|
|
07-24-2017, 03:12 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,854
Likes: 3,767
Liked 11,624 Times in 3,642 Posts
|
|
New toy-A Ciener .22 unit
I like .22 handguns. I ran across a Ciener unit for a Colt 1911 and bought it, hoping it would work on my Colt LW Commander. I did have to remove my extractor. I fired it twice into a wood post to see if it worked. Tomorrow I will take it to the range.
Last edited by ColbyBruce; 07-24-2017 at 03:13 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 03:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 6,228
Liked 4,828 Times in 1,867 Posts
|
|
Mine stays on my Colt 1991A1. I find it to be very accurate. It doesn't run well with lead bullets, so I stick with the plated ones.
Enjoy!
__________________
Because of the metric system?
|
07-24-2017, 03:29 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,854
Likes: 3,767
Liked 11,624 Times in 3,642 Posts
|
|
Did you have to remove your extractor?
|
07-24-2017, 04:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,483
Likes: 236
Liked 28,948 Times in 14,015 Posts
|
|
All I have heard about the Ciener is that they tend to be finicky about ammunition. I have an EAA .22 conversion unit, and it sure is. Wont handle either Federal or Remington bulk pack, but OK with the high-priced stuff.
|
07-24-2017, 04:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,854
Likes: 3,767
Liked 11,624 Times in 3,642 Posts
|
|
I have a Advantage Arms conversion kit for Glock 29/30 models. It worked so well on my Glock 29 that I bought a Glock 30 frame and put it together as a dedicated pistol.
|
07-24-2017, 04:44 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Low Country SC
Posts: 845
Likes: 2,521
Liked 1,443 Times in 426 Posts
|
|
I was fortunate enough to buy a Colt 45/22 unit years ago with the floating chamber. No problem except for dirty ammo. Works great. I also have a Ciener for 1911 which is more finicky. I also have one for Glock which I consider poorly functional.
|
07-24-2017, 05:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,483
Likes: 236
Liked 28,948 Times in 14,015 Posts
|
|
I'd really like to have a genuine Colt .22 conversion unit, but for the prices being asked, I'd be much better off buying a new .22 autopistol like a Ruger Mk IV or the S&W Victory .22. Or maybe a used Hi-Standard or Colt Woodsman. I have a Chiappa .22 M1911 alloy replica that I bought very cheaply. It's worth about what I paid for it. No real complaints about the quality of gun itself, except it shoots the poorest groups and has the heaviest trigger pull I have ever experienced with any .22 handgun, and there is not much I can do to improve either.
|
07-24-2017, 07:50 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,758
Likes: 18,437
Liked 22,313 Times in 8,245 Posts
|
|
I have had two different Ciener's, and a Marvel, and while they work, but very finicky on ammo, (and don't bother trying standard velocity) non of them will hold up to the accuracy and reliability of many good quality 22 target grade pistols. High Standard, S&W, Colt, even Ruger & Browning make excellent pistols, and there are thousands on the used market.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
07-24-2017, 07:54 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 6,228
Liked 4,828 Times in 1,867 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColbyBruce
Did you have to remove your extractor?
|
I did not. Slipped right on.
__________________
Because of the metric system?
|
07-24-2017, 08:08 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: East of Stick Marsh, Fla.
Posts: 9,404
Likes: 4,871
Liked 20,873 Times in 6,323 Posts
|
|
I have a Colt Conversion Unit that I bought with my Series 70 Gold Cup when I bought it 10 years ago. Got the whole setup for $1100 back then, which I thought was a good deal. Have had a Kimber upper and did not find it any better than the Colt.
__________________
USMC 69-93 Combat Pistol Inst.
|
07-24-2017, 09:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 14,444
Liked 3,763 Times in 1,784 Posts
|
|
I never see Cieners advertised any more. I vaguely remember they had financial difficulty.
I bought an original Bob Marvel 22 conversion kit for a 1911-style pistol on this forum. It is mounted on a Kimber lower that a gunsmith lowered the trigger pull to less than 2#. I did not like a trigger that low for action shooting but it is great for the Marvel. Bob Marvel stopped making his conversion units many years ago and the rights to do so have traveled a bit. I can say my Marvel is the most accurate 22 I have ever owned.
__________________
Bob.
SWCA 1821
|
07-25-2017, 04:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,854
Likes: 3,767
Liked 11,624 Times in 3,642 Posts
|
|
So I shot these two conversion pistols today
I had five different brands of .22 LR ammo to try. I took the Glock/AA and Colt/Ciener pistols. The Ciener booklet suggested Remington Golden 40 grain solid ammo. I did well with CCI and Remington. It did not like Blazer, Winchester or Federal ammo.
The Glock/AA was a lot less picky on ammo. I enjoyed shooting both pistols. The Colt/Ciener performed well enough that I believe I will get a dedicated frame for it.
Last edited by ColbyBruce; 07-25-2017 at 07:32 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-25-2017, 11:10 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bartlett, Tennessee
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 2,924
Liked 18,639 Times in 4,777 Posts
|
|
About 15 years ago, I found a Ciener Platinum Cup unit on close out at a very good price. I liked it so much that I built up a frame to mount it on permanently. Mine will shoot just about any ammo and does it quite well too.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|