Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Ammo

Notices

Ammo All Ammo Discussions Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-23-2009, 11:45 AM
aterry33's Avatar
aterry33 aterry33 is offline
Member
158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum?  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 24 Posts
Default 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum?

In a K-Frame with a 4" barrel...

What have you had better experiences with? I'm looking for a soft-point round that I can carry in the woods for use against hogs, cats, etc. (hopefully never a bear). Bigger bears are not a concern here in NC.

I'd be tempted to carry 180 grain rounds, but I would also want to practice with them. I have always used 158 grain loads for practice. I haven't noticed a tremendous recoil difference myself in the 158 vs. 180. I suppose the 180 would be a lot more likely to overpenetrate.

Thoughts? Thanks.

Talking about soft-points here.
__________________
Aaron Terry

Last edited by aterry33; 07-23-2009 at 11:46 AM. Reason: Clarification
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-23-2009, 11:58 AM
pps pps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Near Fresno, Peoples Repu
Posts: 309
Likes: 7
Liked 34 Times in 19 Posts
Default

I use a 185gr LBT hardcast (from Beartooth Bullets) over 15.8gr of H110 and Winchester small pistol primer. It goes 1200fps but I do have to drop my rear site as it hits a few inches higher than the 158 gr rounds I have my sights set to.

I have taken boar with it (200# sow at 50 yards)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-23-2009, 12:22 PM
Erich's Avatar
Erich Erich is offline
Member
158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum?  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: High Desert of NM, USA
Posts: 6,251
Likes: 9,403
Liked 8,889 Times in 2,567 Posts
Default

I've only used hardcasts in the 180+-grain category. They're not unpleasant to shoot from a K-frame, in my opinion. I run my 180s at 1230 fps from my 3" 65 (max charge of Blue Dot from Alliant's site, standard primer). This is what I carry up Bear Canyon behind the house. I wouldn't use them in town or at home (you're not alone in those overpenetration concerns).

Frankly, I think a good hardcast 158-grainer is likely to do you just as well if you're not thinking black bears. Whatever floats your boat. I enjoy shooting the 180s, though, and handloading makes them price about the same as the handloaded middleweights. You know, you might look at the wide, flat-nosed 190-grainer that Jessie makes over at Tennessee Valley Bullets. I've shot some of them (sorry, I can't post the pix from here at work) and probably should get some more to play with.

pps' point about being aware of the heavier bullets' higher POI is important.
__________________
Now go make God proud...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-23-2009, 01:34 PM
aterry33's Avatar
aterry33 aterry33 is offline
Member
158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum?  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 24 Posts
Default

Erich, I like your signature quote

I have always felt comfortable with 158GR against black bears, just not against brown bears, buffalo, etc. You disagree?
__________________
Aaron Terry
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-30-2009, 10:30 AM
Krull Krull is offline
Banned
158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum?  
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: WV,AKA the outback of USA
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aterry33 View Post
Erich, I like your signature quote

I have always felt comfortable with 158GR against black bears, just not against brown bears, buffalo, etc. You disagree?
I stuff 158gr SP in my 66 for anything that walks in the WV woods,bears will run but a female with young or a young male will be the most you have to worry about.

I have never seen a young male go over 200lbs so I'd not get nervous about it,the female could be a handfull but I'd bet six 158gr's will work ok.

But that's why you carry reloads,no?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-01-2009, 03:41 AM
ArchAngelCD's Avatar
ArchAngelCD ArchAngelCD is offline
Moderator
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum? 158 vs. 180 GR in 357 magnum?  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
Default

IMO a 158gr bullet will do just fine for your purpose. I would suggest a hard cast bullet with a wide flat nose though.

Since it seems you decided a 158gr bullet will do, if you're reloading I would suggest the 160gr Hard Cast bullet from Cast Performance. They are part of the same company as the Grizzly Cartridge Company. If you don't reloading I highly recommend their ammo. The bullets from Tennessee Valley Bullets recommended above are also a good choice.
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437

Last edited by ArchAngelCD; 08-01-2009 at 03:44 AM. Reason: To fix link
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
357 magnum, k-frame, primer, sig arms, winchester


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Light 357 Magnum handload in 38 Speciall brass for 357 Magnum revolver? Naphtali Reloading 18 03-09-2016 07:58 AM
[SOLD] Lew Horton S&W Model 27 Performance Center .357 Magnum !!! (Registered Magnum) twogunjay GUNS - For Sale or Trade 6 08-01-2010 09:06 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)