|
|
04-17-2017, 03:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 3,338
Liked 4,269 Times in 1,042 Posts
|
|
New .41 magnum
My LGS ordered a Ruger Redhawk in .41 magnum. 4.2 inch tapered barrel, hogue grips. I'm liking this a lot.
Fit and finish is good. Barrel is straight, very smooth trigger. The only downside is the cylinder wiggles some with the trigger held to the rear. I've seen other new Rugers and S&W's do this, so I'm going to tolerate this.
I 'slugged' the chambers; with the Remington 210 gr. Rounds they go in easily. Speer Gold dots are quite a tight fit. Hopefully won't be a problem down the road. Any thoughts on this?
Overall I really like this super strong 41
Last edited by American1776; 04-17-2017 at 03:04 PM.
|
The Following 10 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-17-2017, 03:05 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 4,162
Likes: 341
Liked 3,944 Times in 1,494 Posts
|
|
Beauty if you happen to like Ruger revolvers. Unfortunately, I don't.
I LOVE them! Good luck.
Regards,
Dave
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-17-2017, 03:21 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Far Southwest Virginia
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 512
Liked 3,783 Times in 474 Posts
|
|
I like my Ruger Redhawk. Mine's .44 Magnum, same 4.2" barrel.
I did change out the grips, as I found the original rubber grips too big for my taste, couldn't get a proper two hand hold. Ruger Customer Service hooked me up with a wooden set:
I've since changed out those wooden grips for an older walnut set, now I'm happy.
I think a Redhwak will outlast two lives...
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-17-2017, 09:59 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: S/W Indiana
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 1,923
Liked 2,458 Times in 876 Posts
|
|
It will make you a great revolver, big fan of the 41. Only own one Ruger DA, a GP 100 44spl, but have a bunch of their SA's. Looking real hard at a Ruger Redhawk in 45LC / acp. Rugers are rugged, built like a tank and will handle a lot of high intensity rounds. Enjoy your new 41 mag.
Last edited by loc n load; 04-17-2017 at 10:04 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-17-2017, 10:32 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,111
Likes: 2,876
Liked 2,506 Times in 1,281 Posts
|
|
Very very nice congrats
__________________
Spin The Wheel
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-18-2017, 06:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 7,404
Likes: 29,169
Liked 8,461 Times in 3,772 Posts
|
|
Why would Speer factory ammo be a tight fit? And why would the hand and bolt not hold the cylinder tightly with the trigger held back in the "fire" position? Don't know about this one. At times, I think we cut Ruger revolvers too much slack with this "built like a tank" description. The SP101 DA pull, for example.
Up to you...
Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-18-2017, 07:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Center Point, Texas
Posts: 275
Likes: 51
Liked 407 Times in 120 Posts
|
|
I have a .41 Redhawk with 5 1/2" barrel. Very accurate. Only been shooting it with "Cowboy" loads. Makes a decent range gun that I don't mind using. I don't mind throwing this one a range bag and shooting it all day. Fun on silhouettes. Mine still has it's factory wood grips and they actually fit my hand pretty well.
Nicer if you reload. Starline is now making 41 special head stamped brass for those days you just want some trigger time and don't need to shoot bears.
My Redhawk surely has it's place. Corvettes are nice but I actually drive a pickup truck more.
__________________
Go West young man..
Last edited by 1-1917; 04-18-2017 at 07:09 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-18-2017, 08:12 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Swamp-East, Missouri
Posts: 136
Likes: 44
Liked 432 Times in 76 Posts
|
|
i sometimes use Trailboss powder for my 41, lots of fun to shoot, accurate, but fairly tame..
I have a 3-screw Ruger Blackhawk in 41, i won't give it up, great gun.
__________________
USAF AMMO!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-18-2017, 08:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 131
Likes: 5
Liked 225 Times in 63 Posts
|
|
I am a newly recruited fan of the .41 Magnum
Last edited by shinbone; 04-18-2017 at 08:20 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-18-2017, 08:59 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 6,115
Likes: 6,648
Liked 6,156 Times in 2,666 Posts
|
|
My thoughts
You bought the right gun in the wrong caliber.
A heavy 357 mag equals a light 41 mag (180 grain), and a light 44 mag (215 grain) equals a heavy 41 mag. There is a 200 grain 357 bullet and 200, 220, 240, 260 grain 44 bullets.
I have NEVER bought a box of 44 mag ammo because over the years, I acquired 1,700+ pieces of range brass. The same is true for 357 mag brass. In all these years of brass picking and scrounging, I think I found about 6 pieces of 41 mag brass. The last time I saw 41 magnum ammo on the shelf for 50 rounds of jacketed bullets, the price was $75 for each box, no limit, and 3 boxes were on the shelf.
Bullets, brass, and firearms are all scarce (there certainly is no great selection to chose from) in 41 magnum, but the owners are really enthusiastic about it virtues. I understand, its Dillon vs. Hornady.
__________________
S&WHF 366
|
04-18-2017, 09:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 3,338
Liked 4,269 Times in 1,042 Posts
|
|
Update. I fired about 30 rounds in the Redhawk today. Accuracy was good. Remington 210 gr. JSP, Speer Gold Dots, and Underwood 210 gr. JHP. All very hot and loud.
Revolver was flawless, sights needed no adjustment. I was concerned about the somewhat loose cylinder lockup, but there was no spitting or shaving going on. I'm going to leave it as is, since it works.
It's been a while since I owned and carried a 41 mag, and I'm very glad to be back on the horse again.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-18-2017, 09:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 10
Likes: 2
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
I have had a Ruger Redhawk and an S&W model 57 for many years. I load a little less than full power, and use them to bust water-filled paper milk cartons, usually at 50 yards. The .41 is impressive when it hits. I don't hit as often as I used to, but still manage one every 5 or 6 shots. I'm only an average marksman, so I take plenty of ammo. I have found that I get good 50-yd groups with lead bullets. I like the Hornady XTP bullets, but they are too expensive for my purpose. When I was searching for a decent load, I used a Ransom Rest, which was a real asset.
I like the model 57, also. However, my main complaint is the grooved trigger. After 50 rounds, I get a welt on my trigger finger. Why does S&W persist in putting this type of trigger on its more powerful handguns? I know they make a smooth trigger, but it should be standard. For this reason I shoot the Ruger more often, plus its heavier weight dampens recoil. Anyone else have the Smith trigger problem?
Regards,
QW
|
04-18-2017, 10:58 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,353 Times in 5,549 Posts
|
|
I own RedHawks in 44mag ever since they were offered. I just picked up a 41 mag and 357mag with 5 1/2" barrels. I been eyeing the 4.2" barrels. The 41mag/4.2 barrel is a nice ccw revolver.
I shot federal 410gr JHP out of my s&w m58 she barks for sure the whole range woke up and all eyes were on me. Funny they watched me put it in my waist ban holster. Those 380's make little noise.
Last edited by BigBill; 04-18-2017 at 11:04 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-18-2017, 10:59 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,353 Times in 5,549 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quiet Wyatt
I have had a Ruger Redhawk and an S&W model 57 for many years. I load a little less than full power, and use them to bust water-filled paper milk cartons, usually at 50 yards. The .41 is impressive when it hits. I don't hit as often as I used to, but still manage one every 5 or 6 shots. I'm only an average marksman, so I take plenty of ammo. I have found that I get good 50-yd groups with lead bullets. I like the Hornady XTP bullets, but they are too expensive for my purpose. When I was searching for a decent load, I used a Ransom Rest, which was a real asset.
I like the model 57, also. However, my main complaint is the grooved trigger. After 50 rounds, I get a welt on my trigger finger. Why does S&W persist in putting this type of trigger on its more powerful handguns? I know they make a smooth trigger, but it should be standard. For this reason I shoot the Ruger more often, plus its heavier weight dampens recoil. Anyone else have the Smith trigger problem?
Regards,o
QW
|
Shooting gloves?
|
04-20-2017, 07:10 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,421
Likes: 6
Liked 5,315 Times in 1,937 Posts
|
|
After a nasty divorce from a S&W due to a Model 57, my dear, old dad picked up a Redhawk in 41mag. He was a big fan of Elmer Keith, who advocated the 41mag as the standard police round. Dad's long gone, but the Redhawk resides in my safe. I'm normally a S&W man, but this Ruger's a fine shooter and it's staying in the inventory.
|
04-20-2017, 08:41 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rochester, NH USA
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 1,620
Liked 4,900 Times in 1,701 Posts
|
|
...you bought the right gun and the right caliber... 180 .357s dodn't even come close to .41s... And .44s are more than what one needs and kicks more...
Had a .41/5.5" for several years but sold it a long time ago. Two years ago when Ruger made the run of 4.2" guns I bought one out of the secnd batch shipped...absolutely superb DA...
First shots fired...about 30 yards DA...
Best 50 yard DA group I have ever sshot...
Was so happy with it I bought the 2.5" when it came out...
It's a shooter too but a little more concentration is needed...
http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...ad-Data-Center
Bob
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-20-2017, 10:33 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: for now ,Texas
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 185
Liked 3,297 Times in 1,523 Posts
|
|
QuietWyatt , I have the same problem so I grind / file them down smooth . The other option is to put a band aid on your finger before shooting . I've never used a shooting glove and never will .
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-20-2017, 11:07 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Indyucky
Posts: 388
Likes: 99
Liked 578 Times in 197 Posts
|
|
I love the .41 mag as well. I have a very old 6" 57 and a 58 that I still carry now and then. The 57 has taken several white tail over the years.
__________________
BT
EGO VOLUNTAS HAUD OBEDIO
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-21-2017, 09:46 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: for now ,Texas
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 185
Liked 3,297 Times in 1,523 Posts
|
|
I enjoy the 41 and have several . I have to say that a 180gr cast in a 357 can be a great powerful load . I prefer to shoot them from a 6" barrel to get all the velocity I can . The barrel twist rate on Smiths is a little slow for heavier bullets so I want all the velocity on the bullet I can get before it leaves the barrel . It packs a powerful punch , on both ends .
Last edited by cowboy4evr; 04-21-2017 at 09:51 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-21-2017, 06:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 101
Likes: 124
Liked 75 Times in 40 Posts
|
|
I love the 41. That was a great purchase. Congrats! Both the Redhawk and m57 are on my wish list.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-21-2017, 07:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,415
Likes: 1,100
Liked 5,123 Times in 1,572 Posts
|
|
Rugers D/A revolvers have a lot going for them. They're well made, durable and reliable. They are also among the ugliest guns in existence. LOL.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-21-2017, 08:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Monroe cnty. Ohio
Posts: 6,923
Likes: 4,410
Liked 10,023 Times in 3,676 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sodacan
Rugers D/A revolvers have a lot going for them. They're well made, durable and reliable. They are also among the ugliest guns in existence. LOL.
|
Me too, been there done that, sticking to S&W and that's my story.
|
04-22-2017, 11:14 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rochester, NH USA
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 1,620
Liked 4,900 Times in 1,701 Posts
|
|
...one thing about Ruger...at least they are making a variety of guns in .41... Redhawk in 2.5 and 4.2", Super Redhawk in 7.5", Blackhawk in 4 5/8 and 6.5" and a Super Blackhawk Hunter 7.5"...
...and S&W...one blue 6" Classic with the IL Didn't even make a 50th Anniversary edition like they did for the 27 and 29....
Ruger is also making .327s...where is Smith....
Would love to buy some more Smiths but my last four revolver purchases have been Rugers...
Bob
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-23-2017, 08:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Angleton Tx
Posts: 149
Likes: 1
Liked 123 Times in 66 Posts
|
|
I don't get where you guys are coming from when you call Rugers ugly. they're friggin revolvers fer Christ's sake. They all have the same basic shape/form in their own respective genre' (DA/SA) and the finish, in my opinion is not much different between the makers (with a nod to S&W in earlier models). But the Rugers are, for the most part, more robust. Able to handle more thrust and there is not much difference, especially in the later arms,in the fit and finish. I have as many Ruger pistols as Smiths and the difference in accuracy is nil. You got a preference, say it is a preference and quit dumpin on Rugers!
Now, back to our regularly scheduled program!
Last edited by locolobo56; 04-23-2017 at 08:10 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|