|
|
01-22-2017, 02:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Montana
Posts: 596
Likes: 454
Liked 333 Times in 170 Posts
|
|
Lowest grip profile?
I have been informed that the lowest grip profile - the grip least likely to "print" when S&W 640 is worn in a pocket holster - is the combination of "old style" standard grip with Tyler T-Grip. If this information is accurate, how significant is the difference of "printing" between the grip I describe compared with a Michaels/S&W soft boot grip?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-22-2017, 02:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Denver area
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 20,283
Liked 13,112 Times in 4,176 Posts
|
|
That's how I carry my j frames.
|
01-22-2017, 03:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 1,285
Liked 2,285 Times in 776 Posts
|
|
I just pulled out an older Model 60 that I have the original grips and a Tyler T grip on and my 642 with the Spegal inspired Uncle Mike's boot grips on it for comparison.
I have never really thought of looking at this before but it does appear the magna and T grip does have a smaller profile in both the length, width and front to back.
I then pulled out my current carry 442 with wooden Spegal boot grips and they are even slightly larger than the UM's.
With a proper pocket holster I believe the issue of printing would be a non-issue with either.
Not a scientific study by any means but using my cheater glasses and a side by side comparison it appears the Magna/T-grip combo is the winner.
I put the T grip and old style grips on the Model 60 because I like the old school look. I really like the feel of the Spegal style grips though and don't see me changing.
If you do go with the UM's style a word of caution the new S&W grips won't work with many of the speed loaders.
Last edited by 326MOD10; 01-22-2017 at 03:10 PM.
Reason: added sentence
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-28-2017, 11:15 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mansfield, Texas
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 11,499
Liked 2,888 Times in 947 Posts
|
|
Personally, I have been carrying revolvers for a long time now and one thing I have noticed... no one is looking at you, much less, with such intensity as to actually see that lump in your pocket or on your waist as a weapon. All that said, I do like the stock Magnas and a Tyler T configuration the best.
Last edited by DevilDog72; 02-03-2017 at 06:51 PM.
Reason: add pic
|
01-28-2017, 02:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Denver area
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 20,283
Liked 13,112 Times in 4,176 Posts
|
|
For me, printing has nothing to do with the desirability of the t grip and original wood stocks.
The advantage is the ease of carry, ease of drawing from the pocket (I don't use pocket holsters: too bulky, serve no useful purpose) and Shootability.
I think that anything else defeats the purpose of a j frame.
All my M 38's and M40's and Centenials are set up this way.
|
02-01-2017, 12:58 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bartlett, Tennessee
Posts: 7,618
Likes: 2,935
Liked 18,698 Times in 4,789 Posts
|
|
Easy carry is pointless if you can't grip the gun properly. Make sure the grip fits you.
|
02-01-2017, 10:47 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: God's Country
Posts: 4,711
Likes: 1,235
Liked 3,535 Times in 1,770 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rpg
For me, printing has nothing to do with the desirability of the t grip and original wood stocks.
The advantage is the ease of carry, ease of drawing from the pocket (I don't use pocket holsters: too bulky, serve no useful purpose) and Shootability.
I think that anything else defeats the purpose of a j frame.
All my M 38's and M40's and Centenials are set up this way.
|
If you are pocket carrying and your gun prints, your pants are too tight. You will never be able to draw in a decent amount of time.
I find that any gun will eventually permanently print (literally) if you do not use a pocket holster
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|