Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Ammo
o

Notices

Ammo All Ammo Discussions Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-16-2017, 07:45 AM
Old Corp's Avatar
Old Corp Old Corp is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Coastal NC
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 2,339
Liked 4,673 Times in 1,599 Posts
Default Track record? - .38 Spl +P+

A good friend, retired ATF, was helping out a fellow retired agent in a move. That friend gave him a bunch of ammo, which a good quantity was given to me.
I've accumulated some from various sources before, but much of this is full boxes of their old duty round - WW .38 Spl. +P+ 110 gr. JHP, with the expected 'LE use Only' label on the box.

IIRC, my friend told me this was used mostly in some M640's in .38 that were marked for +P+, and a bit later, for M640 .357's.

Anyone got any info on the rounds track record in actual use?

Don't have a chrono, and guess I've never been a fan of fast, light bullets. For snubs, I usually carry either Fed. 135 gr HST +P, or a similar Speer Gold Dot Short Barrel or 158 gr LSWC-HP +P.

Just wondering if anyone has any info of real world use on this blast from the 1980's?
__________________
Ret'd LEO
SWCA #2275

Last edited by Old Corp; 06-16-2017 at 07:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-16-2017, 10:06 AM
bmcgilvray's Avatar
bmcgilvray bmcgilvray is offline
SWCA Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 10,447
Liked 6,092 Times in 1,249 Posts
Default

Fix ya' right up.

A friend of my parents worked for the Treasury Department and occasionally gave me boxes of this load. This would have been 1978-1980.

From some old notes I keep. The load was chronograph tested around 1980.

Winchester Western "white box" +p+ .38 Special 110 grain JHC

Model 10 4-inch barrel - Velocity: 1120 fps

Model 14 8 3/8-inch barrel - Velocity: 1228 fps
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 06-16-2017, 10:51 AM
Duckford Duckford is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 575
Likes: 563
Liked 920 Times in 303 Posts
Default

The short gyst of things from the "streets" I've always heard was that it was going to be the darling new super velocity magick bullet that was going to slay bad guys through magic shock waves based on the bad science of the time, 20% gel and success based on temporary cavities alone. Higher velocity was going to make it better for penetrating barriers (which has merit to it). But, from everything I heard, the bullet was too light for caliber and still under powered, ended up being a poor penetrator of people and basically a junk load for all the hype it walked in with. There was a good reason why the Fed's reversed course and went back to a "simple" lead hollow point again.

Take a long look at all ballistics gel tests done from now till back when 10% became the norm, the 110's are too light and have always been a poor performer in the laboratory, and its only praise comes from the propaganda and hype that came before it, not after it started use.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 06-16-2017, 01:44 PM
gwpercle's Avatar
gwpercle gwpercle is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,838
Likes: 7,394
Liked 8,050 Times in 3,652 Posts
Default

But they are fun to shoot water filled plastic jugs with.....
When Super-Vel came out with the 110 grain HP's we loaded them hot and were duly impressed on their ability to take down water jugs !
While maybe not the "best" self defense round , you got them for free. Go water filled plastic jug hunting !
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-16-2017, 08:31 PM
sigp220.45's Avatar
sigp220.45 sigp220.45 is offline
US Veteran
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,075
Likes: 27,790
Liked 33,581 Times in 5,253 Posts
Default

I don't think they were all that hot. Definitely not enough to merit all the "only use them in .357s!" comments they usually elicit.

The 110s barely make 1200 fps, which you can beat handily with non +P 9mm loads all day long.

The FBI issued +P+ 147 grain Hydra Shoks in .38 Special, which usually will give the entire internet a case of the vapors and generate multiple posts asking if they are safe to use in a Model 28. They lope along at 950 fps. Its a decent load, but I used to qualify with them in my old Model 36 with no problem.



They did work on the street, though, and that is all that counts.
__________________
“What you got, ain’t new.”
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 06-17-2017, 02:42 PM
michpatriot michpatriot is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 321
Likes: 144
Liked 474 Times in 196 Posts
Default

Hey those look like bonded Gold Dot bullets..interesting rounds you got there I'm gonna look around more @ gun shows..147 huh..
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 06-17-2017, 03:34 PM
rwsmith's Avatar
rwsmith rwsmith is online now
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 30,918
Likes: 41,503
Liked 29,153 Times in 13,781 Posts
Default .38s are tough....

I know that model 10s are tougher than the ammo that is usually designated +P and an old book I had gave loads a grain higher that anyone else's. I worked above the 'recommended max' for some loads that would get your attention. The trouble I have with the +P+ is that you don't know anything except that it's stronger than +P. I'd suspect that a good brand wouldn't load anything dangerous but I'd be sure to fire them them in a modern, well built gun that was heavy enough to take it. (Like a model 10).
You could still expect accelerated wear, though.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-17-2017, 08:42 PM
shouldazagged shouldazagged is offline
Absent Comrade
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,386 Times in 11,801 Posts
Default

I have one of the early 640's, about 5,000 made, marked "TESTED FOR +P+". I carry it daily, have for years. It's loaded with 158 grain LSWCHP, +P or equivalent. I just feel better about what I hear and read about the merits of heavy, slower projectiles over lightweight screamers.

Call me old school and I won't argue.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 06-21-2017, 01:11 PM
Homie Homie is offline
US Veteran
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 776
Likes: 577
Liked 273 Times in 181 Posts
Question

In the March '79 RIFLEMAN I found a reference for the Winchester 110 gr. load-(Q4070)- that states the specified velocity from a 2" @ 15' was 1020 fps. Federal offered a similar load. From all the testing members here have reported on these loads, this velocity seems to have varied greatly from lot to lot.

The writeup also mentions a Federal +P+ 125 gr. @1015 fps from a 4", loaded for some state LE agencies. I've not seen or heard much on this specific load- does anyone have any additional info on it?
__________________
Good shooting.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-21-2017, 10:17 PM
Boge Boge is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Border
Posts: 426
Likes: 86
Liked 262 Times in 129 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Corp View Post
...Anyone got any info on the rounds track record in actual use?...
I remember a retired Customs Agent speaking of this round whereas his partner shot a guy six times with it in the chest. DRT if I recall.


Quote:
Originally Posted by sigp220.45 View Post
...The FBI issued +P+ 147 grain Hydra Shoks in .38 Special,...

I thought it was the Silvertip 140 gr. .357 or the 158 gr. +p+ LSWCHP post 1972.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-22-2017, 05:38 AM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,759
Likes: 7,836
Liked 25,616 Times in 8,661 Posts
Default

I believe this was a politically correct answer (back in the 70's) to the Public's outcry when the Fed's went to .357 Magnum M66's. By hopping up a .38 Spl, they could say they were not carrying a Magnum load - made people "feel better".

I've got both the Federal and Winchester versions and do not and would not use them for SD since there are now much better options out there. My Dad was a Fed and he didn't think much of them and after a short while did not carry them either.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-22-2017, 08:30 AM
Old Corp's Avatar
Old Corp Old Corp is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Coastal NC
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 2,339
Liked 4,673 Times in 1,599 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chief38 View Post
I believe this was a politically correct answer (back in the 70's) to the Public's outcry when the Fed's went to .357 Magnum M66's. By hopping up a .38 Spl, they could say they were not carrying a Magnum load - made people "feel better".

I've got both the Federal and Winchester versions and do not and would not use them for SD since there are now much better options out there. My Dad was a Fed and he didn't think much of them and after a short while did not carry them either.

Thanks Chief38 and other's for your responses.
This from Chief lines up with what my retired ATF friend told me - that even when they switched to .357 revolvers, using the .38's was a PR move.

Much the same with my old agency - when I started, issue was Colt Trooper MKIII's .357 (4"), switching soon thereafter to the M66 .357(4" uniform, 2.5" plainclothes).
Duty round was ALWAYS a .38 +P, the first I recall was the S&W-brand ammo of .38 +P 110 JHP, later for unknown reasons switching to the 125 gr JHP. Soon S&W was out of the ammo business and the revolver years were finished up with the Federal 125 gr. +P JHP.
The duty round choice I am pretty sure was strictly a PR move.
Ironically, my city also had sworn Park Rangers who trained with us. Duty weapon for them, a nickel M19 with .357 158 gr. JHP.
__________________
Ret'd LEO
SWCA #2275
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-22-2017, 11:03 AM
Duckford Duckford is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 575
Likes: 563
Liked 920 Times in 303 Posts
Default

The PR move was a real thing, but also recoil. After the Newhall tragedy, California standardized the 38 Special in the Model 28's because they decided that they should practice with the same ammunition that they serve with, and went with the light load instead of the full power load, in a big heavy N frame made for a lifetime of heavy magnum use. This has many factors, including the school of "only shot placement counts, just teach everyone to become bullseye shooters, shoot small hit big" mantras, as well as people in various police agencies who weren't gun people and wanted to carry the smallest guns and the lightest loads they could get away with.

I remember reading somewhere in the early 80's where Ayoob testified at a hearing about people complaining about guns and ammunition not being suited to women and other people who didn't like shooting the normal stuff in what I believe was the FBI or some other Federal agency. The fact people were making a fuss about 38 Special +P gives us more than what we need to know on the subject of 357 Magnum and why it fell out of favor as a standard cartridge, even if other shooters who liked it preferred it.

Downgunning is a common issue in all areas of shooting, from hunting to official agencies, all for the same reason that people just don't like recoil and blast. The 10mm was introduced, and what happened? It was loaded light to begin with, and it still had to toned down with a new, shorter replacement with less umph. How many lawmen carried 38's in their 357's on their own volition, how many departments switched to 38's because of whining? Out of dogma of certain shooting schools of thought?

its an interesting time in handgun round development, different theories of wounding effectiveness came, bullet designs and processes moved quickly, and the fact there seemed to be so many changes in that short period of time in round selection showed the kind of chaos the fast learning curve created.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 06-24-2017, 09:17 PM
Doug M.'s Avatar
Doug M. Doug M. is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,445
Likes: 14,499
Liked 9,263 Times in 3,702 Posts
Default

Placement is more of an important variable than most differences in ammo, but widespread knowledge of where to shoot has been lacking until the last 10 or so years. The corresponding knowledge that pistol rounds are not all that great is likewise relatively recent, so training to shoot as many rounds as needed to discern a lack of ability to continue the actions that justify the shooting has also been relatively recent. I am amply confident that with decent placement, my standard velocity .38 SWCs should do the job if that were what I had when TSHTF.
__________________
NHI, 10-8.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-03-2017, 01:52 AM
Steve C Steve C is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 727
Likes: 1
Liked 133 Times in 93 Posts
Default

This Stopping Power chart came from Handloads.com. It is basically from the Marshal Sannow Study so its generally police ammo performance of the late 90's. It shows the 110gr .38 spl +P+ at about an 80% effectiveness compared to other +P+ rounds. This is equivalent to some of the best 9mm standard velocity ammo of the same era. You can go to Handloads.com and find the iterative chart for viewing comparisons to other ammunition.


Last edited by Steve C; 07-03-2017 at 01:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-03-2017, 02:59 AM
ddixie884's Avatar
ddixie884 ddixie884 is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Avery,Tx
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 3,812
Liked 1,860 Times in 938 Posts
Default

I wish I'd have bought a case of that 147gr +P+ Federal, when it was on close-out from the on-line sellers. It was a good buy.
__________________
dd884
JMHO-YMMV
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-03-2017, 12:33 PM
Duckford Duckford is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 575
Likes: 563
Liked 920 Times in 303 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve C View Post
This Stopping Power chart came from Handloads.com. It is basically from the Marshal Sannow Study so its generally police ammo performance of the late 90's. It shows the 110gr .38 spl +P+ at about an 80% effectiveness compared to other +P+ rounds. This is equivalent to some of the best 9mm standard velocity ammo of the same era. You can go to Handloads.com and find the iterative chart for viewing comparisons to other ammunition.

Marshall and Sannow's works are worthless pieces of trash, and the way these statistics are calculated, collected, and finally analyzed and their conclusions drawn, at best their work is worthless and at worst harmful to the field and study.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-03-2017, 12:59 PM
rockquarry rockquarry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,553
Likes: 4
Liked 8,885 Times in 4,121 Posts
Default

Regarding this study, one might question the meaningfulness of the figures under "Shootings" and "One Shot Stops". Assuming this is only a very cursory summation of the entire study, are there other figures that show whether a suspect received one or more non-fatal, non-stopping bullet wounds?

Without adequate supporting information, these results seem inconclusive at best, but maybe I'm missing something here.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-03-2017, 01:15 PM
DocB's Avatar
DocB DocB is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 4,550
Liked 5,572 Times in 1,319 Posts
Default

Buffalo Bore will beat those all day long. You can either go with the very soft lead hollow cavity or the hard cast bullet. Either will generate 350 ft lbs of muzzle energy. Both are full size bullets appropriate for the caliber. In a 6 inch barrel, the hard cast is claimed to generate close to 500 ft lbs of muzzle energy. . .a "light" 357 magnum load in a 38 Special. Everything that I have read indicates that Buffalo Bore is right on with their ballistics.
__________________
Dr. B
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #20  
Old 07-07-2017, 09:27 PM
AZretired's Avatar
AZretired AZretired is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Mexico & Arizona
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 735
Liked 1,460 Times in 644 Posts
Default

At time the WW 110gr +P+ load was issued to the ATF they carried a 2.5 inch M-66 and that was their duty load. I was given some in 1980 and the 640 didn't exist.
__________________
Support your Police, & NRA
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-07-2017, 11:31 PM
Peak53's Avatar
Peak53 Peak53 is offline
Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Tincup, CO
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 6,266
Liked 7,454 Times in 2,279 Posts
Default

I think I would only shoot that through an N frame
__________________
Some collect art; I shoot it!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-13-2017, 09:22 PM
bmcgilvray's Avatar
bmcgilvray bmcgilvray is offline
SWCA Member
Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+ Track record? - .38 Spl +P+  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 10,447
Liked 6,092 Times in 1,249 Posts
Default

I've chronograph tested Buffalo Boar +P+ 158 grain ammunition and shot it for familiarization through a very heavily used 1971 vintage Smith & Wesson Model 10-6, the same one used to test various Treasury and +P+ loads years before. The revolver shrugged it all off.

The Buffalo Bore load is all it's cracked up to be with reference to the company's stated velocity.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
K-22, M17 Am I on the right track? Dewy12 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 13 08-05-2015 10:13 AM
a little off track blackbird94 Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 0 12-27-2013 12:02 AM
Keep track of legislation williamcrane 2nd Amendment Forum 0 02-13-2013 02:48 PM
Ever seen a train lay its own track? raisedin99 The Lounge 20 08-22-2010 01:05 PM
what happens at the track stays at the track gettysburg The Lounge 5 06-15-2010 05:51 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)