I would like to make mention of one thing here that NO ONE seems to talk about. As reloading tools become more complex (the large expensive progressives) the more mechanical ability they require. If a person needs help tying their shoes (hey! We all cannot be mechanical wizards- there is room in the world for computer programmers, artists, musicians,et al). It IS important to recognize your personal limitations (I am an excellent photographer but I cannot draw or paint pictures). If you do not have "good hands" - not good with mechanical things, then you need to rethink the use of a Progressive Press. The least complicated tool will serve you much better.

I have the required mechanical ability but personally prefer the Dillon 550B. If the Hornady LnL had been available when I started with Dillon, I might have chosen it. With all of the equipment that I have acquired since I started many years ago, it made sense for me to stick with Dillon when I bought my additional press.

I wouldn't make "amount per hour" my main criteria. Ease of use, with a reasonable speed of loading might, just might make more sense.

One other thing, it would pay a potential new progressive owner to consider the cost of caliber conversion before he settles on a particular press. They DO vary, and vary CONSIDERABLY.

This is NOT directed at any one person but should be food for thought for anyone considering a progressive press.

Dale53

I've got a pair of Dillon SBD's (square deal B's), one set up for .38 spec, the other for 45 acp- changing calibers is a pain, so this keeps it simple.

I also use a lee turret press set up for rifle (neck-sized, bolt action only) ammo.

Three presses, about $800 invested and practically zero time wasted in swapping calibers. :-)

(I messed with loading for semi-auto rifle, but the lube was a hassle and just not worth the time/effort, as I have other priorities.)