Member
|
quote: Originally posted by Erich: I'll leave it to you wealthy private-bar types to test and tell me if they're a good way to go!
Would that it were so... 
|
| |
| Posts: 4433 | Location: Lubbock, TX, US | Registered: 20 May 2004 |    |
|
Member
|
Supposedly, XTP expands less and penetrates better than most JHP's. I just suggested it to a friend who wants an emergency bear load for his S&W M-66 snub .357. There, you WANT that added penetration.
"There is nothing quite so exhilarating as to be shot at without effect." Sir Winston Churchill, KG
|
| |
| Posts: 3365 | Location: Texas | Registered: 11 March 2005 |    |
|
Member
|
I've used "Factory" hornady 140 gr. XTP's on hogs with great results and wonderful expansion. I like to use them in my 586 with 8 3/8 inch barrel.
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!"
|
| |
| Posts: 1009 | Location: South Texas | Registered: 05 November 2007 |    |
|
Member
|
For self defense I'd rather use Corbon's 140 gr. load. I know that the Sierra JHP bullet will fragment like one would expect from Remington 125 gr. SJHPs.
Don't carry a gun because of what may happen today. Carry because once, just once, and at the least likely time imaginable, you may run into the worst monster you ever could imagine. Be their worst nightmare and resist them with all the stubbornness that our pioneer ancestors posessed. To do less is to be unamerican.
|
| |
| Posts: 3116 | Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Michigan | Registered: 06 September 2006 |    |
|
Member
|
I had just a few minutes last night before it got too dark, to do some unscientific testing. I chronoed 3 rounds through one of my trusty 3" 65-3s, and shot a round from the same gun into jugs of water.
Chrono results: Mean velocity- 1193.6 fps. (443 ft.lbs. energy) ES- 42.8 fps. SD-23.9 fps. Recoil was noticeably greater than Remington 125gr. Golden Saber (1205-1225fps., with an ES of about 20fps. from this gun) but nonetheless very controllable. Flash was not visible to me in the daylight, but I did not shoot after it was really late enough to tell much about flash.
I usually line up one-gallon milk jugs of water to test expansion, but was low on them, so I shot into a 1 gallon milk jug, backed by a much heavier one-gallon windshield washer fluid jug, with a 48 oz. Drano jug (heavier still, and edgeways) behind that. The bullet stopped, barely, inside the Drano jug, after almost penetrating the back side. I'm convinced that it would have at least entered, and likely penetrated, a 4th gallon milk jug, if only those had been used. The moderately expanded bullet measured 0.49"-0.52" across, and appeared to have lost little to no weight. I did not weigh it, since my lovely wife was by then asking for my presence indoors.
Conclusions? Well, I'm with flopshank on this one, at least for social use and shorter barrels. The loads with the known best street records pretty much always stop in the third milk jug, and exhibit better expansion or fragmentation.
|
| |
| Posts: 4433 | Location: Lubbock, TX, US | Registered: 20 May 2004 |    |
|
Member
|
quote: Originally posted by 38-44HD45: The loads with the known best street records pretty much always stop in the third milk jug, and exhibit better expansion or fragmentation.
Love him, or hate him, Evan Marshall says that bullets that fragment in gelatin will pretty much always expand in street shootings (I don't remember the exact quote, but that's the jist of it).
Don't carry a gun because of what may happen today. Carry because once, just once, and at the least likely time imaginable, you may run into the worst monster you ever could imagine. Be their worst nightmare and resist them with all the stubbornness that our pioneer ancestors posessed. To do less is to be unamerican.
|
| |
| Posts: 3116 | Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Michigan | Registered: 06 September 2006 |    |
|