smith-wessonforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Smith & Wesson Semiauto Pistols    model 41 - what's so great about it?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Picture of khclark
Posted
So, I've decided to cancel my 945 layaway and put it into a model 41. I've shot several 41's and liked them and I've wanted one for a long time, but had couple questions...

I understand and believe that the model 41 is one of the best target pistols made, but I was wondering exactly what is it that makes it great? I mean, mechanically, what is the difference between a $900 model 41 and, say, my $300 22S?

Right now, this 41 will be just for recreational shooting, but I foresee getting into NRA-type bullseye competition with it at some point in the future. With that in mind, which barrel is better, the 5.5" heavy or the 7" light?

Thanks for your help.


______________________________
revolvers: anachronistic yet efficacious
 
Posts: 578 | Registered: 25 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
The trigger pull quality.

The accuracy.

The great sights.

The way it balances in your hand.

The warm, fuzzy feeling it gives you as you chew the center out of your target.
 
Posts: 3638 | Location: SLC, Utah | Registered: 09 November 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BUFF:
The trigger pull quality.

The accuracy.

The great sights.

The way it balances in your hand.

The warm, fuzzy feeling it gives you as you chew the center out of your target.


I agree with everything BUFF said.

Just walked back into the house about 15 minutes ago (10/7/08 - 15:04 CDST) with a BSEG from shooting mine. It shoots so good you want to shoot it every day - and generally, I do! Smiler
 
Posts: 36 | Location: Texas | Registered: 31 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
which barrel is better, the 5.5" heavy or the 7" light?


The 5 1/2" has a better rear sight (or used to). For this reason I use an Aimpoint on my 7 1/2" instead of the 5".
 
Posts: 186 | Location: indiana | Registered: 26 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of khclark
Posted Hide Post
Thanks, guys. I didn't even know the rear sights were different. I'll take a closer look.

Doesn't the distance between the sights exceed the NRA mandated ten inches on the 7" barrel model?


______________________________
revolvers: anachronistic yet efficacious
 
Posts: 578 | Registered: 25 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I don't know the answer to that, but they do have an extended front sight model that you could adjust to be just right, that comes on the 5 1/2 heavy barrel.


Alias aeronut04. SWCA 2015
 
Posts: 325 | Location: Addison IL. | Registered: 01 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I have been posting a lot of questions about my new (used) Model 41 lately. I LOVE it. It does everything they say -- chews up the center. The trigger is heavenly, the sights (early 80s style) are fabulous, but it's what you can't get from a photo that makes it for me: the feel. It balances perfectly. It holds rock steady. It fits the hand like a 1911. And that blocky front end is pure sex appeal, for me. Like a SIG P225. Neither the Ruger nor Browning rounded, fluted, or even slabside barrels look and feel as good as the Model 41. If I had nothing else, I'd even consider carrying it for defense, it's so accurate.


"The Langstrom 7-inch gangley wrench can be used with the Finley-head sprocket."
 
Posts: 75 | Location: Sandy, Oregon | Registered: 24 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of khclark
Posted Hide Post
Thanks.


______________________________
revolvers: anachronistic yet efficacious
 
Posts: 578 | Registered: 25 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of OpsMgr
Posted Hide Post
I have 3 heavily modified Rugers that are tack drivers but my M41 is a "step up" in accuracy, fit, finish and balance plus it just looks F I N E in my hand...
 
Posts: 8 | Location: Southeast USA | Registered: 30 July 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
KAZ
Member
Posted Hide Post
My M41 is the best single firearm purchase I've ever made. I never tire of shooting mine. As to the barrel length I suggest that you just buy the best/cleanest example that you can find regardless of barrel length. Then pick up the other barrel to take advantage of the easy barrel swap out on the 41. I bought a new 7" barrel (they come factory drilled/tapped)so that I could shoot a red dot sight without modifiying my original 5.5.
 
Posts: 65 | Registered: 28 May 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Dump the iron sights and get an Ultra Dot. I have an older 41 that I bought back in the late 80's and the rear sight is different than the current one. While the irons are good, I'm sold on the Ultra Dot. Best of all, in your case, the factory barrel is already drilled and tapped. I bought a new barrel from Gil Hebard for a few dollars more than what the local gunsmiths wanted to drill and tap my old barrel.

Just don't shoot high velocity ammo in it, or if you must, buy a buffer.
 
Posts: 524 | Location: Stafford, VA | Registered: 01 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I can't explain what makes it great. all I know is that they are great.

About 15 years ago I was a dealer, and I took one in on trade. It was a long barrel (7"??) with a factory compensator/weight. I was not at all interested at the time in shooting that caliber, but I had heard so many stories about a model 41 that I just had to try it out.

After some rounds to get a feel for the gun and trigger, I put 48 out of 50 in the 2" square of a Redfield sighting in target shooting offhand at 10 yards. I later did 46 out of 50.

I never shot that kind of grouping with any kind of gun of any kind of caliber before or since. I handed it off to a friend who is an accomplished shooter and he did 50 out of 50.

Sooooo, that's my answer. I don't know why it's great, but it is.

Incidentally, we all have had guns we should not have sold, and that is one of mine.


NRA-USPSA-IDPA-ICORE-GSSF
 
Posts: 163 | Registered: 12 February 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Great choice for a .22 pistol. Just shoot one, then you'll know. Mine has sure found a home!
 
Posts: 1342 | Location: Signal Mtn., TN USA | Registered: 07 May 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of ammoman
Posted Hide Post
The S&W M-41 is real piece of crap.Don't buy any more. If you have any I'll take them off your hands for $75.00 apiece. I'll have to take the lose.

Best Regards
ammoman
 
Posts: 132 | Location: Charlotte, NC, USA | Registered: 14 August 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Swissman
Posted Hide Post
It's a nice pistol, but the triggerpull is not adjustable. And this makes it worthles for official competitions in Switzerland. My gun has a lighter triggerpull than allowed. So i stay with my FN "Browning" International for the real "fights".


Swissman


"I'm married to a woman named................something."
 
Posts: 1312 | Location: Switzerland | Registered: 19 February 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

smith-wessonforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Smith & Wesson Semiauto Pistols    model 41 - what's so great about it?

© smith-wessonforum 2008