Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
this is the good side of my 32-20 SN.9830x The other side is the confusing one.
 
Posts: 289 | Location: SW Ga. | Registered: 11 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
This side shows what happened if you sent your gun back to S&W in the 1970's.
 
Posts: 289 | Location: SW Ga. | Registered: 11 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Yes - that was SOP for some number of years. Roy Jinks was able
to put a stop to that, when he found out about it.

I think the factory believed that the service depart should bring
a gun up to current specifications, and apparently roll markings
were part of those specifications !

There were several guns like this offered at an auction last year.
It was very confusing, at first, to see very early guns with very
late markings.

Later, Mike Priwer
 
Posts: 2461 | Location: Portland, OR & San Francisco | Registered: 24 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Bullseye Smith
Posted Hide Post
I learn something every day on here, Thanks Mike.


Later, John



We live in the land of the FREE, because of the BRAVE.

 
Posts: 3081 | Location: Mountain State | Registered: 04 November 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I bid up an Army marked 1917 .45acp that had those roll stamps on them. That was before I learned that it was the rule for guns returned to the factory for repairs. Didn't win the auction.
 
Posts: 363 | Location: Florida | Registered: 04 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I've never seen that before either - thanks for sharing.
 
Posts: 74 | Location: Missouri City, Texas | Registered: 10 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 


© smith-wessonforum 2008