smith-wessonforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Ammunition    Is the .357 disappearing...?
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted Hide Post
Vanilla,

Read it and weep.
 
Posts: 1983 | Registered: 29 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
pps
Member
Picture of pps
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Vanilla Gorilla:
quote:
Originally posted by casingpoint:
For personal defense/CC, the .327 MAG will eventually edge out the .38/.357 MAG. Getting the new cartridge up and running is a tough hurdle. But Smith already has an eight round, two-inch-barrel .357 N-frame. When it gets chambered for 12 rounds of .327, it's all over but the funeral. No telling what Ruger will come up with for it's three-inch GP100, but rest assured it will be bad to the bone. Not to mention who in their right mind, cops excepted, would want an autojammer in place of a twelve shot revolver with a 91% stopping power rating?



I honestly hope that's sarcasm in that post.


I don't think it is sarcasm. I have this mental image of this being a revolver that Nigel Tufnel from Spinal Tap might carry. A little something to go with his tricked out, over the top guitars.


Respect wildlife, use a good marinade.
 
Posts: 2495 | Location: Near Fresno, Peoples Republic of Kalifornia | Registered: 05 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I wouldn't be laughing too hard at Casingpoint. He's made a great point. A 115 gr. .327 magnum coming from a 4" 9 shot L frame at 1375 fps (483 ft. lbs.) would be no joke. I'd gladly carry that gun as a cop. If fashion would get out of the way (it won't), revolvers could reemerge as primary cop guns.
quote:
Originally posted by pps:
Maybe the gold dots for barrier penetration without core-jacket separation, but for self defense the exposed lead hollow point of the 158gr SJHP still gives me a warm fuzzy feeling. These rounds performed ok back in the day, and I'm sure that they will still work fine for most situations.
I couldn't agree more, excepting I use the 125s. I'd use the heavier bullets in a heartbeat if 125s weren't available. The asswhipping .357s of the '70s are the first modern hollowpoints that stuck. I'd love to know who designed the Remington SJHPs. Those cats had their crap together.


Don't carry a gun because of what may happen today. Carry because once, just once, and at the least likely time imaginable, you may run into the worst monster you ever could imagine. Be their worst nightmare and resist them with all the stubbornness that our pioneer ancestors posessed. To do less is to be unamerican.
 
Posts: 3124 | Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Michigan | Registered: 06 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
pps
Member
Picture of pps
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by flop-shank:
I wouldn't be laughing too hard at Casingpoint. He's made a great point. A 115 gr. .327 magnum coming from a 4" 9 shot L frame at 1375 fps (483 ft. lbs.) would be no joke. I'd gladly carry that gun as a cop. If fashion would get out of the way (it won't), revolvers could reemerge as primary cop guns.
quote:
Originally posted by pps:
Maybe the gold dots for barrier penetration without core-jacket separation, but for self defense the exposed lead hollow point of the 158gr SJHP still gives me a warm fuzzy feeling. These rounds performed ok back in the day, and I'm sure that they will still work fine for most situations.
I couldn't agree more, excepting I use the 125s. I'd use the heavier bullets in a heartbeat if 125s weren't available. The asswhipping .357s of the '70s are the first modern hollowpoints that stuck. I'd love to know who designed the Remington SJHPs. Those cats had their crap together.


I used to keep 125's in my Ruger until I started treating inmates for CDC. Some of those guys are thick (in every sense of the word)

I changed to the heavier slug in hopes of something that will blissfully chug through an outstretched arm, bone, exit skin, re-enter skin, break rib or sternum, and still keep chugging on through to hopefully hit something vital with enough force to elicit compliance, or at least slow the BG down enough for follow up doses of lead.


Respect wildlife, use a good marinade.
 
Posts: 2495 | Location: Near Fresno, Peoples Republic of Kalifornia | Registered: 05 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
PPS, I can't disagree with your logic. Americans are a lot heftier than they were thirty years ago when the 125 gr. .357 began to establish it's reputation. Has anyone seen evidence that the 125's are coming up short where they didn't use to?


Don't carry a gun because of what may happen today. Carry because once, just once, and at the least likely time imaginable, you may run into the worst monster you ever could imagine. Be their worst nightmare and resist them with all the stubbornness that our pioneer ancestors posessed. To do less is to be unamerican.
 
Posts: 3124 | Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Michigan | Registered: 06 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
pps
Member
Picture of pps
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by flop-shank:
PPS, I can't disagree with your logic. Americans are a lot heftier than they were thirty years ago when the 125 gr. .357 began to establish it's reputation. Has anyone seen evidence that the 125's are coming up short where they didn't use to?


I have zero evidence of the 125's coming up short, in the statistical sense. I made my decision based on the fact that if I were choosing a round to stop a game animal the same size as some of these inmates, I'd pick the 158gr.

One of the charts for penetration/expansion in jello showed the Federal 125gr SJHP offering penetrating 10.7"/.49" expansion in bare jello, 11.8"/.51" in clothed. The Federal offering in 158gr went 16.5"/.50" in bare jello and 15.9"/.64" in clothed

here is a link to the table I'm refering.
http://demigodllc.com/~zak/firearms/fbi-pistol.php


Respect wildlife, use a good marinade.
 
Posts: 2495 | Location: Near Fresno, Peoples Republic of Kalifornia | Registered: 05 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Those Federal 125 stats are pretty consistent with what I saw while researching Marshall's data. I went with the Remington 125 gr. round because it offered a little more penetration according to the data that I saw. I hope to shoot Perma-gel with my three .357s that I load with that ammo (2 1/4", 4" and 6") soon to see how the ammo performs from different length barrels.


Don't carry a gun because of what may happen today. Carry because once, just once, and at the least likely time imaginable, you may run into the worst monster you ever could imagine. Be their worst nightmare and resist them with all the stubbornness that our pioneer ancestors posessed. To do less is to be unamerican.
 
Posts: 3124 | Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Michigan | Registered: 06 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
pps
Member
Picture of pps
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by flop-shank:
Those Federal 125 stats are pretty consistent with what I saw while researching Marshall's data. I went with the Remington 125 gr. round because it offered a little more penetration according to the data that I saw. I hope to shoot Perma-gel with my three .357s that I load with that ammo (2 1/4", 4" and 6") soon to see how the ammo performs from different length barrels.


Cool. How close is perma gel to 10% ballistic? What is the cost of perma gel?


Respect wildlife, use a good marinade.
 
Posts: 2495 | Location: Near Fresno, Peoples Republic of Kalifornia | Registered: 05 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Close, but I don't remember any specifics. Go to www.midwayusa.com . They sell it and I put up a review that you might find helpful. Do a google search. There's plenty of info out there. Evan Marshall tried it and liked it. His test results are on his site. The stuff isn't cheap, but it's a better choice for me than dealing with 10% gelatin and all the hassle it entails. I also called and talked to Dr. Darryl Amick the inventer and found him very helpful and approachable. I found his phone number on the internet somewhere. If you can't find it while you research the stuff, just holler and I'll dig it up. Big Grin


Don't carry a gun because of what may happen today. Carry because once, just once, and at the least likely time imaginable, you may run into the worst monster you ever could imagine. Be their worst nightmare and resist them with all the stubbornness that our pioneer ancestors posessed. To do less is to be unamerican.
 
Posts: 3124 | Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Michigan | Registered: 06 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3  
 

smith-wessonforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Ammunition    Is the .357 disappearing...?

© smith-wessonforum 2008