|
|
|
10-05-2014, 09:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 10,428
Liked 28,236 Times in 5,273 Posts
|
|
Looks like your's is a 1893 vintage Model 1884 rifle.
Determine the age of your TD here.
Springfield Trapdoor Rifles & Carbines
__________________
Eccentric old coot
Last edited by Iggy; 10-06-2014 at 12:34 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-06-2014, 10:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alde
Yes, I picked up an mod 1884 rifle with a rod bayonet.
|
You got a rod Bayonet for $500?! You done GOOD!
|
10-06-2014, 11:12 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Western WA
Posts: 3,165
Likes: 3,819
Liked 3,347 Times in 1,395 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pitspitr
You got a rod Bayonet for $500?! You done GOOD!
|
I think I got a pretty nice rifle for the price. I was not able to take pictures yesterday but will try later today. Sometimes my time is not my own.
__________________
AL
Pax Per Potens
|
10-06-2014, 12:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 10,428
Liked 28,236 Times in 5,273 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pitspitr
You got a rod Bayonet for $500?! You done GOOD!
|
He's not wrong there. That's a great price for an uncommon rifle.
__________________
Eccentric old coot
|
10-06-2014, 01:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Central FL
Posts: 211
Likes: 434
Liked 151 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Iggy,
Thanks for the link to the trapdoor dates and info.
FWIW, here's my experience with a trapdoor carbine that I bought from and older gentleman back in the early '90's while still living in NJ.
It was in poor condition and not all there. It was propped up in the corner of his basement!
It had areas of white paint on it that took a lot of time/work to remove.
The trigger was broken, it had no rear sight and the hammer spring was also broken. The saddle ring was missing but the original bar was in place.
I bought a rear sight at a gun show in PA back then which was suppose to be original for a carbine but over the rears I had my doubts. It still on the gun.
The bore is somewhat pitted but not too bad.
The breech block is marked US over Model with 18?? under that. I can't make out the rest of the date.
It shots pretty good with BP loads using a 405 gr. GC lead bullet over 55 gr. of FFg. It was the only bullet I had at the time.
According to the chart and its serial #, 144XXX, it is one of 501 carbines made in 1881.
I replaced the broken parts with reproductions.
I tried selling it a couple of times but due to the condition and the non-original replacement parts, I had no takers.
__________________
JimC
Last edited by JimC; 10-06-2014 at 01:13 PM.
|
10-06-2014, 01:37 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 10,428
Liked 28,236 Times in 5,273 Posts
|
|
Mine is one I rescued from my Grandpappy's barn. He bought it at the turn of the last century from Bannermans, when he homesteaded out here to Wyoming. He paid $7.50 for it. He never fired it, and it sat in the barn for over 40 years.
He left it in the barn when he abandoned the old homestead and moved to town. I found it and drug it home.
It was rusty and in sad shape. I played with it as a kid and finally put it in the back of the closet.
Years later I remembered it and drug it out again.
I always wanted a Officer's Model TD so back in the 80's, I decided to make a poor man's version.
I found an unfired barrel with some rust in the rifling near the muzzle. Cut the rusted part of the barrel off, remounted the front sight, ground the sling swivel off and reversed the trigger guard, pillar mounted the receiver, and free floated the barrel in a Rinehart-Fajen stock.
It has no value as a collector, but it has turned into my go to rifle for hunting or for fun.
A little 45-70 trivia. At 1000 yards with a 500 grain slug, the mid-range trajectory is 127 feet. Now that's lobbin' them down range...
__________________
Eccentric old coot
Last edited by Iggy; 10-06-2014 at 04:24 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-06-2014, 03:51 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 7,522
Likes: 19,279
Liked 32,379 Times in 5,478 Posts
|
|
The Trapdoor Springfields are relatively plentiful and many remain in very good to excellent condition, having sat in National Guard armories for many years before being released for sale to the public. Many will be found with degraded bores due to the use of black powder and mercuric primers followed by inadequate cleaning processes. Usually, as long as the rifling remains strong a little bore pitting does little to degrade performance with cast bullets. The steel used in these is relatively soft by today's standards, so I avoid the use of jacketed bullets in my vintage rifles. Plenty of molds available, and several companies offering cast bullets properly sized and lubed for this cartridge (.459 to .460 diameter meets all requirements I have found with half-a-dozen period rifles).
As with any antique firearms, relative rarity and overall condition (including originality of all parts, finish, etc) will establish values. Plenty of reasonably good "shooter" grade rifles are available well under your price mark. As others have noted, carbines are usually much higher in price.
Be careful about the carbines. Many, many Trapdoor rifles were cut down to resemble carbine specifications over the years. As with any such modifications, this type of alteration pretty much destroys the collector value of any specimen. A quick way to identify many of those cut-down pieces will be the hole remaining at the front of the forend where the rifles' cleaning rods went, which was not present on the original carbines.
Standard load for the rifles was the .45-70-500 (.45 caliber, 70 grains FFg, 500-grain bullet). Standard load for the carbines was the .45-55-405 (.45 caliber, 55 grains FFg, 405 grain bullet). The carbine ammunition was intentionally underloaded due to excessive recoil of the .45-70-500 load in the lighter weight carbines.
I've been handloading and shooting the Trapdoors for over 30 years. Original ammo spec's are easily duplicated with black powder and cast bullets. Pyrodex RS is also useful (meters by volume like black powder, but weight of charges is about 10% less). Smokeless powders are also useful, and I have had good results with IMR-4198.
The Speer manuals and others are useful, having sections on loads specifically for the Trapdoor Springfields at acceptable pressure levels.
There is absolutely no need to exceed original BP pressures with this cartridge. I have killed Rocky Mountain elk with the .45-70-500 loads and seen bullets penetrate from the diaphragm through the chest cavity and break the off-side front shoulder before exiting (about 4 feet of penetration). Very effective caliber on just about any North American game. I generally prefer the lighter bullets (340 to 405 grains) for most shooting; recoil is not unpleasant and performance on game animals is more than adequate.
Feel free to PM me with any questions you may have. I love the Trapdoor Springfield rifles.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-07-2014, 01:28 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 3,929
Liked 50,520 Times in 6,022 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moosedog
This is the only Trapdoor Springfield I have ever owned. I have it listed in my inventory as a Allin conversion 45/70 Cadet rifle. I'm no Springfield expert.
I bought it because it looked cool and that's about it.
Since it's out, I'm going to have to shoot it. The rifling is very nice and the gun shoots pretty well although it's been years since I shot it.
You Springfield experts let me know what you think.
|
Moosedog:
The only "Allin conversions" were the models of 1865 and 1866. The first was .58 rimfire, the second was .50/70. Yours is a later trapdoor in .45/70.
Cadet rifles had a barrel length of 29 11/16." The infantry model was 32 5/6" and the cavalry carbine was 22".
I sent you a PM on how to measure.
John
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
|
10-09-2014, 07:10 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,548
Likes: 89,904
Liked 24,944 Times in 8,538 Posts
|
|
Anyone that owns and shoots the H&R replicas should read these:
Gun Blowing up on the line - Page 2
I have read for years that some of the copies had problems.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
10-10-2014, 02:06 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Western WA
Posts: 3,165
Likes: 3,819
Liked 3,347 Times in 1,395 Posts
|
|
I slugged my bore tonight and I sure hope I am reading it right. I used a .460 round ball and then put a piece of shim stock of a known thickness around it. I measured it with digital calipers 6 times in different places and came up with .457" groove diameter after deducting 2X the thickness of the shim stock. If that's accurate it should do pretty well with commercial .459" cast bullets. I am going to do the whole thing from scratch again to make sure the slug is ok but it's looking good.
__________________
AL
Pax Per Potens
|
10-11-2014, 04:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Western WA
Posts: 3,165
Likes: 3,819
Liked 3,347 Times in 1,395 Posts
|
|
Just back from the range with the TD. It shoots way high at 100 and with my load patterns like a scatter gun. I am using Missouri Bullets 405 grain RNFP sized at .459". I don't see any leading but I'm not sure the bullet was touching the grooves. I'm sure I measured it wrong. I have ordered a Lee hollow base mold based on the original bullet for these. I hope these bump up to the grove diameter with smokeless powder. I will cast them with a soft alloy. I guess I need to get going with Black Powder pretty soon to really make this old gun shoot like it should.
__________________
AL
Pax Per Potens
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|