enough umph to cycle a 22 WMR semi-auto and can get stuck in the chamber. It seems to me it'd be fine in a bolt action rifle but, that was another that was mentioned as a no-no.
I thought about buying some for my 22 mag. revolver since it's easier to find and is a good bit cheaper.
|
06-02-2016, 03:49 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,628
Likes: 3,723
Liked 7,223 Times in 3,013 Posts
|
|
I have a Winchester mod 1890 in .22 WRF that I got from a coworker
about 20 yrs ago. I got a partial box of Rem WRF ammo with the 45 gr
FP bullet. It was vintage ammo and marked as WRF and not .22
Special so I'm assuming they offered both types back then. The Win
ammo as in the pic was readily available at gun shows so I stocked
up. CCI has produced a 45 gr HP version and they are not hard to find.
The WRF is the same dia as the .22 Mag but much less powerful. It is
more powerful than the .22 LR however. My chronograph notes show
the vintage Rem ammo at 1356 fps, the retro Win ammo at 1310 fps
and the current CCI at 1229 fps out of my 1890 with it's excellent
bore. Not really surprising to see the CCI ammo being watered down
somewhat. Accuracy from any old .22 rifle is greatly determined by
bore condition and rough pitted bores just aren't going to be accurate
with the soft bullets of .22 ammo.
|
06-02-2016, 09:46 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Inman, SC USA
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 95
Liked 649 Times in 372 Posts
|
|
I stand corrected on confusing the .22 Remington Special with the .22 Remington Automatic. I am old enough that I can remember when good gun shops carried all three of these now obsolete cartridges on their shelves. I didn't know much about guns back then, but I knew enough to avoid any that didn't use ammo that was available in the local hardware or feed store, so I have never owned a gun in any of these calibers.
__________________
Tom
1560
|
06-02-2016, 10:13 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC Montana
Posts: 853
Likes: 90
Liked 483 Times in 201 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald Paul
...the .22 special:
A few years ago I took advantage of the opportunity to purchase a few hundred rounds of a recent reproduction of a very old .22 caliber cartridge that I had never previously heard of, and is now almost obsolete. This round is called the .22 SPECIAL. The formal name for this round is the Winchester Rim Fire {WRF}. Remington also made it.
Today, this cartridge is not very well known. Back around 1890-1905 a few firearms manufacturers produced handguns and rifles for this round, {Colt, Winchester, and Stevens, etc.}, Winchester and Remington produced the cartridge. It was, at that time, the answer to the need for a harder hitting small-bore projectile that was not available from the well known .22 Long Rifle cartridge. After about five decades, this round lost its appeal when today's more powerful and better known .22 Magnum Rim Fire {MRF} was introduced in 1959. The old WRF can be fired in a newer MRF gun, but not other way around.
If you have one of these old firearms whose unaltered chamber is designed to fire the old .22 Special {WRF}, you can still fire the other available present-day cartridges {short, long, and long rifle}, but if you do fire these other three rounds in that old firearm, the majority of the cases will split, just the same as if you fired them in a modern chamber designed to fire the MRF. Accuracy may slightly suffer, but this creates no danger to neither the person firing nor to the firearm, provided the firearm is in good condition.
Other obsolete .22 rounds also existed in those early days, such as the {not very popular} .22 xtra-long-rifle, but these cartridges didn't survive the change-over from black powder to smokeless powder which occurred in the mid 1880's.
Just thought I'd pass this on to you for your information and enjoyment. {My pictures are also included}.
-Don
|
What's really unknown is the 22 MRF --- because it doesn't exist. Maybe you mean the Winchester Magnum Rimfire (WMR).
|
06-02-2016, 10:30 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,607
Likes: 240
Liked 29,113 Times in 14,076 Posts
|
|
There was once also another odd .22 rimfire round based on a shortened .22 WRF case called the .22 ILARCO (and sometimes the .22 Short Magnum Rimfire), used in the even odder American-180 SMG. It used a horizontal flat pan magazine holding 177 rounds, similar to that used on the Lewis gun. I think only Winchester ever made the ammo and it was only in very limited distribution.
Last edited by DWalt; 06-02-2016 at 10:33 AM.
|
06-02-2016, 01:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 2,905
Liked 5,333 Times in 1,869 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skeetr57
I stand corrected on confusing the .22 Remington Special with the .22 Remington Automatic. I am old enough that I can remember when good gun shops carried all three of these now obsolete cartridges on their shelves. I didn't know much about guns back then, but I knew enough to avoid any that didn't use ammo that was available in the local hardware or feed store, so I have never owned a gun in any of these calibers.
|
I though I had straightened this out in my Post #11 but I guess not.
Put as simply as possible:
The 22 WRF, The 22 Winchester Automatic and the 22 Remington Automatic are all different cartridges and are NOT interchangeable.
The ONLY interchangeability here is the 22 WRF can be used as a reduced load in the 22 Magnum but NOT the reverse.
The are also several other long obsolete 22 rim fire cartridges but I won't go into that here.
Jim
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-02-2016, 06:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,607
Likes: 240
Liked 29,113 Times in 14,076 Posts
|
|
It always seemed odd to me that the .22 Win automatic and the .22 Rem automatic cartridges were developed for the same reason (to prevent use of black powder ammunition in semiautomatic rifles), yet are dimensionally different enough to prevent interchangeability. Looks like they could have gotten together to standardize on one cartridge.
|
06-03-2016, 05:39 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 5,060
Likes: 739
Liked 3,275 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
Might have been a case of each saying, "Nyah, nyah, mine's better!" Bitter competitors then, over smaller markets.
|
07-06-2016, 02:26 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 379
Likes: 1,280
Liked 931 Times in 196 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry from Bend
What's really unknown is the 22 MRF --- because it doesn't exist. Maybe you mean the Winchester Magnum Rimfire (WMR).
|
~~~~~~~~~~
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-06-2016, 05:39 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 776
Likes: 583
Liked 274 Times in 182 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald Paul
~~~~~~~~~~
|
EXACTLY!!!
__________________
Good shooting.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-06-2016, 11:39 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Rome, GA
Posts: 555
Likes: 13
Liked 459 Times in 196 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry from Bend
What's really unknown is the 22 MRF --- because it doesn't exist. Maybe you mean the Winchester Magnum Rimfire (WMR).
|
Oh but, it DOES exist.........er well, it used to anyway. I think they were introduced back in the late 50's...........before my time so, I've never actually seen one.........just pictures.
|
07-07-2016, 12:02 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Wrong side of Washington
Posts: 10,186
Likes: 13,015
Liked 17,123 Times in 5,141 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by italiansport
You are right. The Winchester Model 1903 rifle was designed to fire the 22 Winchester Automatic cartridge and this cartridge was never chambered for any other firearm. When Winchester upgraded this rifle they converted the chambering over to the much more conventional 22LR.
Additionally Remington had a similar round to the Winchester Auto and the two are NOT interchangeable.
A run of 22 Winchester Automatic cartridges was made several years ago but I haven't seen any around for quite some time.
Jim
|
It's still around, But expensive. https://www.cheaperthandirt.com/prod...40420001173.do
__________________
Life Is A Gift. Defend it!
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|