|
|
02-19-2011, 04:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Beaverdam, MI
Posts: 723
Likes: 20
Liked 1,091 Times in 242 Posts
|
|
Help Identify Colt 1860??
Greetings forum friends.
Doing some research on what this is. It is not mine. I do not own it. It is not for sale. It's not a repro and I have written documentation on where it came from. I think it is a model 1860 Colt but none of the original Colt markings are on it. I have been looking at pictures on line of other Colts and this seems to look identical. The gun was unfortunately refinished in the mid 1930's. This should have a manufactures name on it though, right? It does have the 3 serial numbers on the frame and trigger guards. Two are the same, one is different so I can assume it is pieced together. It is stamped US in front of the trigger guard and has a very small D stamped behind the trigger guard.
I guess what I am looking for is confirmation that it is or is not a Colt, and why it might not say Colt where it should be marked. I am not a Colt or old arms experts but I'm sure in hours most on here can tell me what it is.
Thanks In advance.
Kevin
|
02-19-2011, 04:47 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: washington illinois
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 9,209
Liked 2,712 Times in 1,039 Posts
|
|
that revolver is either a colt 1860 Army revolver or a colt 1861 navy
Last edited by mg357; 02-20-2011 at 05:57 PM.
|
02-19-2011, 06:45 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
|
|
It's the .44 M-1860. The 1861 Navy doesn't have a rebated cylinder. And the .44 usually has this 8" barrel length. The Navy has a 7.5-inch bbl. The model of 1862 is the Pocket Police .36, which is smaller and has a fluted cylinder.The Colt name and address were probably polished off during the refinish. And the trigger guard looks as if the gun may have been dropped on it, or that part was otherwise bent, and improperly straightened.
The screw through the grips is also unusual on this model, which had a special one-piece grip, I think. The frame screws had to be taken out to remove the grip.
T-Star
Last edited by Texas Star; 02-19-2011 at 06:51 PM.
|
02-19-2011, 08:45 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South East , PA . USA
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 485
Liked 1,610 Times in 884 Posts
|
|
Well , not being able too see it , or read the serial number (real 1860s went from 1-200500) , it looks like a common 'antique-ing- trick. Take an Italian copy ,put it outside in the elements and weather for awhile , let it get a bit rusty , then buff and polish the rust , pitts and import/proof marks off of and claim it's an old genuine Colt. Some cowboy re-enactors do this to make their guns look like the real thing.
And as was alluded too already , genuine Colt's , as well as most replicas , had a one piece grip.
My vote , it's a fake.
Last edited by mkk41; 02-19-2011 at 08:50 PM.
|
02-19-2011, 08:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Beaverdam, MI
Posts: 723
Likes: 20
Liked 1,091 Times in 242 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkk41
Well , not being able too see it , or read the serial number (real 1860s went from 1-200500) , it looks like a common 'antique-ing- trick. Take an Italian copy ,put it outside in the elements and weather for awhile , let it get a bit rusty , then buff and polish the rust , pitts and import/proof marks off of and claim it's an old genuine Colt. Some cowboy re-enactors do this to make their guns look like the real thing.
|
Serial 102XXX
Serial 703XX
Serial 102XXX
|
02-19-2011, 09:03 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South East , PA . USA
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 485
Liked 1,610 Times in 884 Posts
|
|
Well , here's some genuine 1860s for comparison.
Collectors Firearms
Hmmm , mixed numbers , mixed parts. Sorry , but it's just to difficult to tell. There have been examples where stamps were added or embellished. Some fakes are so good as to fool people who know more than me. Parts guns are really tricky. I see a US stamping on the triggerguard. I'm seeing that marking were removed from the frame , which were case hardened and colored.
|
02-19-2011, 09:18 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,543
Likes: 667
Liked 6,774 Times in 1,312 Posts
|
|
That's looks to me like a repro that someone made older (or tried) to make it look original. There should also be a serial number on the bottom of the grip frame.
__________________
Vaya con Dios
|
02-19-2011, 09:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Beaverdam, MI
Posts: 723
Likes: 20
Liked 1,091 Times in 242 Posts
|
|
Thanks everyone so far. There are only the 3 serial numbers listed above. I did take the grips off and they are held on by the single screw and do not go under the frame, but stop at the frame. I do know this was in the same family since 1911.
When did copies/italian copies start showing up?
|
02-19-2011, 09:36 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So Cal Desert
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 1,166
Liked 1,227 Times in 393 Posts
|
|
Once saw an "original" at a gun show that had "Black Powder Only" stamped on the barrel. Me thinks it wasn't too original.
__________________
A closed mouth gathers no foot
|
02-19-2011, 10:56 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,524
Likes: 89,687
Liked 24,881 Times in 8,519 Posts
|
|
"I do know this was in the same family since 1911."
The Eye-talian repos were introduced in the late '50-early '60s.
This revolver has been cut for the optional shoulder stock.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
02-19-2011, 11:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Beaverdam, MI
Posts: 723
Likes: 20
Liked 1,091 Times in 242 Posts
|
|
This revolver does have the notch on the back of the bottom butt strap for the shoulder stock.
|
02-20-2011, 07:16 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Netherlands Rotter
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 1,363
Liked 2,053 Times in 570 Posts
|
|
I look at the color of the metal. An guine Colt has an other look to it. Sorry this is a FAKE.
You can see it direct to screw out an bold and trye to place an bold with American thread in it. It woulden fit becouse the thread is European Metric.
Here is mine. Look at the color of the metal.
|
02-20-2011, 10:40 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arnold, Missouri
Posts: 4,818
Likes: 7,179
Liked 6,595 Times in 2,117 Posts
|
|
There were many Confederate copies of the Colts. Not saying this is one, but can't be ruled out unless it is in hand. Screws have to be measured, internal workings compared, etc.etc.
__________________
James L. "Jim" Rhiner
|
02-20-2011, 12:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Netherlands Rotter
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 1,363
Liked 2,053 Times in 570 Posts
|
|
Yes, there where Southern copy's. But never of an Army 1860.
They where copý's of the model 1851 or even the Dragoon.
|
02-20-2011, 05:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Beaverdam, MI
Posts: 723
Likes: 20
Liked 1,091 Times in 242 Posts
|
|
Thanks everyone for the input thus far. I guess I am at this point after looking at all of the 1860's for sale in the Collector's Firearms link on the first page. A lot of the Colts are pretty worn where the markings of 44 cal, colts patent, and the cylinder markings are almost worn off. I guess this is all attributed to wear, holster or otherwise. It this revolver in question had similar issues of most if not all of those markings worn off, when refinished, it would not be improbable that they would be missing or taken off after refinishing and reblued.
As noted above, I agree the only way to be absolutely certain it is a Colt would be to have someone take measurements and compare to a known original. I really don't have that option right now as it is locked in a safe deposit box in a bank vault.
Thanks all again for the input. Just knowing it's family history and where it came from I have to say it is an unfortunate refinish with it's identity lost. I wish I knew what it looked like or had a picture of it before it was refinished.
Kevin
|
02-20-2011, 06:43 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,463
Likes: 800
Liked 3,052 Times in 1,009 Posts
|
|
If this revolver has actually been in the owners family since 1911 as stated I speculate it is a mail order parts gun. Sears and Bannerman, to name just two, were assembling all sorts of odd stuff. Around 1900 it is very possible that a large quantity of parts were bought as surplus by a mail order firm, assembled and sold. In the '50's and 60's it was possible to assemble a Spencer from parts the Government had recently released as surplus. Why not a 60 Army in 1900?
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|