|
|
03-12-2016, 03:50 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kennesaw,Ga
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 3,939
Liked 5,521 Times in 1,148 Posts
|
|
My first M1917 Enfield
Just picked up my first 1917 Enfield. It's a Remington, with a Remington barrel dated 9-18. The receiver dates to 12-18 so I doubt if this one saw any action in WWI.
__________________
That's what she said!
|
The Following 11 Users Like Post:
|
5-Shot, AlHunt, Cyrano, da gimp, Frank46, les.b, moosedog, nicky4968, S&WIowegan, SilentKnight, Tyree1867 |
03-12-2016, 04:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Denver area
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 20,240
Liked 13,058 Times in 4,158 Posts
|
|
Great rifle!
You'll love it
|
03-12-2016, 04:08 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern NY-AdirondackMts
Posts: 7,997
Likes: 12,856
Liked 13,380 Times in 5,043 Posts
|
|
Looks real nice.
Point of information the P14 (British version. 303) holds 5 rounds in the magazine your American rimeless 06 cartridge gun will hold 6.
__________________
14 S&W Revs none with locks!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-12-2016, 04:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: So. Florida
Posts: 766
Likes: 2,080
Liked 1,711 Times in 520 Posts
|
|
These are excellent shooting rifles! And yours has a really nice looking set of wood on it.
This one (Winchester) went thru a rebuild at one time but judging from the blue on the barrel and receiver I doubt it spent any time in the trenches.
Last edited by tndrfttom; 03-13-2016 at 10:31 AM.
|
03-12-2016, 04:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,835
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,242 Times in 2,483 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tndrfttom
These are excellent shooting rifles! And yours has a really nice looking set of wood on it.
|
True but conspicuously refinished. Due to their rush rush manufacture sanding stopped at a coarse grit.
U.S. 1917s are my favorite surplus rifles. Their sights, weight and balance makes them easy to shot accurately offhand. Nice find.
|
03-12-2016, 05:12 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: N GA
Posts: 4,466
Likes: 204
Liked 3,613 Times in 1,498 Posts
|
|
I guess that's why Alvin liked his so much!
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-12-2016, 05:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,770
Likes: 2,468
Liked 8,296 Times in 2,908 Posts
|
|
The 1917 is my favorite bolt action battle rifle,
Longer site radius , better sites and lower felt recoil combine to produce better accuracy than my old 1903 .
Another neat feature is it uses the same bayonet as the Winchester trench broom :
Last edited by Engine49guy; 03-12-2016 at 05:26 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-12-2016, 05:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: TN
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 5,163
Liked 4,852 Times in 1,390 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KEN L
I guess that's why Alvin liked his so much!
|
Sgt. York did not use a 1917 Enfield for his exploits. While the All American Div. was issued Enfield rifles when it disembarked for France, York acquired a 1903 by "midnight requisition" from a Marine Corp unit encamped near his company.
This information is from a Bruce Canfield article and verified by one of York's sons. I believe the article appeared in the American Rifleman magazine several years ago.
|
03-12-2016, 07:13 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southwest Iowa
Posts: 10,867
Likes: 2,688
Liked 18,968 Times in 5,588 Posts
|
|
My US Springfield Model M1917 is my best shooting battle rifle (even better than the Krag).
Ours are pretty close in age. Mine was made in Eddystone in Oct 1918.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-12-2016, 08:47 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kennesaw,Ga
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 3,939
Liked 5,521 Times in 1,148 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by k22fan
True but conspicuously refinished. Due to their rush rush manufacture sanding stopped at a coarse grit.
U.S. 1917s are my favorite surplus rifles. Their sights, weight and balance makes them easy to shot accurately offhand. Nice find.
|
Yea, probably a refinished stock but they left all the stamps in place, nice and sharp edged. The day before I picked it up someone on the local forum listed a bayonet and scabbard for it. The bayonet is the more seldom seen 1918 stamp and the scabbard, I believe, is the British issued model. From my reading, these bayonets were reissued to the British in early WWII and they used their scabbards (1907) instead of ours so they would work with their belts. I paid $60 for the bayonet and scabbard and less than $500 for the Enfield.
__________________
That's what she said!
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-12-2016, 09:28 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2015
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 104,949
Liked 22,295 Times in 4,529 Posts
|
|
Now that's a "cool tool"! Nice find, boyh the rifle and matching bayonet.
__________________
SWCA 3084, SWHF 495, PGCA 3064
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-12-2016, 09:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,835
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,242 Times in 2,483 Posts
|
|
I never could run down a deer to bayonet so I don't pay much attention to them. However, I can report that "Enfields" make venison lay down.
It is very likely that your barrel band and front stock fitting were reblued as well. Despite there being over 3 million of them U.S. 1917s with 90% original (pre-1920) bluing are rare. The Canadian military reblued some and those have the best looking military bluing that you are likely to find. During WWII the U.S. rebarreled a lot of 1917s with High Standard (HS) and Johnson automatic (JA) barrels that were broach cut with the same broaches as 1903A3s. WW I barrels have British designed rifling that has a little larger groove diameter but their deep grooves and wide lands make the cross sectional area of the bore slightly smaller.
One of these days or actually one of these years I'm going to have a Springfield or 1917 rebuilt into a cast bullet rifle. Don't worry. It won't be my original 1917. I'm thinking a .30-40 built on a P14 action or rebarreling my .308 Norma Springfield to .35 caliber.
|
03-12-2016, 11:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,770
Likes: 2,468
Liked 8,296 Times in 2,908 Posts
|
|
Just pulled out my 1917 bayonets, Both are Remington made, one is dated 1917 and the other 1918,
both have the US style belt attachment on t heir scabbards, The leather is a green color.
I also have a long bayonet for my SMLE and it has your style FROG button scabbard and the leather is brown.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-12-2016, 11:33 PM
|
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,581
Likes: 13,500
Liked 6,743 Times in 2,526 Posts
|
|
Your 1918 barrel will have 'Enfield' rifling; five groove, left hand twist. The shape of the rifling is a little different than ours, and you will find it doesn't like boattail bullets.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-12-2016, 11:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kennesaw,Ga
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 3,939
Liked 5,521 Times in 1,148 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by k22fan
I never could run down a deer to bayonet so I don't pay much attention to them. However, I can report that "Enfields" make venison lay down.
It is very likely that your barrel band and front stock fitting were reblued as well. Despite there being over 3 million of them U.S. 1917s with 90% original (pre-1920) bluing are rare. The Canadian military reblued some and those have the best looking military bluing that you are likely to find. During WWII the U.S. rebarreled a lot of 1917s with High Standard (HS) and Johnson automatic (JA) barrels that were broach cut with the same broaches as 1903A3s. WW I barrels have British designed rifling that has a little larger groove diameter but their deep grooves and wide lands make the cross sectional area of the bore slightly smaller.
One of these days or actually one of these years I'm going to have a Springfield or 1917 rebuilt into a cast bullet rifle. Don't worry. It won't be my original 1917. I'm thinking a .30-40 built on a P14 action or rebarreling my .308 Norma Springfield to .35 caliber.
|
As with most military rifles, these went through Arsenal rebuild and they didn't worry about putting the correct parts back on. The front bayonet lug band is a parkerized Eddystone, stamped with an E. The middle band is a Winchester, stamped with a W with an Eddystone swivel. From what I've read the Winchesters had better blue, and this middle band shows. So mines not 100% matching, if so I could probably double my money on it. But the main parts are Remington and I got it for a bargain price so I'm thrilled with it. Now to just get out and shoot it!
__________________
That's what she said!
|
03-13-2016, 12:19 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southwest Iowa
Posts: 10,867
Likes: 2,688
Liked 18,968 Times in 5,588 Posts
|
|
Weapon: US Springfield Model M1917, 98 years old
Shooter: US citizen, Model Obsolete, 70 years old
Ammo: US Army issue 30-06, 40 years old
First time firing rifle.
Range: 100 yards
10 rounds
Iron sights (shooter did use glasses)
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-13-2016, 12:53 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: East of Albany, NY
Posts: 386
Likes: 2,630
Liked 255 Times in 129 Posts
|
|
I bought an Eddystone this summer. The sights are easier on old eyes than the Springfields and the weight really helps with recoil. It's a great shooter. You will love yours.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|