Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Ammo

Notices

Ammo All Ammo Discussions Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-10-2017, 11:57 PM
dubshooter dubshooter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 544
Likes: 136
Liked 1,044 Times in 311 Posts
Default 66-8 2.75” Carry Ammo

So I know there’s a ton of talk about +P vs 357 in a snub. But here’s my question.

I just got my set up with my 66-8 and have my holster and grips and comfortable with the gun. Going to be added in just in time for winter carry. Now I’m looking into some good ammo for it.

I get issued Gold Dot 135gr 38+p short barrel from work for my 640. Was going to use that in the 66 as well.

But I was thinking of moving up to 125 gr Federal or Remington 357 for this gun due to the extra weight.

What say you all? Is the hype of the extra flash and noise worth it, or stick to the free +P ammo and call it a day?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:22 AM
Ashlander's Avatar
Ashlander Ashlander is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ellisville, Missouri
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 4,996
Liked 1,309 Times in 685 Posts
Default

For personal defense you will not likely need to shoot through any car windows, so plus P should be fine. That's what I carry. Besides if you shoot a .357 Magnum is a small room or car your ears will be ringing for 6 months -- which is fine if it is necessary to save your life, but if Plus P is enough, then why chance major hearing loss.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:33 AM
Goodtime Charlie's Avatar
Goodtime Charlie Goodtime Charlie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North Central Kansas
Posts: 107
Likes: 111
Liked 57 Times in 26 Posts
Lightbulb

In a snubby? I'd stick with the .38 Spl +P SB, I don't think that with the .357 Mag. you would gain much velocity, but you would get more recoil, flash and blast, not exactly conducive to quick follow-up shots. But, it might be interesting to compare the two at the range, just to see, so then you can make your own informed decision what is right for you.
__________________
Buy American!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 10-11-2017, 01:04 AM
BLUEDOT37's Avatar
BLUEDOT37 BLUEDOT37 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 6,483
Likes: 5,881
Liked 9,324 Times in 3,494 Posts
Default

This article & test may be of interest:

.38 Special and .357 Magnum Self-Defense Ammo Ballistics Test

.
__________________
Waiting for the break of day
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-11-2017, 06:33 AM
white cloud white cloud is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 2,742
Liked 1,373 Times in 573 Posts
Default

I find the Remington Gold Saber 125 grain .357 to be a good compromise. I carry it in SP101s or similar sized guns. Looks like it did ok in the tests referenced above.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-11-2017, 09:43 AM
ContinentalOp's Avatar
ContinentalOp ContinentalOp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,315
Likes: 13,115
Liked 12,802 Times in 4,228 Posts
Default

I would suggest trying the ammo and see.

When I had a 3" 65, I compared the standard pressure and +P versions of Buffalo Bore 158gr LSWCHP in it. Even though the +P has more power, I went with the standard pressure version (which produces the same velocity as other makers' +P, BTW) because I could get noticeably quicker follow-up shots.

If you're talking about the full-power 125gr JHP in .357 Magnum, you're likely to get significant muzzle blast and flash from a snub, plus slower follow-up shots. I would suggest a good .38 Special +P, like the Speer 135gr SB-GDHP (which has a solid track record in actual shootings) or a mid-range .357 Magnum load, like the Speer 135gr SB-GDHP or Remington's 125gr Golden Saber. If I were in your position, I'd stick with the .38 Special Gold Dots since they're issued to you. Even if they weren't, I'd still probably recommend the .38 Special Gold Dots since you can buy them in 50-round boxes at a better value. I carry those in my 642 and have carried them in a 3" 65 as well as a 2" 64.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 10-11-2017, 11:46 AM
colt_saa's Avatar
colt_saa colt_saa is online now
SWCA Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,578
Likes: 3,066
Liked 22,550 Times in 5,843 Posts
Default

Having had to fire 4 shots through a car's windshield, I am one that believes in having as much power as you can control. That amount of power is different for each person and there is no way that a stranger on the Internet can make that evaluation for you

Muzzle flash is a NON-issue in these modern days. All of the premium defensive ammunition being sold by the Major manufacturers is being loaded with low flash powder or powder with a flash suppressant added.

Now if you plan on using white/yellow/green box or foreign manufactured bargain ammunition for personal defense there will be more muzzle flash. Even this is not too big a deal, if muzzle flash were the problem that Internet legend makes it out to be we would all be blinded by the flash exiting out the Barrel/Cylinder gap of our revolvers.

So is the extra power worth the extra recoil? I have never met a person that survived a firefight and walked away saying "I could have gotten by with a less powerful firearm, I think I'll downgrade"

However it is hard to say no to FREE issued ammunition
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:47 PM
ChiefTJS ChiefTJS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 65
Liked 308 Times in 71 Posts
Default

How is the extraction on .38Spl Vs. .357Mag? A lot of snubs have an issue with the longer cases. I have the 4.25" version and it extracts well, just not sure if the 2.75" version offers a full length extractor throw. As to ammo, I swore off the 125gr a long time ago due to the blast and concussion, I like a heavier bullet in the magnums now.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-11-2017, 01:13 PM
StakeOut's Avatar
StakeOut StakeOut is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NW of Austin Texas
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 1,351
Liked 4,938 Times in 1,730 Posts
Default

If you hand load your ammo then 5.0gr of Unique under a Hornady 158gr LSWHP in a 38spl case or 5.5gr of Unique under the Hornady 158gr LSWCHP in a 357 magnum case will fit the bill.

No ammo will be perfect in all situations.I never wished I had more powerful ammo after a successful shooting but I did wish I had a gun with larger capacity once or twice.
__________________
NEVER GIVE UP YOUR GUN
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 10-11-2017, 01:49 PM
Dpris Dpris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Liked 679 Times in 313 Posts
Default

I see no point in carrying a .357 Mag for defense & loading it with .38s.
While many .357 loads today do use flash-retardant powders, not all do, and not all are equal in visual effects.

Among the 5 test loads I ran through the 66-8 sample I had here, the Black Hills 125 JHP produced easily notable flash.
The other four had more reduced levels.

All were fired at an indoor range, and even the BH was far from blinding.
Absolutely no problems in vision interference or sight/target recovery.

If you're going to carry the bulk of a .357 Mag revolver anyway, why would you not take advantage of the gun's power potential?

The only downside, assuming you can handle the recoil, is the increase in decibel output.
Magnum rounds won't add any more bulk or noticeable weight over .38 rounds.

When I did, at various times during a uniformed career, carry .357s on & off duty, I was prepared to gamble on the hearing issue if I ever had to fire indoors.

I carry an M&P auto nowdays in retirement, but I could quite happily switch to my older 66 snub if hi-cap auto magazines are prohibited, and it wouldn't be loaded with .38s.
Denis
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #11  
Old 10-11-2017, 02:27 PM
bigwheelzip's Avatar
bigwheelzip bigwheelzip is offline
Absent Comrade
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 12,990
Likes: 17,229
Liked 41,504 Times in 9,146 Posts
Default

Since I already stock and carry for 2-legged problems Federal 125gr HP(C357B) in all my .357 handguns, I'd stick with those, just to minimize ammo type requirements.

Shoots fine from a similar sized 2 1/2" L-frame with Hogue Bantam grips.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 10-11-2017, 03:14 PM
Mehutch's Avatar
Mehutch Mehutch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Seattle Washington
Posts: 897
Likes: 3,820
Liked 3,815 Times in 735 Posts
Default

Here is my load...

Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #13  
Old 10-11-2017, 09:20 PM
Bill In Texas Bill In Texas is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Home is Texas.
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 3,409
Liked 1,408 Times in 847 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mehutch View Post
Here is my load...

Mine also in my 640, 60, and 66.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-11-2017, 10:46 PM
Kanewpadle's Avatar
Kanewpadle Kanewpadle is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Wrong side of Washington
Posts: 10,184
Likes: 13,015
Liked 17,119 Times in 5,139 Posts
Default

Check Lucky Gunners website for gel tests. There is proof that 357 beats 38 +p in most loads. Velocity, penetration, and expansion is better even out of a two inch barrel.

As long as you can handle the recoil there is absolutely no reason not to carry 357 mag.

Cheap Ammo For Sale | In Stock Ammunition For Sale
__________________
Life Is A Gift. Defend it!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 10-12-2017, 03:32 PM
Dpris Dpris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Liked 679 Times in 313 Posts
Default

People tout the AR-15 for indoor home defense.
I can safely say the noise from a couple rounds of .357 Mag isn't going to do any more ear damage than the same from a .223.
Denis
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 02-17-2019, 12:06 AM
Sol-Invictus's Avatar
Sol-Invictus Sol-Invictus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 227
Likes: 190
Liked 291 Times in 119 Posts
Default

I realize I this is an older thread but with the popularity of the 66-8 2.75 it bears noting that this firearm easily handles 357 loads. Either the full power 125s or any of the snub loads like Hornady critical defense or the gold dot or the reintroduced black talon. No issues with blast or quick followups. The 66-8 is the best carry revolver smIth has ever produced and is better than the older 66s hands down. I own a no dash and the elusive LS. The myth of equality of 38+p vs 357 in short barrels is ridiculas. It is patently false and irresponsible and wreckless to repeat and is indicative of pure ignorance.

Sent from my SM-T520 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-17-2019, 02:19 AM
ArchAngelCD's Avatar
ArchAngelCD ArchAngelCD is offline
Moderator
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
Default

Carry the ammo you can shoot most accurately in your gun.
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #18  
Old 02-17-2019, 09:05 AM
IAhunter's Avatar
IAhunter IAhunter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cochise County, Arizona
Posts: 390
Likes: 230
Liked 311 Times in 136 Posts
Default

I carry the 145 grain Silvertip load in my 66-5. Very accurate in a couple of my K frames. I like the 38 Special 135 grain GoldDot load in my .38 Special K frames. The .357 Gold Dot 135s are not very accurate in my guns.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Selecting range ammo and carry ammo for a 686 3" corgiS&W S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 24 04-23-2015 03:38 PM
Best place for 9mm ammo and best carry ammo? Ballplayerlc Ammo 17 08-24-2013 03:52 PM
9mm carry Ammo jshull Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 5 03-06-2013 11:51 PM
what ammo. to carry?? .38 speedo1 Ammo 14 03-12-2009 01:04 PM
Best carry ammo for my "new" 36-1???? G-Mac S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 17 10-18-2008 06:23 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)