Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics

Notices

Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics Post Your General Gun Topics and Non-S&W Gun and Blade Topics Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-02-2010, 02:58 PM
Sacerdote Sacerdote is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Ruger .22 question

I pulled out my old Ruger .22 that I haven't shot in decades mostly because I have many other .22s to shoot and I forgot how to out it back together. (I remember trying each time to remember the "trick" to reasemble the last piece). I do love it though.

Anyway I can't figure out if it is a Mark I or "Standard". Bought it in 1976 and is marked "Made in the 200th year of American Liberty". (Hope that holds true in the future). There is no "Mark I" but simply "Ruger 22 cal. Long Rifle Automatic Pistol".

Is it a Standard or Mark I?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-02-2010, 03:06 PM
Texas Star Texas Star is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
Default

Does it have adjustable sights? Mk I. Standard doesn't have target sights.

However, the mechanism still follows the various Marks. So, some people refer to MK II target or standard versions.

Most feel the present MK III was a mistake, the MK II being the full evolution of the design, with no "improvements" needed.

T-Star
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-02-2010, 03:12 PM
Gutpile Charlie's Avatar
Gutpile Charlie Gutpile Charlie is offline
US Veteran
Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indian Territory, USA
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Look at the back of the receiver, right in front of the "ears" that stick out on the bolt. If it is recessed, it is a MkI, if it doesn't, it's a Standard.

Some standards also had target sights. They came in 4 3/4" and 6" barrels, and some had bull barrels.

The slide stop on the Standards would not hold the barrel open, but would on the MkI
__________________
G.P. Charlie
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-02-2010, 03:12 PM
Nimble, Jack B.'s Avatar
Nimble, Jack B. Nimble, Jack B. is offline
Member
Ruger .22 question  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Copperhead Bluffs, Tennes
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Texas Star is spot on.

I have a 1976 Ruger Standard. It's a six-inch barrel, fixed sights and has the same bicentennial inscription.

I wish I had a quarter for every round I've fired from that pistol!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-02-2010, 03:17 PM
dant's Avatar
dant dant is offline
Member
Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question  
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 26
Liked 451 Times in 233 Posts
Default

you have a 1976 made 'standard auto' ( fixed sights) these are NOT marked "Mark I".......
as for putting it back together make sure the bolt goes in, pull the trigger to lower the hammer, it MUST be forward... push the mainspring assembly ,up and into the receiver from the bottom, make sure the "pin" goes all the way up and through the top hole, now you can tilt the gun on an angle upwards, and look up ,inside , behind the hammer, you will see the strut, , and it should be 'free" and dangling downward, and as you swing closed the mainspring assembly ,back into the frame, this 'strut' MUST go into the top of the mainspring assembly.......and it will then Lock in place, the lever will close and you will be able to "cock and dry fire" the gun...if this doesn 't happen , you "missed" getting the 'strut' into the proper location...this is the main problem/issue with re-assembly of any of the Ruger 22 semi autos, standard or target ( MKI I & II....)
good luck, if ANY problem get a hold of me and I can and will talk you through it....been doing this since the 1950's.........
__________________
dan
NRA Benefactor,PMA
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-02-2010, 03:27 PM
Texas Star Texas Star is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gutpile Charlie View Post
Look at the back of the receiver, right in front of the "ears" that stick out on the bolt. If it is recessed, it is a MkI, if it doesn't, it's a Standard.

Some standards also had target sights. They came in 4 3/4" and 6" barrels, and some had bull barrels.

The slide stop on the Standards would not hold the barrel open, but would on the MkI

Charlie-

I think I should politely tell you that I think you need to go study Rugers more before posting.


Or, maybe I'm wrong. But I think you're confusing Mk I and MK II guns, and that no Standard model ever had a bull barrel or target sights. If you have one, please post photos.

The scalloped area just ahead of the bolt handle/knobs was incorporated in all MK II models, Standard and Target. The MK I Target model didn't have that recessed area. And I believe that the bolt release didn't appear until the MK II.

Just to refresh my memory, I got out one of Larry Koller's old gun books and checked the photo of a MK I Target. No scallops, no bolt release.

T-Star
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-02-2010, 03:46 PM
Homie Homie is offline
US Veteran
Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 776
Likes: 583
Liked 274 Times in 182 Posts
Smile

Gents,

On the first model Standard Auto, and the Mark I Target versions of it, the bolt can be locked open by putting the safety on while it is open.

Hope this helps!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-02-2010, 03:54 PM
Sacerdote Sacerdote is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Looks like a Standard guys based on all the comments. 6" barrel, fixed sights, bolt handle sticks out and not recessed.

Thanks all. Will bring this one out of retirement to play.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-02-2010, 05:39 PM
Gutpile Charlie's Avatar
Gutpile Charlie Gutpile Charlie is offline
US Veteran
Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indian Territory, USA
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Star View Post
Charlie-

I think I should politely tell you that I think you need to go study Rugers more before posting.


Or, maybe I'm wrong. But I think you're confusing Mk I and MK II guns, and that no Standard model ever had a bull barrel or target sights. If you have one, please post photos.

The scalloped area just ahead of the bolt handle/knobs was incorporated in all MK II models, Standard and Target. The MK I Target model didn't have that recessed area. And I believe that the bolt release didn't appear until the MK II.

Just to refresh my memory, I got out one of Larry Koller's old gun books and checked the photo of a MK I Target. No scallops, no bolt release.

T-Star
___________________________________________________

Ok, I'm getting confused in my old age. They didn't call the "first" one a MkI back in the day. Yes, the "MkII" has the beveles infront of the bolt ears.

I had an early one...i.e. 1961. I purchased it new at the time for $37.50.

Back then they had the 6" and the 4 3/4" tapered barrels. They came with fixed sights. For slightly more money you could get the 6 3/4" with an adjustable sight. There were also blull barreled target models back then too.

Sorry about the confusion of MkI and MkII.

The original Ruger designation was something like RS4? They were refered to in all the literature as Standard.

Back then, when you refered to a Ruger .22, it was the semi-auto. That was all there was. This preceded the Bearcat and the Single-Six. When the revolvers came out, the auto became the "Standard".

When the first auto came out...the term "MKI" had not even been thought up. I think "MKI" came into being after Ruger changed the design to the new model.
__________________
G.P. Charlie

Last edited by Gutpile Charlie; 01-02-2010 at 05:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-02-2010, 07:30 PM
jrm53 jrm53 is offline
Member
Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rogers Arkansas
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 4,820
Liked 1,085 Times in 468 Posts
Default

I had one that cost about 54.00 with fixed sightsback in the early 70's I took the paper clip like it said to disassemble and I like to never got it back together even with the directions, I have never taken another one apart. Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-03-2010, 12:18 AM
FrankD45's Avatar
FrankD45 FrankD45 is offline
Absent Comrade
Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question Ruger .22 question  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Default

If anyone is interested, here are a couple of links to a pretty good guide to field stripping and re-assembly.

http://www.1bad69.com/ruger/field_strip.htm

http://www.1bad69.com/ruger/field_strip_quick.htm

I hope that helps,

Frank
__________________
sona si latine loqueris .
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bull barrel, lock, recessed, ruger


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ruger guy has question about 640 espresso S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 50 10-13-2015 11:12 AM
Ruger question 4330Inroute Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 21 10-12-2015 12:15 PM
Ruger S/N Question Snapping Twig Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 5 03-22-2012 08:14 PM
Ruger question guitar1580 Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 35 12-05-2011 10:56 PM
OK I have a Ruger question. Memphis Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 9 01-30-2010 04:04 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)