Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > >


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-01-2017, 06:10 PM
Tex1001's Avatar
Tex1001 Tex1001 is online now
Member
No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: North Texas
Posts: 395
Likes: 484
Liked 520 Times in 159 Posts
Default No more Kimber Solo

I saw on another blog that Kimber is discontinuing the Solo. Apparently too finicky.
I have had several students ask my opinion on this pistol, and I have told them that I have no experience with the Solo. I do have extensive experience with the Kel-Tek PF-9 and Ruger LC9 micro 9 platforms and could recommend them.
3 of my former students bought Solos, 2 women and 1 man. All have been very displeased with them. All of them sold theirs and went with Rugers.
The Solo struck me as a niche type pistol to begin with. I guess now it will be a collector's item.

By the way, anyone know the status of Remington's R51?
_______________________
I don't have Alzheimer's- My wife had me tested.

Last edited by Tex1001; 01-01-2017 at 06:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #2  
Old 01-01-2017, 09:38 PM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is offline
Member
No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 124
Liked 3,341 Times in 1,497 Posts
Default

I love the looks of the Solo, and if it were a DA then I would already have one. But their weird half-SA half-DA design kinda puts me off. Seems like the worst of both (as opposed to the best of both). I too have read that they are pretty finicky, and they're pretty pricey for what they are. I've looked at them several times and have never quite convinced myself to plunk down the cash for one...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-01-2017, 09:41 PM
sodacan sodacan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 96
Liked 1,141 Times in 557 Posts
Default

As overpriced as their 1911's.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 01-02-2017, 11:42 AM
JJEH's Avatar
JJEH JJEH is offline
Member
No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tornado Alley, OK
Posts: 4,976
Likes: 7,753
Liked 2,928 Times in 1,275 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex1001 View Post
By the way, anyone know the status of Remington's R51?
I believe their newest update was in 2016 and it's now called R51 Enhanced or something.

Part# 96430 is readily available.
__________________
Jorge
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-02-2017, 11:56 AM
RV4driver's Avatar
RV4driver RV4driver is offline
US Veteran
No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Occupied Colorado
Posts: 794
Likes: 27
Liked 511 Times in 264 Posts
Default

My solo went back to Kimber twice. Since it came back the second time, it has been flawless. The first trip back was for mag retention issue, solved. Second time was for making metal at the lugs in the slide, when it came back, that area had been relieved and a letter stamped in the slide indicating an update had been performed. I've carried it and shot it for years since with no issues. Yes, it's too expensive for what it is. I like the size of it for ankle carry. I think they're 9mm micro line has replaced it, they don't need two of the same gun.
__________________
Fight socialism. Never stop.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-02-2017, 11:58 AM
BEEMER1 BEEMER1 is offline
Member
No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 6 Posts
Default

I have carried a Solo for five years now and after trying just about every small 9mm out there it suits me the best.

I am on my second Solo right now. I liked the first one so much that I bought one of the CDP's to get night sights and front strap checkering. I have never had a failure of any kind with my Solo's.

I am sorry to see them go. I just can't pocket carry a SA pistol cocked and locked.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 01-02-2017, 11:59 AM
SC_Mike's Avatar
SC_Mike SC_Mike is offline
Member
No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 5,276
Liked 2,612 Times in 766 Posts
Default

A friend had/has the Solo in 9 and he said it worked great, as long as you didnt load more than 3 rounds in the mag. I told him to pack the mags full and let them sit, perhaps it's a spring tension issue.

Nice looking pistol tho.
__________________
John 14:12-13
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-02-2017, 12:10 PM
gregintenn gregintenn is offline
Member
No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lafayette, Tennessee
Posts: 5,203
Likes: 3,841
Liked 4,512 Times in 1,704 Posts
Default

Although I've never owned, or even fired a Kimber of any make or model, I get the impression that pretty is their claim to fame.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 01-02-2017, 12:58 PM
CustomChevyGuy CustomChevyGuy is offline
Member
No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 424
Likes: 696
Liked 327 Times in 182 Posts
Default

I don't have any experience with the Kimber Solo; however the LGS I frequent seems to be constantly selling them. I can't recall many visits where one wasn't being sold. He's said before that he can't keep them in stock.
__________________
John 14:6, Luke 21:11
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-02-2017, 01:17 PM
Arik Arik is offline
Member
No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Outside Philadelphia Pa
Posts: 13,708
Likes: 5,780
Liked 13,080 Times in 5,664 Posts
Default

At least one LGS doesn't carry Kimber in general. Too many returns for the price point. And several others don't carry the Solo

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-02-2017, 02:50 PM
ChattanoogaPhil's Avatar
ChattanoogaPhil ChattanoogaPhil is offline
Moderator
No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 13,266
Likes: 6,132
Liked 16,161 Times in 4,882 Posts
Default

If Kimber is no longer manufacturing the Solo there is finally a logical reason to buy a carry gun with a reputation for not working.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-02-2017, 03:09 PM
hkcavalier hkcavalier is offline
Member
No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pierce County, WA
Posts: 740
Likes: 66
Liked 859 Times in 284 Posts
Default

I was a Solo owner, note the past tense. The machining and smoothness were top notch. I actually liked the SA striker trigger a lot. The main problem with the gun was that it required perfect conditions to work well. Perfect hold, perfect ammo, perfect lubrication, perfect temperature. Mess up any variable and it would stop feeding well, particularly the last couple rounds in the mag where the spring pressure was reduced.

Now I carry a G26 which, while larger, has none of those issues with variables. I suppose you could limp wrist it to the point it wouldn't feed, but I've never had a malfunction with it.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 01-03-2017, 09:10 AM
BEEMER1 BEEMER1 is offline
Member
No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hkcavalier View Post
I was a Solo owner, note the past tense. The machining and smoothness were top notch. I actually liked the SA striker trigger a lot. The main problem with the gun was that it required perfect conditions to work well. Perfect hold, perfect ammo, perfect lubrication, perfect temperature. Mess up any variable and it would stop feeding well, particularly the last couple rounds in the mag where the spring pressure was reduced.

Now I carry a G26 which, while larger, has none of those issues with variables. I suppose you could limp wrist it to the point it wouldn't feed, but I've never had a malfunction with it.
My experience is just the opposite. I have pocket carried two of them without a single failure.

I have carried the pistol loaded with Rem 124 gr Bonded GS +P for 3 months at a time and the Solo never fails to fire , feed, or eject when I finally get to the range for practice. I have complete confidence in mine

I am sorry to see them go.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 01-03-2017, 11:40 AM
steamloco76's Avatar
steamloco76 steamloco76 is offline
Member
No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,379
Likes: 1,514
Liked 2,982 Times in 1,048 Posts
Default

The Solo may be rounded a bit better than my choice, however my Sig P938 has been 100% reliable with hollow point defensive ammo from day one and is very easy to shoot considering its small size and grip area. Accuracy is very good too.
__________________
F.O.E. Aerie #1488
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 01-03-2017, 06:48 PM
Ptarmigan's Avatar
Ptarmigan Ptarmigan is offline
US Veteran
No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 197
Likes: 8
Liked 136 Times in 69 Posts
Default

For those of you with absolutely reliable Kimber Solos, consider yourselves fortunate and I'm certainly glad for you. I certainly hear a good share of tales claiming the opposite--at the range, at the gun counter, etc. I've never owned one so I'm not entitled to a vote.

But.....for those looking for a pocket 9mm you can carry ready for business but not cocked and locked, I have found the striker fired Kahr CM9 to fill the bill wonderfully. It's well worthy of a look if you are looking. Well made but much less spendy than the Solo.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-03-2017, 09:00 PM
rangemeister's Avatar
rangemeister rangemeister is offline
Member
No more Kimber Solo No more Kimber Solo  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mid Tennessee
Posts: 175
Likes: 54
Liked 45 Times in 27 Posts
Default

My Solo has been perfect. Sorry to hear if demise is fact, but the gun serves me as a viable pocket nine in the DC format. I am using the new Federal 150 Micro and there is NO recoil with this round. Cheap at Walmart.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kimber Solo H Richard Firearms & Knives - Other Brands 11 02-01-2016 10:54 AM
Kimber Solo classic bob Firearms & Knives - Other Brands 4 02-14-2015 12:22 AM
WTT/WTS KIMBER SOLO SPF gallor1 GUNS - For Sale or Trade 2 06-17-2014 08:18 PM
S&W needs a Kimber Solo answer mbliss57 Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 15 06-12-2012 10:55 PM
Kimber Solo, Buy It YES or NO WardenRoss Firearms & Knives - Other Brands 8 03-15-2012 04:20 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:22 AM.


S-W Forum, LLC 2000-2015
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)