|
|
01-17-2017, 03:05 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 117
Liked 1,116 Times in 510 Posts
|
|
Now, if marlin would do another run of 1894s in 41 so I could replace the one I lost 5 years ago.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-18-2017, 06:42 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,405
Likes: 3,189
Liked 12,771 Times in 5,690 Posts
|
|
at 1620 fps .....................
that be smok'in !!
There are a lot of calibers out there that are falling to the side...........
to the brand new loads and designs with the fancy manes and plastic guns.
One just has to stay on top of it all.
|
01-18-2017, 06:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: dallas,tx.
Posts: 345
Likes: 2,356
Liked 295 Times in 121 Posts
|
|
I wonder how this would preform in say a 4" revolver. 1620 specs from a 10" barrel maybe 1250-1300 from a 4' barrel.
|
01-19-2017, 11:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rochester, NH USA
Posts: 4,008
Likes: 1,630
Liked 4,916 Times in 1,705 Posts
|
|
Funny thing is that there are fewer manufacturers today who make .41 Magnums but there is more ammo that ever before...
And I was also VERY disappointed that Smith chose not to honor their own...
Since Henry now has three models of .41 now in their catalog, they are putting Marlin/Freedom Group to shame...
Bob
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 PM.