smith-wessonforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    That's odd, MPs question my wife about her CCW permit
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Picture of Hobie
Posted Hide Post
A pregnant soldier in uniform without ID is stopped for speeding on post and questioned about her CCW. She was wrong for speeding, wrong for not having her ID with her and apparently innocent of violating an order not to have the CCW on post. In today's world I think she did darn well.

FWIW, women have used the pregnancy "bump" to hide a number of things and they have dressed in various clothing to deceive others as to their identification. People, even women, have been known to hide "stuff" in medical appliances such as casts, slings and colostomy bags. She would do well to have her ID with her.

That said, some MPs are no smarter than some infantry guys (I was one of those, too) and some get a lot of "juice" from making a stop. It pays to be cool and collected and smile, it pays double not to draw their attention.


Sincerely,

Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend."
Robert Louis Stevenson
 
Posts: 115 | Location: Staunton, VA, USA | Registered: 31 January 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
KKG
Member
Picture of KKG
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by fredmaya:..Seems to me, there is a lot of downside to a CCW.
I can't think of any thing that doesn't have a down side or maybe even two. Since I've been 'carrying' for the last Forty Years and have found more than one reason for having one and don't even want to consider what might have happened if I hadn't had one at those times. Well, you shoot what you want to and let me know when your D-300 gets you out of a jam with something more than an angry butterfly!!!


KKG - Again!!!


Texan - 1st, Last and Always!!!
S&WCA #1805
1st Cav Division, 45B20, Spec. 5, Proud Viet Nam Vet '69-'71
NRA Life Member - Benefactor Level
"There are some things more painful than the truth, but I can't think of them."
 
Posts: 4363 | Location: Kent - Wet (and Humid) Western Washington | Registered: 11 April 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of sipowicz
Posted Hide Post
Was she driving the Gator family tank? Big Grin




_________________________________________________
When a problem arises, sometimes Sipowicz is on the way!
 
Posts: 7249 | Location: Gun lovin' Hollywood Ca. | Registered: 09 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of CelticSire
Posted Hide Post
Marines are MPs, Navy are Masters-At-Arms. If they did run her license plate and came back w/ a CCW response, they did right in questioning whther or not she had the weapon w/ her. CCW, CHL, etc. are NOT valid on military bases that are Federal property, and possession of civilian firearms is restricted: If you live in quarters you may keep them there, but a soldier living in a barracks has to keep them in the unit Arms Room. All weapons must be registered with the PMO (Provost Marshal's Office), and concealed carry is only allowed for specific individuals in specific assignments. Regular MPs are not authorized to carry concealed. The nervousness may have come from her outranking them.


_________________________
Pray for peace, but keep your powder dry.

"My beloved America, thank you for your children. If your children want to become soldiers I will train them. When they are hungry I will feed them. When they are thirsty I will give them water. When they fight for freedom I will lead them. When they are unsteady on the battlefield I will motivate them. If they die on the battlefield I will bury them. So help me God."
 
Posts: 2168 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 25 April 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Venom Ballistics
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by fredmaya:
quote:
Originally posted by BarbC:
When we visited the base in Norfolk, we were told that concealed weapons were not permitted on base. It could be that they ran her plate, it came back that she has a permit, and so they wanted to be absolutely sure she was not in violation of post rules.
Seems to me, there is a lot of downside to a CCW.

Theres ample downside to many good things, and precautions are warranted.
Surviving child birth will result in every imaginable form of pain, illness and ultimately death.
car ownership will result in insurance premiums, fuel and maintenance expenses, and risk of becoming lost, or stranded. Please check your oil and other important fluids.
A moonlit slow dance with a beautiful woman may result in marriage, child support payments and regret. Make sure you can spend a lifetime with her.
A moonlit slow dance with a married beautiful woman may result in pain, severe hemorrhaging and loss of consciousness. Look for the wedding band mark on her hand.
Packing heat in forbidden areas may result in incarceration. Make sure your packing to the letter of the law.

Hunting with a 35 MM Cannon may result in a hostile encounter with subject matter confused about its proper place on the food chain. packing a 44 magnum backup is not unreasonable in this practice.
I hope I successfully articulated the point without the cheap shot


The good Lord will provide ... but its up to you to keep your powder dry www.venomballistics.com
 
Posts: 1035 | Location: WI | Registered: 13 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
GatorFarmer, what others have said about the running of the plates and a hit on the database...as I understand it here in Colorado CCH are put into a database and that data comes back to the inquiring LEO as "a person of interest" Eeker. This could be someone with an outstanding warrant, convicted felon, sex offender...bless my county sheriff's heart he and a hand full of other sheriffs refuse to put the names of their county CCH's names into the state for addition to that database.

I doubt that that is the case with your wife in her situation...they may have been following SOP in dealing with a CCH. Go talk to the PMO and see what the facts/SOP are. Preston
 
Posts: 163 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 06 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Frankly, considering your wife didn't have her ID on her, I'd let this drop. I have seen sailors taken to Mast for not having their ID. I would ensure that she has her military ID at all times in the future. If she is stopped again, she needs to have a chat with her CMC and let him or her pursue it with the base CMC. It can be a quiet way of finding out why and stopping it.


NRA Life Member
SWCA 1729

 
Posts: 812 | Location: Memphis, TN, USA | Registered: 02 March 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of sigp220.45
Posted Hide Post
Frankly, I don't see any reason to complain. She was speeding, so it was a valid stop. I'm sure the Concealed Weapons Permit came up in NCIC. She didn't have her ID. The MPs asked if she was carrying her handgun, but didn't search the car (all vehicles on the installation are subject to search) and didn't give her a ticket.

I'd drop off some cold Gatorade at the gate on the next hot day.


.............................

You might beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride.
 
Posts: 2987 | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Smitty500Mag:
quote:
Originally posted by fredmaya:
Seems to me, there is a lot of downside to a CCW.


Your about to be mugged by 2 criminals and you pull out your gun and either shoot them or put a stop to the assault without having to fire a shot to save your and your families lives. Now what is the downside? Confused

To hell with the other little inconveniences the main thing is you have a way to protect yourself whereas otherwise you would be killed with your cell phone in your hand dialing 911. Roll Eyes

Smitty


Am I all screwed up, or am I being reasonable in assuming that fredmaya is referring to the downside of having a LICENSE, not the downside of carrying a WEAPON?
 
Posts: 4159 | Location: MA | Registered: 15 December 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of billhud
Posted Hide Post
Not long after 11 Sep 01, I dove thru the Quantico MCB exit 148 gate (east of I95) from the WTBN on the west side of I95. Had several rifles in the cab of the 1978 Toyota P/U. While it took awhile to get through the gate (had to await the arrival of a Desk Sergeant/supervisor), I wasn't hassled at all, nor was I questioned about my CCW permit.


As Benjamin Franklin once said, "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."
 
Posts: 4470 | Location: The Old Dominion | Registered: 10 January 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tennexplorer:
Frankly, considering your wife didn't have her ID on her, I'd let this drop. I have seen sailors taken to Mast for not having their ID. I would ensure that she has her military ID at all times in the future. If she is stopped again, she needs to have a chat with her CMC and let him or her pursue it with the base CMC. It can be a quiet way of finding out why and stopping it.


If I remember correctly, Gatorfarmer's wife is not a sailor but an officer. While she should certainly have her ID card with her at all times, she should also be treated respectfully by the local MP's. Her immediate superior would probably be the best person to advise her how to respond, if at all, unless she's a nurse or an MD or somesuch, in which case the lowest-ranking person superior to her who actually knows anything about the military would be the choice (that might still be her immediate superior, but it is slightly less likely).
 
Posts: 4159 | Location: MA | Registered: 15 December 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
KKG
Member
Picture of KKG
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigp220.45:...I'm sure the Concealed Weapons Permit came up in NCIC...
Concealed Permits are issued by the individual States and have 'nothing' to do with the NCIC Computer System. Would you care to explain this Statement?


KKG - Again!!!


Texan - 1st, Last and Always!!!
S&WCA #1805
1st Cav Division, 45B20, Spec. 5, Proud Viet Nam Vet '69-'71
NRA Life Member - Benefactor Level
"There are some things more painful than the truth, but I can't think of them."
 
Posts: 4363 | Location: Kent - Wet (and Humid) Western Washington | Registered: 11 April 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Gator, did she have a scarf on her head? If so, she probably spooked them. Big Grin


Its a shame that youth is wasted on the young.
 
Posts: 1980 | Location: Goldsboro, NC | Registered: 09 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GatorFarmer:
We live off post. Of less concern than the MPs questioning her regarding the potential presence of the weapon, was the possibility that the "speeding" stop was a pretext to fish to see if there was a weapon present. We're well aware of the rules against carrying on Federal property/military bases. The general demeanor of a specific fishing expedition - continuing to ask numerous leading questions after being informed that there was no gun present - simply seemed a bit odd.

I found it a curiousity moreso than overly oppressive, as I'm sure that the guards have a job to do and do the best that they can. (The only time I considered complaining up the chain of the command was a past incident when I saw a guard at the gate who was keeping his finger on the trigger of his Benelli shotgun. Pretty sure that wasn't SOP, and while there likely wasn't a round in the chamber - one hopes - it still seemed poor gun safety. But I figured that standing in the hot sun wearing armor is punishment enough and his supervisor can yell at him for it when he catches him doing it.)

Gator
Don't be so sure the shotgun did not a have a round in the chamber. Rules are made to be broken. I know when I ran some security details all my people had rounds in the chamber. I told my crew look it's your a** if you want to carry the firearm with a round in the chamber it's up to you I do. And trust me if you didn't have your ID or know the password of the day to gain access to the area you were detained. Usually spread eagle on the ground.
If you didn't cooperate My orders were shoot the pos. I could tell you some funny happenings about that.
I would select my people I would select the least intelligent people I could find they make the best sentries They follow orders to the T.

Pay attention to rule #11

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Orders_for_Sentries
 
Posts: 2072 | Location: USA | Registered: 01 July 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
RKO
Member
Picture of RKO
Posted Hide Post
Gator,

Sig 225.45 and Celtic Sire are giving you some sound advice.

Your wife was at fault by driving on a military base without her military ID, and was speeding. The stop was probably motivated by a link to the VA CHL list, and the speeding.

Do not, repeat, do not, try to intercede on her behalf. This incident is her responsbility. The system will not look kindly on her civilian husband trying to insert himself into this
situation. She got off easy, let it stay like this.

RKO

quote:
Originally posted by sigp220.45:
Frankly, I don't see any reason to complain. She was speeding, so it was a valid stop. I'm sure the Concealed Weapons Permit came up in NCIC. She didn't have her ID. The MPs asked if she was carrying her handgun, but didn't search the car (all vehicles on the installation are subject to search) and didn't give her a ticket.

I'd drop off some cold Gatorade at the gate on the next hot day.
 
Posts: 1296 | Location: "War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it;and those who brought war into our country deserve all the curses and maledictions a people can pour out." William T. Sherman, First President of the Ol War Skule, 1860 | Registered: 25 April 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3  
 

smith-wessonforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    That's odd, MPs question my wife about her CCW permit

© smith-wessonforum 2008