smith-wessonforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  S&W Revolvers 1945 to the Present    Heavy L and N Frames. Best Balance? 3 or 4" BBL??
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
Hey all.
Just wanted to get some opinions on which barrel length everyone thinks balance better in these guns.
Examples of "Heavy" would be guns such as 686,627,629 etc.
Thanks, Pete
 
Posts: 63 | Registered: 04 May 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Hi, I have a 625 with a 3" barrel and have several with 4" barrels...I think both are pretty even on the ballance...I dont think the 1 inch would make much of a difference...Now the 6 inch guns are probably pretty well balanced....I like the 3 inch for carry and 4" for carry and target shooting...


Evil Triumphs When Good Men Do Nothing
 
Posts: 749 | Location: Winston-Salem NC | Registered: 06 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Landpimp
Posted Hide Post
much prefer my 4" 686 over my 6"
 
Posts: 1370 | Location: Gig Harbor WA | Registered: 29 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of diamonback68
Posted Hide Post
Did Smith ever make anything except 4" barrel guns? Big Grin Big Grin


Dick

If two of us are exactly alike, one of us is unnessary..
 
Posts: 3941 | Location: Central FL. USA | Registered: 24 June 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I've a 28-2 4" and it is probably the best-balancing gun I've ever shot.
 
Posts: 697 | Location: Upstate NY | Registered: 13 June 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Most of my S&Ws are 4 inch except a 25-2 and a model 28-2. I would not make a lot of difference in them as I do not carry anything. Each one is accurate if I do my part
 
Posts: 1619 | Location: KY | Registered: 03 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I have 3,4 and 6 in a 29--the longer length the better the balance for me
 
Posts: 483 | Location: Ohio USA | Registered: 26 April 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
As I prefer the gun to balance back in my hand for fast moving from target to target, I find the 3" in both L and N frames to work best for me, although I do not feel handicapped by a 4" in that regard. I only have 5 long (6-6.5") N frames, and I like them for precision aimed fire(SA). For fast work I find them slightly inhibiting.


The Islamic Terrorist Express; go directly to Allah, do not pass hell.
 
Posts: 438 | Registered: 26 June 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Depends on the gun, but the 4" does balance nicely on the N-frame. Here's a 22-4 4" in .45.
Bob

 
Posts: 292 | Registered: 01 January 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I can't speak to the K-frames. I have a slight preference for the 4" over the 3" in an N-frame.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would rather wake up in the middle of nowhere than in any city on earth.--Steve McQueen
 
Posts: 1212 | Location: Alyeska | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of m657
Posted Hide Post
I've got an unfluted 3-7/8" (or whatever) 610 that has the best natural balance of any DA revolver I've handled.


************
There are only two types of pain in this life: The pain of discipline, or the pain of regret.
The pain of discipline weighs pounds.
The pain of regret weighs tons.
 
Posts: 1555 | Location: sunny Orygun | Registered: 13 January 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of toroflow1
Posted Hide Post
I like the balance of the 4", and especially when shooting beyond 100 yards...that extra inch of barrel and sight radius makes a difference over a 3".


ken
S&WCA #1959
3" N frame accumulator (pre MIM!)
 
Posts: 2921 | Location: West Coast of Arizona | Registered: 15 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of tbury
Posted Hide Post
I have a 625 5" and a 625 mountain gun 4" for quick shooting it is hard to beat a half lug 4". For target work a 6.5 27 is hard to beat also. But then my 5" 625 punches paper with the best or them. Big Grin


revolver luvin' Mountaineer
 
Posts: 396 | Location: Central Kentucky | Registered: 01 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
The 4" balances best for me but I wouldn't dump my 3 incher.
 
Posts: 560 | Registered: 25 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
To me, the 4" tapered barrel N-frames balance the best. Current examples include the 21-4 and 22-4 models and the mountain gun models. The 4" heavy barrel, especially full-lugged versions, are barrel heavy; the 3" barrel N-frames, even the fully lugged ones, are a little barrel light. And in magnum calibers the 3" barrels have a very fast upward whip during recoil that tends to literally rip up my hands if the gun is wearing rubber grips.
 
Posts: 638 | Location: Broomfield, CO, USA | Registered: 13 September 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2  
 

smith-wessonforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  S&W Revolvers 1945 to the Present    Heavy L and N Frames. Best Balance? 3 or 4" BBL??

© smith-wessonforum 2008