Looking at a Winchester Model 12, 12-gauge riot gun, 20-inch barrel, supposedly all original. The barrel is properly marked CYL.

The serial number puts its manufacture around 1958.

Problem is...there's no serial number on the barrel/magazine tube assembly.

To the best of my knowledge, all Model 12s are takedown models, which is why the guns have the serial number in two places.

Plus, again to the best of my knowledge, Model 12 barrels have the year stamped on the bottom of the barrel between it and the magazine tube. So this one should have the number 58 on it. Yet the owner says it doesn't.

So. I'm interested in any opinions/facts anyone has to offer. A photograph is below.

I'll add that I have other photos, and that something doesn't look "quite right", but I simply can't put my finger on what it might be. Possibly something about the juncture of the receiver and the barrel/magazine tube assembly?

Thanks for your time.

I first thought it was a Model 25 then saw the TD arrow,,duh...and read the original post again.

I think the mag and bbl assembly are probably a parts put together and added to the receiver.
The TD arrow looks a little weak (polished over), but a nice looking job and a nice blue.

Not any wear on the mag assembly to match the wear on the recv'r.
In '58 Winchester was using Du-Lite hot salt blue for their general production bluing. This M12 recv;r , bbl extension, mag tube, bbl and small parts included.
But the bbl extension along with showing no wear at all to match the recv'r it is supposedly 'original' to,,also has a bluing color that does not match the color of the recv'r.
Age, wear, handling can all effect the color, as can heat treat of the steels used. But the difference is brilliance and just the color shade of the blue itself make me think the bbl extension is a more recent hot salt blue. A different commercial salt may have been used. Even if the same DuLite used,,it is very tough to exactly match colors and wear. Especially when held so closely side by side as this.


Numrich at one time offered up lots of NOS Model 12 riot bbls along with the other magazine parts, forends and bbl extensions (un-numbered.)
Some of the small parts were still in the white,,some factory blued.

The bbls that Numrich bought (from Winchester?) may have been from production times when the date stamp was not applied to the bottom.
That 2 digit stamp was phased out of use at one point altogether and sometimes wasn't used at times at all for what ever reason during regular production.

Maybe 'seconds or reject bbls' that didn't deserve the date stamp for use in the factory and made their way out the back before being scrapped.,,who knows,,

The Bbl extension that the ser# got hand stamped on was fitted and done while in the white at the factory.
The only other explanation for the missing number would be a complete assembly with a mis- matched number.
The old number belt polished off (they are quite lightly stamped so as not to deform the part) and then it was just left that way and blued.
No attempt to 'fake' a factory riot gun by re-applying the matching ser number in it's place from the recv'r.
I'd give the person who did the work some credit at least for that much, if that was the case!

A few different ways it could have come to be in that condition and with those features.
Just my thoughts.

2152hq:

Thank you so much for your input.

I just deleted everything I said in reply to your post. I'd originally decided someone had installed a Model 25 Receiver Extension on a Model 12 receiver, when I realized that I, too, had overlooked the TD arrow. So duh on me, too. So I'm gonna go along with your theories as to why there's no serial number.

I was obsessing over this. Geez. I'm not gonna buy the thing, anyway.

Nice looking shotgun, I have a 20 and 16 gauge, they are great shotguns. I've had the 20 gauge since October 1963, 55 years ago. I wish I had a 12 gauge. That one would make a great house gun.

Have a blessed day,

Leon

Winchester offered complete "front ends" to field repair stations, that were intended to be numbered to the receiver when they were fitted. Model 12s required a whole new assembly to change barrels from say 26 inches for quail, to 30 inches for waterfowl.

What I can see of the forearm in the picture looks like the smaller forearm, that I believe was no longer in use by the mid fifties. It is hard to tell, but that's how it looks to me.

Also, from my understanding, an extra barrel assembly that was purchased with the gun would have the same serial number on both assemblies. If it had been returned to the factory, it would not have a serial number on the second set, although it would have been fitted.

I'm not a model 12 guy, I'm a model 97 guy. On take down guns the barrel assemblies are interchangeable.

But both guns were made in take-down and ridged frame models. The 97 Trench Guns of WW I fame were always solid frame to support the bayonet. The "Riot" guns were available either way. But most were solid frame because of less cost. A factory short barreled take down model is a Grouse Gun. Some police departments did buy takedowns (usually from local stores, not from the factory).

My 1904 take down 97, has a front half with the number scratched removed. Most likely from a "Homer" repair. Before they went exclusively to Remington 870's, In the 1960's thru 1980's, armorers at Columbus, Ohio PD used to fit the barrels to actions (or take down front ends) to come up with any combo they needed, "Homers" would just swap front ends!

Personally, I love the short barreled take down versions! There are not a lot pump shotguns the fit in a small 2 suite Samsonite Suitcase!

Ivan

Well, I passed on buying this one. But I do still have two 12-gauge factory riot guns...one from 1941 and the other from 1951. Used to have one stamped "Washington State Patrol" on the receiver, but foolishly sold it.

I'm always looking for them, always looking at them whenever they come up for sale.

The Model 12 isn't referred to as "The Perfect Repeater" for nothing.

It is the perfect repeater, and was a terrific trap gun in its day. Unfortunately over time they have become very expensive to repair, and in spite of the ability to adjust the take down they do not last forever. I wore out two (they were not new to begin with) to the point where it was not feasible to have them rebuilt. I don't think I have ever shot as well with any other trap gun.

I've mentioned this before. I used to do a lot of crow hunting back in the seventies. Almost every weekend, it seemed. Most of the time, I used a Model 12 with a 28-inch barrel choked modified. My memory might be a bit off on the barrel length...it could have been a 26-inch.

I'd down crows and ask myself, "How did I make that shot?" The only thing I could figure out was that the gun was such a natural pointer for me with its factory length of pull and drop at comb, it made it easy to use.

That ol' gun made me look good, better than I really was.

Really? I had no idea. I sure wouldn't mind running across a few of those "front ends" squirreled away in some old LGS's back room.

I also love all my m-12's...still shoot several of them, and shoot sx-1, sx-2's....sx-1 points like the old 12

The SX-1, Winchester's best automatic. The M-12, Winchester's best pump.

Not being a big fan of autoloaders (except for the old Remington Model 11), I'm not too familiar with the SX-1. Autoloaders seem so complicated to me, for lack of a better word.

But there's a really good article on it that you can read by clicking here.

The article sort of opened my eyes about this shotgun, and I may have to look deeper into it. And if does, indeed, point like the Model 12, that's a major point in its favor (no pun intended).

I don't know what I'd actually do with one, mind you, since I no longer hunt...but it might be nice to have one.

I had M12s but never with extra barrel assembly numbered to the gun.
I did have a 97 , 12g that had factory extra assembly. In fact it was a older model marked 1897.

I've had m25s too. Never had to fool with one but I always thought it was
a solid frame m12.

I have one of the original Model 1912s in 20 gauge (from early 1913). The earliest Model 1912s were in 20 gauge only, as other gauges did not appear until 1914. Mine had the 2-1/2" chamber but I lengthened it to take 2-3/4" shells. Only problem is that it is impossible to eject fired Federal plastic shells - you have to pry them out of the opening. Both Remington and Winchester shells eject OK as their plastic cases are slightly shorter.

As I stated earlier, I would like to have a 12 gauge in the Model 12, but I have a weakness for 20 gauges of almost any kind. Had my 20 ga Model 12 since October 1963.

Have a blessed day,

Leon

Watchdog, you'll never be unhappy with how a SX-1 shoots. the one pictured is a trap/skeet version as seen with scroll on receiver and beavertail forearm, somewhat more desireable. keep the gas system clean and normal maintenance, they shoot forever. still bangin' away with my first one from 11/76. others still faithful also

That front end has not been with the receiver for its entire life. No serial on the front end alone is enough for anyone wanting a genuine article to politely pass on. Collector value is nill but its still worth 4-5 hundred for a nostalgic house gun.

[QUOTE=Watchdog;140134179]Really? I had no idea. I sure wouldn't mind running across a few of those "front ends" squirreled away in some old LGS's backroom.

About 10 or 12 years ago I found an un-numbered 2 9/16ths chambered, Cylinder choked,16 gauge complete front end for 135 dollars, and I fit it to my circa 1922 gun.

I then learned the tidbit about un-numbered factory front ends from a collector friend.

I also have circa 1915 20 gauge, a circa 1922 solid rib gun in 12 gauge, and a model 12 heavy duck.

The model 12 is a great old gun, and they are going very reasonable these days compared to 10 or 15 years back.

Finest pump shot gun ever made Win m12
Finest auto loader shotgun ever made Browning A5
No Contest, the facts. Some got close but no cigar.

I only have one model 12 it's a WWII 1944 trench gun, cant really use it for much because it's got the fitting on the barrel for a heat shield so there's no front bead. Unfortunately I don't have a heat shield for it. I considered getting a reproduction just haven't got around to it.
The left side of the receiver has a stain that I haven't been able to remove that looks a lot like a blood stain.

Attached Images

	IMGP0230.jpg (96.9 KB, 15 views)
	IMGP0231.jpg (95.3 KB, 13 views)
	IMGP0232.jpg (138.1 KB, 17 views)
	IMGP0233.jpg (114.7 KB, 208 views)

The xtra bbl assemblys were available from Winchester as an accessory when you ordered the M12. They were a separate part#, each bbl style and gauge. Not all bbl rib styles fit all style of frame tops.
You could also get an extra bbl assembly fitted to your M12 by returning the gun to W. The xtra assembly would be fitted and returned to you.

In both these cases, the extra set would be factory ser#'d to the frame.
That ser# on the recv'r extension is stamped after the fitting & before the bluing process.

Also, Winchester would sell you the separate recv'r extension itself,,just that part.
It would come to you factory polished and blued BUT no ser#,,a blank part.

It was for replacement of a damaged one or in many instances I'm guessing where a 'smith would build a new bbl/forend assembly.

Separate bbl's,,just the tube itself, was a part that was available for a time also.
These would have the Postal Proof mark on them (P in an oval) instead of WP in an Oval) to show they were sent out of the Repair Dept as a separate part.

Only bbls that were proofed and shipped attached to their matched/proofed actions hold the WP/oval proof.

Taking the recv'r extension ( I usually call it the bbl extension, just a habit) off the bbl itself takes a bit of finesse and a special wrench.
Trying to turn them off with a regular jaw or strap wrench will in 99% of the cases just crush the thin sides in or in the very least deform the magazine opening to uselessness.

I think the bbl assembly here is just a made up from Winchester parts ,,nothing more than that.
It's possible to hand stamp the frames ser# into the recv'r extension carefully to match the frame of course.
They were hand stamped at the factory both on the line and in the Repair Shop.
A block is generally pushed into the mag opening when doing this to again avoid deforming that thin portion. Even then the stamping is done with less authority than that upon the frame section right below it.
Matching the font, it can be very convincing,,,simply dunk rebluing the extension after the marking,,it is very very convincingly factory.
Look carefully.
Many extra assemblys that were made and fitted outside the factory were then numbered to match their frame.
Not a big secret and easy to do.

Winchester Model 12's are great, but they pound you good on a trap field. I like A5's and have a 16ga 1940 model, bit Beretta makes a fine Auto too

__________________
Pete
I ain't no fortunate son

Some information for Narragansett on his Model 12:
The sleeve shown in the third photo on the end of the barrel was a means to allow the use of the bayonet adapter on riot guns. It was placed there by Government Arsenals to convert Model 12 riot guns to trench guns. (riot gun: no bayonet adapter - trench gun: with bayonet adapter)
Actual trench gun barrels have no taper at the end of the barrel which allows proper fit of the bayonet adapter directly with no sleeve/shim needed.
The added sleeves/shims took up the slight taper of the riot barrels.
See if there are letters stamped into the stock. It was common for "LEAD" or "AA" or other arsenal marks to be put on the stocks when they were converted from riot to trench guns.

I have one of the converted Model 12's myself.

It ended up selling for less than $500. I want to say $480. So someone got a good shooter.

Blood stains are notorious for causing pitting.

I have a new 28" FC barrel with reciever extension already
installed. It was ordered from Win back in 60s but never used.
I like to have one on hand for when. M12 comes along with a
Cutts or Poly. I don't know if it's serialed or not.