|
|
01-16-2012, 05:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 3,043
Liked 1,791 Times in 932 Posts
|
|
Not while Bloomburg is in office.
__________________
NRA Pistol/Rifle Inst. RSO
|
01-16-2012, 05:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Sorry, but you need the know the laws of the places you go. It is no secrect that NY has highly restrictive gun laws. With that said, the law also needs to address a simple mistake instead of an intential act to break the law.
|
01-16-2012, 06:59 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
Posts: 928
Likes: 141
Liked 441 Times in 158 Posts
|
|
No mercy shown for ignorance of the law. That "honest mistake" will probably wind up giving him at least a felony record. Anyway, rumors of a large ape on top of the Empire State Building are false. No King Kong here, just King Bloomberg.
|
01-16-2012, 08:42 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 7,330
Likes: 7,502
Liked 5,556 Times in 2,547 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tripledipper
No mercy shown for ignorance of the law. That "honest mistake" will probably wind up giving him at least a felony record. Anyway, rumors of a large ape on top of the Empire State Building are false. No King Kong here, just King Bloomberg.
|
No mercy should be shown for ignorance of the Constitution, either. Bloomberg belongs in prison. And he's not the only one.
|
01-16-2012, 08:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: HOUSTON, TEXAS
Posts: 10,123
Likes: 7,091
Liked 14,252 Times in 5,366 Posts
|
|
He will wish that he left that gun at home. I would expect there to be an exception for a serving Marine, but it appears that he has mustered out. If he is in a reserve unit there might be a technicality in his favor there. Also, how can the prosecution prove that the gun was in his control prior to trying to check it unless he admitted to as much? As if I needed another reason for staying out of New York.
|
01-16-2012, 09:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arkansas Ozarks
Posts: 6,264
Likes: 7,266
Liked 33,982 Times in 3,679 Posts
|
|
I went to NYC for the first time in my life a few months back. I'm a hillbilly from the Arkansas Ozarks and even I knew to leave my gun(s) at home.
__________________
- Change it back -
|
01-16-2012, 09:17 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 12,916
Liked 7,597 Times in 2,035 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mc5aw
This time, a Marine. The only good news in this ongoing sage of tourist arrests is that it might bring enough pressure on NY to amend its arcane gun laws.
|
Unfortunately thats not very likely!!
__________________
I reckon so
|
01-16-2012, 09:54 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 897
Likes: 55
Liked 527 Times in 144 Posts
|
|
NYC has justified its byzantine gun laws by stating that it’s a privilege to bear arms, not a right. I think that a showdown in the courts is near.
D.C. vs Heller ’08. The Supreme Court recognized the Second Amendment right to own and bear arms. The Court stated that the rules violated the Second Amendment, and rejected the policy arguments that one could justify such a ban because of the dangers associated with handguns.
McDonald vs. Chicago '09. The court’s decision stated that the Second Amendment right is a fundamental individual right.
|
01-16-2012, 10:02 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times in 53 Posts
|
|
Carrying a RUGER?????????????? Darn. Marines were used to be smarter.
|
01-16-2012, 10:10 PM
|
Junior Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sheridan, Wyoming
Posts: 5,333
Likes: 159
Liked 3,889 Times in 1,361 Posts
|
|
It shouldn't matter if someone is ignorant of a local law if that law is blatantly unconstitutional. Constitutional protections don't end where the limits of NYC begin. It's been clearly decided in the United States that a citizen has a right to have a handgun for protection, that this has been expanded to cover the States, and that this is an individual right. That leaves a NYC law against simple possession to be a very dubious prospect.
The governor of Indiana or another state could get points at home by simply refusing extradition to New York - let someone make bail, go home, and then refuse to go back to New York. Would be good press for any governor in a fly over state.
Though I'd still go with impounding cars with New York plates on the grounds that New York plates aren't valid in another state. If NYC can't trust people from elsewhere to be trusted with a gun that is legal in their home state, why assume that anyone from NYC (or possibly the state) has a valid motor vehicle tag and lisc?
|
01-16-2012, 10:43 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,472
Likes: 88,957
Liked 24,779 Times in 8,481 Posts
|
|
"Carrying a RUGER?????????????? Darn. Marines were used to be smarter."
At one time, embassy Marines used Ruger revolvers.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
01-17-2012, 12:54 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CNY
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 6,968
Liked 4,812 Times in 1,416 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOUSTON RICK
He will wish that he left that gun at home. I would expect there to be an exception for a serving Marine, but it appears that he has mustered out. If he is in a reserve unit there might be a technicality in his favor there. Also, how can the prosecution prove that the gun was in his control prior to trying to check it unless he admitted to as much? As if I needed another reason for staying out of New York.
|
If the gun was in his possession when he tried to check it, why would "prior to" matter?
Please explain this to me, Rick, I'm just a welder, not a lawyer....
__________________
'Merica!
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|