Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > The Lounge
o

Notices

The Lounge A Catch-All Area for NON-GUN topics.
PUT GUN TOPICS in the GUN FORUMS.
Keep it Family Friendly. See The Rules for Banned Topics!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-26-2010, 09:56 PM
686fan 686fan is offline
Member
FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Asheboro, NC
Posts: 131
Likes: 50
Liked 95 Times in 39 Posts
Default FBI Miami Shootout

This has probably been discussed before, but unfortunately I missed it. In the 1986 Miami FBI Shootout with Platt & Matix, several of the agents were armed with 357 Magnums. From what I've read, they were loaded with 38 Special ammo, not 357 Magnum. Does anyone know the reason the agents weren't using 357? If it was the FBI's policy to not issue 357 Magnum ammo, does anyone know why? I'm certainly not criticizing the agents. Two of these brave men died in the line of duty. Platt & Matix were both shot several times by the agents early in the gunfight. I know it's easy to second-guess, but I can't help but wonder if using 357 ammo would have stopped the fight earlier, possibly saving agents Dove and Grogan's lives. Even though this happened over 24 years ago, it still saddens me to think about the loss of these two agents.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-26-2010, 10:07 PM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

The biggest snafu wasn't that the agents weren't using .357 ammo, it was that there was a policy in place that had them out looking for hyper-violent bank robbers, known to use long gums, and the FBI guys didn't each have a shotgun or a rifle.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-26-2010, 10:12 PM
Steave's Avatar
Steave Steave is offline
Absent Comrade
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 10 Posts
Default

IIRC, 125 gr. JHP .38 Special was the FBI issue at the time. I know there are other here who know for sure and will chime in.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-26-2010, 10:26 PM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

The agents were using the FBI load (.38+P 158 gr. LSWCHP). I've read the autopsies of Platt and Matix. It worked reasonably well. Not stellar though.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-26-2010, 10:28 PM
NE450No2 NE450No2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 7
Liked 469 Times in 278 Posts
Default

Some of the agents were carrying 9mm's as well.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-26-2010, 10:40 PM
Ogandydancer's Avatar
Ogandydancer Ogandydancer is offline
Member
FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: High Point North Carolina
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 595
Liked 1,647 Times in 740 Posts
Default

There were a lot of mistakes made that day, I guess the one that stands out the most is the fact they were grossly underarmed. There is a very good documentary on this on I think maybe the Bio. Channel or maybe one of th History channels that runs every so often. If you will watch for it it can answer a lot of your questions,and much better than I.

Last edited by Ogandydancer; 06-26-2010 at 10:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-26-2010, 11:10 PM
Grog Grog is offline
Member
FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: East of Dallas... TX
Posts: 955
Likes: 33
Liked 161 Times in 91 Posts
Default

There was one shotgun used, and used well. Too bad it was too little too late.
__________________
I miss my 4546 the most.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-26-2010, 11:36 PM
jframe's Avatar
jframe jframe is offline
Member
FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florence, Alabama
Posts: 2,067
Likes: 1,887
Liked 1,137 Times in 304 Posts
Default

What I DON'T understand, as a private citizen, is why were the agents armed with Model 13 .357 Magnum revolvers, then mandated to carry .38 Special? I understand that the LHP was the issued load, but why give a man a gun that's chambered in .357, then force him to download it to protect himself and others?
__________________
MARK
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-26-2010, 11:37 PM
robertoj29's Avatar
robertoj29 robertoj29 is offline
Member
FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Adel, GA
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

There's a pretty good analysis at this link.

Educational Zone #106 - Forensic Analysis, 1986 FBI Miami Firefight - Page 1
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-27-2010, 12:17 AM
Grog Grog is offline
Member
FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: East of Dallas... TX
Posts: 955
Likes: 33
Liked 161 Times in 91 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jframe View Post
What I DON'T understand, as a private citizen, is why were the agents armed with Model 13 .357 Magnum revolvers, then mandated to carry .38 Special?


Agencies have done that for years. At one time, some bosses figured it was ok to practice with .38spl wadcutters while issuing full-power .357mag ammo. Then the cops got killed because they could not handle their duty weapons so the bosses made them shoot with the same ammo they were issued, sometimes that meant going to a .38spl load.


During the mid-90s, South Carolina would not let security officers carry .357mag ammo so I issued the .38spl FBI load to my people.

It was funny, because they also allowed the 380, 9mm, 40S&W, 45ACP and the 10mm plus the 12ga shotgun. I didn't own a 380 or 10mm, so I just carried the other ones (not ll at the same time ).
__________________
I miss my 4546 the most.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 06-27-2010, 12:28 AM
jframe's Avatar
jframe jframe is offline
Member
FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florence, Alabama
Posts: 2,067
Likes: 1,887
Liked 1,137 Times in 304 Posts
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grog View Post
Agencies have done that for years. At one time, some bosses figured it was ok to practice with .38spl wadcutters while issuing full-power .357mag ammo. Then the cops got killed because they could not handle their duty weapons so the bosses made them shoot with the same ammo they were issued, sometimes that meant going to a .38spl load.


During the mid-90s, South Carolina would not let security officers carry .357mag ammo so I issued the .38spl FBI load to my people.

It was funny, because they also allowed the 380, 9mm, 40S&W, 45ACP and the 10mm plus the 12ga shotgun. I didn't own a 380 or 10mm, so I just carried the other ones (not ll at the same time ).
Wow, and I thought that bureaucratic bullcrap only existed in my Ford parts and service department where I work!
__________________
MARK
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-27-2010, 12:46 AM
sigp220.45's Avatar
sigp220.45 sigp220.45 is online now
US Veteran
FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,075
Likes: 27,790
Liked 33,581 Times in 5,253 Posts
Default

The issue ammo at the time was 158 grain +P lead hollowpoint. They carried what they were issued.

Most of them weren't carrying Model 13s. SSA McNeill had a personally owned 2 1/2 Model 19 and SA Mireles had a personally owned four inch 686.

SAs Dove and Grogan had SWAT Smith 459 9mms. Their issue was the 115 grain Silvertip.

The guns assigned to the agents involved in the shootout are listed in the first section of this compendium on pages 69 and 70, by model and serial number. The blacked out names are guys that were on the stakeout but not involved in the shooting.

Federal Bureau of Investigation - Freedom of Information Privacy Act

There were 17 agents involved in the rolling stakeout that day. There were shotguns and MP-5s and ARs amongst them. As it turned out, the guys who did the stop had pistols and shotguns. SSA McNeill elected not to use his 870, and later regretted it. SA Mireles used his, but it wasn't particularly effective. He shot a G-ride and some feet. He put their lights out by walking up to the car and firing that 686 into their heads and necks. The .38 ammo worked fine for that.

There was no policy that they couldn't have long guns with them. Most guys did. Some of these guys didn't. They all could have had one if they wanted to.

Believe me, if it happened today the air would be a-glitter with flying .223 and 10mm brass. Both guys would be swiss-cheesed, and people would be moaning about excessive force.

I work with agents that won't knock on a door without a 12 pound gadget laden M4 hanging around their neck. I still prefer a pistol for 95% of the work I do. I don't feel undergunned.

I'm amazed that this shootout still fascinates people almost a quarter century after it happened, and that so much bad information still gets passed around. Its not secret stuff - click the link above and read all about it. I remember long debates about what kind of gun Mireles carried, and Massad Ayoob weighing in with his recollection that Mireles told him it was a 686. Mas was right, but that info was readily available for those who would just search it out. (Keep your eye out for a four inch 686 with serial number AAH8939.)

To answer the OP's original question, the issue ammo was and is a good round. .357 Magnum ammo was authorized for carry as a reload, and for carry in the revolver with the permission of the Assistant Special Agent in Charge (ASAC). When I carried a revolver, I went ahead and loaded .357 Silvertips and carried the .38s in my backup. The rationale for the edict to carry .38s in .357 revolvers is probably boringly pragmatic - it worked, it was cheaper, and lots of guys were still carrying Model 10s and it made issue easier. Nothing more, nothing less.
__________________
“What you got, ain’t new.”

Last edited by sigp220.45; 06-27-2010 at 01:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-27-2010, 12:54 AM
Lew Archer's Avatar
Lew Archer Lew Archer is offline
Member
FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 289
Likes: 213
Liked 333 Times in 85 Posts
Default

Back in the day, Agents had to obtain "SAC Authority" (permission from the Special Agent in Charge of the field office) to use .357s. As a practical matter, many Agents carried .38s in the revolvers, but .357s as spare ammo. SAC authority was also required to deploy certain long guns, such as the M-16.

Things have changed. Today, Agents (including non-SWAT Agents) routinely deploy with M-4 carbines without special permission. Some carry private purchased Glock 21s. There are still MP-5s in 9 and 10mm in the field and, of course, shotguns (the preferred round being a slug).

Regarding Miami, keep in mind that the gunfight was preceded by a loose surveillance...Agents stationed all along the area where the suspects had previously robbed banks. Some of those Agents did have M-16s and MP-5s, but arrived at the scene of the gunfight too late.

Two Agents, in one vehicle (SAs Grogan and Dove) spotted the suspects and began following the suspects, who quickly recognized the surveillance. With less than all the available Agents on scene, SSA McNeill made the decision to stop the vehicle using force...I think his intent was to contain the suspects before they got out onto a major highway.

Two on scene Agents had shotguns...SA Mirales, who used his valiently, and, after being injured, with one hand, and SSA McNeill. His shotgun was in the back seat. After the forcible car stop, the gun fight began, and he had no time to get to his shotgun. Instead, he disabled Matix with rounds from his Model 19 (but .38, I believe). This was likely a personally owned weapon. Some of these key rounds were fired after his gun hand was hit by a .223 round. He kept shooting, despite that injury. He was then put out of action by a chest hit from the .223 which momentarily paralyzed him.

The two murdered Agents, SAs Dove and Grogan, were SWAT team members and armed with S&W 9mm pistols (not sure the model, but they were hi-capacity). Grogan was rendered almost sightless after losing his eyeglasses in the beginning of the fight and Dove's weapon was eventually disabled by incoming fire from Platt. He was defenseless at the time of his murder.

I often wonder how different the outcome would have been if SSA McNeill's shotgun had been in his Bureau vehicle's front seat...or if SA Dove had a second gun...or if SA Grogan had a second pair of eyeglasses on hand. He was the best shot in the office.

No doubt about it, having more of everything can only help.
__________________
Trust, but verify - R. Reagan
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-27-2010, 01:35 AM
bennettfam bennettfam is offline
Member
FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Upstate California
Posts: 491
Likes: 5
Liked 27 Times in 22 Posts
Default

I think this is one of the incidents that led my local PD to transition first to .40 and then to .45 handguns, along with rifles to keep the 870s company in the patrol cars. None have ever been used but they are there in case. A shame agents had to die to bring about change.
__________________
Jon
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-27-2010, 08:59 AM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jframe View Post
What I DON'T understand, as a private citizen, is why were the agents armed with Model 13 .357 Magnum revolvers, then mandated to carry .38 Special? I understand that the LHP was the issued load, but why give a man a gun that's chambered in .357, then force him to download it to protect himself and others?
Ever fire .357s from a snubby? The fierce recoil and muzzle flash are beyond the ability of the average shooter. While g-men are generally considered good shots, I can say that, in my case, it took a good thousand rounds of full house 125 gr. JHPs before I'd mastered them from snubs.

Many of the experienced shooters on this forum adamantly refuse to use hot .357s in their snubnose revolvers and in some cases full size guns.

SigP22045, thanks for clarifying the policy thing. Deliberately not taking a long gun into such an encounter displays a lack of understanding and/or judgement, IMO. I'm glad to see that things have changed.

As far as the ongoing fascination goes, it's really quite simple to understand. Miami is the O.K. Corral of our era, but really supercedes it because of the tremendous impact it had on small arms ammunition, caliber selection and policy for not only law enforcement, but non-LEO civilians also.

Last edited by flop-shank; 06-27-2010 at 09:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-27-2010, 10:15 AM
Faulkner's Avatar
Faulkner Faulkner is offline
Member
FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arkansas Ozarks
Posts: 6,264
Likes: 7,266
Liked 33,983 Times in 3,679 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jframe View Post
What I DON'T understand, as a private citizen, is why were the agents armed with Model 13 .357 Magnum revolvers, then mandated to carry .38 Special? I understand that the LHP was the issued load, but why give a man a gun that's chambered in .357, then force him to download it to protect himself and others?
Actually, it was quite common in the 70's and 80's for LEO's to carry .357's but load them with .38 Special ammo. When I joined our sheriff's department in the early 90's they had not yet transitioned to semi-auto's and MOST of the officers carried .38's in their 586's. It was also common practice that when we did our semi-annual qualifications we use .38 ammo regardless of what we carried on duty. The .38's were considered easier to qualify with and "not as hard" on the guns.

I recall several other departments where officers had to have approval from the CLEO to carry magnum ammo. Most of the time these would be the "gun guys" in the department.

I was young and anal back then and I insisted that I not only carry .357's on duty, but I shot my qualifying rounds with magnum ammo too. The range officer would always put me (and a couple others who were like minded) down on the end of the range so we would not disturb the rest of the shooters with our magnum ammo.
__________________
- Change it back -
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-27-2010, 11:20 AM
Wyatt Burp Wyatt Burp is offline
Member
FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 3,299
Liked 17,158 Times in 2,907 Posts
Default

My 3" Model 13-3 with Pach. compact grips is a dream to shoot with .357's. And I'm a moderate .44 special and .45 Colt fan. Is there a big difference beyween it and a 2 1/2" Model 19.
That TV movie on this was really good if it was accurate. It was brutal and for the first time for me took the "glamour" out of movie shootouts that you still see today. We just watched From Paris With Love with Travolta and the constant shootouts were so far fetched. Bad guy's 9MM won't penetrate a turned over dining room table? Right.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-27-2010, 12:45 PM
jframe's Avatar
jframe jframe is offline
Member
FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florence, Alabama
Posts: 2,067
Likes: 1,887
Liked 1,137 Times in 304 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wyatt Burp View Post
My 3" Model 13-3 with Pach. compact grips is a dream to shoot with .357's. And I'm a moderate .44 special and .45 Colt fan. Is there a big difference beyween it and a 2 1/2" Model 19.
That TV movie on this was really good if it was accurate. It was brutal and for the first time for me took the "glamour" out of movie shootouts that you still see today. We just watched From Paris With Love with Travolta and the constant shootouts were so far fetched. Bad guy's 9MM won't penetrate a turned over dining room table? Right.
There's a video clip of the shootout in the movie on YouTube, but I'm not computer savvy enough to post a link. I think you can type in "1986 FBI shootout" there, and it'll take you to it.
__________________
MARK
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-27-2010, 01:09 PM
Wyatt Burp Wyatt Burp is offline
Member
FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 3,299
Liked 17,158 Times in 2,907 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jframe View Post
There's a video clip of the shootout in the movie on YouTube, but I'm not computer savvy enough to post a link. I think you can type in "1986 FBI shootout" there, and it'll take you to it.
Here it is. Do you guys real familiar with this shootout find this accurate?
YouTube - The 1986 Miami FBI Shootout
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-27-2010, 02:56 PM
Jellybean Jellybean is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 6
Liked 351 Times in 243 Posts
Default

686fan, it was common for many agencies to issue .38s for the .357s for the simple fact that it made it easier on the agency. Not every agent can handle a full house .357 magnum round,or a normal 10mmm and it's not just the females. It was much easier to procure and distribute ammo if everyone was carrying the same thing and I'm sure the fact that some agents had 9mms was a nightmare to whoever it was that had to keep track of who was using it.

I doubt that it would have made any difference if anyone was using it instead of the .38s. I also doubt it would be any different if it happened again tommorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-27-2010, 04:40 PM
sigp220.45's Avatar
sigp220.45 sigp220.45 is online now
US Veteran
FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,075
Likes: 27,790
Liked 33,581 Times in 5,253 Posts
Default

[QUOTE I also doubt it would be any different if it happened again tommorrow.[/QUOTE]

You're dead wrong there. For one thing, it would be a SWAT operation under current policy - ninja suits, helmets, rifle-capable body armor, air units, and probably an armored vehicle. Even if a squad did pull it off today (which would be woefully against Bureau policy and extremely unlikely), everyone would have a long gun of some kind immediately available - most likely an M4, but possibly a 10mm MP-5 or an 870 loaded with slugs. The traffic stop itself would probably be initiated with a marked PD unit. More likely the car would be surveilled to a remote location and obliterated at the first sign of armed resistance.

Its been almost 25 years since this shootout, and many turds like these two have been taken into custody. We've lost some more good guys, but this kind of arrest has been made many many times since 4/11/86 and the lessons learned on that day have kept lots of good guys alive.
__________________
“What you got, ain’t new.”

Last edited by sigp220.45; 06-27-2010 at 05:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-27-2010, 04:51 PM
Lew Archer's Avatar
Lew Archer Lew Archer is offline
Member
FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout FBI Miami Shootout  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 289
Likes: 213
Liked 333 Times in 85 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wyatt Burp View Post
Here it is. Do you guys real familiar with this shootout find this accurate?
YouTube - The 1986 Miami FBI Shootout
The director of this made for TV movie ("The FBI Murders") did attempt to accurately tell the story of the events leading up to the firefight, and tried to depict the actual shooting accurately. From what I've heard, he spent a great deal of time with the FBI researching the fight. This is evident in the positioning of the vehicles after the forcible stop, which seems about right.

From presentations I have heard on the topic, including one given by the SA Mirales, who ended the fight, the movie generally depicted the overall shootout accurately. I'm sure the survivors would note various discrepancies, as they did even in the in-house re-enactment made by the FBI.

Certain details in "The FBI Murders" (or the FBI documentary, for that matter) may not be correct. Certain details remain unknown. Not every round fired can be accounted for or attributed to a specific person, as noted in one forensic analysis.

The actual lighting conditions were poor (varying shadow, sunlight and haze). The lighting favored the bad guys and hampered the good guys. Due to shadow and haze, the Agents had difficulty seeing the movements of the suspects. SA Mirales discusses this issue in his comments on the matter.

Of course, a film maker (particularly in that era) wants the audience to be able to see everything clearly...so the viewer is seeing the events unfold in a way the actual participants could not have.

Matix was not as active in the shooting as in the TV movies. I believe he fired on round from his shotgun, at the outset of the fight. He was put out of action by SSA McNeill's fire, as I understand it. At the end, Platt moves him out of their stolen Monte Carlo and into one of the Bureau cars.

Some things can't easily be put on film...such as SA Mirales' reported tunnel vision at the end where he delivers the final rounds from his revolver. He was well aware he was about to lose consciousness and was determined to put the bad guys down before that happened.

The crime scene was gorier, too. For example, Platt lost most of his blood and most of it transferred to some of the vehicles as he maneuvered about.

That said, for an '80s TV movie, it does a pretty good job of capturing the intensity and ferocity of the fight, as well as the determination of the combatants.

Platt was a ferocious, determined adverary, with prior military training (likewise Matix). The pair was implicated in at least one murder and other violent shootings, not to mention a number of bank and armored car robberies. They took their weapons and training seriously and were mentally and physically prepared to violently resist LE. Keep in mind, they made no attempt to run from the Agents when they realized they were under surveillance. Instead, they taunted and challenged the Agents by brandishing their weapons prior to the car stop.

SA Dove's round, early in the fight, delivered a lethal hit that did not immediately incapacitate Platt, as had been discussed ad infinitem. Given the overall loss of blood, this incident vividly demonstrated that humans, if mentally determined, can remain lethal in battle even if they have sustained grave injuries and are the walking dead.

Determination was evident on the part of the Agents as well, who also refused to give up and ultimately defeated their adversaries.

I think the film captured that rather well.
__________________
Trust, but verify - R. Reagan
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-27-2010, 10:05 PM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Based on my research, I agree with Lew. The you tube clip gives the basic jist of it. It was a real "eye of the tiger" kind of fight, but what do you expect with two experienced Army Infantrymen on one side and a former Marine (Mireles) on the other?

I'm also vocal in my support of SSA McNeil's decision to bring things to a head when the FBI did. If Platt and Matix had escaped, they would likely have changed their MO, which would have sent the FBI back to the drawing board. In the meantime, there is no doubt in my mind that more innocent people would have been murdered by those two before the feds caught up with them.

One other fact that is of interest when picturing the shootout in one's mind is that several idiot drivers actually drove right down the street and through the middle of the gunfight while it was going on!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-28-2010, 11:46 AM
Jellybean Jellybean is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 6
Liked 351 Times in 243 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sigp220.45 View Post
[QUOTE I also doubt it would be any different if it happened again tommorrow.
You're dead wrong there....
Its been almost 25 years since this shootout, and many turds like these two have been taken into custody. We've lost some more good guys, but this kind of arrest has been made many many times since 4/11/86 and the lessons learned on that day have kept lots of good guys alive.[/QUOTE]

There was not one lesson learned that day. Everything that went wrong and every mistake that was made had been learned long before that day. No matter how serious or how publicized they were, they were ignored over time by the complacency that I saw every day. I don't know how the FBI operates, and am not going to pretend that I do, but the agencies I did work for were made up of the same type of human beings. A disaster happens, everyone is on high alert, then after a period of time it happens again. The fact that all those turds have been taken into custody means they were not exactly the same turds, making the same decisions with the same abilities and having similar good guys making the same mistakes. If you look closely at this shooting and the Newhall incident, and any other shooting that was made notorious by the press, one fact shows itself repeatedly, the bad guys out shot the good guys.

I've never seen a guy arrested where someone didn't make a mistake or a bad decision. The fact that the bad guy didn't act on it is what differentiates them from this one. That and the fact that your average bad guy is a worse shot than the average good guy.

By the way, I wasn't saying it would necessarily happen to the FBI again, but it could since they hire human beings, and they aren't perfect.

Last edited by Jellybean; 06-28-2010 at 12:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
223, 357 magnum, 380, 38spl, 45acp, 586, 686, colt, glock, military, model 13-3, model 16, model 19, sig arms, silvertips, snubby, snubnose, transition

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My rundown of the Miami Shootout.... rwsmith The Lounge 58 03-22-2016 02:42 PM
Miami Shootout Revisited jimmyj The Lounge 18 05-14-2015 08:44 AM
FBI Miami Shootout Part 4, 5 or 6 max The Lounge 2 09-16-2011 08:52 PM
25th Anniversary of the FBI Miami shootout Sonny Crocket The Lounge 6 04-11-2011 07:49 PM
FBI Miami shootout 3rd Gen Neal The Lounge 24 05-06-2009 05:08 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:18 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)