Is there a marked difference between the way straight drop and FBI cant holsters carry? Is there an advantage to one over the other, specifically when using for concealment? Is one more versatile than the other?

All of my experience is with the FBI cant. I’m considering a Kramer Vertical Scabbard which is available in both configurations. It would be for either a 3” K frame or 2” J frame. Maybe, if my financial secretary is feeling generous, I can get both!

First, take the financial secretary to a nice dinner then approach the subject….. I have three of them all straight drop - 4 inch k frame, 4 inch N frame and 1911 commander. The 4 inch K and the commander were bargain bin gun show finds. If I were to order another and it was for concealed carry I would go with the FBI cant. The straight drop is great for field use but on my body (5’8” 175) the guns butts are too straight up for good concealment except in winter with heavy coat. Just my opinion. Kim at Kramer is very good to deal with.

I much prefer the FBI cant of 15-20 degrees to the vertical variety.

I’m significantly quicker on presentation with the canted variety.

Although it’s not a significant issue for me, the canted holster is easier to conceal than the vertical holster

To me, the longer the barrel, the more helpful the cant.

Depends on the pistol for me. Revolvers and 5” barrels need a cant. Shorter semi’s don’t. Your body style and draw stroke dictate it, so it’s different for everybody . . . .

__________________
Wisdom comes thru fear . . .

Prefer the FBI cant at 3 oclock for the medium to large semi's being carried. Much better concealment, especially for when you actually move/bend/reach. For the smaller gripped pistols like a xds, can easily use a straight drop at 4 oclock, or behind the hip for what ever time that is.

For me carrying with a FBI cant takes some practice to bend my hand slightly rearward.

The forward cant helps with a draw while seated for sure, and seems to help while standing as well. Straight drop I use for woods walking sidearms.

For me straight works fine for a j-frame on the hip and gives you the option of appendix carry without a cant, which is preferable in front.

__________________
Thirty characters. Exactly...

It is kind of a personal body dynamics thing for me. If I am carry behind my hip (normal) I like a slightly high rise, canted holster. If I am carrying at or slightly in front of my hip I do much better with a vertical holster.

I have a couple of the Kramer MSP paddles, and have carried a pistol as big as an H&K USP 45 concealed. Your shoulder joint may drive the train. As for getting a holster, I would get it for a 3"K - the difference in performance is easily worth the modest difference in concealment.

__________________
NHI, 10-8.

Mostly body mechanics and personal preference, but the length of the barrel will also have some impact on which works better.

I prefer a straight up and down OWB holster, but it needs to be worn just in front of the point of the hip to work right, and this can compromise concealment depending on clothing.

The FBI cant is designed to be worn behind the hip. The draw is a little longer, but can be easier on worn out shoulders, and provides slightly better concealment. I usually go with some cant on an IWB strong side holster to get it behind the hip for max concealment.

I love when actors on TV shows have an FBI cant holster shoved all the way around to the appendix... looks ridiculous!

The cant is supposed to move the butt of the gun forward and make it less likely to print. But, you can dress around that.

As some others have mentioned body mechanics, the ride height of the holster and barrel length can affect which works best for you as does exactly where you put it. Right at 3 o' clock for a right hander will make it very hard to hide. Back behind the hip hides better. Considering body mechanics, my duty rig was never at 3 o' clock. I've got a Mernickle holster with a very slight cant, but the front edge of the trigger guard is about in the middle of the belt. Works for me.

IMO, a straight drop conceals better in most cases; due to the heel of the grip not sticking up. An FBI cant draws quicker. Ofcourse all this depends on the gun, body, where it’s worn, etc… All my holsters are canted.

IMO, a straight drop conceals better in most cases; due to the heel of the grip not sticking up. An FBI cant draws quicker. Ofcourse all this depends on the gun, body, where it’s worn, etc… All my holsters are canted.

My wrist doesn’t like too high of a ride or more than a few degrees of butt forward can’t from the hip point back.

Straight drop at the hip of forward.

I really like a cross draw work on the strong side, with the but over where acjeans pocket would be. That’s reverse cant compared to the FBI cant and works great for me.

I hope that the above is useful, but I think that you have to try each case. My inclination is toward FBI cant, and most of my holsters have it, but I did buy a Kramer vertical from Dillon for my 520, and it worked great. I did carry it at three o'clock (see post #8 above).

__________________
Formerly Model520Fan

Bad shoulder; 3 o'clock, straight drop, seems to work least painful for me!

I prefer a canted holster and LOVE the Kramer OWB scabbards made in Horsehide. I own a bunch of them and aside from never wearing out, they are the best holsters I've ever owned!

Straight vs canted is more of a personal choice, however it seems most EDCers prefer canted from my observations over the years. It just seems a bit easier to extract the gun when worn in a 3 - 4 o'clock position. If worn between 2 - 3 o'clock a straight design might be easier.

I wear at about 4 O'clock so I need the cant.

Also important is how high the holster rides on the belt; for me some "high ride holsters don't allow me enough arm movement to draw anything but a 2" revolver...... 5'8" 165 lbs.

Go with what works for your body. In my case, I'm a bit large of belly, small of butt and have bad shoulders. Straight drop works much better for me than any cant at all.
I'm also very fond of Avenger style holsters that tuck the gun's butt in close to my body.
But again, you need to experiment and find what works for your particular body type. That's why most of us have a box of holsters that didn't work.

Neutral cant I like as it is possible to use right side or cross draw draw.

Very slight cant forward for me is my preference but I do use a few non adjustable neutrals. I find the FBI cant (believe 15-25 degrees) can get a little to forward for me.

__________________
Is that a gun No a lifesaver

In the car seated the canted holster is more comfortable. My opinion.

__________________
SWCA 3255 SWHF 615

Lots of good answers there that are very near the mark. Yes, it depends -- but not so much on the pistol but on the 'clocking' of it around the waistbelt, in a holster.

Put your favorite pistol, or any pistol, in your waistband without a holster starting at 3:00. For your hand to insert the pistol into the trousers band naturally, you'll discover that the barrel is pointed roughly straight down. This w/b call zero 'caster'.

Move it 'round to 4:00 and you'll find that the angle has changed; this is about 25 degrees negative caster and the barrel is to the rear. This was used by the Texas Rangers beginning 1905 to conceal their SAAs in the Sunday scabbard better known as the Brill.

negative caster 24 degs (3).jpg

The FBI followed the same practice because both groups of gunfighters were required to hide their big guns well back of open coats. These were no longer cowboys. It's not an accident for another reaon, that the FBI and the Rangers used the same angle; they also used the same holsters. Famed Rangers like Trimble carried the Brill, and famed FBI agents like Bryce and Campbell carried the Myres Threepersons with the same angle.

Move the pistol further back towards the spine and you'll end up with a 60 degree angle while you're holding the pistol by its grips; this we call *** ("small of back carry" in censored mode) today.

Move it forward of 3:00, to 2:00, and the muzzle will begin to swing forward to what's known as positive caster; your hand will always fall naturally to the grip. This is the angle that became popular with 'combat' shooters of the '70s because it could also be used as a crossdraw on the opposite side.

positive caster 20 degrees (1).jpg

1:00 and 12:00 carry is simply stupid so it doesn't matter how well the hand falls to the grip when you shoot yourself :-)

Anyway, because few makers accurately depict on their sites or catalogs, just how each of their holster models carries at an angle, one needs to be VERY careful in making a choice. Making assumptions about this purchase will create a 'box o holsters' for you. Ditto getting the carry HEIGHT wrong; ideally the holster carries your pistol with the knuckle of the second finger just clearing or touching your carry belt when concealed carry.

This height will keep your pistol from being top heavy, and keep the cylinder of a revolver at an ideal location on your torso. This is for concealed of course; specialized carry or cowboy carry has another set of 'rules'/'guidelines'.

This way the choice stops being a 'matter of opinion' but a matter of informed choice instead.

P.S. no pistol carrier you meet will truly know what angle his/her pistol is being carried at. I've been on forums a long time and typically these are simply educated guesses. i will say two things: the first is that one cannot 'feel' a difference in angle of 5 degrees; and the second is that no matter what angle you've been handed, you will move the grip along the belt line until your hand falls naturally to the grip ANWAY.

__________________
Red Nichols The Holstorian

I only wear OWB holsters, preferably pancake holsters for CCW. They’re all straight, no cant. Years ago when I carried a 6” 28-2, I bought an A. E. Nelson forward cant break-front duty holster (when they were authorized), opposite of the FBI cant and man, I could draw fast with that thing... Not as comfortable as the FBI cant in the car but since I was working a freeway beat it was the way to go for me...

Agree Jimmy: I've worn this neutral cant old Hunter as a left side cross draw for years when driving. Comfortable and easy access. I usually wear it with a CA Undercover or Model 36.

__________________
John

We can think of the FBI angle as originating with future FBI agents Jelly Bryce and Jerry Campbell, fellow detectives at Oklahoma City P.D. since 1927 who were recruited by Hoover for their reps for killing armed crims; both became agents for the BOI in 1934 that became the FBI in 1935. Both men had the Myres 614, as did agent Walsh; and we have two of the three of these men's holsters and can say confidently that 'the FBI angle' was that of the Brills of 1905 -- typically a carry angle of 30-35 degrees. That's a LONG way from 15-25 degrees. This is Walsh's, the other two agents are the same and first were for Smith's .44s then for the new .357s:

walsh fbi 33 degrees negative caster.jpg

Also be aware that these agents favored the Myres over the Brill because the Myres belt loops were for wider gunbelts of 2+", and these agents liked to rock the holstered revolver forward during the draw; which I call the 'sling draw'. Many images of both men in action, and news articles about their Myres features.

Now: today's FBI may be using a Safariland plastic paddle holster that most definitely is nearly vertical, and it appears to be worn as on TV, forward of the hip (pelvis). So that angle is much less and c/b considered a 'modern' FBI angle yet darned near 100 years later . . ..

__________________
Red Nichols The Holstorian

I tried FBI cant because I thought that's what I was "supposed" to do, but find a neutral cant more comfortable to draw from.

The "FBI Cant" was/is intended to facilitate the draw from a holster typically carried at waist level. It was not intended to improve either comfort when seated in/driving a car or concealment as others have opined. However, there may/can be some incidental benefit in either of these things.

I've used both. I would give a slight to the neutral (straight) cant for faster draw for most handguns. The FBI cant conceals better when carrying larger handguns, particularly larger grips. Bending with a neutral cant is going to print more.

Posted above..... see RedNichole's post 23 above...........

For most of the past 30 + years I've carried predominantly slight cant when carrying a S&W 3913NL IWB at 4 O'clock.

Lately, with cooler weather, I've been carrying a Beretta 92 Compact w/ 15rd Mec-gar magazine OWB in a Bang Bang Gun Leather "Rhodesian" w/ Stright drop at 3 O'clock Under a LL Bean "Hurricane" heavy cotton/fleece lined shirt.
The 92 Compact is really a "small' duty size gun IMO...... but the short butt on the Compact does not extend beyond my rib cage.

Every holster design involves compromises among the 4 basic factors of comfort, accessibility, security, and concealment. When any one factor is emphasized there will be compromises in the other factors.

There is no such thing as the perfect holster any more than there is a perfect handgun for every user or situation.

What works well for one person will fail miserably for another person.

With holster cant as a specific topic for conversation, we need to consider the basic abilities and limitations of the human body. Neutral cant works very well when carried on the point of the hip (3 o'clock position) or slightly forward. A butt-forward cant works well when carried behind the hip. The further to the rear a holster is carried the more cant is required to allow the hand, wrist, and forearm to achieve a correct shooting grip when drawing the weapon.

Forcing the hand and wrist to rotate to extreme positions has a negative effect on grip strength. What good is it to draw your weapon without having positive control? What good is it to draw your weapon, then have to shift your grip before you are able to properly address a potential target?

For most civilian concealed carry (and plain clothes LE work) a strong-side holster riding just behind the hip (3:30 to 4:00 position) with about 15-degrees forward cant provides the optimum combination of comfort, concealment, and accessibility. Security can be addressed by retention devices (thumb-break), but is also possible simply by clamping your strong-side arm snugly against the body.

Again, nothing is perfect, nothing is absolute, and nothing is fool-proof. Only the individual user can determine which factors are most important for his circumstances and choose accordingly (knowing that compromises are part of the selection process).

__________________
Life of the party until 8:00PM

^This.

Well said.

Plus, I'd add that I've purchased many a holster that I thought would be perfect, but after wearing them for a week, I wasn't comfortable.

How far up or down the pistol rides also matters.

I only wear inside the pants.

Just FYI, this is how I wear my 3" model 66. I don't even know it's there.





Just for giggles, this is how I wear an autoloader (Glock23).

Attached Images

	0A3B988E-E4F7-4972-ADC1-6AD89F9497A9.jpg (98.2 KB, 78 views)
	57DB46EA-77BA-4E1B-81D9-F331CA1B0820.jpg (60.7 KB, 79 views)

__________________
Death? Smile back...