Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Ammo
o

Notices

Ammo All Ammo Discussions Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-12-2016, 12:53 PM
Sconie Sconie is offline
Member
S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN  
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Green Valley, Arizona
Posts: 17
Likes: 54
Liked 25 Times in 10 Posts
Default S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN

Out at the range this past week, I had an interesting development arise while firing Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRNs in a S&W 642 Airweight.

Specifically, on 3-4 different occassions, after loading the revolver and firing 2 or 3 (out of a possible 5) rounds, I found that the cylinder would no longer rotate----and upon investigating----much to my chagrin----found that the lead round nose projectiles (with no cannilure on them) had worked themselves loose from the aluminum case, to the point where they were projecting out through the front-end of the cyliner, and in so doing, preventing the cylinder from advancing.

Has anyone else experienced something like this?

Interestingly, I tried to replicate the occurrance, that same day, using two other S&Ws I had brought along (a 66-4 and a 686), and was unable to do so.

I am prone to think that the recoil associated with using a very lightweight firearm is probably causing this. Then too, could it be that this is more likely to happen with an aluminum cased cartridge (as compared to brass)----my impression being that aluminum tends to be more "springy" as compared to brass, etc.?

As a side note, I do not use these cartridges as my "carry" rounds in that gun----I use the likes of Federal Premium or Speer Gold Dot, etc., with a crimped bullet, as my preferred "carry" round.

Thanks in advance for any thoughts that you might be able to send my way!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-12-2016, 02:38 PM
ContinentalOp's Avatar
ContinentalOp ContinentalOp is offline
Member
S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,315
Likes: 13,115
Liked 12,802 Times in 4,228 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sconie View Post
I am prone to think that the recoil associated with using a very lightweight firearm is probably causing this. Then too, could it be that this is more likely to happen with an aluminum cased cartridge (as compared to brass)----my impression being that aluminum tends to be more "springy" as compared to brass, etc.?
I suspect this is the correct conclusion. While I haven't experienced it myself, I've heard of issues with using FBI loads (i.e., lead hollowpoint +P) in the Airlite guns (340, 360, etc.) because recoil can cause the bullet to pull forward in the remaining rounds, enough to tie up the gun.

I've never had that happen on the rare occasion I've used lead bullets (Buffalo Bore std. pressure FBI loads) in my 642, but they were brass-cased ammo.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 06-12-2016, 03:27 PM
Old cop Old cop is offline
US Veteran
S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 4,206
Liked 15,133 Times in 4,143 Posts
Default

The problem you've identified is called jumping crimp and S&W puts a warning on some models of their Titanium .357 J frames: "No bullet lighter than 120 grains." Owning a 340PD I called S&W and asked if that referred to .357 only and was told yes. At the range the gun ran fine with the FBI +P 158 grain lead hollow point in .38, and every other self defense round in thirty-eight. I don't plan on shooting or carrying magnum rounds so it's a non issue for me.
__________________
Old Cop
LEO (Ret.)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 06-12-2016, 03:29 PM
38SPL HV's Avatar
38SPL HV 38SPL HV is offline
Member
S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN  
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 957
Liked 949 Times in 419 Posts
Default

I'm surprised std velocity ammo did this in your 642. Try Reminton 158 gr RN, bet they won't creep on you.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 06-13-2016, 02:41 AM
alwslate alwslate is offline
Member
S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,606
Likes: 3,693
Liked 7,175 Times in 2,997 Posts
Default

I would tend to think that it's more of a bullet problem. I've shot
various handloads with cast 158 gr cast bullets out of my lightweight
J frames without ever seeing any bullet creep. They were in brass
cases of course but all bullets had a crimp groove which allowed a
roll crimp.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 06-13-2016, 09:26 AM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,158
Likes: 3,605
Liked 5,199 Times in 2,172 Posts
Default

That's odd. I've shot various handloads with 158gr bullets including plated with no cannelure in my 442 and never experienced bullet creep.
__________________
Science plus Art
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 06-13-2016, 10:16 AM
kaaskop49 kaaskop49 is offline
Member
S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 7,404
Likes: 29,169
Liked 8,461 Times in 3,772 Posts
Default

Different lots of this LRN ctge seem to perform differently. One of my 36s would jam up on this load, while an identical Chief would eat it up and beg for more. I'm presently working my way down several boxes of this ammo given to me by a pal and my J-frame .38s are having a ball with it. This does not mean that the next J I try it in won't stutter. Never had C-J with it, though.

OP: this is a pure range round. Do NOT think about using it for carry. If you practice with it, make sure you have another ammo type for carry on the trip home.

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 06-13-2016, 10:21 AM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Nevada Ed Nevada Ed is offline
US Veteran
S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,376
Likes: 3,183
Liked 12,712 Times in 5,669 Posts
Default

I have loaded lead 158 gr RN bullets that did not have a cannelure in my 21 oz. J frame to match standard Federal ammo in my snub nose at 655fps, with a light crimp and never had a bullet pull loose.

I am thinking it is due to the aluminum cases, that might not have as good a grip as the brass cases.

You might try a SWC bullet that usually have a little deeper cannelure and see if the problem goes away.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 06-15-2016, 07:26 PM
.455_Hunter's Avatar
.455_Hunter .455_Hunter is offline
Member
S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN S&W 642 and Blazer Aluminum .38 Special 158gr LRN  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Front Range of Colorado
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 1,241
Liked 1,640 Times in 612 Posts
Default

I generally don't have an issue with CCI products, but their 158 gr LRN .38 special loading is about the worst factory .38 round on the market- poor crimp, dirty powder, excessive leading.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blazer 158 357 aluminum Boogsawaste Ammo 13 03-19-2014 05:23 PM
More old ammo - CCI Speer Blazer aluminum 357 158gr SJHP any use? AJMBLAZER Ammo 10 10-11-2013 10:57 PM
Blazer Aluminum .357 158 Gr JHP ConditionOne Ammo 10 12-03-2010 04:27 AM
Blazer .357 158gr JHP Has anyone Chronographed it? ddixie884 Ammo 10 05-24-2010 10:42 AM
blazer .38 special 158gr revolverrandy Ammo 10 01-31-2010 04:51 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:24 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)