|
|
07-13-2018, 10:09 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 3,449
Liked 11,368 Times in 1,323 Posts
|
|
FN HP Capitan
|
The Following 13 Users Like Post:
|
03hemi, jinx, Kurusu, lawandorder, Mike, SC Hunter, OLDSTER, Ozark Marine, petepeterson, RobertJ., Rock185, Seven High, shouldazagged, Xfuzz |
07-13-2018, 10:10 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 3,449
Liked 11,368 Times in 1,323 Posts
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-13-2018, 10:12 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 46
Likes: 412
Liked 35 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
1979 manufacture? I’m assuming that’s a typo..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
|
07-13-2018, 09:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 334
Likes: 672
Liked 394 Times in 181 Posts
|
|
T series much older. A 1979 would have serial number 245RNXXXXX
__________________
Old Guys Rule!
|
07-13-2018, 11:17 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Florida, A Third Wo
Posts: 345
Likes: 28
Liked 138 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
WADR, not a typo and T365098 is a correct SN for a '79 Capitan. FN stopped and started their tangent sight BHPs multiple times...using up pre-existing SN blocks that had been set aside for that purpose, old stock tangent slides and newer other parts, before it was designated "Declassified" in '79. Note the "D'Armes De Guerre" pre-'73 slide legend...also note the 2nd. quarter '78 barrel.
Capitans were later re-resurrected again and produced...off the top of my head, as late as the mid-'90s, but I'm absolutely sure of the '90s period. These were with new production parts...including new tangent slides with MkIII ejection ports and period slide legends.
Classic12; are those your pics or the auction house pics? The reason I ask is that I found...and saved, those same pics several years ago.
Last edited by sub-moa; 07-13-2018 at 11:19 PM.
Reason: SP
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-14-2018, 06:12 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 8,124
Liked 2,996 Times in 885 Posts
|
|
I looks like the chamber section of the barrel is cracked almost all the way around?
__________________
BCCI Life Member #2068
Last edited by Richard Simmons; 07-14-2018 at 07:13 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-14-2018, 06:41 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 3,449
Liked 11,368 Times in 1,323 Posts
|
|
FN HP Capitan
Quote:
Originally Posted by sub-moa
WADR, not a typo and T365098 is a correct SN for a '79 Capitan. FN stopped and started their tangent sight BHPs multiple times...using up pre-existing SN blocks that had been set aside for that purpose, old stock tangent slides and newer other parts, before it was designated "Declassified" in '79. Note the "D'Armes De Guerre" pre-'73 slide legend...also note the 2nd. quarter '78 barrel.
Capitans were later re-resurrected again and produced...off the top of my head, as late as the mid-'90s, but I'm absolutely sure of the '90s period. These were with new production parts...including new tangent slides with MkIII ejection ports and period slide legends.
Classic12; are those your pics or the auction house pics? The reason I ask is that I found...and saved, those same pics several years ago.
|
Those are the pictures I took in April ‘15 and posted on the BHP section of the 1911 forum. And you gave me those infos back then already.
Last edited by CLASSIC12; 07-14-2018 at 06:45 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-14-2018, 08:15 AM
|
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 39,612
Liked 18,061 Times in 4,567 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Simmons
I looks like the chamber section of the barrel is cracked almost all the way around?
|
It's a two piece barrel. That is normal.
__________________
Expect the unexpected
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-14-2018, 08:21 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 8,124
Liked 2,996 Times in 885 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurusu
It's a two piece barrel. That is normal.
|
Had no idea. Thank you for the education
__________________
BCCI Life Member #2068
|
07-14-2018, 12:01 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Florida, A Third Wo
Posts: 345
Likes: 28
Liked 138 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CLASSIC12
Those are the pictures I took in April ‘15 and posted on the BHP section of the 1911 forum. And you gave me those infos back then already.
|
Ahhhhh again . I typed that thinking you JUST bought it and was the new owner...failing to notice you mentioned you'd bought the '52...and another BHP, in '14 in the '52 BHP thread .
Incidentally, I'd saved the pics back then and put them in a folder labelled simply "'79 T" as yet another reference point that "T" production continued way past the SN change date of '68 indicated on the Browning website...that so many folks rely upon. I recognized the pics you posted here but only recalled I'd saved them a few years ago...I should have at least added "1911-BHP '15"...it is now , with "S&W" and your User Name...but from here .
As with the '52 thread; sorry for the redundant reply .
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-14-2018, 12:18 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 3,449
Liked 11,368 Times in 1,323 Posts
|
|
FN HP Capitan
Quote:
Originally Posted by sub-moa
Ahhhhh again . I typed that thinking you JUST bought it and was the new owner...failing to notice you mentioned you'd bought the '52...and another BHP, in '14 in the '52 BHP thread .
Incidentally, I'd saved the pics back then and put them in a folder labelled simply "'79 T" as yet another reference point that "T" production continued way past the SN change date of '68 indicated on the Browning website...that so many folks rely upon. I recognized the pics you posted here but only recalled I'd saved them a few years ago...I should have at least added "1911-BHP '15"...it is now , with "S&W" and your User Name...but from here .
As with the '52 thread; sorry for the redundant reply .
|
No need to apologise, in fact 3 years ago you only replied 1952, so your today’s reply is a lot more complete and informative
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|