Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > >

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-08-2017, 01:24 PM
BoogersXDm's Avatar
BoogersXDm BoogersXDm is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 20
Liked 18 Times in 8 Posts
Default Federal .38 Special +P HST

Shooting Illustrated | Federal Premium Introduces .38 Spl. +P HST Micro Ammo

Federal .38 Special +P HST Micro Self-Defense Ammo: Coming to the Range | Range365

Interesting.

Has anyone seen this yet?

Or, has anyone seen -any- Federal HST for .38 special yet?

Or have they not loaded their HST to this caliber as of this date?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-08-2017, 01:38 PM
ContinentalOp's Avatar
ContinentalOp ContinentalOp is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 2,526
Liked 1,330 Times in 549 Posts
Default

This is the first .38 Special HST loading that Federal has offerred, AFAIK. I have not seen it, but then again I have not been looking for it. At $31/20rnd box MSRP, I likely won't so long as ammo sellers keep selling Speer 135gr SB-GDHP for around $35/50rnd box (+/- $5/box). Plus the Speer load has a solid track record in actual shootings. Obviously, being new, the .38 HST has no track record.

The biggest downside I can see to the .38 HST is the deep bullet seating. It should work fine as an in-chamber load, but I wouldn't want to try doing speed reloads with it. Another reason I like the Speer SB-GDHP is the rounded nose makes it easier to reload.

However, given how well HST performs in other calibers, and has a proven track record in actual shootings in most of those other calibers, I would presume that the .38 Special HST would likely be at least an adequate performer.

But for now I'll stick with the Speer SB-GDHP.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 04-08-2017, 02:04 PM
Brasky Brasky is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 489
Likes: 152
Liked 469 Times in 201 Posts
Default

With the massive expansions hst supplies, i bet it will be just like the 380 load that has inadequate penetration
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 04-08-2017, 04:03 PM
ContinentalOp's Avatar
ContinentalOp ContinentalOp is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 2,526
Liked 1,330 Times in 549 Posts
Default

In the service calibers, HST generally provides a good balance between expansion and penetration. I keep 147gr HST in my Beretta 92FS.

I recall the .380 HST not performing well, but I couldn't remember the reason why. Inadequate penetration seems likely.

While I wouldn't judge a round's performance solely on ballistic gel performance, I would be interested to see what the .38 HST can do in gel. Gel performance wasn't mentioned in either article mentioned in the OP.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-08-2017, 04:28 PM
BoogersXDm's Avatar
BoogersXDm BoogersXDm is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 20
Liked 18 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ContinentalOp View Post
At $31/20rnd box MSRP, I likely won't..........

The biggest downside I can see to the .38 HST is the deep bullet seating. It should work fine as an in-chamber load, but I wouldn't want to try doing speed reloads with it.
These were my first and second thoughts, in that order.

Is there any actual fact behind the reasoning to seat that bullet so deep being what they are saying it to be- namely, uniform powder ignition?

And if so, my thought on this was, why didn't they just use a longer (bigger, and heavier) bullet and seat that a little deeper, or maybe even use a wad in the case, instead of making it look like a Nagant revolver cartridge?

As for performance, we shall see.

I can't find any gello tests of it myself.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-08-2017, 04:32 PM
BoogersXDm's Avatar
BoogersXDm BoogersXDm is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 20
Liked 18 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ContinentalOp View Post
I recall the .380 HST not performing well, but I couldn't remember the reason why. Inadequate penetration seems likely.
The HST suffered from failure to expand across the board in the lucky gunner .380 test.

http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/self...-tests/#380ACP

Is it just me, or does anyone else here think that hardball is still the way to go with .380, for the most part, especially in the itty bitty automatics?
Not just because of the extremely erratic performance of JHP's in this caliber, but for sheer reliability, I like to keep the hottest round nosed FMJ I can find, in my little P3AT.
Right now its got Fiocchi ball in it.

In any case, .38 special is, IMHO, a more capable caliber then the .380, and if done right, I don't see why the HST loading wouldn't be a good one.

But it sure is off to a .....weird..... start.

Last edited by BoogersXDm; 04-08-2017 at 04:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 04-08-2017, 06:07 PM
ContinentalOp's Avatar
ContinentalOp ContinentalOp is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 2,526
Liked 1,330 Times in 549 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoogersXDm View Post
The HST suffered from failure to expand across the board in the lucky gunner .380 test.

http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/self...-tests/#380ACP

Is it just me, or does anyone else here think that hardball is still the way to go with .380, for the most part, especially in the itty bitty automatics?
Not just because of the extremely erratic performance of JHP's in this caliber, but for sheer reliability, I like to keep the hottest round nosed FMJ I can find, in my little P3AT.
Right now its got Fiocchi ball in it.

In any case, .38 special is, IMHO, a more capable caliber then the .380, and if done right, I don't see why the HST loading wouldn't be a good one.

But it sure is off to a .....weird..... start.
Just my opinion, but with .380 I'd still prefer a good, deep pentrating JHP than FMJ. Rounds using the 90gr XTP bullet tend to perform well in terms of penetration. The Speer Gold Dot also seems to do well. My reasoning is that the open mouth of a JHP is more likely to actually cut and tear tissue, i.e. a "cookie cutter" effect, than FMJ, even if it doesn't expand. A FMJ will penetrate deeper, but it will stretch the tissue before breaking through it. After the bullet's passed through, the elastic nature of tissue will often cause it to spring back, leaving a hole that's actually smaller than the bullet's diameter. I'm not sure if a flatnosed FMJ would do much better than a roundnosed FMJ.

This is, of course, presuming the JHP round is reliable in the gun. I would prefer to find a gun/JHP combo that worked reliably than just default to FMJ, if at all possible. But I would rank reliability and shootability higher than terminal performance, so I wouldn't rule out using FMJ in .380, but it wouldn't be my first choice.

I know there are many people, however, who would disagree with me and stick with FMJ in .380s. To each their own.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 04-08-2017, 06:55 PM
iPac's Avatar
iPac iPac is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 414
Likes: 470
Liked 494 Times in 186 Posts
Default

This is great news to hear, sort of. I have been wanting Federal to come out with 38spl and more so 357mag HST rounds. I would love to be able to buy just the bullets too for making my own.

However, this "micro" gimmick will not get my dollars. If they would have made a normal 38spl+P round, I may be interested. This could be baby steps though with a regular round to follow, and hopefully a 357mag round which is what I'm really after.

I wouldn't use their 380 HST round to guess what other calibers will perform like. The use of 380 for defense doesn't make sense to me when much better options are available without sacrificing anything. To each their own though.

Everyone just loves Speer and they do have a good track record, but when I tested Gold Dots vs. HSTs in 9mm+P, the HST won hands down. The GDs were actually rather disappointing with sporadic expansion, while the HST never failed to fully expand. This was 6 years ago, so maybe GDs have gotten better. Given the choice though, I will take HST every time.

So until they get a regular revolver round on the market, I will stick with my 140gr XTP load for 357mag, and Hydra-Shok +P in 38spl.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 04-08-2017, 07:39 PM
BoogersXDm's Avatar
BoogersXDm BoogersXDm is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 20
Liked 18 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ContinentalOp View Post
Just my opinion, but with .380 I'd still prefer a good, deep pentrating JHP than FMJ. Rounds using the 90gr XTP bullet tend to perform well in terms of penetration. The Speer Gold Dot also seems to do well. My reasoning is that the open mouth of a JHP is more likely to actually cut and tear tissue, i.e. a "cookie cutter" effect, than FMJ, even if it doesn't expand. A FMJ will penetrate deeper, but it will stretch the tissue before breaking through it. After the bullet's passed through, the elastic nature of tissue will often cause it to spring back, leaving a hole that's actually smaller than the bullet's diameter. I'm not sure if a flatnosed FMJ would do much better than a roundnosed FMJ.

This is, of course, presuming the JHP round is reliable in the gun. I would prefer to find a gun/JHP combo that worked reliably than just default to FMJ, if at all possible. But I would rank reliability and shootability higher than terminal performance, so I wouldn't rule out using FMJ in .380, but it wouldn't be my first choice.

I know there are many people, however, who would disagree with me and stick with FMJ in .380s. To each their own.
If it were one of the larger sized .380's I'd be using the best JHP I could get, but in the little pocket sized guns that are meant for close quarters situations with short barrels and very little margin for error in their short action cycles, I just feel that FMJ is the way to go (even if the gun does cycle reliably on the range with JHP). I especially favor the round nose FMJ in the tiny guns, despite the agreed upon fact that these don't give the best wounding profiles- its all about ensuring reliability.

Doesn't matter what your loaded with if the gun goes click not bang, and for one of these little guns that are meant for desperate situations, that would be very bad.

Last edited by BoogersXDm; 04-09-2017 at 12:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 04-08-2017, 08:43 PM
.455_Hunter's Avatar
.455_Hunter .455_Hunter is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Front Range of Colorado
Posts: 640
Likes: 426
Liked 496 Times in 205 Posts
Default

I wish Federal would have done an updated version of their older 147 gr +P+ Hydra-Shok loading using a tweaked 147 gr HST.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 04-09-2017, 12:31 PM
BoogersXDm's Avatar
BoogersXDm BoogersXDm is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 20
Liked 18 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by .455_Hunter View Post
I wish Federal would have done an updated version of their older 147 gr +P+ Hydra-Shok loading using a tweaked 147 gr HST.
+p+ is a whole lot of pop for a snubnose, which is what they are obviously trying to market their first take on the HST for in .38 Special.

Why not a 158gr +p.

And why this extreme bullet setback, I've read here and there that because .38 special was once a black powder case that the volume of smokeless powder takes up alot less room in it, it doesn't always provide the most consistent burn or whatever.

Is this true?

And what would be wrong with putting a sort of wad in the case then, to keep the powder down close to the primer?

I've never rolled my own ammo, and am not an ammo historian or anything, so these are just random musings.....

But if anyone can set me straight?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-09-2017, 01:34 PM
Brasso4 Brasso4 is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 54
Likes: 6
Liked 46 Times in 27 Posts
Default

It's possible that they're using a fast powder for low recoil and clean burn and need to set the bullet down deeper. Hard to say.
__________________
Qoheleth 12:13-14
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-10-2017, 04:51 AM
ArchAngelCD's Avatar
ArchAngelCD ArchAngelCD is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 5,052
Likes: 250
Liked 1,545 Times in 953 Posts
Default

So much time and energy wasted on trying to pick the perfect bullet for SD. I have said it so many times already but I will keep saying it. The best bullet in the world will do you no good unless you hit you shoot at. Find a load that is accurate in your gun and go with it!
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 04-10-2017, 12:22 PM
BoogersXDm's Avatar
BoogersXDm BoogersXDm is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 20
Liked 18 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArchAngelCD View Post
So much time and energy wasted on trying to pick the perfect bullet for SD. I have said it so many times already but I will keep saying it. The best bullet in the world will do you no good unless you hit you shoot at. Find a load that is accurate in your gun and go with it!
Yes, but please excuse me, I'm sort of a "bullet geek", so its really not a waste of my time when its a fun thing to think about.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 04-10-2017, 05:33 PM
ArchAngelCD's Avatar
ArchAngelCD ArchAngelCD is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 5,052
Likes: 250
Liked 1,545 Times in 953 Posts
Default

Fair enough, if it's fun go with it...
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #16  
Old 04-10-2017, 07:19 PM
Lostaro Lostaro is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 60
Likes: 11
Liked 63 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Is this ammo available yet? Haven't seen it listed for sale anywhere??
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-10-2017, 07:28 PM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Nevada Ed Nevada Ed is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 5,716
Likes: 157
Liked 2,917 Times in 1,543 Posts
Default

Now if Federal had designed that 130 gr 38 special HST with some
aluminum inside of it, to be able to make it longer, so it would stick
out of the case , at least like a 125gr JHP..............

it might be a winner?

That flush look, just is not my cup of tea for a SD load, that will
pass all the drills..........
or will it?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #18  
Old 04-10-2017, 08:15 PM
BoogersXDm's Avatar
BoogersXDm BoogersXDm is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 20
Liked 18 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lostaro View Post
Is this ammo available yet? Haven't seen it listed for sale anywhere??
I don't believe its available yet.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevada Ed View Post
Now if Federal had designed that 130 gr 38 special HST with some aluminum inside of it, to be able to make it longer, so it would stick out of the case , at least like a 125gr JHP..............
Couldn't they just use a paper wad to keep the powder down close to the primer or something?

Perhaps drop the wad down on top of the powder and hold it in place in the case with some wax or glue or something?

Is this even possible?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevada Ed View Post
That flush look, just is not my cup of tea for a SD load, that will
pass all the drills..........
or will it?
It looks like it would NOT be conducive to rapid reloading of a defensive revolver, but I suppose since some people use wadcutters, maybe its not as big a deal as I'm making out of it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArchAngelCD View Post
Fair enough, if it's fun go with it...

Last edited by BoogersXDm; 04-10-2017 at 08:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-13-2017, 02:49 PM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Nevada Ed Nevada Ed is offline
Member
Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST Federal .38 Special +P HST  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 5,716
Likes: 157
Liked 2,917 Times in 1,543 Posts
Default

Well, if just 5-6 shots are enough for the job............ fine.

I just don't see LE using it until the bugs are cleaned out.
It only takes one strike in this ball game !!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Federal 38 Special FBI Load deyomatic Ammo 25 10-14-2016 10:20 AM
Federal NyClad .38 Special Ammo EO1986 WANTED to Buy 3 03-28-2016 05:59 AM
Federal Nyclad for 38 special? chad214 Ammo 29 02-17-2015 07:59 AM
wtb federal nyclad 38 special p38ma JIMBO1950 WANTED to Buy 1 10-13-2013 11:48 AM
38 Special Federal 147 gr. +P+ ?? M1Lover Ammo 10 08-21-2011 11:29 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:30 PM.


S-W Forum, LLC 2000-2015
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)