Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Ammo

Notices

Ammo All Ammo Discussions Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-24-2009, 11:33 PM
Wolfy Wolfy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I was looking at ammo online and came across Wolf Gold 357 158gr SJHP @1607 FPS and 905 ME. Is this even possible? I tried to find out from Wolfs website what there test barrel was but there is nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-24-2009, 11:33 PM
Wolfy Wolfy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I was looking at ammo online and came across Wolf Gold 357 158gr SJHP @1607 FPS and 905 ME. Is this even possible? I tried to find out from Wolfs website what there test barrel was but there is nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-25-2009, 09:18 AM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

I'd be extremely surprised to find out the barrel was under 6".
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-25-2009, 10:53 AM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,161
Likes: 3,620
Liked 5,210 Times in 2,174 Posts
Default

Based on my handloading, I'd bet a quarter the barrel was at least 6", more likely 8", perhaps a test barrel rather than an actual revolver.

In a real 4" revolver, the speed would be much less.
__________________
Science plus Art
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-25-2009, 09:22 PM
Hoptob's Avatar
Hoptob Hoptob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 231
Likes: 6
Liked 90 Times in 17 Posts
Default

I had a box or two of this ammo. Don't know about 1607 fps, but in my 4" GP100 it clocked 1218 fps with SD 49 and ES 128. ES was a bit overboard and primers looked like VW Bug after collision with a freight train. I did not buy any more of it.

Mike
__________________
9x19, 9x29R, 9x33R, 10x22
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-26-2009, 12:00 AM
Vanilla Gorilla's Avatar
Vanilla Gorilla Vanilla Gorilla is offline
Member
Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Panhandle of FL
Posts: 575
Likes: 23
Liked 273 Times in 87 Posts
Default

That 1607 might have come from a 16+ inch Contender barrel or something, but not any pistol I've seen.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-26-2009, 07:07 AM
Andy Taylor Andy Taylor is offline
Member
Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 631
Liked 109 Times in 52 Posts
Default

If a manufacturer doesn't tell you what the test barrel is, the info is useless.
__________________
Formerly know as Lucky Derby
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-26-2009, 08:33 AM
Dan Cash Dan Cash is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western North Dakota
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Your 1200 fps results are comparible to Federal and WW ammo from back in the 70s. I would not care to use that ammo in a valued classic Smith but my wife's M19-2 snub has surely shot a bunch of it with no ill effects.
Dan
Quote:
Originally posted by Hoptob:
I had a box or two of this ammo. Don't know about 1607 fps, but in my 4" GP100 it clocked 1218 fps with SD 49 and ES 128. ES was a bit overboard and primers looked like VW Bug after collision with a freight train. I did not buy any more of it.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-26-2009, 02:28 PM
Hoptob's Avatar
Hoptob Hoptob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 231
Likes: 6
Liked 90 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Dan,

1200 fps from a 4-incher is also below todays Remington, Speer and Federal factory loads not to mention handloads. I just don't really care for ammo with ES over 100.

Mike
__________________
9x19, 9x29R, 9x33R, 10x22
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-26-2009, 08:08 PM
Wolfy Wolfy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I agree with you guys without a test barrel length the data is useless.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-27-2009, 05:13 AM
Dan Cash Dan Cash is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western North Dakota
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hoptob:
Dan,

1200 fps from a 4-incher is also below todays Remington, Speer and Federal factory loads not to mention handloads. I just don't really care for ammo with ES over 100.

Mike
Mike,
Those ES don't get it for paper target work but considering the availability of ammo and the necessity for self defense, I can live with it as long as it feeds and functions every time. I doubt the aggressor will notice.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-27-2009, 06:24 AM
photoman's Avatar
photoman photoman is offline
Member
Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357  
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 524
Liked 1,909 Times in 788 Posts
Default

A 158gr at 1600fps? Maybe out of a rifle.
__________________
Centennial Every Day
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-27-2009, 12:38 PM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Photoman44:
A 158gr at 1600fps? Maybe out of a rifle.
I have a hunch that a 1600 fps. 158 gr. .357 is possible from a 6" revolver, but it would take some doing. I'm thinking a fast gun, a hardcast lead gas checked bullet, and the right super hot load will get you there. I think it might even be possible with a jacketed bullet. I can get 1650+ fps. from my 5" 629 with hot loaded 165 gr. Sierra JHPs. I don't think it's a particularly fast gun either. Of course .44 magnum is a different caliber, so I might be wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-27-2009, 03:44 PM
Hoptob's Avatar
Hoptob Hoptob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 231
Likes: 6
Liked 90 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Flop, I agree with you, it should be possible. I've never gotten past 1400 fps with a 4-incher. But Buffalo Bore (who else ) has a 158 gr. JHP load on their web site - 19C. They clocked it at 1485 fps from a 4-incher and whooping 2153 fps from 18.5" Marlin. I am thinking this load should be close to 1600 in a 6-incher. Rumor mill has it that BB uses Lil'gun in this load.

Dan, agree 100%.

Mike
__________________
9x19, 9x29R, 9x33R, 10x22
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-27-2009, 05:16 PM
GatorFarmer GatorFarmer is offline
Junior Member
Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357 Wolf Gold 357  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sheridan, Wyoming
Posts: 5,333
Likes: 159
Liked 3,889 Times in 1,361 Posts
Default

Wolf doesn't have a "Contact us" feature on their homepage. Try contacting the good folks at Prvi in Serbia for details, I believe that they are in fact the ones loading all the Wolf "Gold" ammo. Their rifle and handgun ammo sold under their own name is pretty good stuff, albeit with a reputation for running hot.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
44 magnum, 629, m19, model 19, remington, snubnose


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wolf Gold 223 55g 00Buck2 Ammo 19 04-18-2017 11:28 PM
wolf gold 223 wmpowell Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 13 11-09-2015 10:39 AM
Wolf Gold 223 Mydogmax Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 65 04-27-2015 10:40 PM
Wolf Gold .223 Travis15R Ammo 13 12-21-2013 10:33 AM
Wolf Gold in 357? Invictus357 Ammo 3 08-21-2012 04:47 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:06 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)