|
|
12-21-2020, 06:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 54
Likes: 15
Liked 44 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Savage rifle quality decline
I used to own a Savage model 111 in 30-06 that was manufactured in about 2009-10. It was a synthetic stock but it had more steel on it. The trigger guard was steel, the entire magazine was steel, the entire bolt was steel, and it had a nice blued finish. It weighed over 9 pounds
I ordered a new model 111 a few weeks ago thinking it was the same gun, but this one is in 338 win mag. I assumed I would get the same 9 pound rifle. Guess what? The entire trigger guard and magwell is plastic. There is actually a piece of the bolt that is plastic. The magazine is made of plastic so cheapy and haphazardly designed that I have to hit it with substantial force to lock it into place, and gone is the nice blue'd finish, now there is a very cheap, ugly phosphate finish over the whole gun. The old savage's steel magazine gave a very assuring and secure "click" when it was easily locked into place. Guess what else? This gun weighs about 7.8 pounds. I get to shoot 338 win mag in a 7.8 lb rifle.
Oh, and another thing; the Indian Chief is gone, entirely. What I am wondering is why even still use the Savage name? If you're that afraid and/or ashamed, why even sell rifles?
If I had known this, I would NEVER have bought another Savage. Two of my favorite bolt guns, the model 10 and the 700, have completely gone down the drain. I am not angry a much as I am just depressed. Rant ended.
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-21-2020, 07:00 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Homerville, Ohio
Posts: 5,394
Likes: 28,584
Liked 9,201 Times in 2,374 Posts
|
|
Yep, the bean counters and political correctness are ruining good, quality manufactured goods.
I have 2 Savage bolt action rifles a .223 Remington and a .22 Long rifle. Both are very good, accurate, and nicely made. Purchased several years ago.
|
12-21-2020, 07:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 642
Likes: 942
Liked 833 Times in 340 Posts
|
|
I bought a 25 classic in .204 it has a standard weight barrel. I didn't want a heavy barrel. It does have a plastic magazine and trigger-guard assembly, but overall is a beautifully finished rifle that is incredibly accurate. It is my favorite bolt gun.
Last edited by Sgt911; 12-21-2020 at 07:07 PM.
|
12-21-2020, 07:07 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,075
Likes: 27,790
Liked 33,581 Times in 5,253 Posts
|
|
Savage seems to have staked out a chunk of the low-end once-a-year shooter market. Its sad to see.
I had an old 110 in .308 Win. It had a plain hardwood stock, but was nicely blued and shot great. It was low-priced, but not low quality. If there was any plastic on it, it must have been the buttplate.
Now - they look like your new lightweight .338 Mag. They do have some wood stocked guns left, but I’m not sure if they also have the plastic parts.
__________________
“What you got, ain’t new.”
|
12-21-2020, 07:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ALBUQUERQUE, NM
Posts: 13,847
Likes: 8,067
Liked 25,340 Times in 8,518 Posts
|
|
Lefty here, have owned several Savages.
Recently bought this Axis in 223.
Haven’t shot it enough to give a full report.
So far, not crazy about the Magazine.
__________________
NRA LIFE MEMBER
|
12-21-2020, 08:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lafayette, Tennessee
Posts: 6,926
Likes: 6,833
Liked 8,936 Times in 2,910 Posts
|
|
Savage, along with most other American manufacturers dropped quality from their list of concerns in the 1960’s.
I have some high quality Savage rifles. They average about 100 years old.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-21-2020, 08:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Northeast
Posts: 3,165
Likes: 8,324
Liked 2,809 Times in 1,683 Posts
|
|
Seems so many taking shortcuts these days. Ugly matte finishes, plastic mags, plastic trigger guards, and even synthetic triggers! The bluing leaves much to be desired in my opinion. I bought a Rem.700 back in 83. Walnut and high polish bluing that looks like a mirror. Glad I held onto my older stuff. Used to be just run-of the-mill decent quality. Looks almost custom compared to offerings today.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-21-2020, 08:39 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: E. Washington State
Posts: 5,476
Likes: 1,321
Liked 10,568 Times in 3,212 Posts
|
|
My Salvage I put a wood stock on. Got it about14 years ago. 25-06 and extremely accurate with a high MV....
__________________
Only difference Fool/Mule-ears
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-22-2020, 12:05 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 54
Likes: 15
Liked 44 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sigp220.45
Savage seems to have staked out a chunk of the low-end once-a-year shooter market. Its sad to see.
I had an old 110 in .308 Win. It had a plain hardwood stock, but was nicely blued and shot great. It was low-priced, but not low quality. If there was any plastic on it, it must have been the buttplate.
Now - they look like your new lightweight .338 Mag. They do have some wood stocked guns left, but I’m not sure if they also have the plastic parts.
|
I wanted to get a wood stock version in 338 but none are available, anywhere. I am not sure that Savage even does a wood gun in 338. I am going to order a Boyd's stock and acquire steel aftermarket parts because this sh** is unacceptable. I thought the 111 plastic stocks were still pretty decent like they were 12 years ago. Just goes to show you should never assume anything.
Also, I would like to meet the clown at Savage that thought the bottom bolt release was a good idea. There was nothing at all wrong with the side bolt release. It was a proven design that no one didn't like and never requested a change. Not once in all my reading and talking to guys did I ever hear a complaint about the side bolt release.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-22-2020, 12:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 54
Likes: 15
Liked 44 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Savage Arms
FYI, it's true, Savage does not make a single wood stock gun in 338 win mag. Neither does Remington. If you want a 338 win mag in a wood stock and which doesn't have a plastic magwell, trigger guard, and magazine, then you have to pay about $1,500 bucks for a model 70 made in Portugal, a Sako, or some other.
I hate to say it, but guns suck these days. The market is bent on ruthless cut throating of buyers. Complete screw job everywhere you look. It's remarkable that I am here looking back to 2008 and 2010 as a golden age.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-22-2020, 12:40 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 469
Liked 2,087 Times in 731 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE PILGRIM
Lefty here, have owned several Savages.
Recently bought this Axis in 223.
Haven’t shot it enough to give a full report.
So far, not crazy about the Magazine.
|
I had an Axis in .243. The trigger was so bad I called Savage and they told me 8 pounds is acceptable. With the bad trigger, it would shoot 1 1/4 MOA, but I had to work for it. I got a replacement trigger and it still shot 1 1/4. Just less work. I found out from that gun if you take your time on a bad trigger, you can reach the full max, or almost the full max of the gun's ability..
|
12-22-2020, 01:20 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 1,023
Liked 3,574 Times in 954 Posts
|
|
Hunting season will be over soon and there will be plenty of old rifles in the used section of the gun shop. Many of them have no more than a couple of boxes of ammo through them. I have two 110Ls from the early sixties, one in .243 and the other in .30-06 and they have good triggers, are accurate and look great:
And you wouldn't believe how inexpensive they were.
__________________
My sgntr is mor thn 30 chrctrs
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-22-2020, 01:29 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 8,671
Liked 3,497 Times in 1,342 Posts
|
|
I have an Axis II in .223 and a Model 10 TR in .308.
Yes, one does have to make sure the mags are seated. I got used to it.
Both have nice Accu Triggers and the M-10 has the Accu Stock.
What counts is the sub MOA accuracy they both deliver. Maybe Savage does not have all the desirable features of the vintage guns but the barrels still deliver top notch accuracy.
No complaints I cant live with.
Jim
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-22-2020, 03:07 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 3,093
Liked 4,737 Times in 1,517 Posts
|
|
I can totally sympathize with the OP.
But, it's not just Savage.
As long as buyers are willing to pony up the dough, manufacturers will continue to cut corners.
Unfortunately, it's not just the entry level market that exhibits this trend, either. I've seen cheesy plastic parts appear on some surprisingly expensive goods.
And, that's just the corner cutting that can be readily seen. How many makers fabricate every part in house? How many outsource anything and everything from small parts to major components?
How much actual "making" goes on vs "assembly"?
In some ways, these are age old questions that get redefined over time.
|
12-22-2020, 12:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Northeast
Posts: 3,165
Likes: 8,324
Liked 2,809 Times in 1,683 Posts
|
|
Guess $350-400 may have seemed like a lot 40 years back but we all got some quality it seems for our money. Am sure the higher cost of materials, walnut, and labor has led to these shortcut cost saving measures. I agree with scrounging the used gun racks for guns made years back. Am often surprised how reasonable the prices can be.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-22-2020, 02:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Spanaway, Wa
Posts: 64
Likes: 2
Liked 106 Times in 41 Posts
|
|
Quality of firearms hasn’t gone down, they are just built to a certain price point. In terms of precision and performance the new stuff is light years ahead of the old stuff. If one so desires a “polished beautiful” something built with wood and metal parts it’ll cost you $1,200~$1,500. The plastic-fantastics are an amazing bargain if one only cares about function over looks, look at the Ruger Precision Rifle as an example.
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-22-2020, 03:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 642
Likes: 942
Liked 833 Times in 340 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herky Bird
Quality of firearms hasn’t gone down, they are just built to a certain price point. In terms of precision and performance the new stuff is light years ahead of the old stuff. If one so desires a “polished beautiful” something built with wood and metal parts it’ll cost you $1,200~$1,500. The plastic-fantastics are an amazing bargain if one only cares about function over looks, look at the Ruger Precision Rifle as an example.
|
and for what's it worth $400 in 1980 is $1,263.25 today, so they are cheaper dollar for dollar so I cant complain too much. You seem to be spot on.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-22-2020, 08:14 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 54
Likes: 15
Liked 44 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herky Bird
Quality of firearms hasn’t gone down, they are just built to a certain price point. In terms of precision and performance the new stuff is light years ahead of the old stuff. If one so desires a “polished beautiful” something built with wood and metal parts it’ll cost you $1,200~$1,500. The plastic-fantastics are an amazing bargain if one only cares about function over looks, look at the Ruger Precision Rifle as an example.
|
"1,200-,1500"
Really. Savage was making a model 114 "American Classic" which was chambered in 338 win mag among others (I should have bought one" just about three years ago for about $750-800. The wood 111's were slightly cheaper. Why did they stop?
My theory is that they are purely screwing us. It does not take a $1,200 or $1,500 price tag to recoup the cost of a wood stock, sorry but I refuse to believe it based on the guns I've seen before. They are deliberately withholding manufacturing wood and blued guns, drowning us in the plastic garbage, and then using our frustration to force us to pay 3 or 4 times the actual cost of wood stocks for a $1,500 gun. It is pure cut-throatery.
|
12-22-2020, 08:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 2,427
Likes: 390
Liked 2,827 Times in 1,257 Posts
|
|
I honestly never thought Savage quality was that great to begin with, but some of the plastic stocks they're sticking rifles now are flimsy junk. I've seen rifle that actually rock in the stock even when the action screws are properly torqued down. And forearm that are free floated but pinch the stock when the rifle is put on sandbags.
|
12-22-2020, 08:53 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Great Lakes State
Posts: 29,687
Likes: 12,673
Liked 33,605 Times in 7,845 Posts
|
|
Savage was always innovative. Their 1895/1899 were years ahead of their time and the quality was typically first rate.
Their .45 Trials pistol and 1907 were great guns and their current Accutrigger has a strong following. The external barrel nut on their bolt guns is pretty ugly, but it works really well and keeps costs down.
Premium gun companies had a habit of bellying up over the years. It's a shame, but cost/performance has always beat out quality in the American market.
Some of the older 99's were as good or better than anything on the market!
__________________
"I also cook."
|
The Following 12 Users Like Post:
|
AlHunt, CH4, clang444, daddio202, desi2358, dmar, gregintenn, jughed440, mauser9, RTILSON, sandog, sigp220.45 |
12-22-2020, 09:07 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 2,177
Likes: 5,723
Liked 1,685 Times in 933 Posts
|
|
I am to the age I have enough rifles, but grandson has a wood stock Mossberg .243 that is a good shooter. I have built most of my rifles thru the years on Mauser based actions, but the new (to me) Howas are a good bang for the buck. Got a couple of them, not wood stocks, but they take abuse and shoot good.
__________________
Kevin in Oregon
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-22-2020, 10:18 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 1,061
Liked 1,738 Times in 624 Posts
|
|
I gave my grandson-in-law an old Remington 721 30-06 before hunting season. He said wow this was when they made real rifles. I told him that in it’s day a 721 was looked at as an economy rifle in comparison to Winchester model 70 and the Remington model 30.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-22-2020, 11:17 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 54
Likes: 15
Liked 44 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
So, I shot the 111 today. 40 .338 win mag rounds off the bench. 250 grain soft point bullets with 69.5 grains of IMR 4955. Specs are about 2,640 fps. The gun is accurate, I nailed bullseye at 100. Had some difficulty getting it on paper at first, hence 40 shot rounds.
Not going to lie, I think I have a slight concussion. Later today I had a slight headache and couldn't remember what I did this past weekend, and remembered that I mostly cooked on Saturday. Just generally felt weird. Let me tell you this; a 338 win mag with that load in a 7.8 lb rifle makes a 300 win mag of any load in any rifle look like a .308. This thing would make Elmer Keith flinch. You definitely want a 9 or better 10 pound rifle if you intend to shoot this round regularly.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-22-2020, 11:29 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 19,827
Likes: 24,247
Liked 28,996 Times in 10,772 Posts
|
|
I see the "plastic = cheap" philosophy is alive and well on this forum.
As for the recoil, two words: muzzle brake.
__________________
Release the Kraken
Last edited by LVSteve; 12-22-2020 at 11:32 PM.
|
12-22-2020, 11:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 10,254
Likes: 17,901
Liked 23,938 Times in 6,786 Posts
|
|
For me Savage stop making rifles when they discontinued the 99. I also like the 24 and vintage bolt guns 22s, but I could never warm up to their newer bolt rifles. Accurate perhaps, but they’re just ugly and feel cheap.
Sincerely
The gun snob
__________________
213th FBINA
Last edited by CH4; 12-23-2020 at 11:56 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-23-2020, 02:15 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 19,827
Likes: 24,247
Liked 28,996 Times in 10,772 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CH4
...
Sincerely
The gun snob
|
ROFLMAO!!! I think you just won the Internet for a day.
__________________
Release the Kraken
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-23-2020, 10:26 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 30,918
Likes: 41,503
Liked 29,153 Times in 13,781 Posts
|
|
I've got a....
....very basic Savage 110 that does fine. Looks like it might be a 70's model. It has a synthetic stock. I won't b buying any new ones.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
|
12-23-2020, 11:32 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 2,427
Likes: 390
Liked 2,827 Times in 1,257 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LVSteve
I see the "plastic = cheap" philosophy is alive and well on this forum.
As for the recoil, two words: muzzle brake.
|
All my hunting rifles have synthetic stocks, but not the cheap soft plastic g that Savage has been using on their rifles. I have a number of firearms with wooden sticks, but they seldom see hard use in the woods.
|
12-23-2020, 11:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 5,162
Likes: 3,433
Liked 6,245 Times in 2,061 Posts
|
|
I care less about what it looks like, but really like how well my Savage Axis in .223 and .243 shoot!!!
Have never seen a Savage that shot poorly.....some shot better than others but they have all shot quite well for me.
And yes, I own Win. M70's, Rem. 700, a Rem 40x, several Anschutz etc. so I know a little about accurate rifles.
Randy
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-27-2020, 01:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 1,302
Liked 4,379 Times in 1,375 Posts
|
|
Savage was NEVER known as a top tier producer of fine firearms. Savage was built on budget minded guns that performed. Savage has had and maintains today, a reputation for the best accuracy out of the box you can get for a production grade gun.
Younger buyers today want one thing. Performance.
Savage has been way out in front for this change. You could say the market moved to the Savage strategy. Lower costs. Save the money from the wood stock and fancy high gloss finish or labor intensive oil finish. Save the money from polishing and bluing the metal and invest it into accuracy enhancement.
Here is a group I shot with my Ruger American 17 about 3 weeks ago. No it is not a Savage, but it is plastic stock, flat metal finish and a plastic trigger guard. $389.00 rifle with a $200 scope @ 100 yards outdoors.The other groups were 5/8- 3/4”. Keep in mind this is a rimfire gun.
I have a Kimber 308 Custom Select Stainless that wont do that. It will shoot MOA and sub MOA on a good day but it will never shoot 1/2 MOA and it cost almost triple the price of the little Ruger and I can hand load custom ammo for the 308.
Stop and consider what younger shooters are enjoying right now. Performance we dreamed and tinkered for hours to achieve right out of the box at a price that allows them to enjoy our sport.
What us old folks view as value has faded into the dust bin of history. Now younger buyers want accuracy and could care less about aesthetics. They like the plastic stocks and flat metal finishes and they are enjoying that performance for the same prices we were paying way back then.
I am happy gun makers have found a way to keep costs down and improve performance. It keeps our sport affordable for younger shooters on a budget. Not a bad thing at all.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-27-2020, 01:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Monroe cnty. Ohio
Posts: 6,923
Likes: 4,410
Liked 10,023 Times in 3,676 Posts
|
|
When Savage went under in late 80s they were turning out junk. They had withdrawn support from warranty repairs. The 99 was only Savage I was remotely interested in that they were still producing. Then Savage was brought back by focusing on the 110 rifle. It worked and they pulled same thing as the other companies. Expanding product line and cost cutting on what they make. They are losing market for BAs now and will go down the tubes. Just a smaller version of what just happened to Remington.
|
12-27-2020, 06:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On da Bayou Teche
Posts: 18,410
Likes: 18,442
Liked 58,604 Times in 9,624 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herky Bird
Quality of firearms hasn’t gone down, they are just built to a certain price point. In terms of precision and performance the new stuff is light years ahead of the old stuff. If one so desires a “polished beautiful” something built with wood and metal parts it’ll cost you $1,200~$1,500. The plastic-fantastics are an amazing bargain if one only cares about function over looks, look at the Ruger Precision Rifle as an example.
|
$350 in 1985 is right at $1,700 today. They are building rifles to a price point of $400 which is dirt cheap considering for a rifle which is for the most part pretty accurate with a good trigger. Much as I love my stainless 77/22 I has to get a trigger job done on it to get a serviceable trigger which is today eclipsed by the CZ 22's.
Try finding a Model 77 or a Model 70. They are not there. All the stores have is the price point built rifles which look like snot to us old timers but are pretty serviceable. Much as I like my 77/22 If I were buying a bolt action .22 today it would be a CZ or a Ruger American.
Times they are moving on
__________________
Forum consigliere
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-28-2020, 11:37 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 509
Likes: 6
Liked 787 Times in 294 Posts
|
|
Savages aren't terrible, but there are so many models and levels of them that you need to do your homework on them. For "entry" level rifles I think it's hard to beat the Mossbergs now though. I paid under $400 for a walnut stocked 30-06 Patriot and the first three shots out of it could be covered with a quarter. It also had a nicer trigger and much smoother action than my friends new Savage Storm that cost an extra $300.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-28-2020, 01:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lafayette, Tennessee
Posts: 6,926
Likes: 6,833
Liked 8,936 Times in 2,910 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by diyj98
I honestly never thought Savage quality was that great to begin with
|
Sir, I would respectfully disagree with your statement.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|