Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics

Notices

Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics Post Your General Gun Topics and Non-S&W Gun and Blade Topics Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-02-2017, 04:21 PM
smitholdtimer smitholdtimer is offline
US Veteran
Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please)  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: N.C.
Posts: 3,053
Likes: 6,023
Liked 1,856 Times in 819 Posts
Default Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please)

Ruger SP-101 chambered for the .327 Federal Magnum. I was disappointed that the only revolver chambered for the .327 turned out to be made by Ruger and with the 4.2" barrel. I contacted them (Ruger) asking for a 3" barrel and was advised of none being available. (Neither a barrel or a revolver)
I asked my friend who has an FFL to keep his eyes open for an earlier produced and since discontinued 3" in .327 magnum. After a couple years he found one, says it's the only one he has seen in several years of gun show travels and the gun business. This one has been Magna-Ported and has combat grips replacing the originals although the original grips and a speed loader were included in the box with the revolver. The front sight appears to be the glow in the dark green dot and the rear is a two dot, windage adjustable sight, do not believe its powered though.

I am sorry this is so long but in order to ask my question I feel this preliminary was necessary.

The 3" is more desireable in my view and although some of the modifications would not have been made had this been mine from the start. This is a very fine example of how an effective carry revolver chambered in an equally effective round should look. There must have been a valid reason that Ruger chose to discontinue this barrel length and I am hoping someone here will share the advantages and disadvantages of the 3" & the 4". Am not aware of any RECALLS so thanks for your patience and any information or insight you wish to share.
__________________
Sam
S&WHF 333 S&WCA 2198

Last edited by smitholdtimer; 08-03-2017 at 07:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 08-02-2017, 05:45 PM
Ashlander's Avatar
Ashlander Ashlander is offline
Member
Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please)  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ellisville, Missouri
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 4,996
Liked 1,309 Times in 685 Posts
Default

Might want to post a photo since your point is this is how an effective carry revolver "should look."
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 08-02-2017, 06:48 PM
smitholdtimer smitholdtimer is offline
US Veteran
Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please)  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: N.C.
Posts: 3,053
Likes: 6,023
Liked 1,856 Times in 819 Posts
Default Sorry about no photos

Thanks to KLYDE for the photograph, picture his with the "J"combat stocks similar to those from S&W. I'm completely lost as to how to post photos. Please continue with the responses!
__________________
Sam
S&WHF 333 S&WCA 2198
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 08-02-2017, 07:26 PM
BigBill BigBill is offline
Absent Comrade
Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please)  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,354 Times in 5,549 Posts
Default

I'm not sure how ruger figures it out but it's either they manufacture so many of one model or barrel length then it's cutoff. Not popular? I have a snub nose police service six in 357 mag with a 2 3/4" barrel. It's my only magnum snub nose. With stout magnum loads it's not too controllable recoil wise. I like the longer barrels and the bigger frames is a plus. But recently I shot my new to me s&w m58/41mag/4" barrel it's a sweet piece. I like the 4" barrel with the heavy n frame. Now for conceal ability the shorter snub nose is probably better with dress clothes. I can hide up to a 7 1/2" barrel shoulder holstered easily.

I believe the wholesalers order a lot of let's say redhawks in 8 shot with a 4.2 barrel. They probably order just enough so ruger will run the order. The wholesalers probably poll their customers. Using the wholesalers to order guns by the lot is slick.

Last edited by BigBill; 08-02-2017 at 07:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-02-2017, 08:01 PM
eveled's Avatar
eveled eveled is offline
Member
Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please)  
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,612
Likes: 3,067
Liked 3,443 Times in 1,365 Posts
Default

I don't understand mid size barrels in general. Snubby for ccw, or long for the range. In-between is a compromise to me. I know others love em, but not me.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 08-03-2017, 04:32 PM
smitholdtimer smitholdtimer is offline
US Veteran
Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please)  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: N.C.
Posts: 3,053
Likes: 6,023
Liked 1,856 Times in 819 Posts
Default Thought there was more interest in the .327 Fed Mag. (Edited)

Even though its a Ruger.

Are there no more shooters who have experience with the Ruger SP-101? Was hoping for more opinions as to the desireability of the 3" over 4" in a carry revolver, also seeking some reassurance that the .327 cartridge is a very capabile and effective self defense round. Anyone?

OK, many THANKS to all who replied, sorry, I sure thought there would have been more interest in these Ruger Revolvers, I wish it or something similar had been produced in larger quantities by S&W!
__________________
Sam
S&WHF 333 S&WCA 2198

Last edited by smitholdtimer; 08-04-2017 at 02:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 08-05-2017, 12:10 PM
glenncal1 glenncal1 is online now
Member
Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please)  
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,695
Likes: 2
Liked 3,456 Times in 988 Posts
Default

I have the 4.2" sp101 in .327. good little gun. As I understand it the 4.2 barrel allows Ruger to sell the gun in Canada (min req there). They also make the lcr in .327. My favorite ruger in that caliber is the GP100 (not in production) and the single 7. I put some larger grips om my SP101 and a minor trigger job and it is a great gun to shoot. Enjoy yours.
__________________
Jim
Many K and N Frames
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 08-05-2017, 01:16 PM
Jingles's Avatar
Jingles Jingles is offline
Member
Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please) Traded a 4.2" for a 3" (Anyone Have Further Thoughts, Please)  
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Murrieta, CA
Posts: 628
Likes: 76
Liked 1,112 Times in 356 Posts
Default

I'm a big fan of 3" guns (just not Ruger) so I think you made a good trade. I'm also not a big fan of magnaporting defensive weapons because the flash is directed upwards and is dang near blinding at night; but I can't deny the ports add to the coolness factor. All-in-all, good trade!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Traded Off Site 629-2 "MOUNTAIN" 4" Tapered Barrel. LNIB TRADED OFF SITE jjbrewst1 GUNS - For Sale or Trade 0 02-21-2016 12:00 AM
"TRADED" DELETE LNIB Smith & Wesson Model 37 Flat Latch .38 Chiefs AirWeight 3" Nicke OkiDoki GUNS - For Sale or Trade 0 01-05-2016 03:04 PM
TRADED : Beautiful nickel finished S&W model 29-2 with a 6.5" barrel. TRADED Punisher0822 GUNS - For Sale or Trade 0 04-15-2015 09:12 PM
TRADED WTS: S&W 629-6 Performance Center Carry Comp 3" BBL (AL) TRADED gadwallis GUNS - For Sale or Trade 2 12-06-2011 10:58 AM
"TRADED" WTS:Competition Items "New Holster Photo added james56 Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 4 01-08-2010 07:45 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:50 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)