Yesterday I got an envelope about filing on the Remington fiasco, two pages and did I want to put a claim in? I bought a used 700 BDL in 1976 and I had them replace the trigger about about three years ago. They fixed it very well and quickly, no problems. I think this is just a bunch of trial lawyers trying to make a dime off their problems and I'm not going to do it, they were always a fine company. Jeff
Yesterday I got an envelope about filing on the Remington fiasco, two pages and did I want to put a claim in? I bought a used 700 BDL in 1976 and I had them replace the trigger about about three years ago. They fixed it very well and quickly, no problems. I think this is just a bunch of trial lawyers trying to make a dime off their problems and I'm not going to do it, they were always a fine company. Jeff
Actually it is probably a proof of claim that is required to be sent under law. What you do with it is your business. The bankruptcy lawyers get paid the same whether you file a claim or not. I daresay that there will be no funds with which to pay as this probably falls into the unsecured category. If there are funds it will be a minuscule amount. Has absolutely nothing to do with the much hated "trial lawyers". Trust me on this one. Most people do not take the time to send these in as the return is problematic if at all. FWIW after all is said and done anything left over goes to the stockholders. So your actions in not sending anything is really means nothing other than an enpty protest that will no doubt make you feel all good and self righteous-but please quit bashing my profession based on some misguided notion of those greedy lawyers. It only indicates a lack of understanding of bankruptcy law.
Have to agree with Cajun Lawyer on this. There are no contingency fees for bankruptcy lawyers that I am aware of. Trial lawyers look for companies with "deep pockets" to sue. Bankrupt Remington does not have "deep pockets".
Remington bankrupcy papers
Linear Mode
