|
|
|
01-16-2019, 11:22 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,657
Likes: 3,301
Liked 17,159 Times in 2,908 Posts
|
|
Is my Walther obsolete just becasuse there's newer, lighter, more powerful guns now?
This is just a rhetorical question based on what I recall reading in recent years about the Walther PPK/S (or PPK,PP). I love this little Interarms PPK/S .380 I bought a few years back. But it seems with all the more high cap, powerful, lighter, smaller pocket autos out nowadays this gun is relegated to respected nostalgia as a classic gun but impractical compared to the new guns. Personally, I don't automatically think something loses it's usefulness just because of new technology. That's tools, cars, guns, etc. So I'll just stick with the old stuff and watch the world past me by.
Last edited by Wyatt Burp; 05-26-2020 at 09:21 AM.
|
The Following 51 Users Like Post:
|
Andyd, beagleye, bmcgilvray, Boogsawaste, Breakaway500, brucev, Chukar60, cjtraining, Delta Rose, DGT, Echo40, ecu70, Ed Fowler, FifthWheel, Geronimo Jim, hannstv, hcaroselli, Ingramite, Inusuit, Islander, jframejoey, jinx, kraynky, les.b, loknload, LostintheOzone, Marlin57M, Marshwheeling, max503, mbliss57, mfholmes, Moo Moo, ohioan55, Papaw, pawncop, Porkie, R.J. in Phoenix, raylan007, Riverboys, robrossk, Rock185, roguegamma, Seven High, shouldazagged, Skeptic 9c, smitty_bs, tsillik, turnerriver, URIT, walter o, whataboutbob |
01-16-2019, 11:34 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Vermont
Posts: 468
Likes: 771
Liked 711 Times in 260 Posts
|
|
Some would say it becomes elevated to a higher status as a classic...
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 11:35 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Whiskey Hill Ma.
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 16,218
Liked 9,121 Times in 1,980 Posts
|
|
I'm with ya....obsolete metal guns in obsolete calibers..who need them?
Last edited by Breakaway500; 01-16-2019 at 11:37 AM.
|
The Following 10 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 12:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: A Burb of the Burgh
Posts: 14,786
Likes: 1,659
Liked 19,895 Times in 8,796 Posts
|
|
Heck no ....... there's a new James Bond movie about every two years!!!!!
I'm a strong believer that new means "new" not necessarily "better" or "improved"
My stainless .380 PPK dates to the mid-1980s and still gets carried in a Milt Sparks Summer Special when I wear a suit or Tux..... or go to a J Bond movie!!!!!
My Smith 3913 and NL date to the early 90s and are my usual every day carry here in the Burbs or the Burgh.
No reason to change.
Last edited by BAM-BAM; 01-16-2019 at 12:09 PM.
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 12:04 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,109
Likes: 27,904
Liked 33,821 Times in 5,284 Posts
|
|
Hahaha, I often think the same thing.
My days of shooting sassy bandits are behind me now, but should the need arise I’m sure one of my Colt Pocket Hammerlesses would be up to the task.
.32 or .380? Toss a coin.
I carry guns that I like, and that will do what I need them to do. I'm sure there are guns smaller and lighter and more powerful and with more rounds than either of these two 100 plus year old Colts. I don't care. I like these.
Obsolete? Not hardly. Chuck Heston had one in The Planet of the Apes!
__________________
“What you got, ain’t new.”
Last edited by sigp220.45; 01-16-2019 at 08:45 PM.
|
The Following 30 Users Like Post:
|
beagleye, bmcgilvray, Breakaway500, brucev, Delta Rose, Echo40, Erocksmash, Hunter Keith, jframejoey, Joe Kent, Kifaru, LB001, les.b, mbliss57, mfholmes, Mr. Wonderful, mr.revolverguy, Old TexMex, OLDSTER, R.J. in Phoenix, Rock185, safearm, shouldazagged, Skeptic 9c, smitty_bs, Tadeus67, turnerriver, URIT, Watchdog, Wyatt Burp |
01-16-2019, 12:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 5,164
Likes: 3,441
Liked 6,257 Times in 2,063 Posts
|
|
Obsolete does NOT equal inferior!
Your Walther is a very fine handgun in ALL aspects, carry it with pride.
Randy
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 12:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,657
Likes: 3,301
Liked 17,159 Times in 2,908 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAM-BAM
Heck no ....... there's a new James Bond movie about every two years!!!!!
I'm a strong believer that new means "new" not necessarily "better" or "improved"
My stainless .380 PPK dates to the mid-1980s and still gets carried in a Milt Sparks Summer Special when I wear a suit or Tux..... or go to a J Bond movie!!!!!
My Smith 3913 and NL date to the early 90s and are my usual every day carry here in the Burbs or the Burgh.
No reason to change.
|
When my son left the Marines in 2005 I bought him a used Beretta 92 as a gift, but he said he’d rather have my 3913. So I gave him it instead. Since I only really like older stuff, the 3913 seems modern to me. My friend looks at my nickel 39-2 as an antique!
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 12:22 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 465
Liked 1,574 Times in 700 Posts
|
|
I collect Walther pistols. They will never be out of date to me.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 12:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 1,261
Liked 1,375 Times in 451 Posts
|
|
There is a great review of the Walther PPK and all the mystic that surrounds it especially when us older types were envying Sean Connery as James Bond on "The Truth About Guns" and how mystic still lives on especially in my mind. When I went looking for my first semi auto this year it was the first model that popped into my mind before I had done any research and just happened on to the article which just crushed all my fantasies for owning a PPK. Apparently the author points out the many draw backs of Bonds selection of the PPK even in his rein of Bond and how it was dictated to him from the home office at the time to upgrade to, **** I can't remember the caliber or mfg but will try and find the article and post it. Anyway that was my education on the old romanticized vision of owning one and I sure as hell wouldn't criticize anyone else from owning one but I did back down from my original thought of owning a Walther PPK, and yes ended up purchasing a Walther PPQ, so all was not lost. This review is a very good read especially if you grew up as I did thinking there could and still be only one true James Bond and that would always be Sean Connery.
Gun Review: Interarms Walther PPK/S - The Truth About Guns
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 12:27 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 680
Likes: 8,607
Liked 547 Times in 264 Posts
|
|
To Wyatt Burp I agree with you, and am happy to carry what works, regardless of age.
Thank you Breakway500 for posting your P64. Even though I own other guns (Walther/Makarov/S&W etc) I carry my P64 every day in my pocket at my office. It's much more discreet in my pocket when I am with a patient, as opposed to the .40 Shield or 4013tsw I wear on my belt on the weekends (and wearing casual clothes).
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 12:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Stephenville, TX
Posts: 878
Likes: 3,282
Liked 2,807 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
As my long-suffering wife will testify, my firm belief is that the "obsolete metal guns" and "newer, lighter, more powerful guns" question is NOT an either/or question. My conviction is that "both/and" is the answer!
Last edited by Bro. Dave; 01-16-2019 at 12:59 PM.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 12:41 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Where this month?
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 264
Liked 4,215 Times in 1,714 Posts
|
|
Is my Walther obsolete just becasuse there's newer, lighter, more powerful guns now?
More powerful..?? Does the same ammo produce less power in older guns..?
A 380 is still a 380.. and older Walthers are classics..
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 12:44 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
I think there is a difference between “obsolete” and “no longer the best available tool for the job”
And having devoted some study to the subject, I need to put your “in recent years” a bit in perspective.
About 50 years ago, starting with the urban terrorism beginning in the late 1960s and peaking in the mid-1970s, German police, the main users of the PP/PPK series, began clamoring for better guns because the “Waltherchen” (little Walthers) left them quite under-gunned against terrorists whose favorite guns were pistols like the Colt Commander. The result were more modern designs, the P5, P6, and PSP/P7 in 9mm by the late 70s.
So this recognition of their limitations isn’t exactly recent.
I love my PP. In fact, I think the PP is one of the most perfectly designed pistols with classic and classy appearance. But I wouldn’t carry it for self-defense unless there was no other option.
Last edited by Absalom; 01-16-2019 at 12:48 PM.
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 12:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,657
Likes: 3,301
Liked 17,159 Times in 2,908 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigggbbruce
More powerful..?? Does the same ammo produce less power in older guns..?
A 380 is still a 380.. and older Walthers are classics..
|
I meant the fact that there are lots of smaller lighter guns in 9MM and .40 than my PPK/S .380. And much smaller .380s available now, too. I have a bohemoth Colt New Service .45 ACP with a 2 1/2” barrel that I packed hanging out in the desert. That would be a good example of weight and size overkill compared to lighter “practical” .45s. Yet I still choose such guns.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 12:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: New Bern NC
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 7,497
Liked 2,354 Times in 1,111 Posts
|
|
I carried revolvers on and off duty for years. Now, I'm attracted to the Gen3 S&W pistols from yesteryear, but do carry a Walther PPS40 in the summer when North Carolina humidity and the need for concealment forces me to choose a smaller option. Most of the year, I opt for either my 3953 or 4053 for EDC.
I've never felt comfortable with pocket carry. I feel uncomfortable carrying a card wallet and money clip in one pocket and keys in the other. I empty my pockets as soon as I get in the house.
When considering the Bond connection to the PPK, we need to consider when the first movie came out and what was available. The PPK is a great Tux gun -- ask Bam-Bam. The PPK was "The Statement Gun" in the 1960s. Even in the mid-60s, many police officers in Europe were carrying the .380ACP or .380Auto (also known as the .380 Browning after its inventor) as their duty pistol. In reality, the .380ACP is a true 9mm measuring .355".
I like the old but appreciate the new. Ask my range pals if I've ever turned down an opportunity to fire their newest and greatest gun.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 12:58 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Where this month?
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 264
Liked 4,215 Times in 1,714 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wyatt Burp
Yet I still choose such guns.
|
So do I, because the feel of a gun in my hand that both fits in the grip and enough weight to not sprain my wrist when shooting it are my priorities.
|
01-16-2019, 01:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central SD USA
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 1,884
Liked 1,504 Times in 608 Posts
|
|
I would say that the improvement in bullet design for the .380 makes it more relevant than ever before. A classic, elegant design.
__________________
otis
|
01-16-2019, 01:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cedaredge Co.
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 11
Liked 2,756 Times in 980 Posts
|
|
Over the years I have owned a German PP .22, a stainless and a blue PPKs in .380. I loved all of them for what they were. Wish I still had the Blue PPKs. They are beautiful little pistols displaying fine craftsmanship. Having said that, I found them to have sharp edges and felt that the .380's were somewhat snappy. There are just other more modern designs that are about the same size in 9mm now, that I find to be more practical for carry.
|
01-16-2019, 01:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 60
Likes: 517
Liked 52 Times in 30 Posts
|
|
If you go over the Bond history you will quickly determine that the author was a Naval intelligence officer, not a gun guy. He got a gun expert to brief him and then misunderstood what he was told.
Specifically the Walther PPK .762 was suggested and a Berns Martin Triple Draw holster. To replace his Beretta .25 in some kind of soft shoulder holster.
Anyway, the Berns-Martin is fine for a small .38 revolver. I have one and use it routinely. A Walther of course would fall out if used in the shoulder holster configuration. Which Bond is portrayed as using.
Regards, Porkie
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 01:15 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 3,482
Liked 4,241 Times in 1,900 Posts
|
|
Try an LCP, G42 or any DAO action polygun vs a PPKs Walther or even our S&Walther PPKs ..... offhand at 20yds.... no contest as after the doubletap ..... the PPKs pistols are very accurate.
Only down side to Heavy Metal pistols is wearing a belt that can scratch a Palm Beach finish if boats are in the daily mix.
Snappy is not an issue.
Last edited by Imissedagain; 01-16-2019 at 01:24 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 01:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 993
Liked 1,923 Times in 956 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boudiepitbull
Some would say it becomes elevated to a higher status as a classic...
|
I agree.Classics are timeless, and they also look good doing their thing.
(More modern stuff out there, but a DC3 and National Model 1900 register, also fit into that category)
|
01-16-2019, 01:17 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 20,007
Likes: 24,514
Liked 29,300 Times in 10,891 Posts
|
|
The major factor that the PPK/S has over many of the polymer guns is slimness. The only other .380s that come close or beat it are the Ruger LC380 and the Taurus 738 (IIRC). The Sig 238 is also small but getting blocky around the top of the slide.
The Ruger, Taurus and the Sig all win over the Walther design as they are locked breech designs so are easier to rack and exhibit less felt recoil because of physics. If you go to a Sig 250SC in .380 you get a 12-15 round gun only a little bulkier than the PPK/S. Sadly, that model is discontinued.
__________________
Release the Kraken
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 01:18 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Kansas
Posts: 720
Likes: 1,919
Liked 1,143 Times in 454 Posts
|
|
No way Jose In my opinion the Walther's will never be obsolete. You can succumb to the plastic fantastic craze if you want too, but as for me I like steel guns. And keep in mind John Mosses Browning developed the 380 ACP back in 1908. That's 111 years and still going strong. Are there better choices heck yes lots of them, but the 380 has stood the test of time.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 01:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 979
Likes: 1,118
Liked 1,242 Times in 536 Posts
|
|
Blowback vs. Locked Breach
Critics and fans of the new generation of .380 pocket guns, as compared to Walthers, have overlooked the basic action type of the PPK/S, blowback. Nothing wrong with blowback, and they are probably a tiny bit more reliable than Browning locking block actions, but blowback slides have to be heavier than locking block slides, or have impossibly stiff recoil springs. Walthers have aluminum frames lest they weigh too much.
|
01-16-2019, 01:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Where this month?
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 264
Liked 4,215 Times in 1,714 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imissedagain
Only down side to Heavy Metal pistols is wearing a belt that can scratch a Palm Beach finish if boats are in the daily mix.
|
I hear 'ya there.. I work under the hood of many cars and trucks. AIWB means I have to be real careful or disarm. Well almost, the bug stays put.
|
01-16-2019, 01:54 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 885
Likes: 557
Liked 2,656 Times in 611 Posts
|
|
There are more modern pistols that will do everything a PPK can do better than a PPK. That being said, a PPK does what it does as well as it ever has. You make your choices and take your chances. Personally, long ago I stopped making choices based upon the opinions of others, or seeking validation for them.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 01:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 623
Liked 1,426 Times in 567 Posts
|
|
I know for many there's the burning desire to get the latest/greatest gun each year. Lighter, smaller, color coordinated, works as a remote for your TV, gets 4G LTE coverage, etc.
But seriously, until and unless this is the new thing on the market
then anything that shoots a centerfire round reliably isn't "obsolete".
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 02:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,878
Likes: 3,791
Liked 11,733 Times in 3,661 Posts
|
|
Not obsolete but there are a plethora of possible better firearms available in the same weight/size/power/price range so one would be wise to consider the various offerings.
I used a PP in these photos. If you compare it to a Shield and a Glock 43 you immediately see the Walther has serious competition.
Last edited by ColbyBruce; 01-16-2019 at 02:58 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 02:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,147
Likes: 2,420
Liked 3,586 Times in 1,597 Posts
|
|
No there are still plenty out there who do not care for the toy like feel of the poly guns.Nothing wrong with a .380,shot placement is everything.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 03:01 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,876
Likes: 979
Liked 18,991 Times in 9,293 Posts
|
|
I see the OP answered his own question . I like the PP series and think they still make for a serious sidearm.
In the novel, JB carried a Beretta 418 or Panther, until forced to carry the .32 PPK..."hits like a brick through a plate glass window".
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
01-16-2019, 03:03 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 27,007
Liked 37,079 Times in 4,571 Posts
|
|
The gun is not obsolete. If I would question anything it would be the cartridge. I still have mine from 1985 bought new. Couple clips through it. Youngest son has his eye on it
__________________
Pete
I ain't no fortunate son
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 03:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: A Burb of the Burgh
Posts: 14,786
Likes: 1,659
Liked 19,895 Times in 8,796 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColbyBruce
Not obsolete but there are a plethora of possible better firearms available in the same weight/size/power/price range so one would be wise to consider the various offerings.
|
Name a few and why they are better.......not putting you or anyone else down... just wondering what folks think are "better"...............
PPK Weight's in at 24 oz is 1" wide and only 6" in length and 4" high........
Price....... mine cost me about $300 in 1986...... What's that $10 a year ; and it's paid off.
Modern .380 is good stuff...... for close and dirty.
I like the fact it "controls" are the same as my 3913NL and Beretta 92 Compact.... two other guns I've had since the 1980s,.... the PPK is not a gun I would chose to take to war..... or for ridding in a patrol car...... but for the risks I face in my Burb of the Burgh..... it's as good as I need.......when I'm wearing a tux
Last edited by BAM-BAM; 01-16-2019 at 04:28 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 03:07 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,878
Likes: 3,791
Liked 11,733 Times in 3,661 Posts
|
|
Here are a few others to consider. Glock 26, Sig P250sc, Sig P232, Glock 29, Sig P239.
Last edited by ColbyBruce; 01-16-2019 at 03:15 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 03:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,865
Likes: 10,603
Liked 15,203 Times in 5,250 Posts
|
|
You know what they’re saying about those all metal ancient Hipowers....
|
01-16-2019, 03:47 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,878
Likes: 3,791
Liked 11,733 Times in 3,661 Posts
|
|
My favorite carry pistol of all I have owned. It was a joy to tote and shoot.
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 03:49 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 8,434
Likes: 2,498
Liked 13,165 Times in 4,567 Posts
|
|
The only guns that are obsolete for self defense are, IMHO, blackpowder guns. I truly believe that any guns made for shooting smokeless powder will never be obsolete for self defense. Some ammunition might be a little puny for that purpose but not modern .380 ammunition and even mouse calibers are still able to terminate an aggression on your person. A "modern" gun like a Walther PPK will never be obsolete. You can rest easy on that score. Every handgun I own but for, I think, two, are made out of metal. Okay, three, since I have two Walther P-22s.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 03:49 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 215
Likes: 37
Liked 158 Times in 77 Posts
|
|
Considering no one makes a small/flat DA/SA polymer auto, I would say "no".
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 03:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,878
Likes: 3,791
Liked 11,733 Times in 3,661 Posts
|
|
Not much difference in size between my Walther PP and my S&W 3953 or Glock 19.
Last edited by ColbyBruce; 01-16-2019 at 03:58 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 04:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: North Central Illinois
Posts: 973
Likes: 1,460
Liked 705 Times in 351 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ISCS Yoda
The only guns that are obsolete for self defense are, IMHO, blackpowder guns. I truly believe that any guns made for shooting smokeless powder will never be obsolete for self defense. Some ammunition might be a little puny for that purpose but not modern .380 ammunition and even mouse calibers are still able to terminate an aggression on your person. A "modern" gun like a Walther PPK will never be obsolete. You can rest easy on that score. Every handgun I own but for, I think, two, are made out of metal. Okay, three, since I have two Walther P-22s.
|
And I’d somewhat argue that a BP revolver isn’t quite obsolete with the first 6 rounds. Where BP revolvers become obsolete is with reloading. (I’ve personally always had a soft spot for the Ruger Old Army).
As to a .380 PPK, I think ammo is the driving force as to obsolescence. IMO the pistol is not obsolete until you can no longer readily find ammo for it. There are plenty of .380 ammo choices currently. Whether you rely on a metal framed hammer fired pistol to launch your .380 or a striker poly pistol are is simply a personal choice based on your preference for weight, capacity, bulk (easier or harder to conceal). In the photo above comparing the Shield and PPK, the PPK is still less bulky and more concealable.
I would not consider the PPK obsolete because it does not fire a 9mm or .40. That is an ammo choice, not a pistol choice.
Last edited by spad124; 01-16-2019 at 04:24 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 04:19 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Piedmont of Virginia
Posts: 3,992
Likes: 4,428
Liked 5,764 Times in 2,232 Posts
|
|
If you shoot it well and it serves your purpose just smile and understand their ignorance. When it will no longer serve it intended purpose perhaps then it will be obsolete.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 04:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: A Burb of the Burgh
Posts: 14,786
Likes: 1,659
Liked 19,895 Times in 8,796 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColbyBruce
Here are a few others to consider. Glock 26, Sig P250sc, Sig P232, Glock 29, Sig P239.
|
I've looked at or owned some of these .........
Glock 26 ...... owned 2 over the years; felt overly thick/chunky to me... width 1.25" IIRC..... never warmed to the Glock's trigger(s)
Sig 250 I think I've held one.....do own a compact Sig 245; about the same size and weight.
Sig 232.... nice gun, dates to the 1970s; same overall size but lighter w/ alloy frame but heel mag release turned me off....
Glock 29... double stack so thick like the 26 (and 27) 10mm ... I don't need another round to stock..... I'm invested in the 9mm and 45.
Sig239 about the size of my 3913/6906 and close to my Sig 245.
Of the five the Sig230/232 would be close in size and about 6oz lighter IIRC ..... almost got one in the 80s.
The others are IMO more in the same class as my 3913 and Sig 245.
Not saying they aren't good guns and if I was starting over I would consider them all.... but ''for me" none are worth the $$$$$ investment in not only the gun; but 4 extra magazines and holsters.... to replace my existing Walther autos, mags, holsters and ammo!
Maybe the comparison I'm making is; replacing an existing gun vs. buying
a new 'niche" gun too fill the role of my PPK. Replacing a gun I own and carry with something newer ..... requires more than a "marginal" increase in size weight or performance.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 04:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: A Burb of the Burgh
Posts: 14,786
Likes: 1,659
Liked 19,895 Times in 8,796 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColbyBruce
My favorite carry pistol of all I have owned. It was a joy to tote and shoot.
|
Sweet I had a 70s ( had a 1911 style safety) .380 before my PPK....... wish I'd kept it.
|
01-16-2019, 04:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Socialist Kingdom
Posts: 174
Likes: 492
Liked 251 Times in 90 Posts
|
|
Metal guns always offer that extra last round, smack to the BG head, palmed round house.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 05:11 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 1,766
Liked 7,288 Times in 1,899 Posts
|
|
Obviously the answer is "no."
The word "obsolete" is an odd one as it means very different things depending on context.
With tools like firearms (or hammers, lathes, drills, etc), they're only obsolete to the user when they no longer can perform the task. This dynamic is what kills makers of functional products --- the old one you've already bought works just as well as the new one. Just look at Sears or firearms companies like Winchester or Marlin that stayed on the "tried and true" path. One is going away while the other two are owned by larger conglomerates/holding companies as niche fillers.
Contrast with PCs and smartphones, which are functionally obsolete very quickly and force the purchase of something new. A quick look at market value shows this is a wonderful business strategy --- while it works. Several of the top companies 10 years ago are either gone or shadows of their former selves.
So...hang on to that Walther. Until they develop the noiseless, recoilless death ray and obsolete all those noisy, hard-kicking guns.
__________________
Psalm 27:2
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 05:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 226
Likes: 764
Liked 228 Times in 118 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColbyBruce
Not obsolete but there are a plethora of possible better firearms available in the same weight/size/power/price range so one would be wise to consider the various offerings.
I used a PP in these photos. If you compare it to a Shield and a Glock 43 you immediately see the Walther has serious competition.
|
“Possible better firearm’s” is absolutely right... time and time again I try new pistols thinking I’ll like them better than my 442 (newer gun, not a new design)... but in my hands and on my hip, the little “obsolete” (in the eyes of some) revolver is the best match for me. I think if YOU feel that Walther is the best match for you, then age, design, weight, reliability, variability, etc. are already things you’re comfortable with, that’s all that matters and it’s not obsolete.
|
01-16-2019, 05:24 PM
|
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 39,612
Liked 18,061 Times in 4,567 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAM-BAM
Heck no ....... there's a new James Bond movie about every two years!!!!!
I'm a strong believer that new means "new" not necessarily "better" or "improved"
My stainless .380 PPK dates to the mid-1980s and still gets carried in a Milt Sparks Summer Special when I wear a suit or Tux..... or go to a J Bond movie!!!!!
My Smith 3913 and NL date to the early 90s and are my usual every day carry here in the Burbs or the Burgh.
No reason to change.
|
James Bond never used a PPK/S.
It's the one pistol of the PP family I really dislike.
__________________
Expect the unexpected
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 05:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,878
Likes: 3,791
Liked 11,733 Times in 3,661 Posts
|
|
I really liked the Walther PPS M2 LE 9mm I bought last April. It didn’t offer anything significant over my Shield so I sold it rather than buy a holster for it.
I got to liking the Walther PPS .40 S&W I bought my son for Christmas. It offered nothing over the Shield either other than the ambidextrous paddle mag release. I wouldn’t mind having one for myself, though I do not need it.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 05:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: A Burb of the Burgh
Posts: 14,786
Likes: 1,659
Liked 19,895 Times in 8,796 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurusu
James Bond never used a PPK/S.
It's the one pistol of the PP family I really dislike.
|
So true on both counts;....................
my first Walther was a PPK/s (due to the 1968 import restrictions) but as soon as I could I swapped it for a Interarms stainless PPK....... added a second blue PPK , still new in the box, about 10 years back.
Will admit to buying another PPK/s a few years back.... .32apc with 4 mags for $380...... just to cheap to leave behind!!!!!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 06:03 PM
|
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 39,612
Liked 18,061 Times in 4,567 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAM-BAM
So true on both counts;....................
my first Walther was a PPK/s (due to the 1968 import restrictions) but as soon as I could I swapped it for a Interarms stainless PPK....... added a second blue PPK , still new in the box, about 10 years back.
Will admit to buying another PPK/s a few years back.... .32apc with 4 mags for $380...... just to cheap to leave behind!!!!!
|
Leave some room for a PP. It's the first of them, and still the best.
__________________
Expect the unexpected
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 06:35 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bartlett, Tennessee
Posts: 7,614
Likes: 2,932
Liked 18,678 Times in 4,787 Posts
|
|
Its true that today there are smaller, lighter .380s. There are also 9mms the same size. These may be more practical for EDC.
However, pure "Class" is never obsolete.
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|