|
|
05-11-2017, 01:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 4,550
Liked 5,572 Times in 1,319 Posts
|
|
Mauser P-38 WWII Outfit
Actually a much better gun than the Luger in most regards. I kept one as my personal handgun from 1972-1995. This one is a 1943 Vet bring back from Middle Georgia that I picked up about 5 years ago. I got to missing the one I sold off in 1995. . .$550 seemed like a terrible price to me at the time. Now they are all $1200 and up. I can't figure out why. When I grabbed up this gun, I told them I didn't want the holster. They insisted that I take it. I was having a stupid day. I'm glad they forced me to take it. The gun is mint. It is apparent that Mauser didn't like being forced to produce the P-38. The exterior of the barrel is like a very fine screw. There are also machine marks here and there. Basically an unfired and unused gun that the GI picked up and carried around for his duration in the War. You can see how the soldiers stored their collections of war artifacts. They cut the straps off the back of the holster, poked holes in the leather, and kept all the medals and pins they had picked up with holster. The Nazi markings are still visible on the back of the holster, but just barely. The medals and pins wore down the markings over time during the War. I didn't get those with the gun, but have a ton of them anyway. There was a Walther sitting next to this one when I bought it, but I passed for lack of money. Now I wish I had bought it too.
__________________
Dr. B
|
The Following 17 Users Like Post:
|
Absalom, cwi47, Darkenfast, DGT, eveled, Jebus35745, kaaskop49, LAA, LedFowl, les.b, LT7d103, moosedog, OLDNAVYMCPO, OLDSTER, PALADIN85020, shouldazagged, sureshotbob |
05-11-2017, 01:14 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,452
Likes: 3,929
Liked 50,508 Times in 6,021 Posts
|
|
Nice specimen! The P.38 pistol was a real milestone in handgun development - more modern production techniques including the use of stampings, and the double action mechanism. I've had two; the first bought from a pawn shop when I was on active duty in the Army. I traded that off some time ago. Here is the one I currently own - in decent shape and still working fine. I do have a 1943-dated German military holster for it.
John
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-11-2017, 03:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,631
Likes: 241
Liked 29,144 Times in 14,091 Posts
|
|
I have a superb condition byf 44 P-38 and what I believe is its original soft leather flap holster with a little damage, mainly worn stitching. I retired it from shooting about 10 years ago when it was evident that prices on good examples were heading North. Last one I saw at a gun show a week ago was tagged at $1100, in less-than-average condition and with no holster. A far cry from the days that you could buy all of them you wanted for $25 each.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-11-2017, 03:58 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 4,550
Liked 5,572 Times in 1,319 Posts
|
|
Just looking on EBAY and the holsters are $300 and up while the magazines are $200 and up. . .and they actually sell for that. Things have sure changed in the 5 years since I bought this one. Who would have thought.
__________________
Dr. B
|
05-11-2017, 04:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 10,146
Likes: 14,193
Liked 12,746 Times in 3,482 Posts
|
|
Beautiful, and right up there with the greatest semi-autos of all time
__________________
John
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-11-2017, 05:22 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: E. Washington State
Posts: 5,497
Likes: 1,325
Liked 10,601 Times in 3,231 Posts
|
|
Only P 38. My wife wanted it for some reason.
image urlcertificity.com
She has not shot it, just sits in the safe.....
__________________
Only difference Fool/Mule-ears
Last edited by STCM(SW); 05-11-2017 at 05:23 PM.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-11-2017, 06:59 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Gettysburg, PA
Posts: 130
Likes: 47
Liked 95 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
P-38
Mine is handed down from the WW2 warrior, my father. I also have his original war trophy documentation.
Al
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-12-2017, 12:27 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 11
Likes: 3
Liked 9 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
I also have a nice p38 that was a bring back and I periodically check gun values and I am not seeing many or any that are bringing in $1200. Please inform me as to where these pistols are selling for this price.
Thanks
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,865
Likes: 10,603
Liked 15,203 Times in 5,250 Posts
|
|
Nice! I always liked that model. It didn't seem to be as popular as the Luger, probably because it wasn't as exotic, but it was more so in function.
Wasn't it about the first da/sa made?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
The Beretta 92 is a straight up copy of the P-38 w/different
sheet metal.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 4,550
Liked 5,572 Times in 1,319 Posts
|
|
Yeah. The Smith M39 was basically a remake of the P-38 with that double action/single action transition. Websites consistently show the nice ones in the $1200 range. . .that's a fixed price. I doubt auction sites have gotten that high yet. The P-38's are not all the same. Some argument regarding the Walther or Mauser as being the most desirable. I prefer the Walther by just a tad. The Spreworks (sp) is the trashy one and priced way below the others. It's functionally fine and a good gun. Just an Eastern European thing.
__________________
Dr. B
|
05-12-2017, 02:03 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,452
Likes: 3,929
Liked 50,508 Times in 6,021 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jessie
Nice! I always liked that model. It didn't seem to be as popular as the Luger, probably because it wasn't as exotic, but it was more so in function.
Wasn't it about the first da/sa made?
|
The first, arguably, was the Knoble pistol of 1905. The Walther PP, which was invented in 1928, was the first commercially viable DA/SA, and came on the market in 1929. Fritz Walther, son of the deceased founder of the firm, headed the design team. The P.38 used the same trigger mechanism, but was locked-breech with a falling locking block. The Beretta Model 92 (U.S. M9 service pistol) copied that locking system.
John
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-12-2017, 02:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,835
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,242 Times in 2,483 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jessie
[...] Wasn't it about the first da/sa made?
|
The Walther PP came out before the P-38. No earlier DA/SAs pop up in my memory.
P-38s were the bad guy's gun in about a zillion Hollywood films. Their commonly recognized distinctive shape and association with the evil guy with the mustache made them perfect for the role.
DocB picked up a great historical artifact.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-14-2017, 11:49 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 116
Likes: 94
Liked 94 Times in 45 Posts
|
|
I was told that the decocking function of the safety is not as trustworthy as those on newer pistols. I've never had a problem. Is this another fable making the rounds?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-14-2017, 05:59 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 2,905
Liked 5,333 Times in 1,869 Posts
|
|
I have several of these ranging from early WW II up through the aluminium examples issued to the German services into the 1970s. I still shoot the late examples but I've retired the early ones. Curiously enough; the first one i ever handled was about the last one I acquired. My uncle brought a Walther example back and I remember him showing it to me when I was a lad. When no one in his immediate family wanted it he presented it to me before he died. I still have it of course complete with the capture paper and this is one pistol that will stay in the family.
Jim
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-14-2017, 11:11 PM
|
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,580
Likes: 13,500
Liked 6,743 Times in 2,526 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew2105
I was told that the decocking function of the safety is not as trustworthy as those on newer pistols. I've never had a problem. Is this another fable making the rounds?
|
I know that when Austria was rearmed with them after WW II they modified the safety. Apparentl the wartime ones had a porblem, whether with design, metallurgy on late guns or machining shortcuts, I don't know.
|
05-14-2017, 11:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 2,002
Liked 3,443 Times in 936 Posts
|
|
I had a bunch of wartime P.38s from Walther, Mauser, and Spreewerke and none of them shot as well as a good post-war P 1, so I sold them all and kept just the P1. On the other hand I kept two Mauser made P.08s that are outstanding shooters.
In the West German military the P1 wasn't very popular and while I found some guns with very good accuracy, other well-worn specimens lacked accuracy. I always found them not working great in fast shooting strings.
This comes from my oberservation of having served in a Panzergrenadier unit and we shot a whole lot more than combat support units and spent a lot of time at the firing range, day and night time. I was usually sighting the P1s in and have shot a lot of them, probably over 100 different ones.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-15-2017, 12:58 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,452
Likes: 3,929
Liked 50,508 Times in 6,021 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew2105
I was told that the decocking function of the safety is not as trustworthy as those on newer pistols. I've never had a problem. Is this another fable making the rounds?
|
Not a fable at all. Slave labor was used in making the late war P.38s, and sabotage was a fact. The metallurgy in the safety had to be just right, or it could crystallize with use. Be particularly leery of those dated 1945, and have a qualified gunsmith check the gun in question very thoroughly for safety.
I have had personal experience with this phenomenon. Quite a number of years ago I bought a 1945-dated P.38. In my back yard, I applied the safety, inserted a magazine loaded with 1 round, pointed the gun at the ground and jacked a round into the chamber. As you may know, the P.38 safety drops the hammer, which falls on the interposing round portion of the safety. If this is not intact, it goes BOOM. It went BOOM. Had there been more than one round loaded, that baby would have gone full automatic.
I returned the gun to the previous owner as defective, and told him I wanted a P.38, not an MP.38!
This fact needs to be more widely known - a word to the wise.
John
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
Last edited by PALADIN85020; 05-15-2017 at 01:01 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-15-2017, 02:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Southside
Posts: 920
Likes: 280
Liked 1,284 Times in 418 Posts
|
|
The Japanese Nambu had the safety problem not the P-38!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|