smith-wessonforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Ammunition    .38 Special Personal Defense Ammo
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
many of my comments are based on what I've heard or read


Yes, indeedy. Read these gun forums for so long, and you realize it's basically the same general topics over and over and over again. And before you know it, you, too are a Message Board Expert. Big Grin

p.s., The 135 grain Gold Dots shoot to point of aim from a 637 also.
 
Posts: 1981 | Registered: 29 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PeterCartwright:
I know the original question related to non +P loads, but, for what it's worth, the Speer "short barrel" load shoots very close to POA in my 642. It also groups very well.

PC


That has been my experience as well in my 442.

But I'm Dutch Loading them, first three are the GD, remaining two are the 158gr LHP +P by Remington. Figure if the Speer don't do the job in three, then the FBI load should take care of matters. YMMV.
 
Posts: 64 | Registered: 06 March 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Thats a great advantage of a revoler for defense, you can stuff 5-6 different bullet shapes in the cylinder and they all will work. For instance you could have 2 standard wad cutters to go first, then 2+p FBI loads then one of of Elmer's 173 grain hard cast jobs. Not unlike the way we used to load up the patrol car shot gun. We set the gun up so it would fire 3 rounds 00 buck first, then 2 slugs last. Good and sound concept. ANYWAY just food for thought
 
Posts: 217 | Location: Eastern shore of Maryland | Registered: 08 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Junior Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by WayneM:
I've recently purchased a nice model 36 Chief's special to use as my summer CCW. I have some military surplus Winchester match ball ammo that I shoot in my longer barrel revolvers and it works great in the snubby. It is remarkably accurate. What I'm looking for is a similarly accurate standard pressure hollow point round to use for personal defense (not +P). I tried some Federal Hydro Shock (low recoil) today and was very disappointed. It was very inconsistent in terms of accuracy (don't think I want to "depend" on that stuff).

Do any of the forum members have any recommendations?



I pocket carry my 36, (it's 25 years old) almost every day. I've tried many different rounds I now practice with and carry Hornady .38 SPCL 158 gr JHP/XTP.
 
Posts: 3 | Registered: 29 May 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I tested a bunch of 38SPL.+P that I have on hand in my 642. The best group was with Corbon 125G. 38SPL.+P. at a rating of 950fps from a 2". It shot POA at 30'. What do you people think of this as a self defense round?
 
Posts: 96 | Registered: 24 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by haywood:
I tested a bunch of 38SPL.+P that I have on hand in my 642. The best group was with Corbon 125G. 38SPL.+P. at a rating of 950fps from a 2". It shot POA at 30'. What do you people think of this as a self defense round?
I tested the Corbon 110 gr. JHP in Perma-Gel. It's a good load that penetrated VERY deep. It sounds like your gun shoots the 125 gr. load well so we're down to discussing angels. Wink The Sierra bullets that Corbon uses in their JHP loads are very good. I wouldn't worry about expansion not happening, My SWAG is that heavy clothing won't even be an issue. I'd say you've found your load.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: flop-shank,


Don't carry a gun because of what may happen today. Carry because once, just once, and at the least likely time imaginable, you may run into the worst monster you ever could imagine. Be their worst nightmare and resist them with all the stubbornness that our pioneer ancestors posessed. To do less is to be unamerican.
 
Posts: 3112 | Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Michigan | Registered: 06 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
AZ Shooter - FYI your earlier request.

Load & velocity - 2"/ 4"/ 6"
Fed Nyclad 158 SWCHP+P/ 821/ 855/ 874
Winchester 158 LSWHP+P/ 808/ 833/ 890
Federal 158 LWCHP+P /846/ 896/ 944
Remington 158 LWC HP+P/ 855/ 902/ 951
 
Posts: 559 | Registered: 07 August 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I love ammo discussions, at least until they turn ugly. So many options, so many opinions. I, too, like some form of wadcutter in a 1.8" J frame, especially an alloy, despite the fact that I have personal experience with that round failing miserably. On the other hand anecdotal information from any given incident can be very misleading.

No matter which school of thought you go with, +p or standard, HP or wadcutter, etc., those new offerings by Buffalo Bore sure look interesting and are worth serious consideration.
 
Posts: 319 | Registered: 14 February 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Wadcutters are such great penetrators that pushing them past standard pressure velocities would be pointless and, in fact, a very dangerous overpenetrator IMO. A +p wadcutter would have more recoil and slower follow up shots with little, if any gain in stopping power. One of the best things wadcutters bring to the table is their machinegun-like speed in practiced hands. You'd think someone set the selector switch on the side of your revolver on "auto". I think that Buffalo Bore load makes a lot of sense. I'd love to see how it behaves in gelatin.


Here ya go flop_shank.
http://www.brassfetcher.com/Buffalo%20Bore%20Ammunition...%20Wad%20Cutter.html

And here is what a standard target WC will do for comparison.

http://www.brassfetcher.com/38wadcutter.html
 
Posts: 220 | Registered: 04 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Thanks for posting, 336A. The Brassfetcher's findings are perfectly consistent with my experience using Perma-Gel. Only use a hot wadcutter if you aren't concerned about overpenetration. Light target loads penetrate plenty.


Don't carry a gun because of what may happen today. Carry because once, just once, and at the least likely time imaginable, you may run into the worst monster you ever could imagine. Be their worst nightmare and resist them with all the stubbornness that our pioneer ancestors posessed. To do less is to be unamerican.
 
Posts: 3112 | Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Michigan | Registered: 06 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of AZ Shooter
Posted Hide Post
Sledgehammer: Thanks for that! That is what I was looking for.
 
Posts: 333 | Location: Arizona | Registered: 30 November 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Junior Member
Posted Hide Post
New poster here...

I saw some tests that were very impressive in favor of Buffalo Bore's 125g JHP in a 5-shot S&W. Anyone have any direct experience?
 
Posts: 2 | Location: Knoxville, TN | Registered: 10 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Chris (welcome, BTW!)
Were the tests your referring to done on Brassfetcher, or elsewhere?
 
Posts: 4979 | Location: Left Coast | Registered: 25 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Junior Member
Posted Hide Post
Yeah....it was on the old brassfetcher website.
Here are the results


Cartridge : Buffalo Bore 125gr non +P Speer Low Velocity JHC (Part # 20E)

Firearm : Smith and Wesson 642 with 1 7/8" barrel length

Block calibration : All depths corrected (From 10.8cm @ 615 ft/sec)

Shot 1 - Impacted at 937 ft/sec, penetrated to 12.5" and expanded to 0.528" average diameter. Recovered at 124.1gr weight.

Shot 2 - Impacted at 928 ft/sec, penetrated to 12.2" and expanded to 0.512" average diameter. Recovered at 124.2gr weight.

Shot 3 - Impacted at 949 ft/sec, penetrated to 12.5" and expanded to 0.525" average diameter. Recovered at 124.1gr weight.

Shot 4 - Impacted at 944 ft/sec, penetrated to 12.0" and expanded to 0.510" average diameter. Recovered at 125.3gr weight.

Shot 5 - Impacted at 943 ft/sec, penetrated to 11.6" and expanded to 0.515" average diameter. Recovered at 124.4gr weight.



Granted the depth of penetration was not as good as others, but what struck me was the consistency.
 
Posts: 2 | Location: Knoxville, TN | Registered: 10 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Granted the depth of penetration was not as good as others

It's way short of the 327 MAGNUM from a three-inch barrel.

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=384513

But probably about the same as one could get with the 327 through a two-inch barrel.

So no big whoop if a short barrel is a must and you don't need the extra shot.

I guess there are situations where a sixth shot capability is inconsequential.
 
Posts: 1981 | Registered: 29 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  
 

smith-wessonforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Ammunition    .38 Special Personal Defense Ammo

© smith-wessonforum 2008