smith-wessonforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  CCW Methods & Issues    3" versus 4" for CCW?
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
Hello,

Just looking for some opinions here, forgive the newbie questions...

I had decided after shooting a 1 7/8" barrel that I wanted a 3" for carry and a little woods plinker. I was pretty convinced that I would go with a new Model 60 pro --- until I ran across a very nice pre-lock model 66 with a 4" barrel. It's tastefully after market engraved and a real nice price at a local dealer -- so very convenient.

I know most people wouldn't want engraving on a carry or woods piece, but hey, i like it.

What I want advice concerning is:
1. How much difference the 4" barrel will make for IWB carry.

2. Does anyone know where I can find weight specs for a 4" model 66??? I've searched and cannot find anything. Obviously it will weigh more than the 23.4oz model 60...


thanks for the help!
 
Posts: 6 | Registered: 05 January 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
The 4" is obviously a little heavier and a little slower to draw, but unless you have a really odd body type is not that much harder to hide than a 3". I like the appearance and balance of the 3" better myself, but I sure wouldn't pass up a good deal on a 4". You might find a problem with the muzzle bottoming out on chairs, car seats, etc. depending on how long-waisted you are. I think you will like it.
 
Posts: 144 | Registered: 06 May 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I'd likely snatch up that 4" 66, anyway, if it was priced reasonably. As I recall, the weight will be about 34oz., give or take.
 
Posts: 4433 | Location: Lubbock, TX, US | Registered: 20 May 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I like both.
My 4" 66 is 38 oz empty with Pachmayer Pro Grippers.

The difference for me is that my 3" Model 60 goes in a Kramer IWB while the 4" Model 66 goes in a Safariland OWB on a sturdy belt. I have to dress more for the 66.
 
Posts: 1586 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: 23 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
A 3" is about max for appendix carry for most folks I would guess. A 4" 66 will poke you in the jimmy. Eeker At three o'clock IWB the extra inch of barrel won't matter, it hits harder, will probably be a little faster with follow up shots/more controllable, longer sight radius........IMO the difference in draw speed is moot.

Realize I like bigger guns and carry a 5" full underlug 629 when possible. If given a choice between two similar carry guns, I prefer the one that has more rifle-like ballistics.


Don't carry a gun because of what may happen today. Carry because once, just once, and at the least likely time imaginable, you may run into the worst monster you ever could imagine. Be their worst nightmare and resist them with all the stubbornness that our pioneer ancestors posessed. To do less is to be unamerican.
 
Posts: 3112 | Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Michigan | Registered: 06 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Pioneer461
Posted Hide Post
Give it a try and see how it works for you. If it works, carry it. If not, don't.


NRA Life Member
Retired Police Detective '71-'01 / HR-218 Certified
Navy Vet. (Aviation) '65-'69

United States Constitution (c) 1791
All Rights Reserved.
 
Posts: 607 | Location: NW Oregon | Registered: 15 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Welcome aboard.

66 engraved, all the way sir.

Kinda sorta depends on how 'big' you are, but the 4' (KLN) revolvers are not difficult to tote.

That said, look at all of the ccw revolver options carefully, and do a lot of reading on this Forum. (Pics of the engraved 66?)
 
Posts: 263 | Location: FL | Registered: 17 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
max
Member
Posted Hide Post
Skeeter always said it wasn't the barrel that was hard to conceal, it was the grip.
 
Posts: 3697 | Location: illinois | Registered: 04 March 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Srigs
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by max:
Skeeter always said it wasn't the barrel that was hard to conceal, it was the grip.


Very true. I picked up some Hogue Finger groves for my K-frame square butt and made a huge difference over the normal target grips.


Srigs

www.sideguardholsters.com

"If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking" - George S. Patton
 
Posts: 2331 | Location: Twin Cities, MN USA | Registered: 27 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Target grips don't cut it for CCW.


Don't carry a gun because of what may happen today. Carry because once, just once, and at the least likely time imaginable, you may run into the worst monster you ever could imagine. Be their worst nightmare and resist them with all the stubbornness that our pioneer ancestors posessed. To do less is to be unamerican.
 
Posts: 3112 | Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Michigan | Registered: 06 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I carry a 4" Model 65 or Model 629 and drawing is not a problem.

The problem, as some have noted, is not the barrel. It's the butt. And that is one big reason why revolvers are, for me, easier to hide than semiautos.


Las armas son necesarias
Pero nadie sabe cuando;
Asi no, si andas paseando,
Y de noche sobre todo,
Debes llevarlo de modo
Que al salir, salga cortando.
Martín Fierro
 
Posts: 3418 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 09 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I like 3" barreled revolvers. No really good reason, I just like them. As others have pointed out, it makes little if any difference for concealment. Half the time, I'm concealing a so-called 5" barreled 1911 and the other half a 4 5/8" Ruger Blackhawk 45 Colt and the other half (three halfs equal all the time, right?) a 4" 624. I sold my 3" 629. But I still like 3" barrels. Wink


Parson Colt, the preacher's kid
 
Posts: 1026 | Location: Indian Territory, USA | Registered: 04 April 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
The 3" barrel definitely comes out of the holster quicker, though that won't matter at anything but contact distances. The 4" barrel is more muzzle heavy and in my opinion points better. And I am starting to believe that the butt of the 3" gun flops a bit in the holster due to the different center of gravity.

I'm starting to appreciate the 4" Mountain Gun barrel most of all for concealed carry.

Dave Sinko
 
Posts: 408 | Registered: 12 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by David Sinko:
I'm starting to appreciate the 4" Mountain Gun barrel most of all for concealed carry.

Agree. My 629 MG is a sweet pointer.


Las armas son necesarias
Pero nadie sabe cuando;
Asi no, si andas paseando,
Y de noche sobre todo,
Debes llevarlo de modo
Que al salir, salga cortando.
Martín Fierro
 
Posts: 3418 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 09 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
If you go for the 4 inch 66, i would have the
grips round butted for easier carry. They did
make a factory 66 3inch with round butted grips.
But, hard and pricy to find. I think the 3inch
66 round butted is the perfect compromise.
 
Posts: 133 | Location: ORMOND BEACH, FLORIDA | Registered: 24 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2  
 

smith-wessonforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  CCW Methods & Issues    3" versus 4" for CCW?

© smith-wessonforum 2008