|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Member |
this is the good side of my 32-20 SN.9830x
The other side is the confusing one. |
||
|
|
Member |
This side shows what happened if you sent your gun back to S&W in the 1970's.
|
|||
|
|
Member |
Yes - that was SOP for some number of years. Roy Jinks was able
to put a stop to that, when he found out about it. I think the factory believed that the service depart should bring a gun up to current specifications, and apparently roll markings were part of those specifications ! There were several guns like this offered at an auction last year. It was very confusing, at first, to see very early guns with very late markings. Later, Mike Priwer |
|||
|
Member![]() |
I learn something every day on here, Thanks Mike.
Later, John We live in the land of the FREE, because of the BRAVE. |
|||
|
|
Member |
I bid up an Army marked 1917 .45acp that had those roll stamps on them. That was before I learned that it was the rule for guns returned to the factory for repairs. Didn't win the auction.
|
|||
|
|
Member |
I've never seen that before either - thanks for sharing.
|
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

