Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > >


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-10-2018, 09:17 AM
GOV5 GOV5 is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 1
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Default Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?

It's bad enough that regular citizens can't go through NJ or NY with concealed carry licenses, but how about you Retired/Onduty LEO's? That's ridiculous!

From other Forums, I have read that CCW carriers have checked with NY and were told " Don't even THINK about coming into and through NY carrying a gun", even with a CCW.

So my question is this: Why doesn't the US Attorney General not prosecute the States of NJ & NY for not conforming to the laws of The UNITED STATES? I am sick of States that think they re above Federal Law!
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 07-10-2018, 09:24 AM
Pisgah Pisgah is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 6
Liked 2,115 Times in 782 Posts
Default

Yeah, it's a bummer that the Constitution limits what Congress can do and leaves a lot up to the individual states to decide for themselves, ain't it? Congress is so tuned-in we should just let them decide for everyone, eh? If we'd just let them, they could take care of us all...

My point is, the citizens of NY and NJ can change their situation any time they want to. I am willing to leave it up to them.
__________________
Pisgah

Last edited by Pisgah; 07-10-2018 at 09:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-10-2018, 09:58 AM
SMSgt SMSgt is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,982
Likes: 819
Liked 1,991 Times in 966 Posts
Default

Having no reason to go to/through either, I'll leave fighting that monkey to the citizens of those states. SCOTUS will have to decide that--if it would hear the case.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 07-10-2018, 10:05 AM
cybermgk's Avatar
cybermgk cybermgk is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 259
Likes: 215
Liked 494 Times in 162 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pisgah View Post
Yeah, it's a bummer that the Constitution limits what Congress can do and leaves a lot up to the individual states to decide for themselves, ain't it? Congress is so tuned-in we should just let them decide for everyone, eh? If we'd just let them, they could take care of us all...

My point is, the citizens of NY and NJ can change their situation any time they want to. I am willing to leave it up to them.
The OP isn't arguing that the people of those states shouldn't attempt to change the law(s). It also isn't an argument for taking away State's Right's, not really. The OP is arguing why the Federal DOJ doesn't prosecute States, when they violate Federal Law, on a matter of which the Federal Government has preemption on.

The problem @GOV5, is that this is one area, Concealed carry, etc that the Federal Government does not have preemption, and it falls within a State's Jurisdiction. What the Federal DOJ CAN do is challenge said laws for their Constitutionality. That is somewhat rare though. More often a 'test case', an arrest under the law, is challenged and appealed, until SCOTUS hears it. SCOTUS, has been very picky about what they have heard and ruled on. Part of that is the now retiring Kennedy was never a sure 2A friendly vote (imho).

But, that is about to change soon, as Kennedy retired, and they will soon have an, imho, strong 5 Justice side in favor of 2A rights. BUT, they are also Originalists/Constitutionalists, most of them. As such, they firmly believe SCOTUS isn't there to 'make law', but interpret it based on the original Constitution. So, they will likely not make broad reaching rulings.

That said, NY laws seem to me, to be very like what Heller ruled against in D.C. These types of Justices often love to stick to precedents as well. So, there is a good chance.

Now @Pisgah, it is easy to say it is up to the people of NY and NJ to change their 'fate'. But, it doesn't really take into account reality, particularly in States with a large, progressive voting Urban area, like NY, NJ and Illinois.

Here in Illinois, we have a majority of the area of the state that are very 2A friendly and supportive. However, we have Cook County and Chicago, with their political corruption, majority of population, and way too much political influence at the state level. This is why we have in some ways, more draconian gun laws than NY or NJ (we have to have a license to buy ammo, guns, many accessories, that gets us a nightly background check 360 nights a year).

The Cook County/Chicago Political machine has so much power, that republicans from other areas HAVE to negotiate on everything, or NEVER get anything passed at the State level.

I have no idea if NY or NJ is similar, but I got to think, it is hard to fight against NY City at the state level.
Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 07-10-2018, 10:07 AM
Watchdog's Avatar
Watchdog Watchdog is offline
US Veteran
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,207
Likes: 15,209
Liked 21,681 Times in 5,501 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOV5 View Post
I am sick of States that think they re above Federal Law!
So you're against States' Rights, correct?
__________________
I can't get no...satisfaction.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 07-10-2018, 10:13 AM
blues7's Avatar
blues7 blues7 is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Blue Ridge Mtns
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 845
Liked 2,608 Times in 856 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOV5 View Post
It's bad enough that regular citizens can't go through NJ or NY with concealed carry licenses, but how about you Retired/Onduty LEO's? That's ridiculous!
I'm a retired LEO and can carry in NY and NJ because I qualify under LEOSA.

(The only handgun restriction in NYC that pertains to my carry is magazine capacity. NYC caps it at 10 if you didn't retire from LE while working in NY. So while I worked in NYC as an LEO early in my career, I didn't retire while still employed there. Thus, I am limited to a 10 round magazine.)

If I relied solely on my state issued license I would not be able to carry in NY or NJ at all.
__________________
3" 686+, 642-1, M&P15 TS
Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 07-10-2018, 10:28 AM
GOV5 GOV5 is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 1
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Watchdog View Post
So you're against States' Rights, correct?
What States Right? There is no State Right that goes against Federal Law. UH, that kinda happened down here in SC and MS a few years ago. It was determined that one man can not OWN another. Do you still want to see THOSE States Rights defended? I don't think so!

So, you see, it isn't about States Rights at all. But there are plenty of laws passed where individual States didn't like them and thought it infringed upon their domain, but it didn't matter. The laws were passed anyway and became Federal Law of the Land.

And yes, I against States Rights if I, traveling to a Friendly State but have to go through a NON-Friendly State to get there. That's where it becomes an issue with me. For instance the Northeast for example. I can't get to Vermont unless I go through New York. I shouldn't have to put up with NY's B.S. to go to Vermont.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 07-10-2018, 10:37 AM
Pisgah Pisgah is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 6
Liked 2,115 Times in 782 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cybermgk View Post
Now @Pisgah, it is easy to say it is up to the people of NY and NJ to change their 'fate'. But, it doesn't really take into account reality, particularly in States with a large, progressive voting Urban area, like NY, NJ and Illinois.

Here in Illinois, we have a majority of the area of the state that a

The Cook County/Chicago Political machine has so much power, that republicans from other areas HAVE to negotiate on everything, or NEVER get anything passed at the State level.

I have no idea if NY or NJ is similar, but I got to think, it is hard to fight against NY City at the state level.
So, evidently you are not only opposed to states being able to decide for themselves, you also oppose a majority being able to vote their will.

I am truly sorry for folks who live in such areas, but the fact is they have two choices -- either move, or campaign to change hearts and minds and create a majority that will go the other way. They should NOT count on Congress or the Justice Department coming in to solve their problems.

Our local city government is as corrupt and incompetent as you can find in the US -- yet, a large majority of our citizens have voted time and again to keep the bumbling crooks on City Council in office. I don't like it -- I vote against them, and I constantly campaign among fellow citizens to put the pressure on. But there's no way the state or federal government is going to come in and fix it to suit me, and I don't want them to.

It's part of the deal when you have a republic.
__________________
Pisgah
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-10-2018, 10:39 AM
GOV5 GOV5 is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 1
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Default

cybermgk: "The OP isn't arguing that the people of those states shouldn't attempt to change the law(s). It also isn't an argument for taking away State's Right's, not really. The OP is arguing why the Federal DOJ doesn't prosecute States, when they violate Federal Law, on a matter of which the Federal Government has preemption on."

Thank you for your understanding. That's exactly what I was saying!
As many of you here probably already know, the U.S.House passed a bipartisan bill on total reciprocity for the entire Country a few years back. Harry Reid refused to bring it to the floor of the U.S. Senate. By the way, it passed by a 2:1 margin, so it was heavily favored by both sides of the political divide. It would have solved all our problems going from one state to another. That's not the way I would like to get reciprocity( I'd prefer from the Supremes), but if that's the only way we can get it, I'd be satisfied.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-10-2018, 11:13 AM
kld555 kld555 is online now
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5
Likes: 297
Liked 11 Times in 2 Posts
Default

The Second Amendment does not stop at the border of NY or NJ and if those States choose to ignore said "right", then the Fed's should take them to task. I, too, am covered by LEOSA, but choose not to participate and furthermore feel absolutely no need or compulsion to travel or spend my money in such States.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-10-2018, 11:17 AM
The Big D The Big D is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 822
Liked 1,423 Times in 556 Posts
Default Nope!

You are incorrect. ALL active duty LEO’s can carry in New Jersey and New York...including NYC. In addition, retired LEO’s who qualify pursuant to LEOSA can carry there.

I visit New York often...and will be in NYC for the 9/11 Memorial Ride in August. Will be in New Jersey, too.

Be safe.




Quote:
Originally Posted by GOV5 View Post
It's bad enough that regular citizens can't go through NJ or NY with concealed carry licenses, but how about you Retired/Onduty LEO's? That's ridiculous!
...
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #12  
Old 07-10-2018, 11:17 AM
blues7's Avatar
blues7 blues7 is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Blue Ridge Mtns
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 845
Liked 2,608 Times in 856 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kld555 View Post
The Second Amendment does not stop at the border of NY or NJ and if those States choose to ignore said "right", then the Fed's should take them to task. I, too, am covered by LEOSA, but choose not to participate and furthermore feel absolutely no need or compulsion to travel or spend my money in such States.
I might not participate either...but I have an aging mother in one state and family in the other. I'm not going to cut my nose off to spite my face.

Rather than fly and put myself at the mercy of the TSA and airlines, I just suck it up, hold my nose and drive back up...visit with family or attend a function, and get back in the 4Runner and drive back down.

I agree that it may not be fair, but I do everything I can and contribute money to the cause of making it fair for everyone...and vote in line with my conscience in that regard.
__________________
3" 686+, 642-1, M&P15 TS
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 07-10-2018, 01:29 PM
cybermgk's Avatar
cybermgk cybermgk is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 259
Likes: 215
Liked 494 Times in 162 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pisgah View Post
So, evidently you are not only opposed to states being able to decide for themselves, you also oppose a majority being able to vote their will.
Please do not put words in my mouth. WHERE above did I speak against State's Rights? Where did I say I am against a majority voting it's will? The answer is nowhere.

But, the people do not write the laws. At State level, it is 'elected' representatives. At Municipality levels it is often small boards, or for big cities 'elected' representatives.

All, I pointed out was that there ARE situations, where one large population center can rule those state votes, because of the vast majority of representatives they have compared to the rest of the state. EVEN when those elected representatives are legitimately voted in, that can lead to some democratically, legally created laws that really don't represent a barely minority of the people, as often urban and rural areas have vastly different wants, needs and viewpoints.

BUT, when they are corruptly elected, and done so to facilitate an even smaller groups agenda, it is bad. This is my point. I have very little ability to affect elections outside my district/area.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 07-10-2018, 01:43 PM
Wise_A Wise_A is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 2,090
Likes: 1,859
Liked 2,755 Times in 1,168 Posts
Default

*sigh* So much wrong, so little time.

(1) I'm a private citizen, and I have an NY CCW. 24/7, 365 EDC.

(2) My NY permit isn't valid in your state, either. Reciprocity, how does it work?

(3) LEOSA also works, in both states.

(4) CCW =/= 2A, according to the courts.

(5) We'd just love to "change our situation", but unfortunately the 49% of us with a brain in our heads are a little outweighed by the 51% that live in NYC and Long Island.

(6) ^^ Same as Colorado, California, Nevada, and Florida. And pretty soon, your state if all you do is sit on your butt.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #15  
Old 07-10-2018, 01:57 PM
jeffpo's Avatar
jeffpo jeffpo is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central North Carolina
Posts: 174
Likes: 40
Liked 75 Times in 35 Posts
Default

It's a shame that some states can openly and blatantly defy the Constitution and get away with it. I drive to Maryland once a year for a conference. I'm only in the state a few hours but from everything I've seen I'm banned from possessing a firearm, even if it's locked in the trunk.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 07-10-2018, 02:10 PM
16thVACav 16thVACav is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 648
Liked 2,244 Times in 773 Posts
Default

“The government you elect is the government you deserve.”
— Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #17  
Old 07-10-2018, 03:47 PM
mauser9 mauser9 is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Northeast
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 3,123
Liked 1,085 Times in 690 Posts
Default

Lets not forget Ma. Does not recognize other state permits and became a "may issue" state for long guns as well.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-10-2018, 05:52 PM
Old cop Old cop is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,647
Likes: 1,338
Liked 8,565 Times in 2,578 Posts
Default LEOSA

Quote:
Originally Posted by blues7 View Post
I'm a retired LEO and can carry in NY and NJ because I qualify under LEOSA.

(The only handgun restriction in NYC that pertains to my carry is magazine capacity. NYC caps it at 10 if you didn't retire from LE while working in NY. So while I worked in NYC as an LEO early in my career, I didn't retire while still employed there. Thus, I am limited to a 10 round magazine.)

If I relied solely on my state issued license I would not be able to carry in NY or NJ at all.
The first time I knew we were going to NY I got myself qualified under LEOSA (10 years ago) and have qualified every year since b/c I did not want to take any chances. My EDC is a j frame so I should be OK w/the round limit thing, but I always swap out my carry ammo for lead round nose if going to NJ even though I’ve been told LEOSA certified people are exempt.
__________________
Old Cop
LEO (Ret.)
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #19  
Old 07-10-2018, 06:31 PM
blues7's Avatar
blues7 blues7 is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Blue Ridge Mtns
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 845
Liked 2,608 Times in 856 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old cop View Post
The first time I knew we were going to NY I got myself qualified under LEOSA (10 years ago) and have qualified every year since b/c I did not want to take any chances. My EDC is a j frame so I should be OK w/the round limit thing, but I always swap out my carry ammo for lead round nose if going to NJ even though I’ve been told LEOSA certified people are exempt.
You are correct, OC. The round issue has been settled even if NJ doesn't want to hear it. The problem is that they could still make you take the ride and ruin your day even though it'll come to naught. They're funny that way. Not funny ha-ha.

FWIW, my understanding from colleagues in NJ (and environs) is that Hornady's Critical Defense and Critical Duty are not looked upon with the stink eye by NJ LE. (Not that that is a recommendation to do other than what you are already doing.)

(For the record, I've had a lengthy and extensive discussion with counsel from LEOSA insurance carrier FEDS regarding this matter within the past several months. So I'm pretty current.)
__________________
3" 686+, 642-1, M&P15 TS
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #20  
Old 07-10-2018, 11:52 PM
badge badge is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Pa.
Posts: 690
Likes: 608
Liked 880 Times in 367 Posts
Default

NJSP Firearms unit ok'd Hornady Crital Defense/Duty, Federal Guard Dog, the fully jacketed expanding, as well Corbon PowRball. The instructor at my LEOSA class who is now a Judge advised that the law had been repaired ref this but the NJ AG may not see it quite that way. I also do not care to argue the case at the side of the roadway so I switch out ammo when forced to go back. Great state other than the laws and Politicians.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #21  
Old 07-11-2018, 08:21 PM
Practical Practical is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 598
Likes: 3
Liked 260 Times in 150 Posts
Default

You don't seem to understand one of the FEW rights the states seem to be left is the right to regulate firearms MORE strictly.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-11-2018, 10:42 PM
cgt4570's Avatar
cgt4570 cgt4570 is offline
SWCA Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mount Carmel, TN USA
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 436
Liked 1,195 Times in 394 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Practical View Post
You don't seem to understand one of the FEW rights the states seem to be left is the right to regulate firearms MORE strictly.
If states don't have the right to step on the First Amendment, then they certainly don't have the right to step on the Second!
The Second protects the First.
__________________
Chris Taylor
S&WCA #2243
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-12-2018, 07:03 AM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 543
Likes: 56
Liked 473 Times in 281 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Practical View Post
You don't seem to understand one of the FEW rights the states seem to be left is the right to regulate firearms MORE strictly.
Educate me please, where in the second amendment does it say that the states may place regulations or restrictions on firearms?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-12-2018, 07:10 AM
Wise_A Wise_A is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 2,090
Likes: 1,859
Liked 2,755 Times in 1,168 Posts
Default

District of Columbia vs Heller.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-12-2018, 08:42 AM
kbm6893 kbm6893 is online now
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 158
Liked 2,398 Times in 1,044 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cybermgk View Post
The OP isn't arguing that the people of those states shouldn't attempt to change the law(s). It also isn't an argument for taking away State's Right's, not really. The OP is arguing why the Federal DOJ doesn't prosecute States, when they violate Federal Law, on a matter of which the Federal Government has preemption on.

The problem @GOV5, is that this is one area, Concealed carry, etc that the Federal Government does not have preemption, and it falls within a State's Jurisdiction. What the Federal DOJ CAN do is challenge said laws for their Constitutionality. That is somewhat rare though. More often a 'test case', an arrest under the law, is challenged and appealed, until SCOTUS hears it. SCOTUS, has been very picky about what they have heard and ruled on. Part of that is the now retiring Kennedy was never a sure 2A friendly vote (imho).

But, that is about to change soon, as Kennedy retired, and they will soon have an, imho, strong 5 Justice side in favor of 2A rights. BUT, they are also Originalists/Constitutionalists, most of them. As such, they firmly believe SCOTUS isn't there to 'make law', but interpret it based on the original Constitution. So, they will likely not make broad reaching rulings.

That said, NY laws seem to me, to be very like what Heller ruled against in D.C. These types of Justices often love to stick to precedents as well. So, there is a good chance.

Now @Pisgah, it is easy to say it is up to the people of NY and NJ to change their 'fate'. But, it doesn't really take into account reality, particularly in States with a large, progressive voting Urban area, like NY, NJ and Illinois.

Here in Illinois, we have a majority of the area of the state that are very 2A friendly and supportive. However, we have Cook County and Chicago, with their political corruption, majority of population, and way too much political influence at the state level. This is why we have in some ways, more draconian gun laws than NY or NJ (we have to have a license to buy ammo, guns, many accessories, that gets us a nightly background check 360 nights a year).

The Cook County/Chicago Political machine has so much power, that republicans from other areas HAVE to negotiate on everything, or NEVER get anything passed at the State level.

I have no idea if NY or NJ is similar, but I got to think, it is hard to fight against NY City at the state level.
The laws passed in NY come from NYC. Most of the residents of NY do not approve of the SAFE Act, but it passed anyway. If you even get a pistol permit in NYC, it takes 6-12 months, cost hundreds of dollars, and is frequently denied. Carry permits are only given to the rich and famous. Robert Deniro has one. So does Donald Trump. And anybody with a pistol permit or any kind is subject to random inspections by the police to verify the gun is stored correctly (meaning locked up and with a trigger lock on it). Refusal to let them in could result in revocation or permit.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-12-2018, 12:18 PM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is online now
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,235
Likes: 3,630
Liked 10,406 Times in 4,212 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbm6893 View Post
The laws passed in NY come from NYC. Most of the residents of NY do not approve of the SAFE Act, but it passed anyway. If you even get a pistol permit in NYC, it takes 6-12 months, cost hundreds of dollars, and is frequently denied. Carry permits are only given to the rich and famous. Robert Deniro has one. So does Donald Trump. And anybody with a pistol permit or any kind is subject to random inspections by the police to verify the gun is stored correctly (meaning locked up and with a trigger lock on it). Refusal to let them in could result in revocation or permit.
NY Judges and Pol's are left wing and quiver in their boots under Cuomo. System is BROKEN! But this is not just in NY & NJ...... it will spread to what was currently Firearm Friendly States as soon as the Dem's get control of the WH again.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #27  
Old 07-12-2018, 01:58 PM
hoosierone hoosierone is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: NWIndiana
Posts: 553
Likes: 338
Liked 786 Times in 318 Posts
Default

"shall not be infringed"
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #28  
Old 07-12-2018, 02:04 PM
Triathloncoach's Avatar
Triathloncoach Triathloncoach is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Atlanta NTP
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 2,792
Liked 1,650 Times in 647 Posts
Default

Even active LEO who live in NJ must go through a arduous process that takes several months to purchase a pistol. Same as non LEO.

This must make the citizens feel safe from the police. Glad I moved to Georgia 8 years ago.
__________________
Just hanging with my dogs
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-12-2018, 11:50 PM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is online now
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,235
Likes: 3,630
Liked 10,406 Times in 4,212 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoosierone View Post
"shall not be infringed"
Unfortunately for us, those words are not as strong as public opinion. These days public opinion can dictate what Cities and County's obey and ignore.

Remember Prohibition? The 18th amendment never "took" because the public simply didn't want it.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-13-2018, 12:25 AM
one eye joe's Avatar
one eye joe one eye joe is offline
US Veteran
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 3,432
Likes: 2,913
Liked 2,593 Times in 1,110 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wise_A View Post
*sigh* So much wrong, so little time.

(1) I'm a private citizen, and I have an NY CCW. 24/7, 365 EDC.

(2) My NY permit isn't valid in your state, either. Reciprocity, how does it work?

(3) LEOSA also works, in both states.

(4) CCW =/= 2A, according to the courts.

(5) We'd just love to "change our situation", but unfortunately the 49% of us with a brain in our heads are a little outweighed by the 51% that live in NYC and Long Island.

(6) ^^ Same as Colorado, California, Nevada, and Florida. And pretty soon, your state if all you do is sit on your butt.
IMHO, IF YOU ARE AN MS-13 GANG MEMBER ON LONG ISLAND, NY, YOU CAN CARRY WHATEVER YOU WANT, WHENEVER AND WHEREVER YOU WANT---OR SO IT APPEARS......
__________________
'Nam 1968-69.DAV,VFW,NRA Inst.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #31  
Old 07-13-2018, 06:42 AM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 543
Likes: 56
Liked 473 Times in 281 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoosierone View Post
"shall not be infringed"
The word "shall" is a key component of the second amendment. My attorney explained to me the difference between "may" and "shall" years ago.

"May" indicates flexibility, whatever is being referred to may be changed at some point and its enforceability is also subject to change.

"Shall" is concrete, it is an absolute. There is no flexibility when the word "shall" is used. Therefore, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" is absolute, so laws and ordinances that restrict this right are unlawful and unconstitutional. Getting the courts to actually uphold this portion of the second amendment is difficult as so many people want to alter or reinterpret the amendment.

Last edited by stansdds; 07-13-2018 at 06:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #32  
Old 07-13-2018, 09:41 AM
Ziggy2525 Ziggy2525 is online now
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 327
Likes: 85
Liked 376 Times in 159 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stansdds View Post
The word "shall" is a key component of the second amendment. My attorney explained to me the difference between "may" and "shall" years ago.

"May" indicates flexibility, whatever is being referred to may be changed at some point and its enforceability is also subject to change.

"Shall" is concrete, it is an absolute. There is no flexibility when the word "shall" is used. Therefore, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" is absolute, so laws and ordinances that restrict this right are unlawful and unconstitutional. Getting the courts to actually uphold this portion of the second amendment is difficult as so many people want to alter or reinterpret the amendment.
Yes, but...

Originally, the constitution didn’t apply to the states. The 14th amendment changed that, but not all the amendments were considered included. Over time, more and more have been. IIRC, that’s called the “incorporation doctrine.” I think Heller fully incorporated the 2nd amendment, but pretty sure there’s nothing there covering CCW or posession outside your home. Could be wrong.
__________________
Vegan by proxy.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-14-2018, 09:13 AM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 543
Likes: 56
Liked 473 Times in 281 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy2525 View Post
Yes, but...

Originally, the constitution didn’t apply to the states. The 14th amendment changed that, but not all the amendments were considered included. Over time, more and more have been. IIRC, that’s called the “incorporation doctrine.” I think Heller fully incorporated the 2nd amendment, but pretty sure there’s nothing there covering CCW or posession outside your home. Could be wrong.
I would disagree with the concept that the constitution did not originally apply to the states. If that were the case, then there would have been no Bill of Rights (the first 10 amendments) and the constitution would have not likely been ratified by the thirteen original states.

The 14th amendment, specifically section I, reaffirms the Bill of Rights and that it applies to all citizens of the U.S. This was deemed necessary as the former Confederate States would not likely (and in reality, did not) apply laws equally, but would continue with segregation and not recognizing the rights of minority citizens.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #34  
Old 07-14-2018, 10:21 AM
Ziggy2525 Ziggy2525 is online now
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 327
Likes: 85
Liked 376 Times in 159 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stansdds View Post
I would disagree with the concept that the constitution did not originally apply to the states. If that were the case, then there would have been no Bill of Rights (the first 10 amendments) and the constitution would have not likely been ratified by the thirteen original states.

The 14th amendment, specifically section I, reaffirms the Bill of Rights and that it applies to all citizens of the U.S. This was deemed necessary as the former Confederate States would not likely (and in reality, did not) apply laws equally, but would continue with segregation and not recognizing the rights of minority citizens.
You may disagree, that's your right, but I think there's general agreement the following is more accurate..

Quote:
The incorporation doctrine is a constitutional doctrine through which the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution (known as the Bill of Rights) are made applicable to the states through the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Prior to the doctrine's (and the Fourteenth Amendment's) existence, the Bill of Rights applied only to the Federal Government and to federal court cases. States and state courts could choose to adopt similar laws, but were under no obligation to do so.
Incorporation Doctrine
__________________
Vegan by proxy.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-14-2018, 01:41 PM
rwt1405's Avatar
rwt1405 rwt1405 is offline
SWCA Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 2,135
Liked 1,476 Times in 655 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pisgah View Post
So, evidently you are not only opposed to states being able to decide for themselves, you also oppose a majority being able to vote their will.
Sure, if we were a Democracy.

But, at least as I've always understood, we are a Representative Republic.

I've always understood the difference as "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch" (mob rule), where as in a Republic rights can NOT be overridden by a majority, such as the lambs rights are inalienable and can NOT be taken away by the majority, or the wolves.

Please understand I totally support/accept the idea of States Rights, and generally would side with that idea, with the exception of losing certain, inalienable rights, which the States have NO right to take away.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #36  
Old 07-14-2018, 09:06 PM
Watchdog's Avatar
Watchdog Watchdog is offline
US Veteran
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,207
Likes: 15,209
Liked 21,681 Times in 5,501 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mauser9 View Post
Lets not forget Ma.
I remember Ma. She'd let me get by with a lot of stuff Pa would whip me for.
__________________
I can't get no...satisfaction.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #37  
Old 07-27-2018, 10:28 AM
GOV5 GOV5 is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 1
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pisgah View Post
So, evidently you are not only opposed to states being able to decide for themselves, you also oppose a majority being able to vote their will.

I am truly sorry for folks who live in such areas, but the fact is they have two choices -- either move, or campaign to change hearts and minds and create a majority that will go the other way. They should NOT count on Congress or the Justice Department coming in to solve their problems.

Our local city government is as corrupt and incompetent as you can find in the US -- yet, a large majority of our citizens have voted time and again to keep the bumbling crooks on City Council in office. I don't like it -- I vote against them, and I constantly campaign among fellow citizens to put the pressure on. But there's no way the state or federal government is going to come in and fix it to suit me, and I don't want them to.

It's part of the deal when you have a republic.
Pisgah, it's not up to the voters or politicians of NY and NJ to change their laws on this issue. The Federal Govt DOES have the power over them in this case. But you have to know some history to see how this started in the first place.

The State of NY passed a law called the Sullivan ACT. That was the first law that restricted carry. It was intended to get at mobsters. It was an early example of a good intention law ruining the freedom of the greater masses that were law-abiding citizens, thereby taking away the rights of the lawful citizen to protect themselves from the UNLAWFUL folks. The Supreme Court should have, and could have, stopped the assault on outr rights THEN. But they failed to do so and thus we have all this State Law stuff that we have now, and we all hate.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-27-2018, 12:59 PM
LVSteve's Avatar
LVSteve LVSteve is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 8,996
Likes: 7,614
Liked 9,020 Times in 3,685 Posts
Default

The only thing a state like New York will recognize is a concrete ruling against them by SCOTUS. That is not going to happen unless an offended gun owner with a lot of time on their hands and a shed load of money to burn takes them to court. Even then, it assumes that SCOTUS would even hear the case. Also, it would take YEARS to get that far. All states with dodgy statutes on many subjects play this game.

The DoJ are reluctant to step in even if a complaint is made direct to them as they know the howl of "states' rights" would immediately go up. Also, with the short election cycles we have compared to the apparently infinite inertia of the court system, the chances are there would be at least one change in administration before the case really got going. You could almsot guarantee one of those administrations would "advise" the DoJ to cease and desist. Welcome to America in the 21st century.
__________________
Release the Kraken
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-27-2018, 01:52 PM
ISCS Yoda's Avatar
ISCS Yoda ISCS Yoda is offline
US Veteran
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 1,048
Liked 4,998 Times in 2,056 Posts
Default

I was going to cut and paste a lot of the above comments and reply to them individually but it would take too long. So, I will answer the question this way:

1.

Quote:
So my question is this: Why doesn't the US Attorney General not prosecute the States of NJ & NY for not conforming to the laws of The UNITED STATES?
Really? Are you serious? Do you think the Attorney General has nothing better to do than to try to force those states to change their gun laws? Do you think the US Attorneys in NY and NJ have so little on their plates that they are going to just whip up lawsuits against those states' firearms laws? That presumes those US Attorneys (a) care about the states' firearms laws and (b) don't agree with them - and this item b could be a real issue in such jurisdictions where so many folks are anti-gun. So that's problem number 1 to consider. Then there is this:

2.

Until the McDonald case the Second Amendment did not even apply to the states. See McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010). This landmark SCOTUS decision, using the Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment, held that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms" under the Second Amendment is incorporated against the states. THAT WAS 2010!!!

So the ink is still wet on that decision and its impact on the States and what they can and cannot do. This is especially so because the late, great Justice Antonin Scalia, writing the majority opinion in the Heller case - See District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), two years earlier, said that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited and he specifically noted that guns and gun ownership would continue to be regulated.

(Note to the mods - if there is a copyright on any of that it belongs to the Supreme Court/Federal government but I think it is all public domain).


The sum and substance of those two cases is that until the SCOTUS says otherwise the States are still free to impose reasonable restrictions on firearms. So no US Attorney General is going to try to force anything in the world of gun regulations or the lack thereof on any states across the country.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #40  
Old 07-28-2018, 04:17 PM
Old Arkansawyer Old Arkansawyer is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 264
Likes: 1,507
Liked 398 Times in 155 Posts
Default

Let's face it folks, most, if not all, politicians want some form of gun control. They just bad mouth the opposing party when they are not in charge. Example is reciprocity of ccw permits, don't hold your breath until that becomes law.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 07-28-2018, 05:05 PM
Harrison Harrison is offline
US Veteran
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 443
Liked 1,110 Times in 563 Posts
Default

I find it easier to just avoid these very restrictive states, and not spend a cent within their borders. There are lots of states that honor my CCP that I can visit.
__________________
Can my S&W Mdl 10 shoot +P
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 08-01-2018, 02:45 PM
ISCS Yoda's Avatar
ISCS Yoda ISCS Yoda is offline
US Veteran
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 1,048
Liked 4,998 Times in 2,056 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrison View Post
I find it easier to just avoid these very restrictive states, and not spend a cent within their borders. There are lots of states that honor my CCP that I can visit.
If I didn't have family in such places I would never go there. It's easy to say you won't go there when you are disconnected to the place. Sadly, I have no choice. Heck, I even have a gunless twin brother up there!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 08-03-2018, 02:01 PM
Rastoff's Avatar
Rastoff Rastoff is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: So Cal (Near Edwards AFB)
Posts: 13,062
Likes: 2,132
Liked 13,242 Times in 5,253 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOV5 View Post
So my question is this: Why doesn't the US Attorney General not prosecute the States of NJ & NY for not conforming to the laws of The UNITED STATES? I am sick of States that think they re above Federal Law!
I too am sick about this stuff, but they are not violating federal law. In fact, under the current interpretation of the law, the individual states have the right to limit concealed carry. I don't like it or agree with it, but that is the law as it stands now. So, they are not violating federal law. This is why the US Attorney General (USAG) won't sue them.

However, this is the United States of America. If you don't like something, you have the opportunity to change it. Why wait for the USAG to do it? Do it yourself. In fact, just look at all the landmark cases. None of them list the USAG as the plaintiff. It's always some individual or private group. Miller, Heller, McDonald, Caetano, they're all people bringing suit against the municipality or state.

So, you don't like it? Go challenge it in court. We'll support you.


The biggest problem in gun control issues in modern day US is that we're fast to complain on social media, but slow to real action and far too many don't vote. If you don't like it, CHANGE IT! Don't just sit here and complain about it.
__________________
Freedom isn't free.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 08-05-2018, 12:52 PM
Practical Practical is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 598
Likes: 3
Liked 260 Times in 150 Posts
Default

This thread shows most of us gun owners are ignorant of the true nature of our constitutional rights. The only reason we even have guns today was because the government in most places was distant and not involved in our daily life. Today every level of government is involved in our lives to the point where we eventually will have no rights.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #45  
Old 08-05-2018, 01:36 PM
Ribwizzard's Avatar
Ribwizzard Ribwizzard is offline
Member
Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted? Why isn't NJ & NY prosecuted?  
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Tampa/miami
Posts: 151
Likes: 13
Liked 180 Times in 59 Posts
Default

The importance of keeping states rights is that individuals have the opportunity to live where their beliefs are similar to their neighbors. If the people of N.Y. dont want guns. Dont force it upon them, go somewhere else.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Car mechanic prosecuted for building rifle silencers for Navy SEALs Jinglebob The Lounge 51 03-10-2014 11:36 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.42 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
© S-W Forum, LLC 2000-2018
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)