|
|
|
09-25-2016, 10:05 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 3,299
Liked 17,158 Times in 2,907 Posts
|
|
Woman Shoots Three Armed Home Invaders
When the new NRA ad came out showing a woman with a gun calling police because she's having a home invasion, the media instantly called it a lot of bee ess because this stuff doesn't happen. Then this the other day an Atlanta woman shoots at THREE armed home invaders killing one. all filmed so good I thought it was fake. This hasn't appeared on the Yahoo so called news page yet. Wonder why. Watch how these tough guys run away in fear.
Woman with gun blasts home invaders in Georgia
Last edited by Wyatt Burp; 09-25-2016 at 01:54 PM.
|
The Following 18 Users Like Post:
|
75Vette, Arby, DeathGrip, Dutchguy, fdw, federali, Fishslayer, Frank46, Hawker800, islamoradamark, M E Morrison, old tanker, Ozark Marine, rock doc, SC_Mike, shouldazagged, the ringo kid, zzclancy |
09-25-2016, 11:25 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Treasure Coast
Posts: 13,190
Likes: 24,816
Liked 17,189 Times in 6,133 Posts
|
|
__________________
Dum vivo cano
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-25-2016, 03:07 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego, PRK
Posts: 9,238
Likes: 11,531
Liked 11,249 Times in 3,916 Posts
|
|
If it is genuine I'm putting my money on "more to the story." The intruders look like they know what they're after and the lady seems completely ready for action, more so than I would be right out of bed. That's not her residence so she is there for a reason.
Good for her if it's for real, though. Good thing she's not in Kalifornistan where we don't "need" standard cap magazines...
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-25-2016, 03:21 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20,895
Likes: 85,108
Liked 22,838 Times in 10,553 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wyatt Burp
When the new NRA ad came out showing a woman with a gun calling police because she's having a home invasion, the media instantly called it a lot of bee ess because this stuff doesn't happen. Then this the other day an Atlanta woman shoots at THREE armed home invaders killing one. all filmed so good I thought it was fake. This hasn't appeared on the Yahoo so called news page yet. Wonder why. Watch how these tough guys run away in fear.
Woman with gun blasts home invaders in Georgia
|
I love fairytale happy endings. These thieves were well practiced but not practiced enough. One down-two to go. Also, tons of fingerprints left behind.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-25-2016, 04:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 852
Likes: 479
Liked 469 Times in 320 Posts
|
|
Way to go ma'am!!!
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-25-2016, 04:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,854
Likes: 3,767
Liked 11,624 Times in 3,642 Posts
|
|
It was real enough. The woman ran a seafood business from that home. She likely was targeted for being a person that took cash home. The local news stated the lady was unaware that she had killed one of the robbers until someone found his body in the yard.
Tough break, I am sure the young man was in the midst of turning his life around.
|
The Following 23 Users Like Post:
|
75Vette, American1776, desi2358, fat tom, Fishslayer, Frank46, Hawker800, iouri, M E Morrison, Mydogmax, old tanker, Ozark Marine, PatAz, redlevel, rock doc, S&WIowegan, shouldazagged, silentflyer, tedog, Texas Star, the ringo kid, TTSH, zzclancy |
09-25-2016, 06:57 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rocky River, OH, USA
Posts: 9,451
Likes: 1,271
Liked 9,184 Times in 3,621 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColbyBruce
Tough break, I am sure the young man was in the midst of turning his life around.
|
She turned it around for him...
|
The Following 13 Users Like Post:
|
American1776, BUFF, ColbyBruce, fat tom, Fox4506, Frank46, ImprovedModel56Fan, M E Morrison, Ozark Marine, PatAz, silentflyer, the ringo kid, zzclancy |
09-25-2016, 07:08 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,475
Likes: 8,386
Liked 17,058 Times in 5,593 Posts
|
|
I hate to be the wet blanket, but here it goes. While I agree 100% the perps got what they deserved, I predict that in the least she will be sued by the deceased persons family members, and at the worse, have charges pressed for shooting at them when they were fleeing. Again, I hope it doesn't come to pass, just seen it happen too often.
__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!
|
09-25-2016, 08:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rocky River, OH, USA
Posts: 9,451
Likes: 1,271
Liked 9,184 Times in 3,621 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom S.
I hate to be the wet blanket, but here it goes. While I agree 100% the perps got what they deserved, I predict that in the least she will be sued by the deceased persons family members, and at the worse, have charges pressed for shooting at them when they were fleeing. Again, I hope it doesn't come to pass, just seen it happen too often.
|
I don't know about there, but here, the family of the dead thug could sue all they wanted. Even if they won, they couldn't collect a penny.
I imagine it's tough to find a lawyer who'll work on contingency, KNOWING that he's going to get 1/3 of NOTHING.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-25-2016, 08:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UTAH
Posts: 430
Likes: 158
Liked 516 Times in 152 Posts
|
|
I am just sad to see her miss the other two home invaders!!
Last edited by revolver59; 09-25-2016 at 08:22 PM.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-25-2016, 08:28 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Treasure Coast
Posts: 13,190
Likes: 24,816
Liked 17,189 Times in 6,133 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishslayer
If it is genuine I'm putting my money on "more to the story." The intruders look like they know what they're after and the lady seems completely ready for action, more so than I would be right out of bed. That's not her residence so she is there for a reason.
Good for her if it's for real, though. Good thing she's not in Kalifornistan where we don't "need" standard cap magazines...
|
I think the any more to the story is she has shot enough to be a problem for those three idiots.
As far a right out of bed, Who knows? Lots of restaurant people keep weird hours.
I have no clue if she was there for a reason other than a place to live but being she is a manager I'll bet the restaurant owner gives her a break for living in the house/warehouse.
Anyway you look at it she is no one to mess with and those idiots were thinking it was a soft target. Surprise!
__________________
Dum vivo cano
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-25-2016, 09:26 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
When I first saw it, I also thought it was too good to be true. The bad guys almost seemed to be hamming it up for the camera when they entered the place holding their guns.
But it checks out on all media so far I've been able to find it on, and the video (you can find the complete released footage on youtube) was released by Gwinnett County police. It's pretty impressive. And it provides a good glimpse how chaotic real-life self-defense can play out.
That lady just stormed out and kept fighting. That's what you have to do. And then she calmly got on the phone. I just hope for her that the dead perp didn't die from catching that last bullet she fired out the door after them. In some states that could get her in big trouble.
|
09-25-2016, 10:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 3,299
Liked 17,158 Times in 2,907 Posts
|
|
It said that the thug in the wig was the one she killed. Look at the lower video at around 3:10 onward on the counter. The video that's 5:33 long. That guy and another enter the door to the left and the shooting starts. He looks hit right there crouched down and then they run outside to the right. It doesn't look like one of her shots out the door, the ones we are concerned about, was one that killed the guy. Unless she hit him again then. Though there's no visable blood on the floor, I think he was hit in the room and died outside moments later.
Last edited by Wyatt Burp; 09-25-2016 at 10:36 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-26-2016, 12:32 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 30,907
Likes: 41,495
Liked 29,149 Times in 13,779 Posts
|
|
Well, I guess.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom S.
I hate to be the wet blanket, but here it goes. While I agree 100% the perps got what they deserved, I predict that in the least she will be sued by the deceased persons family members, and at the worse, have charges pressed for shooting at them when they were fleeing. Again, I hope it doesn't come to pass, just seen it happen too often.
|
Well, I guess if they shot and killed her she wouldn't get sued in court.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-26-2016, 10:05 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 4,710
Likes: 3,527
Liked 12,555 Times in 3,342 Posts
|
|
The video showed up in my face book news feed a day or two ago, which wasn't real surprising, nor were some of the comments criticizing her approach which resulted in one of the shooters ending up behind her.
The detractors more or less missed the point that even a poor plan violently and rapidly executed is better than a perfect plan executed too late to achieve surprise or gain/maintain the initiative.
IMHO, she did just fine, seizing the initiative, taking them by surprise and putting them to flight despite the 3 to 1 odds. They obviously were not anticipating an armed response.
|
The Following 14 Users Like Post:
|
desi2358, Fishslayer, Frank46, ImprovedModel56Fan, MaricopaKid, mrchuck, muzzleblast, old tanker, Ozark Marine, redlevel, sigp220.45, the ringo kid, Wyatt Burp, zzclancy |
09-26-2016, 10:17 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: RI
Posts: 5,666
Likes: 2,469
Liked 10,307 Times in 3,607 Posts
|
|
He wont do that again.
__________________
Don
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-26-2016, 10:26 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Vermont
Posts: 463
Likes: 758
Liked 690 Times in 256 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BB57
The video showed up in my face book news feed a day or two ago, which wasn't real surprising, nor were some of the comments criticizing her approach which resulted in one of the shooters ending up behind her.
The detractors more or less missed the point that even a poor plan violently and rapidly executed is better than a perfect plan executed too late to achieve surprise or gain/maintain the initiative.
IMHO, she did just fine, seizing the initiative, taking them by surprise and putting them to flight despite the 3 to 1 odds. They obviously were not anticipating an armed response.
|
The other thing to keep in mind when viewing the video is that it is 4AM and the cameras are providing a night vision view. It was dark and in an unlit room with boxes piled to the ceiling, which is why it looks like a Scooby-Doo routine with all the bad guys running back and forth blindly crossing each other's lines.
Last edited by Boudiepitbull; 09-26-2016 at 10:27 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-26-2016, 11:02 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 3,299
Liked 17,158 Times in 2,907 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boudiepitbull
The other thing to keep in mind when viewing the video is that it is 4AM and the cameras are providing a night vision view. It was dark and in an unlit room with boxes piled to the ceiling, which is why it looks like a Scooby-Doo routine with all the bad guys running back and forth blindly crossing each other's lines.
|
What a great point! DUH!! I saw it looked like night vision but still looked at in terms of a not so dimly lit room. And her phone was super bright, almost as bright as the shots going off.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-26-2016, 11:04 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: OBWAT, TN
Posts: 440
Likes: 758
Liked 725 Times in 258 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmort666
She turned it around for him...
|
...and since he apparently wasn't immediately incapacitated by his wound, perhaps he had a few precious moments to reflect on the wisdom of his life choices.
Fortunately, no one will ever know what may have happened to her had the three thugs found her unarmed.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-26-2016, 01:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rocky River, OH, USA
Posts: 9,451
Likes: 1,271
Liked 9,184 Times in 3,621 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by muzzleblast
...and since he apparently wasn't immediately incapacitated by his wound, perhaps he had a few precious moments to reflect on the wisdom of his life choices.
Fortunately, no one will ever know what may have happened to her had the three thugs found her unarmed.
|
I think we have a pretty good idea:
Cheshire, CT Home Invasion Murders
Strangely, I've had more than one person tell me that if you just submit, you'll be just fine...
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-26-2016, 02:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 5,699
Likes: 8,045
Liked 12,731 Times in 2,419 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom S.
I hate to be the wet blanket, but here it goes. While I agree 100% the perps got what they deserved, I predict that in the least she will be sued by the deceased persons family members, and at the worse, have charges pressed for shooting at them when they were fleeing. Again, I hope it doesn't come to pass, just seen it happen too often.
|
This ain't Michigan.
From the Georgia Code . . . .
Title 51. Torts
Chapter 11. Defenses to Tort Actions
Article 1. General Provisions.
§ 51-11-9. Immunity from civil liability for threat or use of force in defense of habitation
A person who is justified in threatening or using force against another under the provisions of Code Section 16-3-21, relating to the use of force in defense of self or others, Code Section 16-3-23, relating to the use of force in defense of a habitation, or Code Section 16-3-24, relating to the use of force in defense of property other than a habitation, has no duty to retreat from the use of such force and shall not be held liable to the person against whom the use of force was justified or to any person acting as an accomplice or assistant to such person in any civil action brought as a result of the threat or use of such force.
__________________
Georgia On My Mind
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-26-2016, 02:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 290
Likes: 14
Liked 197 Times in 123 Posts
|
|
I'd have to say that was one gutsy woman to take on 3 armed robbers, I wouldn't want to attempt that without my 12 GA loaded with 00 buck and my 9mm as backup
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-26-2016, 03:29 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20,895
Likes: 85,108
Liked 22,838 Times in 10,553 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmort666
|
That reminds me of another that happened during the winter in one of the northern states. I forget the location and name of the case but 4 broke into some home where 4 or 5 younger (early 20s I think?) guys and gals were staying. Ill skip the morbid details, but each of the 4 took turns with all the females after forcing the couples to "put on a show" then stripped the all-took them outside and described how they were going to die. I cant remember if this was in Illinois? but somewhere in the area.
The 4 were found and given various sentences. Not enough justice IMO.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-26-2016, 03:47 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,762
Likes: 1,224
Liked 5,803 Times in 2,355 Posts
|
|
I nominate her for the Sarah McKinley Award.
|
09-26-2016, 08:37 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,854
Likes: 3,767
Liked 11,624 Times in 3,642 Posts
|
|
Most likely the woman woke up to the sounds of the intrusion and rushed in not realizing she had multiple attackers to deal with. She was fortunate.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 07:25 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,475
Likes: 8,386
Liked 17,058 Times in 5,593 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redlevel
This ain't Michigan.
From the Georgia Code . . . .
Title 51. Torts
Chapter 11. Defenses to Tort Actions
Article 1. General Provisions.
§ 51-11-9. Immunity from civil liability for threat or use of force in defense of habitation
A person who is justified in threatening or using force against another under the provisions of Code Section 16-3-21, relating to the use of force in defense of self or others, Code Section 16-3-23, relating to the use of force in defense of a habitation, or Code Section 16-3-24, relating to the use of force in defense of property other than a habitation, has no duty to retreat from the use of such force and shall not be held liable to the person against whom the use of force was justified or to any person acting as an accomplice or assistant to such person in any civil action brought as a result of the threat or use of such force.
|
Everything in that says defense. At the point they are running away, it's no longer defense, it's offense. Doesn't matter what state you live in, unless maybe it's the state of confusion.
Ask your attorney general's office, or local prosecuting attorney if you can get away with shooting a man in the back while he's fleeing from you. And note that I'm not saying that I don't think they deserve getting shot, just what is legal and what's not.
__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!
Last edited by Tom S.; 09-27-2016 at 07:27 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 09:58 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 5,699
Likes: 8,045
Liked 12,731 Times in 2,419 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom S.
Everything in that says defense. At the point they are running away, it's no longer defense, it's offense. Doesn't matter what state you live in, unless maybe it's the state of confusion.
Ask your attorney general's office, or local prosecuting attorney if you can get away with shooting a man in the back while he's fleeing from you. And note that I'm not saying that I don't think they deserve getting shot, just what is legal and what's not.
|
If you read the article carefully, it states that at least one of the thugs returned fire. She was engaged in a fire-fight against multiple assailants. I would bet you $50 dollars against a nickel that no prosecutor in Georgia (even Gwinnett County) would dare bring charges against her. Doesn't matter that they/he were "running away." They were in her home, shooting at her. She returned fire, and kept shooting until the threat was neutralized.
Again, things are a little different here.
__________________
Georgia On My Mind
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 10:13 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,475
Likes: 8,386
Liked 17,058 Times in 5,593 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redlevel
If you read the article carefully, it states that at least one of the thugs returned fire. She was engaged in a fire-fight against multiple assailants. I would bet you $50 dollars against a nickel that no prosecutor in Georgia (even Gwinnett County) would dare bring charges against her. Doesn't matter that they/he were "running away." They were in her home, shooting at her. She returned fire, and kept shooting until the threat was neutralized.
Again, things are a little different here.
|
The article does not say that. Regardless, that still won't stop an ambulance chaser from suing for wrongful death though. As I stated, I support her 100% but I'd only be one member of the jury.
__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!
Last edited by Tom S.; 09-27-2016 at 10:19 AM.
|
09-27-2016, 10:16 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 4,545
Liked 7,558 Times in 1,441 Posts
|
|
I know as I watched the video I thought, "good on her", until I saw the shots out the door. Then I thought, "oh boy I hope those shots don't come back to haunt her."
__________________
Bill Bates
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 10:30 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 3,299
Liked 17,158 Times in 2,907 Posts
|
|
If the cops found shell casings from the guy's guns outside from shooting back towards her right after they ran out, that still sounds like defense to me on her part. They sure can't say they were just defending themselves from her. And if they did shoot, those rounds could have easily went throught the wall or door and killed her.
And a sad, but good in this case reality. She's a woman and a minority which is in her favor here. Those factors in the real world nowadays effect D.A.s and prosecutors who are pressured politically.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 10:33 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 5,699
Likes: 8,045
Liked 12,731 Times in 2,419 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Bates
I know as I watched the video I thought, "good on her", until I saw the shots out the door. Then I thought, "oh boy I hope those shots don't come back to haunt her."
|
She has no duty to retreat. They were returning fire. Under Georgia's Castle Doctrine law (as previously posted) she did everything right.
More information has been made public. The male who was in the house with her was actually an employee, who was sleeping in another part of the house. One of the thugs held a gun to his head, demanding money. She woke up, called 911, then tended to business.
Under the Castle Doctrine law, and given the circumstances, she is immune from civil liability.
They might give her a medal, though.
Victim speaks following violent home invasion | WSB-TV
__________________
Georgia On My Mind
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 10:47 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 5,699
Likes: 8,045
Liked 12,731 Times in 2,419 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom S.
The article does not say that.
|
OK, this report from the Gwinnett County Govt. does say that.
September 16, 2016, 6:00am: Gwinnett County Police are investigating the shooting death of a man who kicked in the front door of an Atlanta home and was shot by the homeowner. Shortly before 4am, police responded to the 3500 block of Spring Drive in Atlanta in unincorporated Gwinnett County. The homeowner told dispatchers that she and another male were awoken to the sounds of someone entering their home. The female retrieved her handgun and went to investigate the sounds. She discovered at least three males coming through the front door. At that point, she began firing rounds from her handgun and struck at least one suspect in the torso killing him. At least one of the other two suspects began exchanging gunfire with the homeowner as the suspects fled the scene.
News Details
__________________
Georgia On My Mind
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 11:05 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 4,710
Likes: 3,527
Liked 12,555 Times in 3,342 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom S.
Everything in that says defense. At the point they are running away, it's no longer defense, it's offense. Doesn't matter what state you live in, unless maybe it's the state of confusion.
Ask your attorney general's office, or local prosecuting attorney if you can get away with shooting a man in the back while he's fleeing from you. And note that I'm not saying that I don't think they deserve getting shot, just what is legal and what's not.
|
So what is your take on an assailant fleeing towards cover or concealment after you engage him or her?
More to the point, how exactly do you divine the intent of the assailant - to retreat to cover and then turn and return fire from a better position, or to fully retreat and leave your residence?
You could of course be charged after an event like this, even if you have not broken the law, if that's not immediately clear, but most prosecutors will apply some sort of reasonable person standard unless they are very strongly motivated by anti-gun politics.
In this case, I'll wager most prosecutors would not second guess a women engaging 3 armed men, in the dark, who broke into her home to commit a felony.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 11:28 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,291
Likes: 33,754
Liked 10,946 Times in 3,945 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BB57
So what is your take on an assailant fleeing towards cover or concealment after you engage him or her?
More to the point, how exactly do you divine the intent of the assailant - to retreat to cover and then turn and return fire from a better position, or to fully retreat and leave your residence?
...
|
Agree 100%
A small woman, just awakened out of her bed, in the dark, confronted by multiple armed home invaders who have scattered themselves around her house. How is she supposed to know how many there are and where the next shot is coming from?
Yeah, let's examine her actions under a microscope. Surely she made a mistake somewhere.
__________________
They lack our altruism.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 11:30 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20,895
Likes: 85,108
Liked 22,838 Times in 10,553 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom S.
Everything in that says defense. At the point they are running away, it's no longer defense, it's offense. Doesn't matter what state you live in, unless maybe it's the state of confusion.
Ask your attorney general's office, or local prosecuting attorney if you can get away with shooting a man in the back while he's fleeing from you. And note that I'm not saying that I don't think they deserve getting shot, just what is legal and what's not.
|
I differ, thugs arent men, and heree, you use whats necssary to stop the problem. That went into effect 2007.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 11:32 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20,895
Likes: 85,108
Liked 22,838 Times in 10,553 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Bates
I know as I watched the video I thought, "good on her", until I saw the shots out the door. Then I thought, "oh boy I hope those shots don't come back to haunt her."
|
With that attitude in mind, YOU will be a victim.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 01:18 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,475
Likes: 8,386
Liked 17,058 Times in 5,593 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BB57
So what is your take on an assailant fleeing towards cover or concealment after you engage him or her?
More to the point, how exactly do you divine the intent of the assailant - to retreat to cover and then turn and return fire from a better position, or to fully retreat and leave your residence?
You could of course be charged after an event like this, even if you have not broken the law, if that's not immediately clear, but most prosecutors will apply some sort of reasonable person standard unless they are very strongly motivated by anti-gun politics.
In this case, I'll wager most prosecutors would not second guess a women engaging 3 armed men, in the dark, who broke into her home to commit a felony.
|
Again, it doesn't matter what my take is. It's what the DA and/or a jury thinks. BTW: someone posted a link that makes it sound as if she opened fire while one of the suspects had a gun to her employee's head. That's scary.
__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!
|
09-27-2016, 03:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 3,299
Liked 17,158 Times in 2,907 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom S.
Again, it doesn't matter what my take is. It's what the DA and/or a jury thinks. BTW: someone posted a link that makes it sound as if she opened fire while one of the suspects had a gun to her employee's head. That's scary.
|
But she couldn't have known that. Proof that she was in another room was that she came out unaware of the thug in her employee's room. She even tells 911 later that there were two guys. I don't think she saw the guy run out past her while she was shooting at the two she did see. and as mentioned, it was dark and we're watching it with the luxury of her camera's night vision. She couldn't. I know you are not getting on her case. You're just well aware of any excuse preosecutors use to go after "certain" people using guns in defense. And you are aware of current law. But it looks like this was OK. The cops say so, too, so far.
Last edited by Wyatt Burp; 09-27-2016 at 03:27 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 03:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: PA
Posts: 149
Likes: 185
Liked 124 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
Thank God for the New Media or the "never happens" narrative would be "true"
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 06:47 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: BISHOP, California
Posts: 953
Likes: 4,433
Liked 1,291 Times in 533 Posts
|
|
I've been to "after" scenes like this.
The woman did good.
She will be totally exonerated.Given a medal maybe.
The ones that got away probably have Detectives on their *** right now!
The deceased friends will be brought in and "interviewed".
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 06:57 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 771
Likes: 9,884
Liked 1,202 Times in 438 Posts
|
|
My favorite part is where the husband finally gets out of bed and comes and takes the gun away.
I'm not sure if she's fearless or crazy.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-27-2016, 08:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 3,299
Liked 17,158 Times in 2,907 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzclancy
My favorite part is where the husband finally gets out of bed and comes and takes the gun away.
I'm not sure if she's fearless or crazy.
|
He was her employee sleeping in a diferent room as we can see in the video. He said one thug was in his room with a gun at his head demanding money. When she starts shooting the guy did in fact come running from the guy's room, or the same direction he does later.
But it did look at first like the guy let her clean house while he stayed in bed for a while.
|
09-27-2016, 11:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PRNJ
Posts: 6,703
Likes: 476
Liked 16,573 Times in 3,281 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Article 1. General Provisions.
§ 51-11-9. Immunity from civil liability for threat or use of force in defense of habitation
A person who is justified in threatening or using force against another under the provisions of Code Section 16-3-21, relating to the use of force in defense of self or others, Code Section 16-3-23, relating to the use of force in defense of a habitation, or Code Section 16-3-24, relating to the use of force in defense of property other than a habitation, has no duty to retreat from the use of such force and shall not be held liable to the person against whom the use of force was justified or to any person acting as an accomplice or assistant to such person in any civil action brought as a result of the threat or use of such force.
|
I live in New Jersey
Not sure that this language would be found to apply in a situation where three armed persons break into a dwelling at 4 am.
I mean, just because there were three of them and they looked like they were armed to the teeth and it was 4:00 AM, how could she be justified when she did not even ask if the perps had real guns loaded with real bullets.
__________________
Buy American
Vote Responsibly
Last edited by bushmaster1313; 09-27-2016 at 11:28 PM.
|
09-27-2016, 11:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PRNJ
Posts: 6,703
Likes: 476
Liked 16,573 Times in 3,281 Posts
|
|
911 operator is incompetant
__________________
Buy American
Vote Responsibly
|
09-27-2016, 11:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 4,545
Liked 7,558 Times in 1,441 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the ringo kid
With that attitude in mind, YOU will be a victim.
|
Victim, not likely. Remember, we shoot until there is no longer a threat. If they are running down the drive way and not shooting back or turning back for second try, there is no longer a threat. That doesn't mean I will not stay at the ready but once they are out the door you had better be able to prove there was still an imminent threat if you continue to shoot; castle doctrine or not.
__________________
Bill Bates
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-28-2016, 09:51 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 4,710
Likes: 3,527
Liked 12,555 Times in 3,342 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Bates
Victim, not likely. Remember, we shoot until there is no longer a threat. If they are running down the drive way and not shooting back or turning back for second try, there is no longer a threat. That doesn't mean I will not stay at the ready but once they are out the door you had better be able to prove there was still an imminent threat if you continue to shoot; castle doctrine or not.
|
That depends on the jurisdiction and the totality of the circumstances.
In this case she was shot - apparently a graze on the head - and was facing three armed intruders in her house.
It's true she continued to fire at two of them after they exited her front door - but on the other hand we have no way of knowing wether or not they left her property, turned around, were pointing a gun at her, or were returning fire after they exited.
Under the circumstances, and given the totality of the circumstances, if she indicated she saw them turn around, point a gun, etc, I'd be satisfied that she was justified in shooting those last shots, regardless of whether or not it was a castle doctrine state. Most reasonable people would probably shoot under those same circumstances.
It's a different story if she were shooting out the front door before they broke into the residence - in that case there would be a much higher burden of proof needed to justify the use of deadly force.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-28-2016, 10:40 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: South of the Nueces
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 23,812
Liked 20,090 Times in 5,871 Posts
|
|
Don't be messin' with them Vietnamese girls. Young fellers didn't get the memo...
Didi mao.
__________________
Halfway and one more step
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-28-2016, 12:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rocky River, OH, USA
Posts: 9,451
Likes: 1,271
Liked 9,184 Times in 3,621 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old TexMex
Don't be messin' with them Vietnamese girls. Young fellers didn't get the memo...
Didi mao.
|
A friend who used to live in the Houston area once told me the story of a Vietnamese home invasion gang which targeted other Asians, on the premise that they culturally avoid contact with police. They were possibly right in this... to their detriment.
They hit the home of a Vietnamese family... and were promptly slaughtered by the home owner. The wife was taken hostage by the home invaders, but managed to turn on the garage lights, a pre-arranged signal for "trouble". He came home, saw the lights, entered the dwelling and promptly shot the perpetrators to doll rags.
It probably doesn't pay to try to do a home invasion on a former Biet Dong Quan (ARVN Ranger)...
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-28-2016, 12:08 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20,895
Likes: 85,108
Liked 22,838 Times in 10,553 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Bates
Victim, not likely. Remember, we shoot until there is no longer a threat. If they are running down the drive way and not shooting back or turning back for second try, there is no longer a threat. That doesn't mean I will not stay at the ready but once they are out the door you had better be able to prove there was still an imminent threat if you continue to shoot; castle doctrine or not.
|
I know that but, here, you can do so on AND near your property and NOT be prosecuted. Hence that castle law going into effect an d signed by Gov. Rick Perry.
Here you CAN actually be in the street and still classified as protecting your property and family. Like I said, you will be a victim, I REFUSE to be. BTW, the District Atty and Police Chief both, have been in public saying what I said above.
Just think on it, a kidnapper dragging your daughter away-you are right behind and with gun in hand. Do you actually think you would not fire to save your kid, I HIGHLY doubt it???? Dont give me that "if I have a clear shot thing" because I know you and any other father would fire, to save that child. I sure as hell would. You would also be hailed as a real hero.
Also, in my area in the last couple weeks, there have been numerous kidnap attempts--all caught on video-and thankfully, none were a success.
Last edited by the ringo kid; 09-28-2016 at 12:18 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-28-2016, 01:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: 5 generations in N. AZ
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 1,942
Liked 3,434 Times in 1,364 Posts
|
|
I'd shoot too if people with three arms broke into my house.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|