Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > >

Notices

Firearms & Knives - Other Brands Post Your Non-S&W Gun, Knife, and Blade Topics Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2020, 08:40 PM
UncleEd UncleEd is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 102
Liked 3,647 Times in 1,319 Posts
Default New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger

After reading a lot of comments for the
new Python, many posters--did I say many--
said they'll be aboard when it comes out
in shorter barrels than the 6-inch and
4.25-inch barrels.

It seems that many--did I say many--of the
offerings nowadays from S&W and Ruger are
in the 2-5-inch and 3-inch models.

After the surge for the new Pythons as offered,
I wonder will desire dwindle considerably until
Colt does offer the "compact" models. I say
compact when thinking of the L and I and GP-100
frames which basically are one and the same.

Also a factor is that Smith and Ruger offer 7-shooters
and I don't see a Python in that mode. I happen to
like the Smith plus 3-inchers.
__________________
Ubi Est Mea

Last edited by UncleEd; 01-07-2020 at 08:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2020, 08:56 PM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,647
Likes: 4,667
Liked 13,122 Times in 5,113 Posts
Default

Given the alternative Revolvers out there PLUS the fact that it looks like Colt actually got this one right - I expect the Python to be a great gun and a good seller.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 01-07-2020, 09:30 PM
Dirty Harry Callahan's Avatar
Dirty Harry Callahan Dirty Harry Callahan is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 940
Likes: 1,208
Liked 1,618 Times in 572 Posts
Default

The Phython is more of a target revolver than a concealed carry gun, and most folks don't carry guns that cost $1500, so a 2.5"-3" Barrel model probably wouldn't have that much of a selling point.
__________________
30 Characters is insufficient.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 01-07-2020, 09:36 PM
JayFramer's Avatar
JayFramer JayFramer is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,964
Likes: 6,195
Liked 7,590 Times in 2,371 Posts
Default

Plenty have carried Pythons for defense, including police.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-2020, 09:59 PM
ContinentalOp's Avatar
ContinentalOp ContinentalOp is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 5,379
Liked 4,703 Times in 1,725 Posts
Default

If the Powers-That-Be at Colt paid enough attention to enthusiasts wanting the Python to return, and thinking there was a market for it, I don't think it's unreasonable to presume that they may also listen to those wanting a 2.5" Python. Add to that the recent short-barrel, more carry-able revolvers being offered as a sign of what the market wants, and if sales of the new 4.25" and 6" Pythons are strong, I could see them offering a snubby Python, maybe as a limited edition model ("Python Carry," anyone...?).

However, I'm just guessing as I'm no expert. I could be way off base here. Just my thoughts.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 01-07-2020, 10:05 PM
daddio202's Avatar
daddio202 daddio202 is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Bradenton, florida
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 2,930
Liked 2,019 Times in 672 Posts
Default

I just have to wonder if having the new models out and available for purchase will have any effect on the exhorbanent prices of the older pythons? If you can go out and buy a brand new gun for $1500 will that kill some of the $2000 to $3000 prices on regular old models?
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 01-07-2020, 10:13 PM
Laketime's Avatar
Laketime Laketime is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,302
Likes: 1,980
Liked 2,356 Times in 1,082 Posts
Default

I still donít get the appeal of a full frame gun with a short barrel. But I am sure Colt will offer one in time to answer demand.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-08-2020, 08:01 AM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 1,607
Liked 2,535 Times in 1,284 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daddio202 View Post
I just have to wonder if having the new models out and available for purchase will have any effect on the exhorbanent prices of the older pythons? If you can go out and buy a brand new gun for $1500 will that kill some of the $2000 to $3000 prices on regular old models?
I tend to doubt it. The improved versions of the S&W revolvers does not seem to have affected the values of the ones produced in the pinned & recessed eras. The new Python looks a lot like the old Python, but the markings are different and the lockwork is very different. People who want a shooter or are new to the revolver world will likely buy new Pythons, collectors will not.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-08-2020, 08:55 AM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,647
Likes: 4,667
Liked 13,122 Times in 5,113 Posts
Default

After watching the video reviews over the last week I actually have gotten interested in possibly buying one! Can't wait until I can actually see and handle one in person. Apparently they have also beefed it up to the point where it is not a "fragile gun" any more. Fit & finish look terrific!

Let's see now...... NO internal lock..... NO Barrel Insert..... Forged..... Interchangeable Sights...... Ultra Smooth DA and crisp light SA Trigger Pulls.... YUP, sounds like Colt finally got it right! Plus the price isn't out of line for today's market. I might just get one!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-08-2020, 08:57 AM
shocker's Avatar
shocker shocker is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 325
Liked 768 Times in 399 Posts
Default

Anonymous source (tool and die maker from Colt) says a 3" Python will be released sometime in 2020. Maybe a blued version too.
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
  #11  
Old 01-08-2020, 09:31 AM
Erocksmash's Avatar
Erocksmash Erocksmash is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 590
Likes: 1,027
Liked 640 Times in 245 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shocker View Post
Anonymous source (tool and die maker from Colt) says a 3" Python will be released sometime in 2020. Maybe a blued version too.
Limited run or a standard production model?
__________________
Just one more!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-08-2020, 09:34 AM
ladder13's Avatar
ladder13 ladder13 is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 21,615
Likes: 29,000
Liked 25,909 Times in 9,427 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shocker View Post
Anonymous source (tool and die maker from Colt) says a 3" Python will be released sometime in 2020. Maybe a blued version too.
3 inch? Iím in
__________________
Pardon me if I ignore you.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #13  
Old 01-08-2020, 09:39 AM
sodacan sodacan is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 376
Liked 2,111 Times in 932 Posts
Default

Looking at the photos, the new Python looks nice, and if I bought new production guns, I would consider buying one if it has more going for it than good looks. I have a 6" from 1972 that I shoot regularly. It's actually one of the very few guns I bought brand new ($198). IMO, the 6" Python is the most beautiful revolver on the planet. I think Colt may help create a new generation of wheel gun enthusiasts with this one.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-08-2020, 10:22 AM
Sistema1927's Avatar
Sistema1927 Sistema1927 is offline
US Veteran
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: "Land of Disenchantment"
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 892
Liked 2,406 Times in 757 Posts
Default

I am guessing that Colt will sell as many as they can make, regardless of barrel length.

I have never owned a Colt revolver, and I don't think that will change. In many ways I am a "purist": S&W for revolvers, Colt for 1911 (and only in .45 ACP, 9mm belongs in the Hi-Power).

I did bring home a new revolver yesterday, a Ruger Redhawk in .45 ACP/.45 Colt. I have long had Ruger Blackhawks in .45 Colt, and decided that a double action convertible would be just the ticket for forays into the wild.
__________________
Only a cold warrior
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #15  
Old 01-08-2020, 11:35 AM
BAM-BAM BAM-BAM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Western Pa.
Posts: 11,390
Likes: 262
Liked 14,168 Times in 6,451 Posts
Default

Concealed carry weapons are carried a lot and shot a little.

Having had a 3" round butt 586......99% of the time when I wanted a revolver for carrying around all day I chose a K-frame; 2 1/2 or 3 inch.

Plus I think you loose a lot of the Cooooool look of the Python barrel if it's less than 4"

Haven't seen one yet....... but been thinking; if they could do the same improvements I'd like to see a "New" 4inch Diamondback... IMHObetter Concealed Carry with +P .38 hollowpoints.

Last edited by BAM-BAM; 01-08-2020 at 11:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-08-2020, 12:04 PM
Wyo's Avatar
Wyo Wyo is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 441
Liked 3,286 Times in 747 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daddio202 View Post
I just have to wonder if having the new models out and available for purchase will have any effect on the exhorbanent prices of the older pythons? If you can go out and buy a brand new gun for $1500 will that kill some of the $2000 to $3000 prices on regular old models?
Well, I sure havenít seen prices on the 1st or 2nd generation Colt Single Actions fall despite the fact that you have been able to buy a newer one at less cost since at least the mid-70ís. I think many people will continue to want the ďoriginalĒ Pythons and prices will stay relatively high as a result.
__________________
ďEverybody could shoot."
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-08-2020, 12:08 PM
xfarfuldog xfarfuldog is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 257
Likes: 64
Liked 139 Times in 67 Posts
Default

I keep hearing about the ‘fragile Pythons’ on this and other forums. I carried one and taught/requalled many for several years. Never a problem with any Python I saw. My Python is in my safe with another blue 4”. I will be buying a new one.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-08-2020, 12:26 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas
Posts: 25,178
Likes: 13
Liked 16,702 Times in 8,963 Posts
Default

I wouldn't mind getting one of the new Pythons, but the price is beyond what I would pay for another bauble. Besides, I already own a 3-5-7 (6") and the old model .357 Trooper (4") so why would I need a Python?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #19  
Old 01-08-2020, 01:09 PM
shocker's Avatar
shocker shocker is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 325
Liked 768 Times in 399 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chief38 View Post

Let's see now...... NO internal lock..... NO Barrel Insert..... Forged..... Interchangeable Sights...... Ultra Smooth DA and crisp light SA Trigger Pulls.... YUP, sounds like Colt finally got it right! Plus the price isn't out of line for today's market. I might just get one!
Has to go back to the Mothership for correcting production faults.... Check.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-08-2020, 01:33 PM
03hemi's Avatar
03hemi 03hemi is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 2,441
Liked 2,419 Times in 863 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Harry Callahan View Post
The Phython is more of a target revolver than a concealed carry gun, and most folks don't carry guns that cost $1500, so a 2.5"-3" Barrel model probably wouldn't have that much of a selling point.
Tell that to Rick Grimes.
__________________
Plastic's for toys - J. Cooper
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #21  
Old 01-08-2020, 01:36 PM
runscott's Avatar
runscott runscott is offline
SWCA Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: PacNW
Posts: 373
Likes: 72
Liked 546 Times in 186 Posts
Default

A few people have posted that they think the price is right, and that they are buying the 2020 Python as a shooter.

If there had never been a Python and this 2020 version were the first, the $1,499 price still be "right"? I would argue that Colt is getting away with this price because of the old Python's collectability. If a 98% old Python had a market value of $2,000, the new Python would be priced proportionally lower, more in line with what other quality .357 shooters are selling for.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-08-2020, 07:12 PM
Texas Star Texas Star is offline
US Veteran
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 19,376
Likes: 22,320
Liked 14,073 Times in 6,663 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt View Post
I wouldn't mind getting one of the new Pythons, but the price is beyond what I would pay for another bauble. Besides, I already own a 3-5-7 (6") and the old model .357 Trooper (4") so why would I need a Python?

Well, obviously for the better cylinder timing! If that proves to be the case...

Also, the new action should be easier to repair, if ever needed. Smiths who'll work on older Colts are few.

I've owned two Pythons and a .357 Trooper on the old action and sold all and swore off Colts. The new Python could bring me back.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #23  
Old 01-08-2020, 07:59 PM
ken158 ken158 is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 3,314
Likes: 801
Liked 2,345 Times in 1,066 Posts
Default

I want to handle one before I make a potential purchase decision but am glad it is a 6 shot because mid and large frame revolvers are traditionally 6 shot and small frame guns 5 or 6 shot. Thankfully, no IL. MSRP is not out of line when compared to MSRP on a regular or PC S&W. Hopefully the old Python delicate action has been improved as advertised. In defiance to some, $1500 is not too much for a carry gun and a shorter barrel model will have a large following.
__________________
S&W factory revolver armorer
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-08-2020, 08:07 PM
runscott's Avatar
runscott runscott is offline
SWCA Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: PacNW
Posts: 373
Likes: 72
Liked 546 Times in 186 Posts
Default

So it's PC quality?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-08-2020, 08:36 PM
Mike, SC Hunter Mike, SC Hunter is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In The Woods Of S.C.
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 4,973
Liked 5,774 Times in 2,124 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laketime View Post
I still donít get the appeal of a full frame gun with a short barrel. But I am sure Colt will offer one in time to answer demand.
Love my 3 1/2" 27.
__________________
S&W Accumulator
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #26  
Old 01-08-2020, 11:40 PM
Engine49guy's Avatar
Engine49guy Engine49guy is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 6,904
Likes: 1,651
Liked 6,887 Times in 2,323 Posts
Default

My guess is since the 4.25" and 6" Python can be sold in the US and Canada it makes sense to offer these first,
When sales begin to decline it then would make sense to offer them in blue,
As sales of the blue versions decline adding a 3" in SS or blue would gain the attention of the people that bought 4.25", 6" in SS and blue and now want to complete the set.

The new Python would make sense to people who like shooting Pythons but dont want to devalue their high condition piece.
Also makes sense to gun investors looking say 15 years down the road as they will likely be out of production by then.

I do like the look of the Python but never liked the old Colt trigger compared to S&W's.
Another consideration is that IIRC the new 4.25' Python is almost exactly the same weight as my 5" full underlug Model 629-3 Classic.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-08-2020, 11:51 PM
runscott's Avatar
runscott runscott is offline
SWCA Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: PacNW
Posts: 373
Likes: 72
Liked 546 Times in 186 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Engine49guy View Post
My guess is since the 4.25" and 6" Python can be sold in the US and Canada it makes sense to offer these first,
When sales begin to decline it then would make sense to offer them in blue,
As sales of the blue versions decline adding a 3" in SS or blue would gain the attention of the people that bought 4.25", 6" in SS and blue and now want to complete the set.

The new Python would make sense to people who like shooting Pythons but dont want to devalue their high condition piece.
Also makes sense to gun investors looking say 15 years down the road as they will likely be out of production by then.

I do like the look of the Python but never liked the old Colt trigger compared to S&W's.
Another consideration is that IIRC the new 4.25' Python is almost exactly the same weight as my 5" full underlug Model 629-3 Classic.
I don't have a preference as to the trigger of old Colts vs old S&W's - I just find them to be different. But that's true even when comparing my old Smiths against one another. My newer ones don't stand up to the ones from the 1950's, but it could just be that the older triggers are more seasoned.

But your statement has me thinking I need to do more comparisons. I believe tomorrow will be my 1974 19-3 4" vs a 1954 Colt 3-5-7 4". Really looking forward to comparing my 686-6 to a 2020 Python, but prices need to drop a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-09-2020, 12:14 AM
Laketime's Avatar
Laketime Laketime is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,302
Likes: 1,980
Liked 2,356 Times in 1,082 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike, SC Hunter View Post
Love my 3 1/2" 27.
I loved mine too I wish I still owned it.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-12-2020, 02:54 PM
kaaskop49 kaaskop49 is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 5,956
Likes: 22,077
Liked 6,197 Times in 2,889 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shocker View Post
Anonymous source (tool and die maker from Colt) says a 3" Python will be released sometime in 2020. Maybe a blued version too.
3" barrel!!?? That's a telegraph pole! I realize that, in the eyes of many, 3" bbls are the greatest thing since sliced bread (for every Jack, there's a Jill), but to me, they're neither fish nor fowl. Gotta be 2.5" as in the original Python. YMMV

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103

P.S. Odd that no one has mentioned that the trigger reach of the original Python frame is just a smidge too long to be comfortable, unlike the K, L, and even N-frames. Since the original grips seem to fit the new gun, from what I've read, I guess this has not been adjusted.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #30  
Old 01-12-2020, 03:02 PM
NYlakesider's Avatar
NYlakesider NYlakesider is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern NY-AdirondackMts
Posts: 5,022
Likes: 6,630
Liked 7,007 Times in 2,763 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaaskop49 View Post
3" barrel!!?? That's a telegraph pole! I realize that, in the eyes of many, 3" bbls are the greatest thing since sliced bread (for every Jack, there's a Jill), but to me, they're neither fish nor fowl. Gotta be 2.5" as in the original Python. YMMV

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103

Well its basically only a machinery adjustment perhaps they will make both a 2 1/2 and a 3''.

Of course you know a collector will have to have those two shorties in his collection. A sold gun is a sold gun!
__________________
14 S&W Revs none with locks!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #31  
Old 01-12-2020, 03:09 PM
reddog81 reddog81 is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: IA
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 305
Liked 863 Times in 463 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYlakesider View Post
Of course you know a collector will have to have those two shorties in his collection. A sold gun is a sold gun!
They'd be wise to sell a 2.5" version, 3" version, 3.5" version, etc. You know there are collectors out there that'd "need" them all
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #32  
Old 01-12-2020, 05:11 PM
scooter123 scooter123 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 6,481
Likes: 160
Liked 3,588 Times in 1,800 Posts
Default

IMO the New Python isn't a Python and never will be. Folks, it's a marketing gimmick and I find it surprising so many people who should know better are falling for it.

Back in the 90's Colt stated that a re-introduction of the Python was because the precision gunsmiths required to fit all the parts together did not exist anymore. A simple conclusion is that this New Python has been re-designed with a lockwork that is easy to manufacture and cheap to produce. I'll bet that if you check under the hood you'll find there are lots of MIM parts in that New Python. So what you get for your money is a 700 dollar revolver for a lot more money spent.

BTW, the following puff piece states pretty clearly is that the New Python uses a re-engineered action.


Me, I would take a 686 over the New Python every time. It's a revolver that is easy to tune, easy to repair, and when done right has a wonderful trigger.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-12-2020, 05:32 PM
reddog81 reddog81 is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: IA
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 305
Liked 863 Times in 463 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter123 View Post
IMO the New Python isn't a Python and never will be. Folks, it's a marketing gimmick and I find it surprising so many people who should know better are falling for it.

Back in the 90's Colt stated that a re-introduction of the Python was because the precision gunsmiths required to fit all the parts together did not exist anymore. A simple conclusion is that this New Python has been re-designed with a lockwork that is easy to manufacture and cheap to produce. I'll bet that if you check under the hood you'll find there are lots of MIM parts in that New Python. So what you get for your money is a 700 dollar revolver for a lot more money spent.

BTW, the following puff piece states pretty clearly is that the New Python uses a re-engineered action.

YouTube

Me, I would take a 686 over the New Python every time. It's a revolver that is easy to tune, easy to repair, and when done right has a wonderful trigger.

Back in the 90's Colt was still making the Python...
Using your logic the current S&W's aren't real S&W's - No pinned barrels, no recessed cylinders, MIM parts, 2-piece barrels, ugly lock, etc. You can't argue one way and ignore the other.

The action changed to address design weaknesses and ease of manufacture. They went to MIM internals and updated the action to take advantage of the new process. S&W has done the same thing over the years but with smaller changes along the way.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #34  
Old 01-12-2020, 07:25 PM
TTSH's Avatar
TTSH TTSH is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: MA
Posts: 7,104
Likes: 12,902
Liked 8,397 Times in 3,956 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reddog81 View Post
Using your logic the current S&W's aren't real S&W's - No pinned barrels, no recessed cylinders, MIM parts, 2-piece barrels, ugly lock, etc. You can't argue one way and ignore the other.
Certainly in the case of the newest shrouded barrel revolver, the Model 19 Classic, it is not a real S&W Model 19 revolver. It is a new design made to look and work somewhat like the original S&W Model 19 revolver.

I accept the fact that the 2020 Python is not an original Python either. It is also a copy. But at least it is a reasonably true copy, externally speaking. And since I blew my one and only opportunity to own an original Python, I'll be taking a close look at the 2020 Python if and when they come out in blue and get approved for sale in my loony moonbat state.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-12-2020, 08:11 PM
robvious robvious is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Eastern Nebraska
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 1,917
Liked 2,131 Times in 810 Posts
Default

the new Python is a real Python like a Cobra kit car is a real A/C Cobra... it looks like it... may have a better motor and better brakes... but it is NOT a real Cobra and never can be... the new ones are a blast to drive (and probably shoot too) but it is just "pretend"... I may end up with one someday, but I know it is just a Starsky & Hutch make believe... lol
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #36  
Old 01-12-2020, 08:50 PM
shocker's Avatar
shocker shocker is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 325
Liked 768 Times in 399 Posts
Default

Well, well. Hickok45 tests the new python and guess what, malfunctions. Cylinder no rotate when it's supposed to.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #37  
Old 01-12-2020, 09:31 PM
TTSH's Avatar
TTSH TTSH is offline
Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: MA
Posts: 7,104
Likes: 12,902
Liked 8,397 Times in 3,956 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shocker View Post
Well, well. Hickok45 tests the new python and guess what, malfunctions. Cylinder no rotate when it's supposed to.
Oh Lordy. Just what Colt didn't need.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #38  
Old 01-12-2020, 09:50 PM
kennyb's Avatar
kennyb kennyb is offline
SWCA Member
New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger New Python vs. trend in Smith, Ruger  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: griz.va@att.net
Posts: 6,774
Likes: 618
Liked 1,055 Times in 658 Posts
Default

All I can say is.....mine is on order :-)
__________________
SWCA#2208
KK4EMO
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Observations on Python, S&W, Ruger American1776 Firearms & Knives - Other Brands 49 02-28-2018 03:24 PM
New Brill style holster for L Frame/Python/ Ruger GP100 Wyatt Burp Gun Leather & Carry Gear 4 06-08-2015 10:51 AM
Sold: 5 Star Speedloaders for S&W L-Frames, Ruger GP100, Colt Python -db- Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 0 03-09-2012 10:32 AM
SOLD WTS: NEW Holsters Ruger LCP w/ CTC Laser,LCR Ruger,Smith Wesson wdy Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 9 01-15-2011 09:08 PM
Engraved ruger super Blackhawk, Nickle Python, S&W model 12, Glock 20 10mm GRIM REAPER GUNS - For Sale or Trade 19 05-25-2009 07:17 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.42 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
© S-W Forum, LLC 2000-2020
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)