Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Ammo

Notices

Ammo All Ammo Discussions Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 01-22-2022, 04:44 PM
Borderboss Borderboss is offline
Member
38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm  
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1,258
Liked 2,533 Times in 859 Posts
Default

I haven't loaded Super for self defense yet, but had planned to do so. This thread got me off my duff. I just ordered 1000 of the 125gr Sierra V-Crown bullets (used in the Sig loads). I'm not going to go crazy on velocity. As long as I can get 1,300 in my 5-inch Nowlin barrel, I'll be more than happy.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 01-22-2022, 06:11 PM
.38SuperMan .38SuperMan is online now
Member
38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm  
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 1,349
Liked 3,193 Times in 898 Posts
Default

Several years ago after selling my (cracked and welded frame) Caspian 38s race gun I wound up with 1000 rounds of major loaded 38s and nothing to safely shoot it in. I didn’t feel comfortable shooting these in an alloy frame gun so I researched to see who made 1911’s with a fully supported chamber and a steel frame. I found that Kimber made an all steel frame and slide with fully supported chamber. Not to take any chances I contacted Kimber support and the assured me the gun would be fine with major loads. The person I talked to said they have several customers shooting major without any issues. So I bought a new Kimber Eclipse Target 5” and proceeded to shoot 1000 rounds of major 38s. I went up in spring weight 2 pounds and added a shock buffer. The Eclipse digested my loads with no issues. I’ll say though, a 124 grain FMJ pushed to just over 1,400 FPS has pretty heavy recoil, lots of flash and a serious bark. At 1,400 FPS you’re in the 357 range and it feels like it.

Last edited by .38SuperMan; 01-22-2022 at 06:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 01-22-2022, 06:52 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is online now
Member
38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,636
Likes: 242
Liked 29,147 Times in 14,094 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy4570 View Post
My first 1911 was actually an early 80's production Llama- I know, please don't snicker. I was only 12.- in 9mm Largo. I only shot factory .38 Super in it and never had any issues over several hundred rounds before I sold it to buy a .45. Bottom line, though, is that I got to appreciate the Super pretty early on.
My very first .38 Super was also a Llama, the "Extra" military model. It wasn't really in .38 Super, but 9mm Largo (aka 9mm Bergman-Bayard), but it handled .38 Super with no problems. I bought it sometime in the later 1960s, and they were very common at gun shows back then, selling for around $25-$30. There were many of them imported, most of which had been somewhat crudely arsenal re-blued. There wasn't much mechanical difference between the Llama Extra and the Colt 1911 except the caliber. The only problem I ever had with it was when the tip of the extractor broke off, effectively making it a single shot. At the time I could not find a replacement extractor (Colt extractors did not fit), so I just applied a dab of steel on the tip with my arc welder and shaped it into a claw with a Dremel tool. It worked fine. Back then, surplus 9mm Largo and 9mm Steyr ammo was available cheaply, and I used them in it, along with .38 Super. That was when I first started handloading .38 Super. I sold that Llama sometime in the early 1990s, but I can't remember why I did that, as I always liked that Llama, and shot it a lot. I haven't seen one of them in a long time. Wish I still owned it.

Last edited by DWalt; 01-22-2022 at 06:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 01-22-2022, 06:58 PM
Borderboss Borderboss is offline
Member
38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm 38 Super better then 9 mm  
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1,258
Liked 2,533 Times in 859 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by .38SuperMan View Post
I went up in spring weight 2 pounds and added a shock buffer.
Just to double check, does that mean you used a 16 pound spring? The standard Colt spring weight in the Super is 14 pounds. I just wanted to make sure as I currently have a 14 pound spring in my Para since I'm just shooting factory rounds right now.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RCBS 38 Super carbide die set; R-P 38 super brass elfego baca Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 0 07-03-2019 02:26 PM
4506 .40 super .45 super info needed 3rdgenman Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 11 03-22-2015 06:50 PM
WTB - 5906 Super 9 or Super 9 upper joker WANTED to Buy 10 02-23-2014 12:18 PM
Ammo Test: Super Vel -vs- Super Vel stiab Ammo 6 09-06-2013 05:18 PM
Vintage Lab Test of 38 Ammunition- Super Police and Super Vel BreakerDan Ammo 3 11-05-2009 12:22 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)