smith-wessonforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Ammunition    Metal Piercing .357 Winchester? I love it...
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Picture of Kamerer
Posted
Ok, I think I've heard of this before. I found a complete box at a gun show today for $10. I couldn't resist. Anyone want to fill me in on what I think I know about this (LE ammo from the late 60s/early 70s I think I read in the past - but I may be wrong or my info was).

At the price of a lot of vintage .38 and .357 I saw at a show, it's cheaper to shoot older than new! (not that I would, but I'm buying it and keeping it for the novelty). I saw bundles of old S&W, Federal .38 for $10 and $12 per box of 50 (full boxes).

I know I should keep the box intact and all as it's full, but as I live in PC western Washington (for the moment), it makes me want to go find a Prius and see just what these babies will penetrate...

The box says 1410 fps and 700fpe (don't know what test barrel), but dang I'd like to put this to the test. I suggested to test it on our Calphalon tonight, but she said no...



Physics 101: "Velocity" is speed and direction. Otherwise it's just "speed."
 
Posts: 2045 | Location: Seattle-ish | Registered: 05 October 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
DC7
Member
Picture of DC7
Posted Hide Post
This isn't a great comparison, but for what it's worth:

I had some of that ammo with me many years ago when I was shooting rifles and handguns at a steel plate (about 1/8" thick, IIRC). 55gr ball ammo from an AR-15--no steel penetrator, just jacketed lead--blew clean through on every shot, so I decided to grab a revolver and see how the .357 metal-piercing ammo would perform against the same plate. Even at close range the .357 made only a small dent, and the "metal-piercing" bullet was recovered flattened but intact on the surface of the plate.

That round might work fine on the thin sheet metal of an auto body, but I doubt it could handle anything much thicker. It was probably good ammo back in its day, especially compared to standard RNL police ammo, but today any one of the newer bonded rounds designed for good barrier penetration would probably perform just as well, if not better.

Ten bucks was a great deal, and for that price I'd say just keep the box and a few intact rounds as a background for your revolver pics, then go out and shoot the rest. Testing it against a few different barriers and comparing it to some newer, modern ammo might not generate a lot of useful information, but it sure would be fun! Smiler
 
Posts: 994 | Registered: 13 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kamerer
Posted Hide Post
Thanks DC7,

I have no delusions this is "better" ammo than now. I would rather carry my 158gr. SJHP than this. I just find it really interesting, historically. I am also surprised they could cram a 158gr. bullet into that narrow a cone - must be deep seated with a fast powder, I am guessing.


Physics 101: "Velocity" is speed and direction. Otherwise it's just "speed."
 
Posts: 2045 | Location: Seattle-ish | Registered: 05 October 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
DC7
Member
Picture of DC7
Posted Hide Post
I wish I had kept the recovered bullet from my informal "test"--I'd like to know if it has some sort of hardened penetrator core, or if it just depended on the pointed jacket for it's "metal-piercing" abilities. I shoot exclusively indoors these days, but if I ever get to an outdoor range again maybe I'll fire off one of the dozen rounds I have left and see what it's made of.
 
Posts: 994 | Registered: 13 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of imjin138
Posted Hide Post
My father bought some years ago at a store called Turnstyle here in Racine, I have a few of the rounds left. I almost bought tsome Super-Vel 110 grn .38 Special yesterday at the show.


Stan
 
Posts: 2966 | Location: Racine Wi. USA | Registered: 28 March 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I love seeing your photo. Thanks for sharing.

Can you imagine the absolute fit that the anti-s would have if ammunition so labeled was sold today?
 
Posts: 3190 | Location: North Texas | Registered: 14 January 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Andy Griffith
Posted Hide Post
I wonder if Barnes solid copper HP's wouldn't fare just as well as this stuff?


Barney- "Nip it, nip it, nip it!!!"
Andy- "Oh now Barn'..."
 
Posts: 1683 | Location: Blairsville, Georgia (that's in the South!) | Registered: 03 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Ah yes! The old "shoot right thru an engine block load"!

Well, it was hogwash then, and it's hogwash now, but they would zip right thru automobile glass and car doors pretty good, and that's what they were designed for. I'd imagine they'd give some grades of body armor fits, too.


Pisgah
NRA Life

"South Carolina is too small for a republic and too large for an insane asylum." James Louis Petigru
 
Posts: 1008 | Location: Upstate SC | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of stiab
Posted Hide Post
quote:
The box says 1410 fps and 700fpe (don't know what test barrel),

Based on the age of that ammo, it was probably a 10" unvented test barrel with 8 3/8" of rifling. I doubt it would get anywhere close to 1410 in your beautiful M27, but it would be fun to try.


"While not every Democrat is a horse thief, every horse thief is a Democrat." HORACE GREELEY
 
Posts: 1159 | Location: Land of the Free, Home of the Brave - NC portion | Registered: 15 April 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kamerer
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by stiab:
quote:
The box says 1410 fps and 700fpe (don't know what test barrel),

Based on the age of that ammo, it was probably a 10" unvented test barrel with 8 3/8" of rifling. I doubt it would get anywhere close to 1410 in your beautiful M27, but it would be fun to try.


yeah, that's a good guess - probably an unvented test barrel.

I have a 4" 686 with a .003" b/c gap that shoots like a laser, and I know where there's an abandoned car - maybe I should go check it out! Wink

Since it's actually a full box, I'll probably stash it for "collecting" - to pass on to somebody who really wants it or trade. But I'll look for some more at the show next weekend and then I'll ride back out to the field with the old Honda abandoned in it...


Physics 101: "Velocity" is speed and direction. Otherwise it's just "speed."
 
Posts: 2045 | Location: Seattle-ish | Registered: 05 October 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
"Old Honda abandoned in it..."

That's no proper test. You need something substantial like a '55 Buick.
 
Posts: 3190 | Location: North Texas | Registered: 14 January 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Yeah BMC,
And you'd better make damned sure it isn't Broderick Crawford's old 55' Buick also!
Ol' 21-50 by, might just return the fire!
 
Posts: 4186 | Location: Left Coast | Registered: 25 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

smith-wessonforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Ammunition    Metal Piercing .357 Winchester? I love it...

© smith-wessonforum 2008