Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > Concealed Carry & Self Defense

Notices

Concealed Carry & Self Defense All aspects of Concealed and Open Carry, Home and Self Defense.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-17-2009, 11:37 PM
JDBraddy JDBraddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 1 Post
Default

Am considering getting a new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Top contenders right now are S&W 642 and Kahr PM9. Tritium night sights are a definate plus for me, I love them on my Kimber Tactical Ultra-II. My 625 also made me fall in love with moon clips. I think my ideal gun would be a 642 converted to shoot 9mm with moon clips, and fitted with tritium dot sights, though I'm afraid it might be cost prohibative to have all that done. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-17-2009, 11:37 PM
JDBraddy JDBraddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 1 Post
Default

Am considering getting a new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Top contenders right now are S&W 642 and Kahr PM9. Tritium night sights are a definate plus for me, I love them on my Kimber Tactical Ultra-II. My 625 also made me fall in love with moon clips. I think my ideal gun would be a 642 converted to shoot 9mm with moon clips, and fitted with tritium dot sights, though I'm afraid it might be cost prohibative to have all that done. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-18-2009, 05:12 AM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

I'm thinking that 9mm would be too high pressure for an Airweight like the 642. A Scandium gun would work. I think a J frame would be easier to hide than a PM9.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-18-2009, 08:36 AM
Gov Gov is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Why not just go with the 642 / Crimson Trace combo....?

okay, crimson trace is not exactly "night sites", and .38 is not exactly a 9mm., but darn close, and from personal experience, quite effective!

Personally, I wouldn't want an auto in my pocket... too many moving parts to get plugged up, and fairly difficult to fire from the pocket compared to the j-frame.

~GOV
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-18-2009, 08:42 AM
yanici yanici is offline
US Veteran
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: N/E Massachusetts
Posts: 445
Likes: 126
Liked 155 Times in 84 Posts
Default

642 in a Mika pocket holster. 'Nuff said.

Edit: I had the misses lengthen my pocket in my jeans by 2 1/2" and what a nice fit for the 642. She did 7 pairs for me. Good girl...I'll keep her.
__________________
John
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-18-2009, 09:21 AM
moxie moxie is offline
Member
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 292
Liked 641 Times in 345 Posts
Default

The 642 in a Mika pocket holster is tops. Although the 642 converted to 9mm and moonclips sounds appealing, it has a drawback as a pocket gun...the moonclip. Loaded, it's a bulky item to pocket effectively, and, without a case or holder to protect it can get bent and a round can fall out. The 642 in .38, on the other hand, can be used with speed strips, which are flat enough to permit easy concealment. They are also robust enough to hold up. I love moonclips, but in a full size gun where spares can be carried in proper holders.
__________________
USAF, 69-92
Vietnam, 72-73
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-18-2009, 10:08 AM
USAF385's Avatar
USAF385 USAF385 is offline
US Veteran
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NEPA Endless Mountains
Posts: 3,919
Likes: 561
Liked 2,190 Times in 754 Posts
Default

642. .38+P

I have very quickly fallen for mine. It's over a month old now, and I can't go anywhere without it. It's light, easy to carry, and with proper +P rounds really packs a punch. I have no issues with recoil or aim. I'd recommend this to anyone.
__________________
- The Federalist #46 -
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-18-2009, 11:44 AM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Actually if you want to get 9mm snubby power, I'll bet a 340 with Speer SB .357 will be about the equivalent and less expensive. For a reload, pack a second gun. I also prefer more power than a .38 +P, so I think your thinking is on the right track.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-18-2009, 12:04 PM
bk43 bk43 is offline
Member
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Liked 38 Times in 26 Posts
Default

I'll second the 642. I'm an average size guy in T-shirt, shorts and flippies weather most of the year. A 642 in a pocket holster is handy, doesn't print and it keeps the body sweat off the gun.

My holsters are the $12.95 Uncle Mike's. Use them until they get a little grungy and then chuck it and buy another.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-18-2009, 04:00 PM
n4zov's Avatar
n4zov n4zov is offline
US Veteran
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: S.E. USA
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Liked 63 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Just pick up a 940 and you have the 9mm plus the ability to use moon clips. I have one, and it my favorite pocket gun.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-18-2009, 04:09 PM
haggis haggis is offline
Absent Comrade
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 16
Liked 203 Times in 87 Posts
Default

My "all the time" gun is a 642. .38+P's are both controllable and effective. Speed strips are good for top-off reloads, Safariland Comp 1's are just about as fast as moon clips, with practice.

The 642 in a Wild Bill's pocket holster is on me all year, summer or winter. On those rare occasions when intuition raises the hair on the back of my neck, it going to be a 3" 625 or a .45ACP Combat Commander, with 230 gr. Golden Sabers, IWB holster.

Buck
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-18-2009, 04:14 PM
Spotteddog Spotteddog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 24 Posts
Default

I just got my first ever 9 mm. Guess what's in the off side pocket? An old school .38 Special Centennial.
(EDIT) I should have said an Aluminum Ti, Centennial, sorry?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-18-2009, 05:08 PM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by bk43:
My holsters are the $12.95 Uncle Mike's. Use them until they get a little grungy and then chuck it and buy another.
Throw it in the wash with your clothes. It will be almost like new, but still broken in. That's what I do for my Uncle Mike's holster for my P3AT.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-18-2009, 05:58 PM
G-ManBart G-ManBart is offline
Member
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Detroit Metro
Posts: 208
Likes: 3
Liked 15 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Tried a 640 with custom D&L Sports night sights and it was too heavy and a touch big for my pockets (mostly the grip was too long) as I'm not a big guy. It's my wife's CCW gun, but I wanted to try it for pocket carry. The 340 would be better as the grip is a little shorter.

In the end we bought my wife a Kahr PM9 for her running gun (she's a hard core runner, but very petite so weight makes a big difference). It's about 100% easier to carry in your pocket...flatter, lighter and just easier. It's in my pocket right now and when I come home from work and take off my duty guns, it goes in my pocket and stays there until I go to bed. Most times I forget it's there. R,
__________________
USPSA TY23298
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-18-2009, 07:13 PM
wjh2657 wjh2657 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lafayette,Tennessee
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

I EDC a 642 in pocket holster in the summer (640 IWB in winter) but up to now I have had problem with jeans. It isn't just the length of pocket but also how they are cut across upper thighs.

After years of attempts to get a BERSA .380 to function well enough to trust, I traded it in on a 637. Voila! The 637 is just enough different in profile to slide into and hide within my jeans' pockets. I use the same pocket holsters but it just fits better. I still use 642 in dress pants and Dockers, but the 637 has become my "blue pants" gun.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-20-2009, 05:10 AM
bk43 bk43 is offline
Member
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Liked 38 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by flop-shank:
Throw it in the wash with your clothes. It will be almost like new, but still broken in. That's what I do for my Uncle Mike's holster for my P3AT.
I'm too stupid to have thought of anything like that. Sometimes I amaze myself. Great idea, thanks!

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-20-2009, 07:54 AM
Landpimp's Avatar
Landpimp Landpimp is offline
Member
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 813
Likes: 5
Liked 37 Times in 15 Posts
Default

I often carry my PM9 in my pocket, works great, but its a bit heavier than my 340PD which is my normal pocket gun
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-20-2009, 02:02 PM
GatorFarmer GatorFarmer is offline
Junior Member
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sheridan, Wyoming
Posts: 5,333
Likes: 159
Liked 3,889 Times in 1,361 Posts
Default

I always washed my Uncle Mikes - once removed from the pocket. Great way to flush out crud. Desantis Nemesis holsters can also survive the washer and dryer. Of course bending up the cardboard from a box of Sponge Bob Cheezits and using some Gorilla tape also works just as well.

Anyway, how big are the pockets in question? I used to pocket carry a G27. Worked fine. Some people carry N frames in their pockets, in which case a snub, alloy frame, moonclipped .45 ACP can be had.

Otherwise use the search function or ask in the revolvers 1980 to present section. There was a thread some months ago about a shop that converted revolvers to 9mm and moonclips. It wasn't all that expensive. I'd think that a steel framed gun would hold up better though. Esp if you're firing hot ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-20-2009, 04:45 PM
jeep jeep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

The 9mm snubbys are a pain to reload and spare ammo in moon clips bend easy and become useless. Have tryed the old ruger,Taurus,SW 9mm snubbys. Its a answer to problem that don,t need to be addressed. 9mm primers can back-up and lock up the wheelgun with there high pressure. THe 38+P is perfection in power and reload with positive ejection. No clips to bend and wear out and no locked up cly. When Charter arms brings out there abortion rimless wheelgun series history will repeat its self.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-20-2009, 05:07 PM
wjh2657 wjh2657 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lafayette,Tennessee
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

When you can wear heavy clothing to hide a belt holster, the bottom feeders can rule. they are the true combat handguns in wonderful calibers like 9MM, .40 S&W and the King .45 ACP. (I have a Glock 23 and carry it in Winter.)

When you have to stick a gun in slacks or shorts in 80 degree plus weather, the J-Frame in .38 spl and it's knockoffs is the queen of the day! The .38 Spl will survive because guns like the S&W 642 and Taurus 85 are being made in it. I have a 637 in my pocket as I type.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-21-2009, 03:34 AM
Stubborn Dutchman Stubborn Dutchman is offline
Member
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern lower Michigan
Posts: 70
Likes: 124
Liked 27 Times in 14 Posts
Default

I EDC a MK9 in a Kramer pocket holster. It's heavy and I need to keep my belt cinched tight (but got used to doing that) cause I'm overweight. The MK9 is a heavy little bugger but you can get used to it. Plus I love the smooth trigger! Been carrying it about eight years now.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-21-2009, 11:10 AM
GatorFarmer GatorFarmer is offline
Junior Member
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sheridan, Wyoming
Posts: 5,333
Likes: 159
Liked 3,889 Times in 1,361 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by wjh2657:
When you can wear heavy clothing to hide a belt holster, the bottom feeders can rule. they are the true combat handguns in wonderful calibers like 9MM, .40 S&W and the King .45 ACP. (I have a Glock 23 and carry it in Winter.)

When you have to stick a gun in slacks or shorts in 80 degree plus weather, the J-Frame in .38 spl and it's knockoffs is the queen of the day! The .38 Spl will survive because guns like the S&W 642 and Taurus 85 are being made in it. I have a 637 in my pocket as I type.
I hear that a lot. I live in VA currently. I've carried N frames, full size steel 1911s, and similar large guns here in the summer. For a while I was toting a Model 58 as constant companion. Either IWB or OWB, I just untucked my shirt.

I'm from Michigan, and in the summer there, I'd just keep my sport coats on, but would buy "tropical weight ones". The Italians still make these and they were popular with colonial oppressors in hot climates for years.

Of course I'd still stick a J frame in my pocket since I just always tend to do that.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-21-2009, 11:15 AM
ENH's Avatar
ENH ENH is offline
US Veteran
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 3
Liked 35 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Here are three that I routinely pocket carry. The 8 shot 327 and the 325 both use your preferred moon clips. 8 rounds of 357 is very comforting.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-21-2009, 02:31 PM
starbuck starbuck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts
Default

I find the Colt Agent .38 special with 6 rds, and a hammer shield, a lite pocket carry and my S&W 386pd for IWB carry for the other days, depending on my mood.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-23-2009, 02:06 PM
zippo zippo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I guess I am going to be beaten up here, love the j frames, but once i put my new ruger lcp 380 auto with a desantis pocket holster in my pants, there was no going back. The key is to use the best 380 ammo, which i believe is the new Hornady critical defense load with the polymertip for deep penatration for the 380.you could alos put a few round of the buffalo bore 380 hard cast.......will penetrate very very deep.
Also, Again I will get beat up, if you have not picked up a kel-tec p9 9mm, your missing something too. Amazing little 9 shot 9mm.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-23-2009, 09:38 PM
G-ManBart G-ManBart is offline
Member
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Detroit Metro
Posts: 208
Likes: 3
Liked 15 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by zippo:
I guess I am going to be beaten up here, love the j frames, but once i put my new ruger lcp 380 auto with a desantis pocket holster in my pants, there was no going back. The key is to use the best 380 ammo, which i believe is the new Hornady critical defense load with the polymertip for deep penatration for the 380.you could alos put a few round of the buffalo bore 380 hard cast.......will penetrate very very deep.
Also, Again I will get beat up, if you have not picked up a kel-tec p9 9mm, your missing something too. Amazing little 9 shot 9mm.
I don't see why you'd get beat up, but I'd point out there are other similar choices that are as good, maybe better depending on your wants/needs. The LCP is 5.16" long and 3.6" tall, and weighs 10oz. The Kahr PM9 is 5.3" long, 4.0" tall and weighs 14oz. The Kel-Tec PF-9 is 5.85" long, 4.3" tall and weighs 13oz.

The best .380 ammo isn't as good as just decent 9mm ammo, and since there isn't enough difference in size, I don't see why anyone would opt for the LCP.

The Kel-Tec is longer, taller and weighs almost as much. The Kel-Tec lists one extra round, but you can use the slightly longer mag for the PM9 and have the same capacity with the height now equal, but still have it shorter which makes it fit your pocket easier.

I'm not a big guy and anything much longer than the PM9 is going to start poking out of my pocket.

The one downside to the Kahr is price....I don't put a whole lot of empahsis on price when it comes down to my security. Actually, the PM9 is my wife's running gun. Her normal CCW is a Smith 640 with D&L night sights....too heavy for running. The PM9 goes in my pocket when I get home and take off my duty guns...stays there until I go to bed and I never think about it being there. R,
__________________
USPSA TY23298
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-25-2009, 03:14 PM
courtyard courtyard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

642, CT grips and a Mika holster.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-25-2009, 03:36 PM
Capt Steve Capt Steve is offline
US Veteran
Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry". Considering new pistol for "Pocket Carry".  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,663
Likes: 762
Liked 2,879 Times in 417 Posts
Default

For pocket carry I prefer my Bersa .380 CC. Eight rounds of .380 Winchester 95 grain FMJ's work for me. In the pocket holster it doesn't print and is light enough to be comfortable even in warm weather (we have a lot of that here in Tucson). If I am going to have enough clothes on to cover the strong side OWB or IWB holsters then the choice is usually the MP9C or the 649.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-25-2009, 06:55 PM
Happy Hunter Happy Hunter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I bought a 642 Airweight 12 yr ago with a Kramer pocket holster. Very pocketable, very reliable, great, what is not to like. Never been "spotted" or questioned in all the time I've carried it.
Me being an engineer type am always looking for something better. I had 2 Kahrs (MK9 and E9) and loved them. So after some thought I bought a P9Covert and a Kramer pocket holster. Carried it about 6 months. I noticed there was a printed line the entire length of the slide. One day a friend asked me "What's in your pocket?" This friend would not react favorably to pistol packing. After a brief discussion that amounted to a nice way of saying mind your own business I have never carried the Kahr in a pocket since. I'm back to the 642. I have the smalled grips that are cut to the backstrap and bottom of the grip (actually the Uncle Mikes boot grips that came on it).
I've heard all kinds of people say "semis are thinner than a revolver so they conceal better". The fact is the cylinder is thinner than the Kahr. In an area about 1.5 x .5 inches the revolver is thicker than the semi. The rest of the gun: the entire barrel, frame and especially grip the revolver is thinner than the semi. It is also rounder while the semi is square edged and those square edge print!!!
I am always looking for something better. And I have tried so many "pocket guns". Really I just can't picture anything better than an airweight 38 revolver.
__________________
Happyhunter loves the outdoors and is thankful God made it. Praise the Lord!!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-26-2009, 05:28 AM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Happy hunter, a Mika pocket holster should print less than a Kramer. I own and like both for my J frames and that has been my experience. That might be the ticket for concealing a Kahr. A small wad of kleenex stuffed in the bottom of the pocket against the front of the holster may be of use breaking up the outline of the gun sometimes.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 04-26-2009, 05:49 AM
Litlman Litlman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pa
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Since 1993, 9 out of 10 times I have my 442 in my front left pocket in an Uncle Mikes. Speed loader in the right pocket.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-26-2009, 05:55 AM
Smitty500Mag Smitty500Mag is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Originally from Knoxville
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Forget the 642 and get the 640PD that way you can shoot not only .38 Special or .38 Special +P you can also shoot .357 Mags if you want to. They are the same size and weight also.

Smitty
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
442, 45acp, 637, 642, 940, airweight, ccw, centennial, commander, crimson, desantis, glock, j frame, kahr, kramer, lock, model 625, ruger, safariland, snubnose, taurus


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pocket Carry Krell1 Concealed Carry & Self Defense 72 02-03-2018 09:38 PM
Pocket Carry Hurryin' Hoosier Concealed Carry & Self Defense 67 06-28-2012 10:29 PM
Weight of pistol for pocket carry greybeard43 Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 3 09-13-2011 08:15 PM
Pocket carry with 442? C/O S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 41 09-12-2011 05:01 AM
Pocket Carry - 38, 638, 49, 649?? KPK102084 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 7 02-17-2010 02:38 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)