|
|
07-23-2009, 03:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Houlton, ME
Posts: 321
Likes: 2
Liked 42 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
WW1 Colt 1911 value?
I went an looked at this colt today. Serial number puts it at 1917, all parts appear correct except the magazine base plate is a replacement (but the magazine is correct 2-tone). Very little finish remaining. Barrel has good rifling but looks like it has some light pitting in the lands, or it just needs a cleaning. Barrel Has the "H" proof but the "P" has pretty much worn off. Frame/Slide has some looseness but really not too bad. "MODEL OF 1911 US ARMY" stamp is partially double stamped on the word "model". Frame has the proper GHS stamp.
I am concerned about the lack of the "UNITED STATES PROPERTY" stamp on the left side of the frame. I don't see any evidence that it was removed, but I'm not really an expert in these things.
What do you think this is worth, guy wants $600?
Last edited by onegunshort; 07-23-2009 at 03:32 PM.
|
07-23-2009, 03:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Florence, Alabama, USA
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 40
Liked 1,398 Times in 774 Posts
|
|
I won't guess a value but will say that the United States Property was probably neatly removed by the vet who pilfered his service pistol. This devalues it a great deal to a collector.
What do you want the gun FOR?
Investment? See above.
Shooting? We are warned about the mild steel in early guns.
Affordable example of the type? OK.
|
07-23-2009, 03:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Houlton, ME
Posts: 321
Likes: 2
Liked 42 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
Mostly the "affordable example" category. I was pretty sure it was supposed to have the US property mark so after I saw that it was missing I was thinking I would probably pass on it. Thought I'd at least check on value anyway though.
|
07-23-2009, 03:57 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Liked 47 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
I would think that is a low price. Are you sure that they all had US Govt. Prop. on them? I would toss this question on the Colt Forum and see what they say.
|
07-23-2009, 04:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SW Virginia
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
If it was in good mechanical shape, I would sure have to think hard about that one. The old .45s are neat guns and the prices are through the roof these days.
|
07-23-2009, 05:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 232
Liked 688 Times in 252 Posts
|
|
Since it's a 1911, everything else being equal, I think $600 is a very reasonable price. I looked at M1911A1s at a recent gun show and everything worth looking at was over $1000.
|
07-23-2009, 05:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: S.E.PA.
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
Liked 99 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Fair price,,, Any 1911 with ser # that starts with "No" was a military issue.
All Commercial ones started with a "C"
I think the US Property was ground off long ago, and worth 600.
But dont shoot it too much, The slide was not hardened the full length,, It could crack,,, And then the 1911 is worth way less....
Peter
__________________
Need 1/2 moon Chiefs special
|
07-23-2009, 10:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: So. California
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
The gun would have not passed final inspection without the United States Property marking on the frame, so it was removed at some point. As for the price, I would not pay $600 due to the removed marking and little finish remaining, but it all depends how bad you want one and how much you are willing to spend. My dad sold a similar looking Colt 1911 with removed markings for $500 about two years ago at a local gun show and the buyer was happy to get it.
|
07-23-2009, 11:41 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,023
Likes: 8,998
Liked 48,770 Times in 9,262 Posts
|
|
The gun was reblued fairly well long ago, evidenced by the significantly rounded "corners" where the flat sides meet the round top on the slide. Other corners show light buffing also. NOT honest wear. None of the reblue remains, so the gun has nothing going for it.
PASS. It's a $300-400 shooter, depending on the bore, the "rattle", and the action.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
07-24-2009, 11:00 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 26
Liked 451 Times in 233 Posts
|
|
Mixed bag, all GOOD comments above and we all have our "reasons" ( opinions) and bottom line I feel, thats too much for that condition, or with the "issues" involved, it ( US Property) was ground off LONG ago, as the 'patina' has covered any and all of the work, but I feel the front end "rounding" is wear, put in and out of a "tight" holster , shows the gun was "used" and a LOT...the holes in the frame as well as the 'horse' (rear left) don't show "buffing and polishing, as the entire front end of the gun,(frame, as well as the slide do.......)
yes, a $300-400, tops, gun, as Lee says, see too many in nicer? ( honest) shape at that $600 mark,,that seems to be the "water level" at least around here,,,better examples shoot over the $1000 mark real quick , at least at the shows and forget it in the blue books/gun list...they want 'triple" and they are "doctored"....
__________________
dan
NRA Benefactor,PMA
|
07-24-2009, 11:32 AM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,023
Likes: 8,998
Liked 48,770 Times in 9,262 Posts
|
|
I still think buffed lightly.
I realize they stayed off the roll marks, but there would be some color difference, even with the patina, where the US Prop was ground off IF the gun had not been blued after.
The edge I mentioned is rolled off by the buffer, and the corners of the ejection port really show it. Also shows on the corners of the scallop at bottom front of slide.
Also note the serrations on right side- they rounded the top edges when buffing, but missed them on the left.
Reblued.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
07-24-2009, 02:16 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Houlton, ME
Posts: 321
Likes: 2
Liked 42 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
Thanks for all the information and opinions, pretty much confirms how I felt as soon as I saw it, so I will not be purchasing. I have a nice modern Colt 1911 already and the money could be better spent elsewhere.
|
07-24-2009, 05:16 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
On the flip side. There are not that many pre 1911A1's around. I have one in similar condition (1918) and really enjoy owning it.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|