|
View Poll Results: Which 4.0" barrel .357 Magnum to buy?
|
Dan Wesson Model 15
|
|
1 |
0.58% |
Ruger GP-100
|
|
24 |
14.04% |
S&W Model 66
|
|
82 |
47.95% |
other
|
|
64 |
37.43% |
|
05-04-2011, 02:08 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 4,162
Likes: 341
Liked 3,944 Times in 1,494 Posts
|
|
Which 4.0" barrel .357 Magnum would you buy?
Greetings:
I recently noticed I only have a single .357 Magnum pistol with a 4.0" barrel in my collection - it's a Ruger Security Six, by the way. I'm looking to add, at least for now, one more to the collection. I don't need it for hunting or home defense, or target shooting, but I'm sure it will be carried for those purposes eventually. Here is what I'm considering now, and I'd like to get your opinions as to which one I should pick:
a) Ruger GP 100 (stainless steel)
b) Dan Wesson Model 15 (blued steel; also comes with a 6.0" barrel)
c) S&W Model 66 (I think it's a dash 7; it was the last year of production, so it has the IL, but it also has the pinned front sight, which is a real plus for me).
The cost is roughly the same for each. The Dan Wesson is in the roughest shape - definitely a shooter though. Okay, learned forum members, what do you suggest and why?
Many thanks,
Dave
|
05-04-2011, 02:18 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: WV
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 507
Liked 4,469 Times in 1,030 Posts
|
|
I'd suggest a model 28 because . . . it's an N frame and you don't have one. A 27 is nice but the 4" tubes are the hardest to find and will cost you probably double what a decent 28 would.
|
05-04-2011, 02:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: N/W Florida
Posts: 5,666
Likes: 2,434
Liked 6,216 Times in 2,424 Posts
|
|
I didn't read your question before I voted, so I said other, since if I was looking for a 4" 357 it'd be a 27 or 28.
Then I read your question. Ahhhh. Of those three, I'd go with the 66. The Dan Wesson would not even be in the running. Don't like the way they open. Just a personal thing with me, but this is an opinion poll. Then, if I felt the need to shoot some ultra-powerful kick-*** "beat the gun to death" loads, I'd step up to a 41 or a 44, so there is no need for the extra strength of the Ruger, and the Smith, usually, feels better.
__________________
I always take precautions
|
05-04-2011, 02:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Out for the duration
Posts: 4,870
Likes: 62
Liked 520 Times in 264 Posts
|
|
"Other"
Whichever one is the best deal.
__________________
Lost it all in a boat accident
|
05-04-2011, 02:34 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 13,995
Liked 5,919 Times in 1,761 Posts
|
|
Another Highway Patrolman vote.
|
05-04-2011, 02:46 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 318
Likes: 42
Liked 328 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
M66 no question.
|
05-04-2011, 02:47 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Garden Spot, Upstate NY, USA
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 3,385
Liked 749 Times in 445 Posts
|
|
I really like the Model 66 in 4". Hangs well in outside holster, shoots well. Also have N and L frame 4" models to share the exercise. No Dan Wesson or GP100, but do like the less refined, but companionable, Ruger Security Six 4" quite well.
Something about a 4" K-frame that is sooo right. Also happen to have the 66 2.5", 3" and 6" to accompany the 4". Each has a certain virtue, well justifying the popularity of each [and none of mine is for sale]. But as for me, did I mention I like the 4"?
Regards,
Dyson
|
05-04-2011, 02:47 PM
|
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: GSO NC
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 23,604
Liked 13,197 Times in 2,860 Posts
|
|
From your choices - the GP100. Everything you need and nothing you don't. Regards 18DAI.
|
05-04-2011, 02:59 PM
|
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 3,701
Liked 5,261 Times in 1,885 Posts
|
|
I voted for the GP100, because it is one heck of a revolver...I have the 3" fixed sight model, and it is a tank.
I noticed that your choices don't include a 686...and your list seems like you are looking at some actual revolvers available for purchase, rather than just considering models. If you are willing to expand your search, you might consider a pre-lock 686. They are really fine revolvers, and usually have a silky smooth action. I've owned a couple, and I really regret letting them go...I tend to trade a lot, and regret a lot.
The reason I own the Ruger now is that I wanted a really strong .357 with a 3" barrel, fixed sights, and no ILS. The Ruger is the one that fit that bill.
|
05-04-2011, 03:19 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 4,162
Likes: 341
Liked 3,944 Times in 1,494 Posts
|
|
Thanks, guys for your responses. I should add that besides the Ruger Security Six, my collection of medium to large frame revolvers also includes:
6.0" barrel S&W Model 686 (scoped)
2.5" barrel S&W Model 66
3.0" barrel S&W Model 64 in .38 Special
4.0" barrel S&W Model 625 in .45ACP
3.0" barrel Rossi Model 720 in .44 Special
Keep the opinions and advice coming!
Thanks,
Dave
|
05-04-2011, 03:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,202
Likes: 9,079
Liked 1,921 Times in 1,043 Posts
|
|
I vote GP-100 over a S&W 66 only because if you are shooting hot .357 then the GP-100 will eat more recoil, last longer, and cost you less. But the 66/19 series are all pretty sweet shooting guns in their various flavors.
|
05-04-2011, 03:58 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sonoma/Marin Counties, CA
Posts: 632
Likes: 5
Liked 69 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Other: S&W Model 586
__________________
~ S&WCA No.2159 ~
|
05-04-2011, 04:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 283
Likes: 4
Liked 26 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
I'll never part with my 581.
|
05-04-2011, 04:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,087
Likes: 10,799
Liked 15,514 Times in 6,800 Posts
|
|
686 or a 686
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
05-04-2011, 04:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Unaka Mountains in TN
Posts: 457
Likes: 234
Liked 122 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
686+ or a 586+ Performance Center
__________________
You are what you learn.
|
05-04-2011, 05:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 893
Likes: 15
Liked 63 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
I have more .357's than anything except .22's. If I could only have one handgun to "do it all" it would be a 4", Stainless steel, Ruger GP-100 with adjustable sights.
__________________
I hope I copied that right
|
05-04-2011, 05:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Smoky Mountains, NC
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Or...
Quote:
Originally Posted by OCD1
686 or a 686
|
Or... A 686
|
05-04-2011, 06:12 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 6,926
Likes: 179
Liked 4,301 Times in 2,112 Posts
|
|
I chose the model 620. Mainly because at the time I purchased the 620 Dan Wesson wasn't making revolvers. Now that I've seen the price for the new Dan Wessons I'm distinctly pleased with my choice.
With the 620 you got a tensioned barrel (ala Dan Wesson) in a half lug profile barrel shroud, so the end result is a 7 shot L frame in a package that looks very much like the model 66.
As for it's accuracy, last week I mounted a Nikon Monarch 2x20 EER on it just do see what I could do with the help of optics. Without trying very hard at all I shot a 1.5 inch group at 25 yards to warm up. Then I tried it at 35 yards and was a bit inconsistent with my trigger release. After that I moved a new target to 50 yards and got serious about getting the basics right. My reward was 4 shots into a 0.88 inch group, then the scope kicked because the rear clamp had shot loose. Put 2 more rounds into a 3/4 inch double and threw one flyer when I jerked the trigger. I've concluded that I'll never be good enough to shoot the 620 to it's limits, I have a hunch that it's probably capable of grouping 1/2 inch or less at 50 yards. I've also concluded that at 50 yards a 2X handgun scope isn't enough, that target sure looked a lot smaller than I expected it to.
|
05-04-2011, 07:16 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 568
Likes: 29
Liked 79 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
I voted other, I really like the 686's.
|
05-04-2011, 07:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Right where I need to be.
Posts: 84
Likes: 2
Liked 17 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
I second the advice of a 686 or 586. The "L" frame seems a perfect fit for the 357 round, every bit as strong as an N frame, but not quite the bulk. I'll probably take heat for that statement so please know that I also love my model 27 and 27 as well!
__________________
*** Made in Texas ***
|
05-04-2011, 08:30 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sebastian, Fl
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 792
Liked 193 Times in 121 Posts
|
|
other M-27-2 4"
__________________
De Oppresso Liber Μολὼν λαβέ
|
05-04-2011, 08:58 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 122
Likes: 12
Liked 103 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
My biased personal opinion is that the two finest 4" .357 Magnum revolvers are the Ruger GP-100 and the S&W 686.
Both are exceptionally crafted with superior fit and finish. The balance on each is outstanding allowing for quick realignment on target after recoil of the most powerful .357 magnum ammo. Accuracy is a given with these two and will satisfy the most discriminating shooter.
The precision mechanical workings of the interiors on each revolver, I think, is the best both companies have produced.
They are superb revolvers and should be a part of any serious shooters collection.
|
05-04-2011, 09:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 858
Likes: 14
Liked 82 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWP357
Or... A 686
|
I would say...............686.
|
05-04-2011, 09:58 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: south central missouri
Posts: 2,396
Likes: 987
Liked 2,270 Times in 654 Posts
|
|
If I had to choose from what was listed it would be the 66. But since I voted "other", then I gotta say a 65. You can find them at reasonable prices, and if you can find one in good condition then you have a real shooter. >38's for practice and .357's to carry. I shoot nothing but 158 grain .357 in mine and haven't had a glitch yet. I believe you should practice with the rounds that you intend to carry for self defense.
Peace,
gordon
__________________
better have that checked
|
05-04-2011, 10:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: OK
Posts: 422
Likes: 89
Liked 133 Times in 63 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by carbuff
My biased personal opinion is that the two finest 4" .357 Magnum revolvers are the Ruger GP-100 and the S&W 686.
Both are exceptionally crafted with superior fit and finish. The balance on each is outstanding allowing for quick realignment on target after recoil of the most powerful .357 magnum ammo. Accuracy is a given with these two and will satisfy the most discriminating shooter.
The precision mechanical workings of the interiors on each revolver, I think, is the best both companies have produced.
They are superb revolvers and should be a part of any serious shooters collection.
|
A big +1 to this. If you want a longer barrel and larger gun, go with the PC 627
|
05-05-2011, 12:24 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 18
Liked 526 Times in 242 Posts
|
|
GP100, you just shoot 'em, as much as you want and they never need anything!
|
05-05-2011, 12:58 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: East Kentucky
Posts: 808
Likes: 247
Liked 189 Times in 102 Posts
|
|
I voted for the S&W 66. Never cared for DW's, or GP100. Really like Ruger Sec Six, though. The 66 is just a more refined revolver. As long as you don't burn it down with a lot of light bullet 357 loads, it will serve you well for a long time. Just remember, Bill Jordan's intent was for a cop gun that weighed less than N-frame 357's, to be carried a lot, & shot mostly with 38 Specials, with 357's reserved for duty. BTW, the 66 fits the same holsters as your Ruger SS.
|
05-05-2011, 09:41 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GVL TN
Posts: 3,937
Likes: 1,359
Liked 2,549 Times in 1,098 Posts
|
|
66 WITH a lock?
No!
586 or a 686 if you prefer stainless (I do ) NO LOCK...
__________________
In dog years I'm dead.
|
05-08-2011, 09:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
A S&W Model 19 .357 can't be beat !
|
05-08-2011, 11:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 58,032
Liked 53,088 Times in 16,559 Posts
|
|
M686 or M28
__________________
Sure you did
|
05-08-2011, 11:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 5,658
Likes: 15,661
Liked 7,682 Times in 2,744 Posts
|
|
other:...........S&W model 686-4
|
05-08-2011, 11:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 18
Liked 132 Times in 70 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by -db-
Another Highway Patrolman vote.
|
+1
My dad has one and it seems to handle the .357 load much better than my model 19.
__________________
Don't look, reload and shoot!
|
05-09-2011, 12:45 AM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego, PRK
Posts: 9,237
Likes: 11,531
Liked 11,249 Times in 3,916 Posts
|
|
Prelock 686. Good luck. I hunted over a year before finding mine. 4" don't go up for sale often and I am behind the tofu curtain.
|
05-09-2011, 12:59 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 417
Likes: 7
Liked 167 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
If it really came down to the three guns you listed I'd have to see their condition in person to really make the call.
As for "other..." I'm a little surprised that nobody has mentioned the current non-PC production 627-5; I've got one and I ******* LOVE IT. (I also own a number of earlier Model 27's...)
It's an 8-shot revolver with a heavy (non-tapered) barrel and the beefed up ejector shroud/lug. Round butt gives you lots of grip otions.
--Neill
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-11-2011, 06:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,202
Likes: 9,079
Liked 1,921 Times in 1,043 Posts
|
|
I thought they had dropped that model for the "new" barrel design???
|
05-11-2011, 10:18 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 2,606
Liked 2,128 Times in 787 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWP357
Or... A 686
|
+1 for the 686 - mine has a really sweet trigger pull and just fits my hands nicely. You really should have one!
__________________
Don't tread on me
|
05-11-2011, 10:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 550
Likes: 5
Liked 75 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by -db-
Another Highway Patrolman vote.
|
And another one!!
|
05-11-2011, 10:22 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
686 or 627 for me!
|
05-12-2011, 12:19 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 527
Liked 3,814 Times in 1,243 Posts
|
|
I'd get a 586, a 686, a 27-2 or 3 or a 28-2 or 3 or a Python or an older Trooper - not the Mk III..
Come to think of it, I bought the 586 and I have a 5" 627-1.
|
05-12-2011, 02:15 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
After my own research, this website included, my choices are:
27-2 / 28-2
586
19-3
In fact, over the last two weeks, I have acquired the 28-2(4") and the 586(6"). Now, for a 19-3(2.5"). You can say that I am in the middle of
my S&W .357 fever. No foreseeable cure...
|
05-12-2011, 06:59 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pinson, AL
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 57
Liked 656 Times in 307 Posts
|
|
No question here - none of the above! Hey, there was but one S&W choice - and you're in 'S&W-land', what could you expect.
The best bargain in a 4" .357M was the 620 - a 7-shot L-frame partial lug replacement for that 4" 66-7. Sadly, it was hard to find three years ago - when I saw the 4" 627 Pro... and made it mine. It's still available - and an even better bargain, considering it's features.
Also shown is last year's re-intro of the 2 5/8" PC627 UDR - a great deal if you want a shorter barrel. Both will take moonclips - even come with a few. The '5starfirearms.com' machined speedloaders & baseplates are great, too. Both sport aftermarket grips - and the spring-loaded front sight on the 4" 627 Pro has a HiViz in the picture, too.
Stainz
|
05-12-2011, 08:08 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 943
Liked 1,437 Times in 362 Posts
|
|
Highway Patrolman
4" Model 28, all day every day.
|
05-12-2011, 09:51 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Eads, Tn, Unites State
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 2,866
Liked 879 Times in 280 Posts
|
|
Other.. KCPD Reg Mag w/HBH!
|
|
Tags
|
357 magnum, 586, 627, 66-7, 686, dan wesson, highway patrolman, hiviz, k-frame, l frame, m28, m66, m686, model 19, model 27, model 28, model 66, model 686, patrolman, performance center, registered magnum, ruger, scope, trooper |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|