|
|
03-23-2009, 06:02 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rural, CT
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 578
Liked 1,390 Times in 324 Posts
|
|
The post that had the info is gone. This rifle used to belong to my grandfather.
30-06
Thanks
__________________
Shoot fast & live long
Warren
|
03-23-2009, 06:02 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rural, CT
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 578
Liked 1,390 Times in 324 Posts
|
|
The post that had the info is gone. This rifle used to belong to my grandfather.
30-06
Thanks
__________________
Shoot fast & live long
Warren
|
03-23-2009, 06:04 PM
|
Junior Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sheridan, Wyoming
Posts: 5,333
Likes: 159
Liked 3,889 Times in 1,361 Posts
|
|
That looks like a 1917 action. Are there any markings on the receiver?
|
03-23-2009, 06:08 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rural, CT
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 578
Liked 1,390 Times in 324 Posts
|
|
Only the firebomb on the bolt handle.
__________________
Shoot fast & live long
Warren
|
03-23-2009, 06:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 746
Liked 1,447 Times in 540 Posts
|
|
I agree with GatorFarmer. To me, it looks like a US Enfield M1917 that has been sporterized.
It is a beautiful piece of ordinance. How does it shoot?
__________________
The Last Standing Knight
|
03-23-2009, 06:15 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
American Enfield.
|
03-23-2009, 06:17 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Great Lakes State
Posts: 29,936
Likes: 12,825
Liked 34,094 Times in 8,013 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by GatorFarmer:
That looks like a 1917 action. Are there any markings on the receiver?
|
+1 It’s a sporterized US 1917.
There should be an "R" or a "E" or a "W" on the bottom of the bolt handle, which signifies the manufacturer (Winchester, Remington and the Remington Eddystone plants made 1917 rifles). The bolt may not be original as many were arsenal rebuilt.
__________________
"I also cook."
|
03-23-2009, 06:22 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rural, CT
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 578
Liked 1,390 Times in 324 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by The Last Standing Knight:
I agree with GatorFarmer. To me, it looks like a US Enfield M1917 that has been sporterized.
It is a beautiful piece of ordinance. How does it shoot?
|
Thank you.
It shoots better than I do. My dad tells me his dad won at Camp Perry 1000 yard when I was a baby. I would love to find more info but so far no records I can find. Would have been about 55-58 I think.
__________________
Shoot fast & live long
Warren
|
03-23-2009, 06:43 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Old Dominion
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
It may be a Remington Model 30 which Remington built on modified M1917 actions from 1921-1940. The M720 was an improved M30. Otherwise it's a sporterized M1917.
__________________
The earth laughs in flowers
|
03-23-2009, 08:18 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: a horrible place in the mid-west
Posts: 563
Likes: 1
Liked 30 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
Original M1917's are good guns, but considered by many (including me) to be kind of ugly and clunky. The one poor design feature was the lack of windage adjustment on the rear sight. Loads of them got sporterized, I think, just to make them "less ugly". I own one in original WW1 configuration, so I can't hate them that much. Overall still an effective military machine, and beats a blunt stick.
__________________
I will move firewood every day
|
03-23-2009, 08:37 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 948
Likes: 15
Liked 177 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
one of my haunts had a Rem M30 in .257 Roberts..
probly should have bought it.. oh well.
who is HA Baker ? family ?
1917s were early candidates for big magnum conversions... reportedly stronger actions than 03 springers
|
03-24-2009, 07:28 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rural, CT
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 578
Liked 1,390 Times in 324 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ElToro:
one of my haunts had a Rem M30 in .257 Roberts..
probly should have bought it.. oh well.
who is HA Baker ? family ?
1917s were early candidates for big magnum conversions... reportedly stronger actions than 03 springers
|
Harold A.Baker. My grandfather lived in Toledo Ohio. He was a very active sportsman and the family says he won the 1000 yard compitition at Camp Perry about mid 50s.
__________________
Shoot fast & live long
Warren
|
03-24-2009, 09:50 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
The Remington and Eddystone versions had a milled "bathtub" under the rear sight that had to be filled when sporterized. The Winchesters did not have this. All models cocked on closing unless they had been modified. Numerich Arms constantly ran adds in the late 50s and early 60s promoting a "cock on opening" conversion. Timney made a very good trigger upgrade.
Joe
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|