|
|
|
08-29-2013, 01:19 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 205
Likes: 1
Liked 532 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
Had one. Sold it. Bought a newer Commando model as a replacement.
It'll be following me back to Indian Territory after this weekend. Dunno when I'll get to it, but I expect to work it over pretty good.
If you want a piece of history, either buy an original or rent one at the nearest convenient range. If you want an overweight novelty that comes up as a compromise in most respects to the one your dad, granddad, great-granddad (maybe) carried, go ahead with the AO/Kahr.
But go in realizing that it's probably not going to be 100% out of the box. I spent a neat grand on mine...I'm looking at better than half-again that figure to get it where I want it. On the upside, I'll have a neat toy to take to reenactments and historical displays when I'm done.
All depends on what you want. If you buy an AO/Kahr wanting an AO/Kahr you'll probably love it. If you buy one hoping for a street-legal version of a Colt or an original Auto Ordnance you'll probably find the new wears off pretty quick.
Not practical in the least. But cool nonetheless.
And having seen that gold thing upthread...gah.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-29-2013, 05:54 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South East , PA . USA
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 485
Liked 1,610 Times in 884 Posts
|
|
The semi-autos just ain't as much fun as the real full-auto thing.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-05-2015, 04:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 34
Likes: 91
Liked 19 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Own a 1927a1 Commando (T1C)...made by Auto Ordnance/Thompson.
Never had a problem...20 round / 30 round stick mags or the 50 round drum...
...people line up at the range just to ask to hold it !!
__________________
SHOOTER13
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-05-2015, 04:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 34
Likes: 91
Liked 19 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Also own an Auto-Ordnance 1911a1 WWII clone...Model PKZSE
Again...never a problem !!
__________________
SHOOTER13
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-05-2015, 11:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sante Fe Trail, Kansas
Posts: 5,350
Likes: 14,441
Liked 6,562 Times in 2,597 Posts
|
|
Old Post. To post or not to post is the question.
I wonder If Beemer got one?
My reloading mentor was a highway patrolman. I started reloading in the 60's with the old Lee hammer em out hammer em in for 38 Special, 45 ACP and 270 Win. He introduced me to a reloading press and all the accessories.
He had an early 70's one. He shot it enough that the sear trigger engagement wore. Soft metal he speculated. We did lots of test firing to see if it was problematic all the time. It was fun to shoot. He eventually decided automatic was problematic and had it fixed.
We bid on two 55 gallon barrels of 45 acp brass at a US salvage auction for reloading. You mailed in your bid. I checked the going price and past bid winners. I bid double. Some bozo bid double on ours. The amount of brass we were looking to reload may indicate how much testing we did. I actually tired of it, he did not. I wanted my share of the brass for my Combat commander and series 70 Gold Cup.
The only good thing is it cleaned up quickly compared to an M-16.
Again, once it proved to be dysfunctional he had it repaired.
Last edited by model70hunter; 04-05-2015 at 11:14 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-06-2015, 12:36 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,658
Likes: 28,811
Liked 16,839 Times in 3,857 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by model70hunter
Old Post. To post or not to post is the question.
I wonder If Beemer got one?
|
Yes I did. I bought it in the fall of 2013, but it took forever and an age for my sheriff to act on the application (due to a staffing issue) and then BATFE cashed my check just ten months ago, so it's still at my dealer. Looking forward to getting it and shooting it...and I will, of course, keep everyone posted.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-06-2015, 09:09 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SE Wisc.
Posts: 3,493
Likes: 784
Liked 6,611 Times in 2,083 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkk41
Auto-Ordnance had severe quality control problems during the 80-90s. The pistols I've seen under Kahr ownership show marked improvement. Haven't seen any recent Thompsons.
|
I bought one in the mid-1980s and every firearm problem know to man occurred. After several return trips to Auto-Orndance and it being returned not working, I stripped every part off the gun until I had a barrel receiver. I then bought a military surplus Thompson parts kit and installed the parts on the barreled receiver and only then did I have a functioning Thompson. When they started remaking the Thompson in the 80s, they put them on the market too early. Quality was NOT present in what they were selling. If they had spent more time "getting it right" before putting on the market, they wouldn't have the bad reputation.
__________________
Bill
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-06-2015, 10:45 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: west Texas
Posts: 89
Likes: 108
Liked 169 Times in 54 Posts
|
|
DGT, Too much gun for you! I suggest you stay with your Chipmunk.
|
04-06-2015, 01:47 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20,895
Likes: 85,108
Liked 22,838 Times in 10,553 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemerguy53
I've always wanted a Thompson sub-machine gun in my collection, but the real, honest-to-Pete Tommy Guns are priced out of sight. Auto Ordnance makes a semi-auto Tommy Gun that, though expensive, is priced within reach, and I'm wondering if anybody here has any experience with one of these?
To be precise, I'm talking about the M1SB, which is the 10.5" barrel model that looks identical to the WWII M1 Thompson, but which is, of course, semi-auto only. It's priced at a tick under $2K, and requires the federal stamp...but it's the closest I can come to holding that particular piece of history in my hand.
I'm not looking for match-grade accuracy, and truth to tell, I probably won't even fire it much...but if I decide to buy it, I want it to be reliable and well-crafted.
What are your thoughts, folks? Should I scratch this itch? Thanks for your input...
|
Ive seen several at local gun shows and they do look and feel great. I want one too. Also,you can get them starting around seven "C"notes up through the price you mentioned.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-06-2015, 01:49 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20,895
Likes: 85,108
Liked 22,838 Times in 10,553 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemerguy53
Yes they are! If memory serves me, the website says 11.5 lbs...and you can bet that's unloaded.
|
Thats not bad at all. The ATI--STG fourty four I have weighs ten point four pounds--the exact weight the originals are.
|
04-07-2015, 11:36 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 34
Likes: 91
Liked 19 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Keep us in the loop Beemerguy...
I would like to hear about your experiences...
__________________
SHOOTER13
|
04-12-2015, 08:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 205
Likes: 1
Liked 532 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
After a significant amount of work, I got mine about 90%. Still waiting on that federale letter to see if they'll let me throw a detachable stock on there.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-22-2015, 07:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: S.E. Wisconsin and MSP
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 713
Liked 1,574 Times in 578 Posts
|
|
Thompson M1A1-M27 left side.jpgThompson M1A1-M27 right side.jpgATTACH]219820[/ATTACH]
I have a Thompson M1A1 to which I added a Thompson M27 lower to match the one I carried in Vietnam. I've had to replace the barrel and a couple internal parts (can't remember what, any more), and the advice I followed was to use ONLY military parts. I'm not sure many military parts are available any more, and I've stockpiled a few. From time to time some treasure trove of parts is found in places like Russia, and the best advice is BUY THEM! There are also individuals who can hand-make excellent parts, for a price, of course. One guy made a bolt handle for my M21/27 that, to me, is indistinguishable from an original.
At about the same time, a friend who didn't want to spend the money to buy an original bought the Auto Ordnance semi-auto with the 16" barrel. It was accurate, but a jam-a-matic. He futzed with it for quite a while, but eventually made it reliable. The long barrel kinda spoils the lines for those of us who know it isn't how the originals were made, but it makes the gun an accurate carbine. I hope the Kahr-made guns are better, but it would be tough to improve on the accuracy of the AO one my friend had.
Learning to use the peep sight on either gun has a lot to do with accuracy. At ranges out to about 50 feet many people can shoot full-auto as accurately from the hip, as by using the sights. At 10-ish meters, using the peep, it's possible to make cloverleafs. I'm sure that's due to the 10" or 16" barrels and long sight radius.
In any case, beemerguy53, I think you should get it. Worst case, you sell it, probably for what you paid for it. Best case? One of the most iconic and just plain cool guns at the range. Or hanging on your wall. Or, get a 1930s suit and - - -
Last edited by Harkrader; 12-22-2015 at 08:12 PM.
|
12-22-2015, 08:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: S.E. Wisconsin and MSP
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 713
Liked 1,574 Times in 578 Posts
|
|
If somebody can tell me how, I'll post a video of shooting from the hip at a target about 10 meters away.
|
12-22-2015, 11:59 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mill Creek, WA
Posts: 306
Likes: 1
Liked 171 Times in 93 Posts
|
|
I have two of the Kahr/AO Thompsons that I bought this year. I have a 1921A1 and a TM!. They are both semi-autos with 16.5" barrels. The 1927A! was built in the last few years and the M1 was manufactured in 2004.
I couldn't get either one to fire more than 4 or 5 shots in a row out of any of my 10 30rd and 20rd mags. I bought the M1 used and it came with 8 30rd mags. Two of them worked 100% of the time. So I knew then the trouble was the mags not the guns.
So I took the worst performing mag and started troubleshooting it. I couldn't make it any worse than it was!! I couldn't push a round out of the mag with heavy thumb pressure. So I took a pair of needle nose pliers and bent the feed lips up (and out at the bottom) slightly to take some of the pressure off the round and tried to push the round out again. This time it got the round half way out of the mag but it hung up on a ding in the left feed lip. So I took the ding out of the feed lip and tried it again. Close but not there yet. I bent the right and left feed lips, at the front of the mag, out to the side of the mag just slightly. I was finally able to push a round all the way out with heavy thumb pressure! The adjustments were on the order of 1/32" to 1/16", not a massive amount!
I took both guns and the adjusted mag to the range and it worked 100% in both guns. All rounds fed flawlessly in the mag. So I got out my other 17 mags and fixed their feed lips also. Now all 18 mags feed 100% in both guns.
The guns made by Kahr/AO have had their problems over the years but they are not junk! Mine work just fine and it's not a matter of luck, I'm never that lucky!! Many guys are sending their guns in for repair when a mag adjustment may be all that's needed to get them to feed well. Consider that most mags on the market are used and some very much used. So some adjustment may be needed. All of my mags work great now in both guns.
They are heavy 13.5lbs for the 1927A1 and 11.5lbs for the TM1. But they are a blast to shoot. When I uncase them at the range it brings the range to life!!!! I love Tommy guns. My uncle was stationed on Okinawa for 2 years during the Korean mess. He trained ship loads of GIs how to use everything from 1911s to 155mm howitzers. But his favorite gun was the Tommy gun. He had some great stories about them.
I've also found that they like a lot of lube. Run them wet and they work better, at least mine do. They are also very accurate. 30 rounds at 25 yards will give you a hole about 3" in diameter without much effort.
Here's a couple of pictures of my two.
http://smith-wessonforum.com/attachm...1&d=1450842583
http://smith-wessonforum.com/attachm...1&d=1450842616
__________________
gunfighter48
NRA Life Member
Last edited by gunfighter48; 12-23-2015 at 12:04 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-23-2015, 10:02 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 487
Likes: 15
Liked 666 Times in 201 Posts
|
|
This is an old thread but timely to me since my Auto Ordnance 1927A1 is only one month old. I've had only two issues since getting my gun, a pin fell out of the peep sight and the drum mag would not feed a single time.
The drum actually shaved the bottom of the jacket off of the FMJ round.
I fixed both issues very quickly. I replaced the press fit pin on the peep sight with a slightly longer pin that I made with flared ends so that it won't vibrate out.
I removed the sharp (unfinished) edge from the bottom half of the drum bullet feed area with a fine grit stone. The drum now works perfect.
Mark
|
12-23-2015, 01:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 4,460
Liked 5,836 Times in 1,899 Posts
|
|
Hey Harkrader, can't get the quote to work, but it's because you have to attach the rail from a mag to a drum to get it to function in an M1. Did you make your drum? Here's my set up. And yes they do fit into a violin case.
|
12-23-2015, 02:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 332
Liked 1,906 Times in 523 Posts
|
|
The late Vic Morrow carried one in the t.v. series Combat. The series is currently being shown on the Heroes & Icons (H&I) channel:
Last edited by Backlighting; 12-23-2015 at 02:50 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-03-2018, 02:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
I bought a beautiful 1927A1 at the PX for $800, no tax last weekend! 3 inch group from a rest at 75 yards with the peep sight. I ordered a 50 round drum for about $155 plus shipping. I'm happy with it. I wish the trigger pull and cocking were both lighter.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-03-2018, 04:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 2,905
Liked 5,333 Times in 1,869 Posts
|
|
I have a 27 That I rebarreled as an SBR, after obtaining BATF approval, several years ago. I purchased it from a couple that was moving to CA and couldn't take it with them. I also did the spring conversion on mine and it's now infinitely easier to operate. Mine came as pictured with the FBI case but with a 16" barrel. It is reliable and was built sometime in the 70s. The one remaining thing I would like to do is convert it to a detachable stock model like the originals.
Jim
Last edited by italiansport; 10-03-2018 at 04:36 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-03-2018, 04:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South of Atlanta, GA
Posts: 374
Likes: 268
Liked 463 Times in 168 Posts
|
|
I bought one (M1 w/ 16 in barrel) approx 20 yrs ago. It will not take the drum mag. I got it because I have a thing for WW2 guns (even if its a copy or clone). And the semi auto was in my price range.
There are a lot of small parts inside and I have had breakage over the years (I ordered replacements and fixed it myself). I don't remember exactly what, but it was minor (less than ten bucks) parts.
There are much better pistol caliber carbines out there. But this one scratches a historical itch for me (along with my Garand, Carbine and 03A3). I shoot it maybe once every other year, but have no plans to get rid of it.
Its like my old VW. Fun to take out, turns heads, and classic, but I have to work on it sometimes to keep it running.
|
10-03-2018, 05:28 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 993
Liked 1,923 Times in 956 Posts
|
|
A friend bought one on the 90s. Problem with the cheesy rear sight attachment and
problem with stick mag function. I think it was ok once those issues were resolved(replacement mags if memory serves).Kinda fun to be throwing those lead marbles down range.
|
10-03-2018, 09:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 3,245
Liked 3,860 Times in 1,967 Posts
|
|
Bought one years ago when they first came out, sometime around 2000-01 IIRC and it’s a 12-lb .45 rifle. About as fun as pissing into the wind. The novelty of the gun wore off quickly and I ended up selling it for a loss but I’ve never regretted it...it ran ok, was just a boat anchor.
__________________
Some Might Say.
|
10-04-2018, 12:16 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,524
Likes: 1,184
Liked 18,473 Times in 7,310 Posts
|
|
Just curious, but if it is a semi-auto, why does it require the tax stamp? Are they that easy to convert to full-auto or something?
|
10-04-2018, 10:30 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,539
Likes: 89,848
Liked 24,925 Times in 8,532 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38
Just curious, but if it is a semi-auto, why does it require the tax stamp? Are they that easy to convert to full-auto or something?
|
The posters are swapping the 16 1/2" barrel for the 10", making a SBR (short barreled rifle), hence the $200 tax stamp.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
10-04-2018, 10:41 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,524
Likes: 1,184
Liked 18,473 Times in 7,310 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muley Gil
The posters are swapping the 16 1/2" barrel for the 10", making a SBR (short barreled rifle), hence the $200 tax stamp.
|
AHHH, I see, so the 16.5" barrel version doesn't require the stamp?
Makes sense (or about as much sense as most BATFE rules).
|
10-04-2018, 09:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 200
Likes: 306
Liked 149 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
My personal preference is the 1928 receiver with the bolt handle on top. Putting the handle on the right, as our military did with the M1/M1A1 was a poor design for right-handed people. The Germans did the design correctly with their MP38/40 by putting the handle on the LEFT side. That way, the right hand can remain on the pistol grip ready to fire once the left hand has inserted a magazine & pulls back the bolt.
Thompsons are fun to shoot. I like the suggestion posted above to rent one and try it out before buying, because they are pricey compared to other semiautos. Also, thanks to the poster who provided the link to the machine gun forum. That looks interesting.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|