Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > Concealed Carry & Self Defense
o

Notices

Concealed Carry & Self Defense All aspects of Concealed and Open Carry, Home and Self Defense.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-19-2017, 11:06 PM
sunnyd's Avatar
sunnyd sunnyd is offline
Member
642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today.  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 341
Likes: 759
Liked 642 Times in 151 Posts
Default 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today.

I have accquired these four guns over the las t several years for the purpose of concealed carry. I have shot all of them quite a bit, but today was the first time I took them all to my farm range for a back to back comparison. All of my shooting was from pocket carry at 4 yards, alternating between point and shoot and then using sites, double taps, silohuette targets Here are my observations:

642 - Pretty concealable, partially due to the hammerless revolver shape. Boringly reliable. Able to put all shots on target with point and shoot. Able to put a couple in the 10 ring with sites. Recoil is significant but acceptable for close encounter self defense use and short practice sessions.

LCP Custom- Most concealable of the group, probably its' biggest asset. Point and shoot accuracy was not all that great. All shots were on the target but usually low due to the way the small grip fit my hand. With sites I could put the majority of the shots in the 10 ring. Recoil was significant due to size and weight, but not as much as the 642. Cycled reliably.

LC9S - Maybe a little large for pocket carry, but it is a 9mm. Had to remember the safety. Point and shoot accuracy was pretty good with most shots in the chest area. Accuracy with sights was excellent due to the very nice trigger. Recoil was snappy and the trigger would always pinch my finger. Cycled reliably.

Glock 42 - Not as concealable as the LCP but not bad in the pocket. Point and shoot accuracy was very good, best of the group. Accuracy with sights was outstanding, again best of the group. Recoil was very pleasant and again the best of the group.
It also cycled all ammo reliably.

After I finished with the comparison, I shot the Glock 42 another 50 rounds just because it was so accurate and so enjoyable to shoot. IMO it was the only one of the group that could double for defense and as a range gun. Its superior accuracy makes it a good farm gun to dispatch small varmints.

All are good guns, but I think the Glock 42 gets the nod over the other semis. However, I still won't leave home without my j frame, its just too functionally simple and reliable for self defense. Maybe not for farm carry though.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-19-2017, 11:26 PM
Bob L Bob L is offline
Member
642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today.  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 2,127
Likes: 1,916
Liked 2,383 Times in 1,066 Posts
Default

Overall, it sounds like it was a good day with a Great range report, Thanks!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 01-20-2017, 10:26 AM
bowzette bowzette is offline
Member
642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today.  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 260
Likes: 171
Liked 120 Times in 64 Posts
Default

Great report.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 01-20-2017, 10:29 AM
Chief Illiniwek's Avatar
Chief Illiniwek Chief Illiniwek is offline
Member
642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today.  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Central IL
Posts: 45
Likes: 315
Liked 53 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Nice report. I always enjoy reading other's thoughts on different firearms.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 01-20-2017, 04:38 PM
Whitwabit Whitwabit is offline
US Veteran
642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today.  
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 2,928
Likes: 1,351
Liked 2,660 Times in 1,302 Posts
Default

Doesn't the Glock have the longest sight length making it easier to be on target ? Its not more accurate .. your just more accurate shooting it ..
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 02-07-2017, 06:12 PM
dlay dlay is offline
Member
642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today.  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: east tennessee, union co
Posts: 176
Likes: 85
Liked 114 Times in 51 Posts
Default

I can carry the lcp and forget that I have it, all others size or weight make them uncomfortable. I end up leaving them in the truck.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 02-07-2017, 09:56 PM
Ytcoinshooter's Avatar
Ytcoinshooter Ytcoinshooter is offline
Member
642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today.  
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 25
Likes: 54
Liked 24 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Nice comparison. I like to shoot pistols back to back for the same kind of reasons. I also have had the same experience as you with my G42. It's a fine shooter and there are some nice, reliable options for increasing magazine capacity.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 02-07-2017, 10:10 PM
silversnake silversnake is offline
Member
642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today.  
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 522
Likes: 313
Liked 523 Times in 249 Posts
Default

I picked up a Glock 42 awhile back and while it's easy to shoot I find it no easier to conceal than a J-frame or 9mm semiauto. Will probably sell in the near future.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 02-08-2017, 08:46 PM
camsdaddy camsdaddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 221
Likes: 55
Liked 95 Times in 53 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silversnake View Post
I picked up a Glock 42 awhile back and while it's easy to shoot I find it no easier to conceal than a J-frame or 9mm semiauto. Will probably sell in the near future.
I have not fired a 42. I did buy a 43 in hopes that it would replace my j frame in my pocket. The accuracy is certainly there. I just don't feel comfortable carrying it in my pocket due to size. I always enjoy expierence others have.

Last edited by camsdaddy; 02-08-2017 at 08:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2017, 08:52 PM
diyj98 diyj98 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 2,427
Likes: 390
Liked 2,828 Times in 1,258 Posts
Default

I love the 43, but it's too big for my pockets as well. I had a 42 but sold it. For my uses as a pocket gun, the LCP does a better job due to it's smaller size and it's accurate enough. I'll always have at least one j frame, but the LCP is much easier for me to carry in my pockets.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 02-08-2017, 09:34 PM
gman51 gman51 is offline
Member
642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today. 642, LCP, LC9S, Glock 42 comparison at the range today.  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Just West of Houston
Posts: 3,468
Likes: 787
Liked 4,674 Times in 2,062 Posts
Default

Good comparison experience you provided.
From many guns I have owned I choose my LCR 357 for my daily carry. It fits in my front pocket, it is light so that I seldom notice I am carrying it, the trigger IMO is best of any revolver, recoil is not punishing, it is accurate and dependable, no safety to be concerned with while having basically no fear of an AD.
Only Glock I ever owned was a G27. I was not impressed with it and it was the first gun I ever sold.
The 640-1 I just bought is a very close second to the LCR. It is only a couple ounces heavier, has a good trigger and it sure is eye candy.
I just got an LC9s and I still choose to carry the LCR. Mostly because the revolver is more dependable. That was proven to me real quick. I will take a revolver over a semi auto any day.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ahhh the Glock 22 at the range today RJJ 1971 Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 1 12-27-2015 10:09 PM
Ruger LC9s range report LVSteve Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 3 11-20-2015 11:18 PM
Size Comparison: MilPro G2 vs Glock 19 doc540 Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 7 01-16-2014 12:13 AM
Went to the Range today, comparison between CCI and Federal tspan Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 4 01-06-2013 06:35 PM
Picked up my BG380 today with pics and some P238 comparison shots RANGE REPORT Nakanokalronin Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 10 06-11-2012 05:36 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)