Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > Concealed Carry & Self Defense

Notices

Concealed Carry & Self Defense All aspects of Concealed and Open Carry, Home and Self Defense.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-13-2014, 07:53 AM
bounty hunter bounty hunter is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 42
Likes: 9
Liked 44 Times in 9 Posts
Default Going back to a revolver for ccw

Good morning all, well I have to make a decision to return to my roots and start carrying a revolver for CCW. I have several including a M60, SP101 and 642. I have made this decision due to my increasing age, simplicity of carry and use, and number of additional items that go along with carrying the gun. An example is when I was carrying my Glock 19, I had the gun, at least one reload magazine (normally two), my knife, and associated keys and wallet. Well, the gun, holster magazines and their holsters start to weigh you down and become increasing harder to dress around rather than the J frame revolver and holster and a few speed strips. I guess I just want to re-simplify my carry options. No more bells and whistles, just straight up protection for myself and family. In addition, my wife and son are more comfortable shooting and handing a revolver than a semi-auto (the crowning factor). Because if it hits the fan, they could handle my gun with confidence in or out of the home (they both carry J's as well). Thank you for letting me vent, LOL. Have a great weekend.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-13-2014, 08:08 AM
4011's Avatar
4011 4011 is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 967
Liked 2,108 Times in 855 Posts
Default

Back to your roots. Good ole J frame.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-13-2014, 08:50 AM
MichiganScott MichiganScott is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: God's Country
Posts: 4,711
Likes: 1,235
Liked 3,535 Times in 1,770 Posts
Default

I've carried a 642 in a pocket holster with a speed strip reload for years and never felt underarmed.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 07-13-2014, 09:08 AM
P33v3 P33v3 is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 263
Likes: 2
Liked 255 Times in 95 Posts
Default

I've been carrying my model 69 lately. Surprisingly easy to conceal.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-13-2014, 09:21 AM
Joe Kent Joe Kent is offline
SWCA Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 8,196
Liked 1,639 Times in 580 Posts
Default

I started ,45 years ago, with carrying a J-Frame and have not ever felt unarmed with one.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 07-13-2014, 09:28 AM
g8rb8 g8rb8 is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2,566
Likes: 5,443
Liked 2,921 Times in 1,222 Posts
Default

I have no problems with the KIS(S) theory.
KEEP IT SIMPLE (STUPID).

John
Scoundrel and Ne'er-Do-Well in Training
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 07-13-2014, 09:31 AM
TexasArmed's Avatar
TexasArmed TexasArmed is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NE Texas
Posts: 657
Likes: 172
Liked 528 Times in 228 Posts
Default

I own four revolvers. I initially qualified with a rented semi automatic.
I have never owned one or shot one since. I do however carry two revolvers
most of the time with 4 speed loaders, one a 44 special the other a Smith &
Wesson J frame 642-1. It is not so much I feel the need for the 2nd revolver,
but if I did have to reload drawing the second one would be faster than my speed
loaders. I like having the S&W 642-1 for pocket carry in a pocket holster, which
I can access faster than the 44 special.

I can always reach for the pocket holstered Smith & Wesson without
exposing are drawing the weapon, which is an advantage in some
circumstances. With the continuing releases of criminal illegals and
the great influx of criminal gangs into the US I do not believe having a second
revolver is being over gunned. However, if I lived in an area populated by well
known street gangs I would probably carry one semi automatic and one backup
revolver. Not being a police officer I think carrying two revolvers is adequate for
any situation I might encounter.

Last edited by TexasArmed; 07-13-2014 at 09:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 07-13-2014, 09:45 AM
cmort666's Avatar
cmort666 cmort666 is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rocky River, OH, USA
Posts: 9,451
Likes: 1,271
Liked 9,184 Times in 3,621 Posts
Default

Most of the time I carry a 2" 36 in a pocket holster I made myself. It's the most convenient carry configuration I have.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-13-2014, 09:45 AM
wingnuut wingnuut is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: feedinghills mass.
Posts: 252
Likes: 31
Liked 49 Times in 35 Posts
Default

You had a Glock 19 and extra mag, you were carrying at least 30 rnds. now 6 rnds well that's keeping it simple.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 07-13-2014, 10:18 AM
shawn mccarver shawn mccarver is offline
SWCA Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 3,522
Liked 6,744 Times in 2,626 Posts
Default

There is nothing wrong with a revolver. If I had to choose, however, I would ditch the extra mags (yeah, I know. . . ), as the G19 still has as many in the magazine as THREE J frames. The G26 carries as many as TWO J frames. The M&P Compact carries as many as TWO K frames. I know you will STATISTICALLY not need that many, but each case is different. And, I can hit far better with less felt recoil with the G19/26 or M&P Compact than I can with a J frame. And the G19 takes up the same "real estate." See picture showing G19 and 642.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Glock 19 under S&W 642.jpg (62.2 KB, 193 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #11  
Old 07-13-2014, 10:26 AM
Simson-Suhl Simson-Suhl is offline
US Veteran
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 260
Likes: 575
Liked 386 Times in 137 Posts
Default

For years while wearing a suit I carried an H&K P7, (PSP Model), in a Mitch Rosen holster with an extra magazine. Now that I am old and retired I carry a Centennial Model 40 or my PC Centennial 640 in a Kramer inside the front pants pocket. The house gun for my wife is also a Model 40. I have told her it is either loaded or it is not. It has a long trigger pull so you are not going to trip over the dog in the dark and shoot yourself in the foot. If for some reason it fails to fire, when you pull the trigger again, an entire new cartridge comes up. And with the long trigger pull, you really intend to fire the weapon.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-13-2014, 10:31 AM
hangnoose hangnoose is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: W coast central Fl
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 1,426
Liked 1,408 Times in 775 Posts
Default GOTTA GO WITH WHAT WORKS FOR YOU.

At a young 57 y/o, just getting out of a week in the hospital. Getting older isn't for sissies. I found out a couple years back, trying to outrun a wasp nest attack, after 1 1/2 steps, I was flat on the ground getting gang stang. I'm NOT gonna outrun anyone or anything and being able to reach cover will be doubtful. I've resigned to make the first few shots count however slow they may be, as that may be all I'll be able to get off. I believe a reload in a real event, semi auto or revolver, would probably be wishful thinking. In a multiple armed attacker encounter, If I could take out the big dog (or any), it may deflate their willingness, and change their decision. In reality I'd be toast if they were determined & had ANY skill, regardless of what I was armed with. I'm pretty much the youngest in my group of bowling pin & steel challenge shooters. Occasional new young Turks are a welcomed sight. I'm slow to get the gun into my hands but once there can compete with the top 10, ALL of whom have at least 10 years on me, some a lot more. With dedicated regular serious practice. I've gone from being unable to shoot at all (in 2 years) & never having shot any type of sport/competition to shooting lefty, then righty using my middle finger, to righty/index finger, to NOT having wrist/hand splints on. Eventually I'd like to be able to draw from a holster, A REAL working holster, NOT some skellatised competition rig. My Father showed me first hand that is IS POSSIBLE to accomplish & reach a high skill level at something you may have never tried before with enough hard work & practice, at an age much higher than mine.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #13  
Old 07-13-2014, 10:54 AM
Shorty 45 MK2 Shorty 45 MK2 is offline
Banned
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Central NC.
Posts: 3,207
Likes: 37,672
Liked 4,393 Times in 1,851 Posts
Default

One really nice thing about J-frames is that most of the time you can carry two of them as easy or easier than a bigger handgun.

It's best to go with what you shoot best and have the most confidence in.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 07-13-2014, 10:56 AM
shouldazagged shouldazagged is offline
Absent Comrade
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,387 Times in 11,802 Posts
Default

I made the same decision sixteen years ago. Now, going on 77 and not getting out as much as I used to, I feel even more comfortable with it.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 07-13-2014, 11:28 AM
robertrwalsh robertrwalsh is offline
SWCA Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Peoples Republic of Calif
Posts: 4,672
Likes: 1,236
Liked 6,044 Times in 2,154 Posts
Default

I used to carry a Colt DS .38 for many years. I felt confident with it and like the operational simplicity. I had to use it once. It did the job.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-13-2014, 11:54 AM
KnotRight KnotRight is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Coastal GA
Posts: 106
Likes: 18
Liked 53 Times in 29 Posts
Default

I was carrying a 640 until the 642 came out. Gave the 640 to the wife. When out walking the dog at night I will have the 642 in a holster on my hip and in my back pocket a Kel-Tec 380. I know there are a lot of non-fans of the Kel-Tec but this one has always shot and you can sit down with it in your back pocket.

If I am in an area where I feel that I need a little more, I might go to a 40 or 45. If I need more that 6 shoots I am in more trouble than I can handle. I really need to get out of there ASAP (not saying that I would want to stay in a threat situation) or pray for help!
__________________
Ricky
Coastal GA
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-13-2014, 12:39 PM
Waywatcher's Avatar
Waywatcher Waywatcher is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 1,457
Liked 1,489 Times in 570 Posts
Default

If we showed our 5 shot snubbies to our ancestors 300 years ago, they would marvel at the fact that it could reliably, consistently, and accurately fire 5 times without reloading. They would also marvel at the small size and rain-imperviousness.

If we keep our perspective, 5-for-sure, even in the rain, without reloading is actually a pretty darn amazing feat, and adequate in almost all situations.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #18  
Old 07-13-2014, 12:49 PM
LimaCharlie's Avatar
LimaCharlie LimaCharlie is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 511
Likes: 63
Liked 651 Times in 269 Posts
Default

My wife has carried an S&W 640 Centennial .357 magnum since 1992. I grew up in the Southwest in the 1950s and early 1960s with revolvers. I am 68 with arthritis and I carry a 5" 1911 in either .45 ACP or 10 mm with a spare magazine on my belt plus a pocket BUG with a spare magazine. If I go into black bear areas, I switch the 1911 for a 4" S&W 29-2 .44 magnum and two speed loaders.
__________________
U.S. Navy - U.S. Army, ret
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #19  
Old 07-13-2014, 03:51 PM
Protected One's Avatar
Protected One Protected One is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,400
Likes: 3,245
Liked 4,624 Times in 1,697 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bounty hunter View Post
Good morning all, well I have to make a decision to return to my roots and start carrying a revolver for CCW. I have several including a M60, SP101 and 642. I have made this decision due to my increasing age, simplicity of carry and use, and number of additional items that go along with carrying the gun. An example is when I was carrying my Glock 19, I had the gun, at least one reload magazine (normally two), my knife, and associated keys and wallet. Well, the gun, holster magazines and their holsters start to weigh you down and become increasing harder to dress around rather than the J frame revolver and holster and a few speed strips. I guess I just want to re-simplify my carry options. No more bells and whistles, just straight up protection for myself and family. In addition, my wife and son are more comfortable shooting and handing a revolver than a semi-auto (the crowning factor). Because if it hits the fan, they could handle my gun with confidence in or out of the home (they both carry J's as well). Thank you for letting me vent, LOL. Have a great weekend.
So which of the three will you be carrying? My choice would be the SP101.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-13-2014, 06:14 PM
rz625-8 rz625-8 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Omaha,Ne
Posts: 350
Likes: 87
Liked 49 Times in 33 Posts
Default

I bought a Glock G30s and it isn't to bad but,I love my revolvers better.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-13-2014, 06:25 PM
Florida J Frame Florida J Frame is offline
US Veteran
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 305
Liked 815 Times in 350 Posts
Default

It's not the easiest gun to shoot well. Do you get to the range often enough to stay sharp? I love my 642 but I have found I can shoot as well or better with my laser equipped LCP and it carries 2 more rounds.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-13-2014, 06:32 PM
snubbyfan's Avatar
snubbyfan snubbyfan is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: WVa East Panhandle
Posts: 28,615
Likes: 71,025
Liked 81,467 Times in 18,450 Posts
Default

My 442 goes with me everywhere, either in my pocket or on my belt in one of my homemade holsters.
__________________
Keep on Chooglin'
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-13-2014, 06:52 PM
Will Carry's Avatar
Will Carry Will Carry is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 762
Likes: 410
Liked 599 Times in 239 Posts
Default

I find myself carrying my J-frame more and more. It's brutally simple. It is also the fastest and easiest handgun I own to draw and fire. That little square butt is like a knife handle. I feel like I'm less likely to drop the weapon while deploying.
__________________
Have Gun Will Carry
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-13-2014, 07:12 PM
Derry 1946 Derry 1946 is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 107
Likes: 5
Liked 77 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robertrwalsh View Post
I used to carry a Colt DS .38 for many years. I felt confident with it and like the operational simplicity. I had to use it once. It did the job.

This is my daily carry. I'll very rarely carry a 642 if I know I'm going to be sweating a lot (like the beach) or a 1917 (in an extremely rare OC situation).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-13-2014, 10:17 PM
pawncop pawncop is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 18,248
Likes: 7,989
Liked 5,675 Times in 2,190 Posts
Default

I am not going back to a revolver as primary sidearm, but have added a model 36 as a second gun when on duty now. Will carry in a pocket holster. When I transferred to CID, I did not carry a second gun,( always did when on patrol) but have felt the need as things are just getting a little more out of hand with each day passing.
__________________
I am a sheep dog!
1601 (ret)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #26  
Old 07-13-2014, 10:31 PM
Oldbuck30 Oldbuck30 is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 17
Likes: 11
Liked 12 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Guys, I'm 67 had health problems and still carry the same gun. S&W 59. been carryin g a 59 0r a 5906 for 38 years. I shoot 400 rounds a week with it, and practice drawing 50 times every day now that I'm retired. I own smith revolvers and love them but the 59 is the gun. Sorry to you revolver guys but more firepower quicker.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-13-2014, 10:41 PM
haywood's Avatar
haywood haywood is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N. Ohio
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 9,441
Liked 2,731 Times in 999 Posts
Default

I pick Two Snubs for carry every day. The 442 and LCR357 were today's pick. I rotate all of these. The 442 and 37 are the best for pocket. The LCR357 also works in the pocket. The rest are IWB guns.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (87.7 KB, 75 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #28  
Old 07-14-2014, 01:47 AM
wildenout's Avatar
wildenout wildenout is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 956
Likes: 511
Liked 338 Times in 189 Posts
Default

I have been heading down that road myself, mostly because I am an old soul and enjoy revolvers more than anything. But also because I don't like polymer and revolvers don't get sweat trapped below the grip! (with most grips that is).
__________________
Still just a kid at heart
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-14-2014, 02:12 PM
Lobster Picnic Lobster Picnic is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 383
Liked 988 Times in 535 Posts
Default

With the focus on CC, there's a market for a DA revolver even smaller than a J-frame. I'd like to see the return of the I-frame, actually. No reason they couldn't do .22lr, .22 Mag, .32 long, and .32 H&R Mag in an I-frame design updated for modern materials and assembly methods. I'd be all over it.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #30  
Old 07-14-2014, 02:17 PM
petepeterson's Avatar
petepeterson petepeterson is online now
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 6,278
Liked 4,872 Times in 1,883 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lobster Picnic View Post
With the focus on CC, there's a market for a DA revolver even smaller than a J-frame. I'd like to see the return of the I-frame, actually. No reason they couldn't do .22lr, .22 Mag, .32 long, and .32 H&R Mag in an I-frame design updated for modern materials and assembly methods. I'd be all over it.
If they can make a ultra-lightweight j-frame that can hande .357, then why not an I-frame that can take .327 mags? And .32 ACP with moon clips? Or the new "S&W .319 magnum"? I'd love a modern I-frame.
__________________
Because of the metric system?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #31  
Old 07-14-2014, 02:19 PM
SIAD MP's Avatar
SIAD MP SIAD MP is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Knoxville Iowa
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Liked 50 Times in 15 Posts
Default

Picture worth a thousand words. Back up is a 642 in an ankle holster.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3204.jpg (126.6 KB, 98 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #32  
Old 07-14-2014, 03:22 PM
kennyb's Avatar
kennyb kennyb is offline
SWCA Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,898
Likes: 736
Liked 1,211 Times in 740 Posts
Default

its summer time and humid here in the south....the M36 is carried in my pocket until it gets cold
__________________
SWCA#2208
KK4EMO
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-14-2014, 04:03 PM
Old cop Old cop is offline
US Veteran
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,812
Likes: 4,242
Liked 15,215 Times in 4,164 Posts
Default

I'm in my late 60's and have been carrying a revolver for more years than I care to recall. It saved me more than once on the job and I see no reason to change now.

At a recent LEOSA qualification I was shooting my Smith M38 while everyone else was using the Glock 23. The tactical utility of the semi auto was painfully obvious but I'm not a cop anymore, and my score w/the J frame was a good or better then some others w/their Glocks. If I was still on the job the Glock would make sense but in retirement the little .38 is all I need.
__________________
Old Cop
LEO (Ret.)

Last edited by Old cop; 07-14-2014 at 04:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
  #34  
Old 07-15-2014, 12:53 AM
AZretired's Avatar
AZretired AZretired is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Mexico & Arizona
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 735
Liked 1,460 Times in 644 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shawn mccarver View Post
There is nothing wrong with a revolver. If I had to choose, however, I would ditch the extra mags (yeah, I know. . . ), as the G19 still has as many in the magazine as THREE J frames. The G26 carries as many as TWO J frames. The M&P Compact carries as many as TWO K frames. I know you will STATISTICALLY not need that many, but each case is different. And, I can hit far better with less felt recoil with the G19/26 or M&P Compact than I can with a J frame. And the G19 takes up the same "real estate." See picture showing G19 and 642.
Go ahead, pocket carry that M19 Glock for a week. Let me know how much better and easier it is to carry than a 642.
__________________
Support your Police, & NRA
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #35  
Old 07-15-2014, 01:41 AM
Chris642 Chris642 is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Southeast, WI
Posts: 76
Likes: 13
Liked 48 Times in 24 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lobster Picnic View Post
With the focus on CC, there's a market for a DA revolver even smaller than a J-frame. I'd like to see the return of the I-frame, actually. No reason they couldn't do .22lr, .22 Mag, .32 long, and .32 H&R Mag in an I-frame design updated for modern materials and assembly methods. I'd be all over it.
All of the above would be good options for disabled people or those who otherwise cannot handle recoil or deal with the battery of arms of a semi-auto.

I'd like to see a .380acp revolver smaller and lighter then the J-Frame, not what Taurus came out with but something lighter and better quality from S&W or Ruger, a true little pocket revolver.

Last edited by Chris642; 07-15-2014 at 01:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-15-2014, 02:16 AM
rwsmith's Avatar
rwsmith rwsmith is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,004
Likes: 41,670
Liked 29,251 Times in 13,831 Posts
Default For those of us....

For those of us that ain't quite as sharp as we used to be, there is a lot to be said for a gun that you just draw and start pulling the trigger.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-15-2014, 04:40 AM
LaVistaBill's Avatar
LaVistaBill LaVistaBill is offline
SWCA Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, Kentucky Area
Posts: 392
Likes: 730
Liked 980 Times in 184 Posts
Default Revolver for CCW?

My present off duty companion...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 0627141453b.jpg (98.1 KB, 101 views)
__________________
S&WCA #2815
Gun Scribe
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #38  
Old 07-15-2014, 04:23 PM
Dave T Dave T is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 882
Liked 1,719 Times in 549 Posts
Default

I carried one form of Colt 1911 for all but the first 9 months of my LEO career and for a number of years after retiring. When I ran my own firearms training business (for 10 years) I experimented with Glocks because so many students showed up with them. The ones I had and saw always worked but I always ended up back with my alloy Commander.

A couple years ago the arthritis in my shooting hand swelled the knuckle of my thumb so much I had to give up 1911s. Just couldn't manage the thumb safety comfortably or positively so I went back to where I started in the academy with revolvers.

J-frames are just too small for my hands. I managed with L-frames for a while and even got a 325 NG that worked for about 8-9 months. I've always been able to shoot revolvers (DA) well deliberately but never as quickly as I could semi autos. For the past few years in which I've been carrying revolvers concealed there was always a nagging feeling that when the brown stuff hit the air circulation device my response would be too slow, or if I pushed it, too in-accurate.

I finally gave in and bought a Glock 30 (not my first one). First time out to the range I shot and hit better than I had with any of my 45 ACP revolvers. So, it is now my carry gun.

I will keep most of my revolvers as some are special to me and have a lot of meaning. But I have admitted to myself that for me the semi auto is the better weapon. The G30 is the size of my 3" L-frames, holds more rounds and I can shoot it better.

YMMV,
Dave
__________________
RSVN '69-'71
PCSD (Ret)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #39  
Old 07-17-2014, 08:25 PM
DaGOOSExyz's Avatar
DaGOOSExyz DaGOOSExyz is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 310
Likes: 141
Liked 172 Times in 94 Posts
Default

Those of you who want something smaller than a J frame might consider the Ruger LCR or the LCRX. It's a 38 special revolver that is quite small.
I have not shot one but have read alot of good things about it. It comes
with a good grip that makes the recoil tolerable for such a small gun.
It's rated for P+ but I think I would stay with the standard P. It is also
said to have a easy triger pull right from the box. I know it's not a
Smith but it could be the best choice for some people.
__________________
Goose
I'm still standing.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-17-2014, 08:40 PM
slowburninsteve's Avatar
slowburninsteve slowburninsteve is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 856
Likes: 39
Liked 64 Times in 23 Posts
Default

This week I carried a full size Sig 1911 with 2 spare mags IWB one day, and on another day I carried a Glock 26 with one spare mag in an ankle holster. I was in misery both times! It's summertime and guns this heavy are made for belt carry OWB in the Fall and Winter. I have decided to pull out either my S&W model 649, model 60, or Taurus model 85 until summer is over, all of which I'd carry either in a pocket holster or Galco ankle holster, plus a HKS speedloader in the other pocket. Not near as much firepower, but much better than throwing rocks!!!!!
__________________
Steve
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #41  
Old 07-17-2014, 10:35 PM
Harkrader's Avatar
Harkrader Harkrader is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: S.E. Wisconsin and MSP
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 713
Liked 1,574 Times in 578 Posts
Default Revolvers for self-defense

I like to rotate between a Colt Detective Special, Colt Police Positive Special, S&W 642 and S&W 520. In cool weather, when I can comfortably wear a bit more clothing, I also carry a 29.
Though I am no longer in any business requiring me to be armed, some habits don't change, so I usually carry two guns. One may be a semi-auto - I like my M&P357 a lot - and also drop a S&W 37 with laser sight into a pocket.
I also have a 386NG and a 386PD I used to carry regularly in the early to mid 00s. Can't really say why, but I don't carry them much any more. One does occasionally go with me when I walk.

In any case, with any one of my favorite semi-autos on my belt, I like a small revolver in a pocket or pouch.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #42  
Old 07-17-2014, 10:46 PM
Cal44 Cal44 is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,572
Likes: 5,476
Liked 6,425 Times in 1,865 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaGOOSExyz View Post
Those of you who want something smaller than a J frame might consider the Ruger LCR or the LCRX. It's a 38 special revolver that is quite small.
I have not shot one but have read alot of good things about it. It comes
with a good grip that makes the recoil tolerable for such a small gun.
It's rated for P+ but I think I would stay with the standard P. It is also
said to have a easy triger pull right from the box. I know it's not a
Smith but it could be the best choice for some people.
I have an LCR and like it. I also have several j frames.

The LCR is slightly larger than a j frame, though.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 07-17-2014, 11:16 PM
Rick_A's Avatar
Rick_A Rick_A is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Northern GA
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 2,025
Liked 4,843 Times in 1,479 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shawn mccarver View Post
There is nothing wrong with a revolver. If I had to choose, however, I would ditch the extra mags (yeah, I know. . . ), as the G19 still has as many in the magazine as THREE J frames. The G26 carries as many as TWO J frames. The M&P Compact carries as many as TWO K frames. I know you will STATISTICALLY not need that many, but each case is different. And, I can hit far better with less felt recoil with the G19/26 or M&P Compact than I can with a J frame. And the G19 takes up the same "real estate." See picture showing G19 and 642.
Nothing wrong with that, but the J frame is only fat in the middle, where the Glock is fat and blocky all over.

Try ankle or pocket carrying that 19.

I shoot my little J very well, but it's not often I carry it alone.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 07-18-2014, 12:24 AM
Yiogo's Avatar
Yiogo Yiogo is offline
US Veteran
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 230
Likes: 47
Liked 101 Times in 59 Posts
Default

I tote my 637 in a pocket holster when I carry.
Jawge
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 07-18-2014, 12:27 AM
feralmerril feralmerril is offline
Absent Comrade
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: utah
Posts: 13,059
Likes: 2,547
Liked 7,201 Times in 3,064 Posts
Default

I bought a sig-sauer P 238 in 380 on a fathers day special where about $200s was knocked off. Being cheap plus the gun is a flyweight I bought it. I shot it the other day and couldnt hit a barn if I was in it! The gun has the hardest trigger I ever encountered. The gun being light with something like a 20 pound trigger its impossible to shoot it without shaking. Went back to my old smith model 40.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 07-18-2014, 12:51 AM
D A Wood's Avatar
D A Wood D A Wood is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Northwestern Wisconsin
Posts: 22
Likes: 4
Liked 50 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Going back? I really haven't strayed away from my favorite CYA revolver for conceal carry.



It's either my Model 19, or



my Model 66 in a Kirkpatrick holster. If I miss with the first shot, they usually need a fire extinguisher to put their shorts out.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #47  
Old 07-18-2014, 01:20 AM
Shooter6br's Avatar
Shooter6br Shooter6br is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: S.E Pa. north of Phila
Posts: 275
Likes: 4
Liked 144 Times in 69 Posts
Default J frame over 380 semi auto for carry

I elected a 638 over a .380 auto
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 163070_01_lg.jpg (51.3 KB, 8 views)
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 07-18-2014, 09:46 AM
diyj98 diyj98 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 409
Liked 2,851 Times in 1,266 Posts
Default

I have 1911's high cap wonder pistols, etc. but the revolver is hard to beat for simplicity. It's what's in my nightstand and normally what I'll carry when I do carry.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 07-18-2014, 10:02 AM
M3Stuart's Avatar
M3Stuart M3Stuart is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northeast Texas
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 921
Liked 1,326 Times in 723 Posts
Default

+1 on the 642. I have the pro series cut for moonclips. Speedy reloads.

Though I am considering going to a Shield.

I just have to note that: not one person on this most polite forum has started the typical 'caliber war' debate regarding CCWs. In that regard, I give you my favorite carry (well, backup) gun in .22LR; "The Mighty Bobcat"!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2085.jpg (130.8 KB, 13 views)
__________________
But then, what do I know?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #50  
Old 07-18-2014, 10:08 AM
mickeyblueyes mickeyblueyes is offline
Member
Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw Going back to a revolver for ccw  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NY/Texas
Posts: 357
Likes: 120
Liked 120 Times in 74 Posts
Default

I too went back to my J frame roots. Lucky enough to stumble across a 340pd some one did not pick up after ordering at a LGS.
You know the old saying....this is going to hurt me more than you.....well I put 357s in it. And boy that old saying is true. Can't say which end of the gun hurt worse. It took about a week to get the feeling back in my thumb. Lol
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Going back to the Revolver platform Mulebuk Sam New Members Introduction 25 06-16-2016 09:27 PM
Going back to the revolver...686 for off duty carry scott1970 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 31 02-09-2016 11:25 AM
Revolver as a back-up gun, need help raidersrule S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 40 09-24-2015 06:05 PM
Revolver #3 now going back to SW for warranty Pef S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 51 12-30-2014 02:10 PM
DA Only Revolver back to DA/SA ia1727 S&W-Smithing 2 01-22-2010 02:01 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)