|
|
08-02-2014, 03:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: maine
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 1,655
Liked 903 Times in 370 Posts
|
|
Held a new striker fired LC9 today......
And now I definately think its gonna give the shield a run for its money. Super smooth trigger and clean break. Very crisp sights, definately a 100% improvement. Will I trade my shield for one? Probably not. Will I buy one? Bet your butt I will!
Last edited by perfectcircle1; 08-02-2014 at 03:02 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-02-2014, 03:13 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Fruitland Idaho
Posts: 5,076
Likes: 1,586
Liked 4,882 Times in 2,025 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by perfectcircle1
And now I definately think its gonna give the shield a run for its money. Super smooth trigger and clean break. Very crisp sights, definately a 100% improvement. Will I trade my shield for one? Probably not. Will I buy one? Bet your butt I will!
|
Looking at the title to this post, the LC9 is not a striker fired pistol. (there's a shrouded hammer, just like the LCP)
__________________
Minimize the variables
|
08-02-2014, 03:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 161
Likes: 292
Liked 67 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
He is referring to the new LC9S which is a striker fired pistol.
|
08-02-2014, 03:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: PALM BEACH FLORIDA
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 15
Liked 749 Times in 422 Posts
|
|
|
08-02-2014, 03:23 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,879
Likes: 1,673
Liked 2,345 Times in 1,111 Posts
|
|
Many pistols feel nice to fondle at the counter...
The proof will be in how nice it feels to shoot. If it doesn't feel nicer to shoot than the Shield, there will probably be SOME die hard Ruger fans that will dump the Shield, but it won't be much competition.
While I haven't gotten a chance to shoot an LC9s yet, I do know that I do not like the heavy recoil of the original LC9. The original LC9 is as uncomfortable to shoot as the PF-9 and DB9 and I don't see a striker fire version changing that.
My Shield on the other hand, is as smooth and nice to shoot as a G26, which to me, makes it an All-Day-Shooter (and I can shoot it all day without feeling fatigued).
Harsh/Heavy recoil = Increased time to get back on target = Slower Follow-up shots. Not desirable in a carry pistol (to me anyway).
Do NOT dump a Shield in favor of an LC9S until you've actually SHOT an LC9S.
Last edited by RobzGuns; 08-02-2014 at 03:50 PM.
|
08-02-2014, 03:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Miwaukee
Posts: 363
Likes: 384
Liked 219 Times in 96 Posts
|
|
Initial reviews seem favorable, but one reviewer noted a pretty long trigger reset.
__________________
-Mike-
|
08-02-2014, 04:31 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Fruitland Idaho
Posts: 5,076
Likes: 1,586
Liked 4,882 Times in 2,025 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakpro
He is referring to the new LC9S which is a striker fired pistol.
|
I stand corrected. I hadn't heard of that one. (not that I follow Ruger news much )
__________________
Minimize the variables
|
08-02-2014, 05:21 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 20,007
Likes: 24,514
Liked 29,300 Times in 10,891 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wishoot
Initial reviews seem favorable, but one reviewer noted a pretty long trigger reset.
|
I think trigger reset is an overrated parameter. More than one VERY successful competitive shooter releases the trigger completely. "Riding the reset" must be learned for every gun you own and is likely to be different on all of them. A full release works with all firearms, so what's not to like? The time saved riding the reset is minimal for the average shooter IMHO, as proven by those competitive shooters who do use full release.
|
08-02-2014, 05:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,058
Likes: 108
Liked 2,125 Times in 968 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobzGuns
I do know that I do not like the heavy recoil of the original LC9.
My Shield on the other hand, is as smooth and nice to shoot as a G26, which to me, makes it an All-Day-Shooter (and I can shoot it all day without feeling fatigued).
|
With roughly the same weight and dimensions, I wouldn't think it would be that dramatically different. Wow.
|
08-02-2014, 06:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Miwaukee
Posts: 363
Likes: 384
Liked 219 Times in 96 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LVSteve
I think trigger reset is an overrated parameter. More than one VERY successful competitive shooter releases the trigger completely. "Riding the reset" must be learned for every gun you own and is likely to be different on all of them. A full release works with all firearms, so what's not to like? The time saved riding the reset is minimal for the average shooter IMHO, as proven by those competitive shooters who do use full release.
|
I think it's just a personal thing. I prefer a shorter rest myself. I find it easier to get off a more accurate second shot.
__________________
-Mike-
|
08-02-2014, 07:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: maine
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 1,655
Liked 903 Times in 370 Posts
|
|
Reset plays no part for me either. For some reason that new ruger felt really slick to me. I owned tjese hammer styled one a few years back and sold it cause of That stupid trigger
|
08-02-2014, 08:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 207
Likes: 216
Liked 138 Times in 76 Posts
|
|
I have a Kahr CW9, based on the feel of the trigger, I think of it as a skinny revolver.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-02-2014, 08:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: maine
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 1,655
Liked 903 Times in 370 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by R*E
I have a Kahr CW9, based on the feel of the trigger, I think of it as a skinny revolver.
|
Good thing about the Kahrs is atleast they are smoooooth
|
08-02-2014, 08:54 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,879
Likes: 1,673
Liked 2,345 Times in 1,111 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorLouis
With roughly the same weight and dimensions, I wouldn't think it would be that dramatically different. Wow.
|
Yeah... It surprised the heck out of me when I shot the Shield for the first time. I was expecting a much rougher recoil, comparable to that of the PF-9 and LC9, but it's much closer to a G26... Smooth.
|
08-03-2014, 12:29 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 956
Likes: 511
Liked 338 Times in 189 Posts
|
|
Been going between one of these, an XDs, and a shield...so this thread has made the decision harder!!!! I can't find any one range that has all 3 to test out.
__________________
Still just a kid at heart
|
08-03-2014, 04:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 266
Likes: 145
Liked 223 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Sold both my LC9 and LCP. I bought them each on high recommendation from a friend and was sorely disappointed with them in the range. Went back to my J-frames for pocket carry, and occasionally carry my Blue Line acquired Glock 42.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-03-2014, 05:31 PM
|
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 3,701
Liked 5,261 Times in 1,885 Posts
|
|
I have owned a hammer-fired LC9, and wasn't happy with it. I'm glad to see that the new LC9S doesn't have the LCI, and it appears like it doesn't have the lock, either. It does still have the thumb safety, which I can ignore, but it also has the mag disconnect, which I don't like. In the hammer-fired LC9, it was hard to remove...I wonder if the LC9S is different?
I still think the Shield is a much better gun than the LC9, either version. Yes, I haven't seen an LC9S in person, much less shot one, but it's only incrementally different from the LC9, and it would have to be a LOT different to top the Shield.
BUT, that's my opinion...and with that and a few dollars, you can get a cup of coffee at Denny's.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-03-2014, 05:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: maine
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 1,655
Liked 903 Times in 370 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevolverDen
Sold both my LC9 and LCP. I bought them each on high recommendation from a friend and was sorely disappointed with them in the range. Went back to my J-frames for pocket carry, and occasionally carry my Blue Line acquired Glock 42.
|
I carry a j every dang day
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-11-2015, 09:35 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: STL Area: Belleville, IL
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 2,446
Liked 777 Times in 407 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by perfectcircle1
And now I definately think its gonna give the shield a run for its money. Super smooth trigger and clean break. Very crisp sights, definately a 100% improvement. Will I trade my shield for one? Probably not. Will I buy one? Bet your butt I will!
|
Now there is a companion model to the Ruger LC9s. The LC9s Pro.
The new LC9s Pro is identical to the LC9s in appearance and function, with a few key differences. The new Pro model is offered without a thumb-operated manual safety lever or a magazine disconnect safety. This model should sell very well!
Read more: First Look: Ruger LC9s Pro | Guns & Ammo
mb
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|