|
|
11-29-2016, 12:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Liked 741 Times in 368 Posts
|
|
Anyone Used Any of This.....
From Buffalo Bore. Lower Recoil .44 Magnum Ammo - 255 gr. Keith - G.C. (1,350 fps/M.E. 1,032 ft. lbs.) There have been several requests for a full power 44 Mag. Load that recoils substantially less than our other Heavy 44 Mag. Loads, but will still penetrate deeply and be deadly on game animals.
Thoughts one way or another?????
|
11-29-2016, 12:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tall Timber of N.W.Orygun
Posts: 873
Likes: 44
Liked 1,711 Times in 465 Posts
|
|
If I want/need light weight 44 mag loads, I just roll my own.
__________________
"Tastes just like chicken"
|
11-29-2016, 02:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,874
Likes: 7,481
Liked 8,135 Times in 3,678 Posts
|
|
A 44 cal. 255 grain LSWC moving at 1350 fps is no powder puff.
Sounds like a decent load to use as an everyday loading in 44 magnum....
Gary
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-29-2016, 08:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 5,346
Likes: 11,606
Liked 9,019 Times in 3,193 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwpercle
A 44 cal. 255 grain LSWC moving at 1350 fps is no powder puff.
Sounds like a decent load to use as an everyday loading in 44 magnum....
Gary
|
Yep, I saw the specs he posted and no way is that gonna be "low recoil". It probably is a lot lighter than BB's hotter stuff but physics says that it won't be low recoil.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-29-2016, 09:37 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: 30min SE Montreal
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 150
Liked 1,540 Times in 841 Posts
|
|
I shoot a few thousands full throttle .44Mag loads a year and I can tell you that any load that generates over 1000ft/pd energy qualifies as full throttle.
Any guy calls this a light load sure will squash my fingers if I shake hand with him!
Qc
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-30-2016, 12:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Liked 741 Times in 368 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by muddocktor
Yep, I saw the specs he posted and no way is that gonna be "low recoil". It probably is a lot lighter than BB's hotter stuff but physics says that it won't be low recoil.
|
I know that's a "tad on the warm side".
Somewhere it states that it is lower in recoil than the heavier weight bullets, hence the term "low recoil"
"recoils substantially less than our other Heavy 44 Mag. Loads, but will still penetrate deeply and be deadly on game"
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 AM.