Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics

Notices

Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics Post Your General Gun Topics and Non-S&W Gun and Blade Topics Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-23-2016, 11:47 PM
ScottN ScottN is offline
Member
Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"?  
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 323
Likes: 437
Liked 369 Times in 132 Posts
Default Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"?

I posted this on another site but thought I'd post it here as well.

I'm looking for a plinker revolver to shoot CCI CB Shorts off the deck of my new-to-me rural property. Just some good old fashioned "no ear plugs required" plinking. It needs to have Coke can accuracy and be a nice size/weight for my wife, my boys and myself to shoot. Needs to be about 25 ounces in weight. This revolver will be paired with a Savage Rascal my youngest shoots and eventually a Henry lever 22.

I think I have it narrowed down to the new Ruger Bearcat stainless with adjustable sights or the Smith 63 3" 8 rounder. I would appreciate feedback on these 2 revolvers or any other revolver that fits my criteria.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-24-2016, 02:02 AM
alwslate alwslate is offline
Member
Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"?  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,628
Likes: 3,723
Liked 7,218 Times in 3,013 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottN View Post
I posted this on another site but thought I'd post it here as well.

I'm looking for a plinker revolver to shoot CCI CB Shorts off the deck of my new-to-me rural property. Just some good old fashioned "no ear plugs required" plinking. It needs to have Coke can accuracy and be a nice size/weight for my wife, my boys and myself to shoot. Needs to be about 25 ounces in weight. This revolver will be paired with a Savage Rascal my youngest shoots and eventually a Henry lever 22.

I think I have it narrowed down to the new Ruger Bearcat stainless with adjustable sights or the Smith 63 3" 8 rounder. I would appreciate feedback on these 2 revolvers or any other revolver that fits my criteria.

Thanks!
There was a test of the new stainless Bearcat in an article in
Rifle magazine not long ago. Accuracy wasn't it's strongpoint
to say the least. I'm not familar with the 8 shot S&W mod 63
but if it has a steel cylinder I'd say buy it. I would not
personally buy one of the new stainless guns S&W has made
with aluminum cylinders. They may be fine but I'm just
giving my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-24-2016, 02:27 AM
Fishinfool's Avatar
Fishinfool Fishinfool is offline
Member
Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"?  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Central PA
Posts: 4,557
Likes: 8,212
Liked 11,453 Times in 3,023 Posts
Default

Used to own a J frame .22, and currently own a fixed sight Bearcat. Actually, when tested in a ransom rest, most Bearcats and J frames prove plinking accurate, or better when using ammo they like.

Problem is, they are hard to shoot well because of their stiff triggers, small grips, light weight, and hard to see sights in the fixed sight models.

Which one? It really boils down to which one you like better. Either will do their intended job - decent accuracy and portability. If portability is not a huge factor, a K frame, or Super Single Six might prove easier to hit with. I often carry my Bearcat in the woods, and have taken a fair amount of small game with it over the years. Just have to concentrate on the fundamentals of grip, sights, and trigger pull a little more than a heavier, better balanced gun.

Larry
Attached Images
File Type: jpg pheasant.jpg (172.7 KB, 57 views)

Last edited by Fishinfool; 02-24-2016 at 02:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 02-24-2016, 08:52 AM
CAJUNLAWYER's Avatar
CAJUNLAWYER CAJUNLAWYER is offline
Member
Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"?  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On da Bayou Teche
Posts: 18,455
Likes: 18,542
Liked 58,860 Times in 9,667 Posts
Default

THAT my friend is a tough question. SInce I've already got an older model 63 and a 317-1 I'd probably get the Bearcat but to tell you the truth, I've hefted that new 63 with the 3" barrel and it's nice indeed. I'll throw out another choice for you-the Ruger SP101 8 shot 22.
__________________
Forum consigliere
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-24-2016, 08:55 AM
silentflyer silentflyer is offline
Member
Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"?  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 1,697
Liked 1,284 Times in 640 Posts
Default

Not a revolver, but for a plinker one of the Ruger Mark 1,2,3 sem-iautos is hard to beat.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-24-2016, 09:45 AM
smith17's Avatar
smith17 smith17 is offline
SWCA Member
Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"?  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 725
Liked 1,116 Times in 304 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silentflyer View Post
Not a revolver, but for a plinker one of the Ruger Mark 1,2,3 sem-iautos is hard to beat.
Those are nice guns (esp. I and II) but they won't cycle the ammo he needs to shoot.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-24-2016, 10:46 AM
eveled's Avatar
eveled eveled is offline
Member
Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"?  
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,612
Likes: 3,067
Liked 3,443 Times in 1,365 Posts
Default

I'd go with the Bearcat, a double action is tough for a kid to shoot, and if you are going to shoot single action might as well have a single action. Plus it will slow them down a little. My single six is a favorite with my kids, the Bearcat second favorite.

For real off the deck plinking fun we go to the red Ryder bb guns. Quiet, cheap, and not filling the yard with lead.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-24-2016, 10:55 AM
ScottN ScottN is offline
Member
Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"?  
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 323
Likes: 437
Liked 369 Times in 132 Posts
Default

Great responses so far. Just a little more info.

If it were only for me I'd probably get the new GP100 22 to pair it with my Match Champion but it would be too heavy for my youngest son and too big for my wife's hands.

I've looked at the SP101 and think it is a little too heavy, and doggone, the ones I've handled at the gun store have a ridiculously hard to cock hammer. I know some folks have changed the springs but it seems like it would have to improve A LOT before my wife and son would be able to shoot it SA which is most likely the way we'd be shooting.

We are a Buckmark family when it comes to target shooting 22 LR at the range. I setup a Buckmark for my son with Tac Sol barrel and grips to make a lightweight shooter...it is excellent!

But, I'm looking for a revolver to shoot short CB's whenever we get the urge and we don't have to get earplugs, etc. I imagine something like the following, "Dad, I bet I can knock a can off that tree stump over there." "Well okay then, prove it!"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-24-2016, 11:25 AM
ImprovedModel56Fan ImprovedModel56Fan is offline
US Veteran
Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"?  
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 7,345
Likes: 7,534
Liked 5,585 Times in 2,559 Posts
Default

I'd find a Kit Gun of some sort. A Model 34 with some Pachmayr Presentation grips or S&W Target "stocks." Maybe a 43, same.

The Ruger SP101 may be a good choice. I had a 63 once, but I bought it back when S&W was having QC problems, and I had to sift though nearly half a dozen before I found one that didn't look like the extractor was gnawed out by trained hamsters with carbide teeth. Kind of soured me on 63s, although you could probably get a perfectly good one now, particularly if you internally lubed it (sparingly) with RIG +P Stainless Steel Lube.

No matter what you get, especially if it's not a blued steel S&W, will benefit from the RIG +P.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-24-2016, 01:50 PM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"?  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,792
Likes: 18,502
Liked 22,390 Times in 8,268 Posts
Default

For me it would be the Mod 63 hands down. I don't have the current version, but have put many rounds through a 63-1 and when you have the "Target" grips on it, so it is more hand filling, it will shoot along side my 17 and 18. You could probably put those "coke" cans on end for targets.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-24-2016, 01:51 PM
labworm's Avatar
labworm labworm is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"? Ruger Bearcat Adjustable Sights or Smith 63 3"?  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 11,738
Likes: 17,756
Liked 22,460 Times in 8,391 Posts
Default

I own all 3, for the wife and kids, Bearcat all the way.

__________________
Doesn't hasta call me Johnson
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTT Ruger Bearcat "ALPHACAT" for 44 Mag semperdog GUNS - For Sale or Trade 0 11-12-2015 11:01 AM
Ruger 3" SA Bearcat Shopkeeper - Review M3Stuart Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 19 08-03-2014 11:54 PM
Colt Python 6"/Colt Diamondback .22/Ruger Super Bearcat/Charter Arms .44 Bulldog ChicagoGun GUNS - For Sale or Trade 1 07-12-2013 10:25 AM
Price adjusted Smith 66-7 $400/$525, Ruger Bearcat $375 obo, Single Six is sold OM18V GUNS - For Sale or Trade 4 02-25-2011 02:30 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)